| Table 1. East Timor:
Selected Economic Indicators |
|
|
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
|
|
Est. |
|
Proj. |
|
|
|
(In
millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
GNP (at current prices)
|
390 |
270 |
326 |
403 |
|
391 |
381 |
435 |
485 |
521 |
|
|
GDP |
390 |
270 |
321 |
389 |
|
371 |
345 |
357 |
382 |
417 |
|
|
Oil income |
0 |
0 |
5 |
14 |
|
20 |
36 |
78 |
103 |
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Annual
percentage change) |
|
GNP growth (at constant
prices) |
1.3 |
-35.4 |
17.3 |
21.5 |
|
2.0 |
3.9 |
15.4 |
10.1 |
4.6 |
|
|
GDP |
1.3 |
-35.4 |
15.4 |
18.3 |
|
-0.5 |
-2.2 |
1.2 |
3.3 |
5.1 |
|
|
Oil income |
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
224.0 |
|
60.4 |
90.3 |
118.3 |
33.1 |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation (end of period)1 |
80 |
140 |
3 |
-0 |
|
-2 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
percent of GDP) |
|
Investment-saving balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross investment |
35 |
21 |
29 |
25 |
|
22 |
22 |
20 |
18 |
17 |
|
|
Non-government |
10 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
|
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
Government |
25 |
16 |
22 |
19 |
|
16 |
15 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
Gross domestic savings |
4 |
-13 |
-50 |
-47 |
|
-37 |
-23 |
-8 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
Non-government |
6 |
-12 |
-1 |
-3 |
|
-1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
Government |
-2 |
-1 |
-49 |
-44 |
|
-36 |
-23 |
-10 |
-2 |
-2 |
|
|
External savings |
31 |
34 |
79 |
72 |
|
58 |
44 |
27 |
17 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money, credits, and
interest rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broad money |
39 |
48 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
Currency |
5 |
9 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
Demand
deposits2 |
6 |
11 |
6 |
7 |
|
11 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
Saving
and time deposits2 |
28 |
28 |
0 |
6 |
|
4 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
Net domestic assets2 |
36 |
47 |
-4 |
-4 |
|
-6 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
Interest rates (percent
per annum) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onlending3 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
10 |
10 |
|
10 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
Consumer
loans |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
11-19 |
|
11-19 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
Business
loans |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
8-17 |
|
8-17 |
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
. . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
External sector |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account excl.
official transfers |
-121 |
-92 |
-254 |
-290 |
|
-235 |
-186 |
-154 |
-136 |
-136 |
|
|
Current account incl.
official transfers |
-21 |
6 |
53 |
-11 |
|
-70 |
-56 |
-51 |
-35 |
-33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade balance |
-91 |
-67 |
-200 |
-233 |
|
-187 |
-151 |
-150 |
-148 |
-148 |
|
|
Merchandise
exports |
61 |
52 |
5 |
4 |
|
9 |
17 |
21 |
28 |
35 |
|
|
Merchandise
imports |
-152 |
-119 |
-205 |
-237 |
|
-197 |
-168 |
-171 |
-176 |
-183 |
|
|
Services (net) |
-31 |
-25 |
-58 |
-61 |
|
-50 |
-38 |
-25 |
-21 |
-19 |
|
|
Incomes (net) |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
|
2 |
3 |
19 |
30 |
28 |
|
|
Current transfers
(net) |
100 |
98 |
307 |
280 |
|
166 |
131 |
105 |
104 |
105 |
|
|
Capital and financial
account (net) |
10 |
-3 |
-4 |
36 |
|
47 |
29 |
36 |
35 |
49 |
|
|
Overall balance |
0 |
0 |
16 |
8 |
|
-23 |
-27 |
-15 |
0 |
16 |
|
|
Gross foreign assets
(end-period) |
0 |
0 |
16 |
24 |
|
13 |
17 |
33 |
46 |
62 |
|
|
O/w:
Timor Sea Account |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
|
10 |
14 |
30 |
43 |
59 |
Sources: Data provided by the UNTAET and the Indonesian
authorities; and IMF staff estimates.
1Rupiah-based CPI for Dili through 2000 and, thereafter,
U.S. dollar-based CPI for Dili.
