Factsheet - April 2008

The IMF and the Millennium Development Goals

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are a set of development targets agreed by the international community, which center on halving poverty and improving the welfare of the world's poorest by 2015. The IMF contributes to this effort through its advice, technical assistance, and lending to countries, as well as its role in mobilizing donor support. Together with the World Bank, it assesses progress toward the MDGs through an annual Global Monitoring Report.

What are the Millennium Development Goals?

In September 2000, at the United Nations Millennium Summit, world leaders agreed to eight specific and measurable development goals—now called the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)—to be achieved by 2015. The first seven goals focus on eradicating extreme poverty and hunger; achieving universal primary education; promoting gender equality and empowering women; reducing child mortality; improving maternal health; combating HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases; and ensuring environmental sustainability. The eighth goal calls for the creation of a global partnership for development, with targets for aid, trade, and debt relief. A significant step toward meeting the MDGs was taken in Monterrey, Mexico, in March 2002, when the international community adopted a two pillar strategy, whereby sustained pursuit of sound policies and good governance by the low-income countries is to be matched by larger and more effective international support.

How does the IMF help countries make progress towards the MDGs?

There are many ways in which the IMF helps poor countries achieve the sustained high levels of growth that establish the basis for poverty reduction—including through policy advice, technical assistance, financial support and debt relief. It also tries to ensure that developed countries' policies are supportive of low-income countries' development efforts, by advocating for increased foreign aid, the opening of markets to developing countries' exports, and the maintenance of a healthy enabling international economic climate.

The pressures to meet the MDGs by 2015 have further focused the IMF's efforts on helping countries assess the macroeconomic consequences of scaling up both their own policy efforts and external financial support. In this context, the IMF encourages countries to develop and analyze alternative frameworks for achieving the MDGs, and to make these underpin their poverty reduction strategies. Typically, one scenario might include a realistic projection that assumes good policy implementation and continued donor support at a level based on current trends and expectations. Another more ambitious projection would take account of absorptive and administrative constraints and try to identify policies to alleviate them so as to put the country on a higher growth path. This can help countries use the MDGs to design their policies, and guide donors in assessing the capacity of a country to absorb increased levels of aid and put it to effective use.

Increasingly, it is recognized that macroeconomic stability and growth depend heavily on structural and institutional factors. Therefore, in contributing to the achievement of the MDGs, the Fund works closely with partner agencies, especially the World Bank, but also other multilateral and bilateral providers of aid and financing.

The Global Monitoring Report—Measuring Progress

The Global Monitoring Report (GMR) is an annual report that aims to assess how the world is doing in implementing the policies and actions needed to achieve the MDGs and related outcomes. It is produced jointly by the World Bank and the IMF, in collaboration with other international partners.

GMR 2008: MDG Prospects - Reasons for Optimism and Concerns

The 2008 Global Monitoring Report, the fifth in the annual series, concludes that thanks to high economic growth in the past five years, the world is on course to achieve the first MDG-halving extreme poverty between 1990 and 2015. The number of people living on less than $1/day declined by 278 million between 1990 and 2004. The decline in poverty has been the largest in regions with the strongest growth, such as East Asia.

On current trends, however, most human development MDGs are unlikely to be met at the global level. Sub-Saharan Africa and, in some cases, South Asia are likely to fall short most, especially in the areas of child and maternal mortality, access to basic sanitation, and reducing child malnutrition. The HIV prevalence rate has shown some decline in Africa but has risen in some other regions, albeit from much smaller levels than in Africa.

Prospects are better in education. The world is likely to miss the goal of universal primary school completion but will come close. However, sizable shortfalls are likely in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The goal of eliminating gender disparity in primary and secondary education seems attainable by 2015, although Sub-Saharan Africa is likely to fall short. Prospects for achieving gender parity in tertiary education are less promising.

Accelerating Progress toward the MDGs: A Six-Point Agenda
Sustain and broaden the growth momentum
  • Strong and inclusive growth must be at the center of the strategy to achieve the MDGs.

  • Need for concerted efforts to spur growth in lagging countries in Africa and fragile states.

  • Sound macro, a conducive private investment climate (regulatory environment, infrastructure), and good governance are key ingredients of strong and inclusive growth.

  • Need for careful monitoring of and responsiveness to risks to developing country growth arising from recent financial market crisis and rises in oil and food prices.

Achieve better results in human development
  • Increased public spending on education and health is not the sole answer; quality and equity of spending are equally important.

  • Policies and interventions must factor in strong linkages between health and education outcomes and child nutrition and environmental risk factors—water and sanitation, pollution, climate change.

Integrate development and environmental sustainability
  • Environmental sustainability must be integrated into core development work, maximizing synergies.

  • For natural resource-dependent countries, sound resource management is critical for sustainable growth.

  • Developing countries will suffer most from climate change and are least able to adapt. For them the best way to adapt is to develop.

  • Mitigation of carbon emissions will require financing and technology transfer to developing countries. Such support should not divert resources from other development programs.

Scale up aid and increase its effectiveness
  • Donors must expedite aid delivery in line with commitments. Sizable shortfalls loom if current ODA trends persist, which will particularly hurt poor countries and fragile states that offer promising scale-up opportunities.

  • The changing aid architecture promises more resources and innovation but also poses new challenges for aid effectiveness and coherence. The Accra HLF provides a timely opportunity to address the new, dynamic dimensions of the aid agenda.

Harness trade for strong, inclusive, and sustainable growth
  • Aim for a successful Doha outcome in 2008. High food prices provide a window of opportunity to move on agricultural trade reform.

  • Aid-for-trade to strengthen trade logistics, supported by services liberalization, is important for poor countries' competitiveness and ability to benefit from trade opportunities.

Leverage IFI support for inclusive and sustainable development
  • IFIs' declining relative financing role does not imply less relevance. Their impact through leverage remains key in achieving collective action on development (MDGs and related outcomes) and the increasingly important G/RPGs such as climate change.

  • Adaptation of strategy to increasing client differentiation and global change initiated by several IFIs is important and timely.


For more information, please visit the key issues page on Development, Trade & Aid.


IMF EXTERNAL RELATIONS DEPARTMENT

Public Affairs    Media Relations
Phone: 202-623-7300 Phone: 202-623-7100
Fax: 202-623-6278 Fax: 202-623-6772