Factsheet
Financing the Fund’s Concessional Lending to Low-Income Countries
May 18, 2012
To help strengthen its support for low-income countries, the IMF revamped its concessional lending facilities to make them more flexible and meet increasing demand for financial assistance from countries in need. These changes became effective in January 2010. Once additional loan and subsidy resources are mobilized, these changes will boost available resources for low-income countries to US$17 billion through 2014–15.
On July 23, 2009 the IMF’s Executive Board approved far-reaching reforms of the Fund’s concessional lending facilities for low-income countries (LICs). These reforms created a new architecture of facilities that is more flexible and tailored to the increasing diversity of LICs and their needs. As part of the reform package, the Board also approved a new concessional financing framework, and transformed the PRGF-ESF Trust to the new Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (PRGT). These reforms became effective on January 7, 2010, when all current lenders and subsidy contributors to the PRGF-ESF Trust provided their consent.
New architecture
Key elements of the new LIC facilities architecture include:
- Three new concessional facilities, consolidating the Fund’s concessional lending—the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) to provide flexible medium-term support; the Standby Credit Facility (SCF) for addressing short-term and precautionary needs; and the Rapid Credit Facility (RCF) to provide emergency support.
- A new interest rate structure linking the concessional interest rates paid on PRGT lending to the SDR interest rate and regular reviews. Additionally, exceptional interest relief was approved for all LICs—zero percent interest on all concessional loans through end‑December 2011 and subsidization of the rate of charge to zero percent for subsidized EPCA/ENDA through end-January 2012. The exceptional interest relief was subsequently extended by one more year.
- Increased flexibility of the concessional financing framework. General Loan Account (GLA) and a General Subsidy Account (GSA) were established to receive and provide financing for all PRGT facilities and special loan and subsidy accounts were established, to accommodate donors’ preference for earmarking their contributions for specific facilities. These function alongside the existing Reserve Account to provide security to lenders for all outstanding PRGT loans. The ESF Subsidy Account was maintained on a temporary basis for subsidizing existing ESF credit at the time of the LIC facilities reforms, and subsequently closed in May 2010 after its resources were depleted (Figure 1):
Demand projections
The global financial crisis has had a severe impact on LICs, with many facing a significant deterioration in their external positions. Additionally, G20 leaders in April 2009 called for a doubling of the Fund’s concessional lending capacity and providing US$6 billion (SDR 4 billion) additional concessional financing over the next two to three years. Against this backdrop, at the time of the LIC facilities reform, total projected demand for PRGT loans over the period 2009–2014 amounted to SDR 11.3 billion (about US$17 billion) (Table 1). Those projections took into account the doubling of access limits approved by the Executive Board in April 2009, and the implications of the new facilities architecture.
New financing package
A financing package of loan and subsidy resources to boost the Fund’s concessional lending to SDR 11.3 billion through 2014 was also approved. Taking into account the available loan resources, the package envisaged new loan contributions of SDR 9 billion to meet projected demand. Following the Board’s endorsement in March 2010 of a voluntary encashment regime that would require a liquidity buffer of 20 percent of outstanding loans, the target for the mobilization of new loan resources was consequently raised to SDR 10.8 billion. The encashment regime would enable outstanding PRGT loans to be readily repayable to lenders participating in the encashment regime in case of balance of payments need.
Resources needed to fully subsidize the projected lending were estimated at SDR 2.5 billion (end-2008 NPV terms), or US$4.7 billion in cash terms (Table 2). This would cover the projected lending of SDR 11.3 billion over the medium term, as well as the estimated cost of the temporary interest relief through end-2011. Taking into account the subsidy resources available at the time of the LIC facilities reform, additional subsidy resources of about SDR 1.5 billion (US$2.8 billion in cash terms) would need to be mobilized. The following sources were envisaged:
- New Bilateral Contributions. In light of the critical role that bilateral subsidy contributions have played in past fund-raising exercises, the Executive Board agreed that such contributions should remain an important part of the new financing package. Recognizing the budget constraints facing many countries, the Board agreed to target additional bilateral subsidy contributions of SDR 0.2–0.4 billion (end-2008 NPV terms).
- Delaying PRGT Reimbursement to the GRA. For a period of three years starting in FY 2010, an amount equivalent to the expenses of operating the PRGT would be transferred from the PRGT Reserve Account to the new General Subsidy Account instead of the IMF’s General Resources Account (GRA). As a key element of the IMF’s new income model, the Executive Board had decided to resume the long-standing practice of reimbursement of the GRA for the cost of administering the PRGT. Based on the projections at that time, delaying PRGT reimbursement to the GRA and the transfer of an equivalent amount to the PRGT’s General Subsidy Account was expected to generate subsidy resources of about SDR 0.15–0.2 billion.
- Use of PRGT Reserve Account Resources. A transfer of SDR 0.62 billion (end-2008 NPV terms) of the resources in the PRGT Reserve Account was agreed. Staff’s analysis indicated that transferring this amount would leave sufficient resources in the PRGT Reserve Account to ensure its annual self-sustained subsidization capacity of about SDR 0.7 billion after 2014–15
- Use of Resources Linked to Gold Sales. The Executive Board endorsed that resources linked to gold sales would be used to generate subsidies of SDR 0.5-0.6 billion (end-2008 NPV terms). It was agreed that, in the first instance, this strategy would involve the use of windfall profits arising from gold sales at an average price above US$850 per ounce. This strategy would allow the corpus of the gold sales proceeds, and thus the Fund’s ability to implement the new income model, to be preserved.