2Figures for 2002 refer to end- March (partially estimates).
3Refers to the rate of interest on loans extended under
the Small Enterprise Project funded by the TFET. |
5. At the same time, inflation has been steadily declining since mid-2000
and, indeed, turned negative at the end of 2001 (dollar-based CPI, 12-month
inflation was -2 percent in April). This trend reflects an increase
in the availability of goods, particularly food items. It is also indicative
of the ongoing (real exchange rate) adjustment to the winding down of
the international presence, which had driven prices and wages to unsustainably
high levels.
6. In the financial sector, the most significant recent development
has been an acceleration in the dollarization process, which has now
reached its final stage. A survey by the Banking and Payments Authority
(BPA) in March indicated that 90 percent of businesses nationwide are
using the dollar as a means of payment, and that almost all major towns
and districts are fully dollarized. This progress reflects the BPA's
stepped up efforts for dollarization, including stricter enforcement,
the rupiah exchange program, and the education campaign, all of which
have been backed by a strong commitment at the political level. Nevertheless,
development of the financial sector remains limited. Although commercial
bank deposits continue to rise, the extension of bank credit is weak,
reflecting the absence of adequate collateral and other risk factors.
Access to banking services outside of Dili is still not available.
7. Recent fiscal developments indicate that revenue performance under
this year's CFET budget is broadly on track, while expenditure has been
running well below target. On the revenue side, direct taxes (income
tax collection) are running slightly ahead of budget estimates, offset
by a small shortfall in indirect taxes (border and service taxes). A
continuing source of concern is a significant shortfall in power sector
collections, which amounted to only 36 percent of pro-rata targets through
March. On the expenditure side, spending has been running well below
target due to a combination of factors, including: (i) a freeze on capital
spending in anticipation of UNTAET asset transfers; (ii) a slow pace
of recruitment of ETPA staff positions; and (iii) sluggish budget execution
on goods and services. Taking these factors together, and assuming outstanding
pledges of donor support are received by the end of the fiscal year,
there would be a carryforward of up to $5 million.
Near-term Economic and Fiscal Outlook
8. Notwithstanding the progress in economic stabilization, the near-term
outlook remains difficult. The wind-down of the international presence,
albeit gradual, will soon have a dampening effect on activity. With
the growth of the private sector being held back by a still unfavorable
investment climate, overall output is likely to decline this year by
½ percent, and a further 2¼ percent in 2003. (These estimates
are somewhat lower than our projections at Oslo; they are based on newly
compiled GDP figures for 2000 and also incorporate the latest information
on the evolution of public sector spending.) The projected decline is
mainly driven by a contraction of public administration and related
services, with other sectors, including agriculture, expected to grow
more strongly.
9. With growth and employment prospects so heavily dependent on an
expansion of the private sector, eliminating impediments to investment
must remain a priority. It will also be important to maintain flexible
labor market policies by allowing high wage rates, which remain well
above those in neighboring countries, to adjust downward in response
to changing labor market conditions. The attention these policies have
received in the National Development Plan is encouraging.
10. The three-year budget outlook has been scaled back from the presentation
at Oslo, and merits support (Table 2). Capital spending
plans have been reduced in line with development priorities and demonstrated
implementation capacity, giving rise to corresponding reductions in
recurrent expenditure. Particularly commendable is the intention to
cap the size of the civil service. The government's plans to raise domestic
revenues at the start of the next fiscal year through small increases
in selected indirect taxes—in line with recommendations of a recent
IMF tax mission—also warrants support (these measures, which have been
incorporated into the revenue projections, are expected to yield about
$7 million over the three-year period). The resulting revenue projections
are in line with the updated macroeconomic projections, and build in
a conservative oil and gas revenue path (a "liquids plus gas"
scenario, discounted by 25 percent to incorporate possible downside
risks to prices and/or production delays).
