The IMF has evolved along with the global economy throughout its 67-year history, allowing the organization to retain a central role within the international financial architecture. Unlike the General Assembly of the United Nations, where each country has one vote, decision making at the IMF was designed to reflect the relative positions of its member countries in the global economy. Today the IMF continues to undertake sweeping reforms to ensure that its governance structure adequately reflects fundamental changes taking place in the world economy. Current reforms are intended to reflect the larger role that emerging market and developing economies now play in the global economy.
The diagram below provides a stylized view of the IMF's current governance structure.
Board of Governors
The Board of Governors is the highest decision-making body of the IMF. It consists of one governor and one alternate governor for each member country. The governor is appointed by the member country and is usually the minister of finance or the head of the central bank.
While the Board of Governors has delegated most of its powers to the IMF’s Executive Board, it retains the right to approve quota increases, special drawing right (SDR) allocations, the admittance of new members, compulsory withdrawal of members, and amendments to the Articles of Agreement and By-Laws.
The Board of Governors also elects or appoints Executive Directors and is the ultimate arbiter on issues related to the interpretation of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement. Voting by the Board of Governors may take place either by holding a meeting or remotely (through the use of courier services, electronic mail, facsimile, or the IMF’s secure online voting system).
The Boards of Governors of the IMF and the World Bank Group normally meet once a year, during the IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings, to discuss the work of their respective institutions. The Annual Meetings, which take place in September or October, have customarily been held in Washington for two consecutive years and in another member country in the third year.
The Board of Governors is advised by two ministerial committees, the International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC) and the Development Committee.
The IMFC has 24 members, drawn from the pool of 188 governors, and represents all member countries. Its structure mirrors that of the Executive Board and its 24 constituencies. The IMFC meets twice a year, during the IMF-World Bank Spring and Annual Meetings. The Committee discusses matters of common concern affecting the global economy and also advises the IMF on the direction of its work. At the end of each meeting, the Committee issues a communiqué summarizing its views. These communiqués provide guidance for the IMF’s work program during the six months leading up to the next Spring or Annual Meetings. The IMFC operates by consensus and does not conduct formal votes.
The Development Committee is a joint committee, tasked with advising the Boards of Governors of the IMF and the World Bank on issues related to economic development in emerging market and developing countries. The committee has 25 members (usually ministers of finance or development). It represents the full membership of the IMF and the World Bank and mainly serves as a forum for building intergovernmental consensus on critical development issues.
The Executive Board
The IMF’s 24-member Executive Board conducts the daily business of the IMF. The current configuration of the Board dates from 1992, following the expansion of the IMF’s membership to include many former Soviet Union countries. Five Executive Directors are appointed by the member countries holding the five largest quotas (currently the United States, Japan, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom), and 19 are elected by the remaining member countries. Under reforms currently being finalized, all 24 Directors will be elected by the member countries.
The Board discusses all aspects of the Fund’s work, from the IMF staff's annual health checks of member countries' economies to policy issues relevant to the global economy. The Board normally makes decisions based on consensus, but sometimes formal votes are taken. A member’s quota determines its voting power. At the end of most formal meetings, the Board issues what is known as a Summing Up, which summarizes its views. Informal meetings may be held to discuss complex policy issues at a preliminary stage.
The IMF’s Managing Director is both chairman of the IMF’s Executive Board and Head of IMF staff. The Managing Director is assisted by four Deputy Managing Directors. The Managing Director is appointed by the Executive Board for a renewable term of five years. The IMF’s Governors and Executive Directors may nominate nationals of any of the Fund’s member countries. Although the Executive Board may select a Managing Director by a majority of votes cast, the Board has in the past made such appointments by consensus.For the 2011 selection, the Executive Board adopted a procedure that allowed the selection of the next Managing Director to take place in an open, merit-based, and transparent manner.
The world economy is evolving and the Fund’s governance structure needs to keep pace ensuring it remains an effective and representative institution of all of its 188 member countries. To secure this objective, in December 2010 the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a package of far-reaching reforms of the Fund's quotas and governance. These reforms represent a major realignment in the ranking of quota shares that better reflects global economic realities, and a strengthening in the Fund’s legitimacy and effectiveness. The elements of the reform include:
- A quota increase and shift in shares. The 14th General Review of Quotas results in an unprecedented doubling of quotas and a major realignment of quota and voting shares to emerging and developing countries. This is a more than 6 percent quota shift to dynamic emerging market and developing countries and a 5.3 percent total shift in voting share to emerging market and developing countries when combined with the 2008 quota and voice reform.
- Protecting the voting power of the poorest. The quota shares and voting power of the poorest members will be preserved through an ad-hoc quota allocation.
- Quota formula and next review. A comprehensive review of the current quota formula and bringing forward the completion of the 15th General review of Quotas to January 2015.
- A new composition and more representative Board. The 2010 reforms also include an amendment to the Articles of Agreement that would facilitate a move to a more representative, all-elected Executive Board. Once the quota and governance reforms are in effect, there will be two fewer Board members from advanced European countries, and all Executive Directors will be elected rather than appointed, as some are now. The size of the Board will remain at 24, and its composition will be reviewed every 8 years.
In order for the proposed amendment on Reform of the Executive Board to enter into force, acceptance by three-fifths of the Fund's 188 members (or 113 members) having 85 percent of the Fund's total voting power is required. As of February 25, 2014, 142 members having 76.13 percent of total voting power had accepted the amendment. For the quota increases under the 14th General Review of Quotas to become effective, the entry into force of the proposed amendment to reform the Executive Board is required, as well as the consent to the quota increase by members having not less than 70 percent of total quotas (as of November 5, 2010). As of February 25, 2014, 158 members having 78.71 percent of total quota had consented (see Acceptances of the Proposed Amendment of the Articles of Agreement on Reform of the Executive Board and Consents to 2010 Quota Increase for the most recent status of the 2010 reforms).
The IMF remains fully committed to pursuing the implementation of the governance that have been agreed to make the fund an even more effective and representative institution.
To promote good governance within its own organization, the IMF has adopted a number of integrity institutions, including a Code of Conduct for Staff—bolstered by financial certification and disclosure requirements, and sanctions—a similar Code of Conduct for Members of the Executive Board, and an Integrity Hotline offering protection to “whistleblowers.” The IMF Ethics Office advises the institution and its staff on ethics issues, inquires into alleged violations of rules and regulations, and oversees the ethics and integrity training program for all staff members.