Mobilizing resources
Most of the targeted loan resources under the 2009 financing package have now been secured, but additional pledges of about SDR 1 billion are still needed to reach the agreed target. As of end-February 2012, fourteen members have pledged SDR 9.8 billion in new loan resources, compared to the target of SDR 10.8 billion. New borrowing agreements totaling SDR 9.5 billion have been signed with thirteen lenders (Tables 3 and 4).

Additional subsidies resources of SDR 203 million have so far been committed by twenty-five members, exceeding the lower end of the bilateral subsidy fundraising target range of SDR 200–400 million (end-2008 NPV terms) (Table 5). Pledges of additional bilateral subsidy resources remain necessary to complete the agreed financing package.

In February 2012, the Executive Board approved the partial distribution of the IMF’s general reserve to the membership of SDR 700 million attributed to part of the windfall profits from the recent gold sales, and confirmations of pledges from the membership are now needed. The distribution, part of the 2009 LIC financing package aimed at securing adequate resources for the PRGT, will be made to all members in proportion to their quotas on the date of the distribution, and will be effected only when members provide satisfactory assurances that they would make new PRGT subsidy contributions equivalent to at least 90 percent of the amount distributed (SDR 630 million). It is important that pledges from the membership be secured in a timely manner to complete the financing package.
PRGT operations
The PRGT has been fully operational since the effectiveness of the LIC reforms in January 2010. Lending commitments to LICs have been approved under all three PRGT facilities. As of end-February 2012, new commitments (including augmentations) under the ECF amounted to SDR 2.2 billion, and commitments under the SCF and the RCF amounted to SDR 0.1 billion each. Loan and subsidy resources have been made available for all the loan and subsidy accounts of the PRGT. In light of the closure of the ESF Subsidy Account in May 2010, the resources in the ECF Subsidy Account are available to meet the subsidy needs of the existing ESF loans.
New concessional lending to LICs in 2009, at SDR 2.5 billion (US$3.8 billion) was broadly in line with projections. However, reflecting partly the recovery of many LICs after the global financial crisis, demand for financing in 2010 and 2011 moderated to SDR 1.2 billion each year. Assuming the agreed 2009 financing package is completed, a lending capacity of about SDR 2.2 billion per year from 2012–14, or SDR 1.6 billion per year through 2015, could be supported (Table 6).
See IMF Reforms Financial Facilities for Low-Income Countries(PIN/09/94, 7/29/09).
More recent projections of the Fund’s concessional financing can be found in Update on the Financing of the Fund's Concessional Assistance and Debt Relief to Low-Income Member Countries [(4/xx/12)].
See Decision No. 14593-(10/41), adopted April 21, 2010, and effective on June 1, 2010.