| Table 2. East Timor: Fiscal Accounts
of the Consolidated Fund for East Timor (CFET) |
| |
2001/02
|
|
2002/03
|
|
2002/03
2003/04 2004/05
|
02/03–
04/05 |
|
2005/06
|
| |
Budget |
Rev. |
Proj. |
|
Core |
|
Proj.1 |
Total |
|
Proj. |
| |
(In
millions of U.S. dollars) |
| Revenue |
31.0 |
31.0 |
31.4 |
|
42.6 |
|
42.6 |
53.4 |
98.8 |
194.8
|
|
101.9
|
| Domestic
revenue |
19.0 |
19.0 |
19.3 |
|
20.8 |
|
20.8 |
20.1 |
21.3 |
62.2
|
|
22.9 |
| Direct
taxes |
2.0 |
2.0 |
4.6 |
|
4.3 |
|
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
13.2
|
|
5.0 |
| Indirect
taxes |
15.0 |
15.0 |
12.4 |
|
14.3 |
|
14.3 |
13.7 |
14.5 |
42.5
|
|
15.3 |
| Non
tax revenue |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
|
2.2 |
|
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
6.5
|
|
2.6 |
| Timor
Sea Revenue |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.1 |
|
21.8 |
|
21.8 |
33.3 |
77.5 |
132.6
|
|
79.0 |
| non-FTP |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
|
20.5 |
|
20.5 |
26.1 |
52.2 |
98.8
|
|
54.1 |
| FTP
1 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
|
0.8 |
|
0.8 |
6.6 |
24.2 |
31.7
|
|
22.3 |
| Interest
on Timor Sea account |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
2.2
|
|
2.6 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Expenditure |
63.4 |
59.1 |
53.8 |
|
67.6 |
|
77.7 |
82.9 |
96.4 |
256.9
|
|
101.1
|
| Recurrent
expenditure |
51.7 |
47.8 |
43.3 |
|
59.7 |
|
61.4 |
68.0 |
71.0 |
200.4
|
|
71.5 |
| Wages
and salaries |
21.8 |
21.8 |
19.8 |
|
25.9 |
|
25.9 |
27.4 |
28.3 |
81.6
|
|
28.9 |
| Goods
and services |
29.9 |
26.0 |
23.5 |
|
33.8 |
|
35.5 |
40.6 |
42.7 |
118.8
|
|
42.6 |
| Capital
expenditure |
11.8 |
11.3 |
10.6 |
|
7.9 |
|
16.3 |
14.9 |
25.3 |
56.5
|
|
29.6 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall balance |
-32.4
|
-28.1
|
-22.4
|
|
-25.0
|
|
-35.1
|
-29.4
|
2.4 |
-62.1
|
|
0.8 |
| Financing |
12.4 |
28.1 |
22.4 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.8 |
-7.2 |
-25.3
|
-28.7
|
|
-0.8 |
of
which: Timor Sea savings
('–' savings)2 |
|
|
-6.1 |
|
-1.3 |
|
-1.3 |
-7.2 |
-25.3
|
-33.8
|
|
-0.8 |
| Financing gap ('+'=gap) |
20.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
21.2 |
|
31.3 |
36.7 |
22.9 |
90.9
|
|
0.0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In
percent of GDP) |
| Revenue |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
|
11.9 |
|
11.9 |
15.2 |
26.7 |
. . . |
|
25.5 |
| Domestic
revenue |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.1 |
|
5.8 |
|
5.8 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
. . . |
|
5.7 |
| Timor
Sea Revenue |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
|
6.1 |
|
6.1 |
9.5 |
20.9 |
. . . |
|
19.8 |
| Expenditure |
16.7 |
15.6 |
14.2 |
|
18.9 |
|
21.7 |
23.6 |
26.1 |
. . . |
|
25.3 |
| Recurrent
expenditure |
13.6 |
12.6 |
11.4 |
|
16.7 |
|
17.1 |
19.4 |
19.2 |
. . . |
|
17.9 |
| Capital
expenditure |
3.1 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
|
2.2 |
|
4.6 |
4.2 |
6.8 |
. . . |
|
7.4 |
| Overall balance |
-8.5 |
-7.4 |
-5.9 |
|
-7.0 |
|
-9.8 |
-8.4 |
0.7 |
. . . |
|
0.2 |
| Financing |
3.3 |
7.4 |
5.9 |
|
1.1 |
|
1.1 |
-2.1 |
-6.8 |
. . . |
|
-0.2 |
| Financing gap ('+'=gap) |
5.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
5.9 |
|
8.7 |
10.4 |
6.2 |
. . . |
|
0.0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Memorandum items: |
(In
millions of U.S. dollars) |
| Combined sources budget3 |
|
|
|
|
| Total
expenditure |
173.6
|
156.8
|
158.5
|
|
152.0
|
