Australia : Addressing Systemic Risk Through Higher Loss Absorbency—Technical Note

Author/Editor:

International Monetary Fund

Publication Date:

November 21, 2012

Electronic Access:

Free Full Text (PDF file size is 1568 KB).Use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this PDF file

Summary:

Australia’s four largest banks can be considered domestically systemic. They make up the lion’s share of the banking system, use similar business models, and are interconnected. The top four banks are relatively similar in terms of systemic importance, partly reflecting the authorities’ ?four pillar? policy, which aims at preventing the number of large banks from falling below four. To deal with systemic risks, the authorities deploy a multi-pronged approach consisting of risk-based supervision, recovery and resolution planning, and conservative risk weights and definitions of loss absorbent capital. Most countries that have already identified strategies to deal with their systemic institutions incorporate higher loss absorbency for systemic institutions in their approach. Market based methodologies using the expected default frequency for systemic institutions can gauge the amount of additional capital—higher loss absorbency—required to reduce the probability of failure of systemic institutions to an acceptable level. Alternatively, the implied funding cost advantage can indicate the degree of systemic importance and be used to define higher capital requirements to offset this implicit subsidy. Application of these methods to Australian banks provides a range of estimates of higher loss absorbency requirements for systemic institutions and a transparent framework for discussion and selection of these requirements.

Series:

Country Report No. 12/311

Subject:

English

Publication Date:

November 21, 2012

ISBN/ISSN:

9781475542776/1934-7685

Stock No:

1AUSEA2012005

Price:

$18.00 (Academic Rate:$18.00)

Format:

Paper

Pages:

24

Please address any questions about this title to publications@imf.org