|
162.2
|
130.2
|
133.9
|
426.2
|
|
138.6
|
| CFET |
63.4 |
59.1 |
53.8 |
|
67.6 |
|
77.7 |
82.9 |
96.4 |
256.9
|
|
101.1
|
of
which: "Capital and
Development" |
. . . |
. . . |
. . . |
|
3.0 |
|
10.0 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
40.0
|
|
25.0 |
| TFET |
53.8 |
42.8 |
36.3 |
|
38.6 |
|
38.6 |
9.8 |
0.0 |
48.4
|
|
0.0 |
| Bilateral/
Multilateral |
56.4 |
55.0 |
54.9 |
|
45.8 |
|
45.8 |
37.5 |
37.5 |
120.8
|
|
37.5 |
| UN
Assessed |
. . . |
. . . |
13.5 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0
|
|
0.0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In
percent of GDP) |
| Total
expenditure |
45.7 |
41.3 |
41.7 |
|
42.5 |
|
45.3 |
37.1 |
36.2 |
. . . |
|
34.7 |
| CFET |
16.7 |
15.6 |
14.2 |
|
18.9 |
|
21.7 |
23.6 |
26.1 |
. . . |
|
25.3 |
| TFET |
14.2 |
11.3 |
9.5 |
|
10.8 |
|
10.8 |
2.8 |
0.0 |
. . . |
|
0.0 |
| Bilateral/
Multilateral |
14.8 |
14.5 |
14.4 |
|
12.8 |
|
12.8 |
10.7 |
10.1 |
. . . |
|
9.4 |
| UN
Assessed |
. . . |
. . . |
3.6 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
. . . |
|
0.0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(In
millions of U.S. dollars) |
| GDP |
380 |
380 |
380 |
|
358 |
|
358 |
351 |
370 |
|
|
400 |
| Timor Sea Account |
8.1 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
|
10.5 |
|
10.5 |
17.8 |
43.1 |
|
|
43.4 |
Source: National authorities; and Fund staff estimates
and calculations.
1Including supplementary spending of US$10.1 million
in FY 02/03.
2Under current policy, First Tranche Petroleum Revenues
are assumed to accumulate in the Timor Sea account through FY 04/05.
3Excludes technical assistance, and funding of the UNMISET
100 core positions. |
11. The outlook yields a three-year cumulative external financing need
of about $90 million for the CFET budget, some $78 million lower
than the gap presented in Oslo. It is based on a continuation of the
current policy to accumulate first tranche petroleum revenues. This
is a sound strategy, which would help establish a principle of saving
oil revenue and build a base of international reserves as a cushion
against future oil market shocks. Thereafter, beginning in 2005/06,
a broader medium-term savings/investment strategy should be adopted
(as described below).
II. Macroeconomic Framework and Fiscal Sustainability
12. The budget outlook should also be assessed for its longer term
sustainability. This can be done in the context of the macroeconomic
framework developed for the Oslo donors' meeting, updated to take into
account the revised budget figures and oil and gas revenue profile.
The latter is higher than the path discussed in Oslo (in light of oil
companies' plans to proceed with gas projects in the Bayu-Undan field),
but is also more backloaded. While significant revenues are projected
to commence in 2004/05, their scale would be more modest than previously
envisaged, with more substantial revenues delayed until 2009/10. This
backloaded revenue profile underscores the importance of maintaining
fiscal discipline.
13. The analysis suggests that the three-year budget proposal would
be consistent with a sustainable fiscal path over a longer time horizon
(Figure 2). As before, this assessment hinges on
the implementation of sound policies, including an effective management
of oil revenues, which are needed to generate a stable macroeconomic
environment and high rate of growth of the non-oil economy. In this
regard, the National Development Plan's emphasis on a sound saving/investment
strategy is welcome.
14. As was the case for the Oslo meeting, the assessment is based on
a scenario consistent with a poverty reduction strategy. It envisages
an ambitious growth target for the non-oil economy of 5-6 percent over
the long term. The large fiscal deficits projected over the near term
would yield to broad balances, and then surpluses, once significant
oil revenues commence (Figure 2, top panel). For
the scenario to be sustainable, and to avoid an over-reliance on oil
revenues, domestic resource mobilization will be required. Over the
longer term, implementation of revenue measures would ensure a steadily
rising domestic revenue-to-GDP ratio. The fiscal strategy is sustainable
in the sense that expenditure would be fully covered by domestic revenues
and interest earnings on oil savings.
15. The scenario described above suggests an appropriate savings strategy
for oil revenues (Figure 2, middle panel). The strategy would enable
some oil wealth to be invested over time in projects with high rates
of return (at least as high as the returns on financial savings), including
on health and education, and would permit a public investment level
sufficient to support the targeted economic growth rate (Figure
2, bottom panel). By the end of the projection period (when oil
revenues dry up), it would also ensure that the combination of interest
earnings on financial saving and domestic tax revenues are sufficient
to cover public spending.
16. The East Timorese authorities have expressed interest in an oil
fund, to help resist spending pressures and encourage that oil savings
be invested wisely. We support this initiative, and have discussed with
the authorities the core principles that should be followed in the establishment
and operation of such a fund, including to integrate inflows and outflows
within the overall budget framework; limit discretionary powers; invest
the resources in safe, off-shore assets; and maintain high standards
of professionalism and accountability. We are encouraged that the National
Development Plan embraces these principles, as well as a number of sound
operational details.
17. As emphasized in our statement in Oslo, it is important to note
that the scenario described above is illustrative, as it is sensitive
to underlying assumptions―oil prices and volumes, among others―and
the supporting policy package. The following policy requirements, which
are appropriately emphasized in the National Development Plan, remain
essential to achieve an ambitious growth target: (i) maintenance of
macroeconomic stability; (ii) maintenance of an open trade and investment
regime; (iii) fostering a favorable investment climate through the adoption
of a sound legal and regulatory framework and resolution of issues relating
to land and property rights; and (iv) a strong tax effort over the long
term to avoid an over-reliance on volatile oil revenues. From our discussions
with the authorities, we remain confident that East Timor's leadership
is committed to the set of policies required, including maintaining
fiscal discipline.
III. Institution Building
18. The development of strong institutions is critical for effective
economic management. The Planning Commission has been instrumental in
performing a coordinating role and establishing priorities as outlined
in the National Development Plan. The Commission should be congratulated
for completing its large and complex task within such a limited time
frame.
19. Significant progress has also been made in the other areas of institution-building
in which the IMF has provided direct support. The Central Fiscal Authority
(CFA) is now operating as a Ministry of Finance. The BPA is close now
to operating as a full monetary authority, with the passage of the BPA
regulation last November. And finally, an IMF-supported statistical
advisor has been in place since early this year to help coordinate the
creation of a statistical office. A number of challenges remain, chief
among them:
-
Local capacity building and qualified staffing. With sound institutions
having been created through the assistance of the international
community, the most pressing need in the period ahead will be to
maintain them in sound operating condition.
-
Strengthening the BPA. The BPA should be properly capitalized over
time to strengthen its financial autonomy, in line with the ongoing
institution-building effort. In this regard, the authorities' plans
to earmark some of the capital budget for BPA capitalization is
welcome. In addition, further efforts are needed to implement the
BPA regulation, including the appointment of the BPA's Governing
Board.
-
Development of a statistical base. Policy discussions are hampered
by the lack of reliable statistics, and much remains to be done
to establish the statistical capabilities of the country in the
post-independence period. The success of this initiative will require
the further support of the authorities—including support for passage
of a Statistics Law and establishment of a central statistical office—and
coordinated efforts of the IFIs and donors.
IV. Concluding Remarks
20. While the support of the international community and commitment
of East Timor's leadership to establishing the conditions for economic
growth and stability have achieved results, much remains to be done.
In addition to maintaining macroeconomic stability and promoting an
environment conducive to private sector development, a critical challenge
will be to maintain and build upon the economic institutions that have
been established. The IMF will continue to support East Timor in meeting
these challenges and, with the membership process on well on track,
we look forward to welcoming the new country as our 184
th
member in the very near future.