Preface
|
0. 1. What is the data collection system underlying your CPIS? |
|
|
|
Equity |
Long Term |
Short Term |
Comments |
Security-By-Security |
End-Investor |
Banks |
 |
 |
 |
|
Insurance |
 |
 |
 |
|
Pension fund |
 |
 |
 |
|
Mutual funds, unit trusts |
 |
 |
 |
|
General Government |
 |
 |
 |
|
Nonfinancial corporation |
 |
 |
 |
No data is collected from nonfinancial private sector entities. The most important nonfinancial public entities are included in the CPIS |
Household |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Custodian |
Banks |
 |
 |
 |
|
Insurance |
 |
 |
 |
|
Pension fund |
 |
 |
 |
|
Mutual funds, unit trusts |
 |
 |
 |
|
General Government |
 |
 |
 |
|
Nonfinancial corporation |
 |
 |
 |
|
Household |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Aggregated |
End-Investor |
Banks |
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
Pension fund |
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds, unit trusts |
|
|
|
|
General Government |
|
|
|
|
Nonfinancial corporation |
|
|
|
|
Household |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Custodian |
Banks |
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
Pension fund |
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds, unit trusts |
|
|
|
|
General Government |
|
|
|
|
Nonfinancial corporation |
|
|
|
|
Household |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
General Section
|
1. 1 Legal and institutional environment |
1. 1. 1. What is the legal basis that governs the collection of the CPIS information? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 4.8 & 4.9 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
CPIS is collected under statistical or other legislation that empowers the collection of statistics in general |
|
|
 |
CPIS is collected under specific legislation empowering the collection of CPIS statistics |
|
|
|
CPIS is on a voluntary basis |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1. 1. 2. Which institution(s) is/are responsible for collecting the CPIS statistics.? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 4.8 & 4.9 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
National central bank |
|
|
|
National statistical office |
|
|
|
Ministry of Finance or other ministries |
|
|
|
Financial regulator (if not central bank or other government ministry) |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1. 1. 3. Which domestic institution(s) is/are responsible for publishing the CPIS statistics? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 4.8 & 4.9 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
National central bank |
|
|
|
National statistical office |
|
|
|
Ministry of Finance or other ministries |
|
|
|
Financial regulator |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Do not publish the CPIS data |
|
|
1. 1. 4. If there are restrictions placed on cross-border portfolio investments, which of the following sectors (i) cannot invest in securities issued by nonresidents or (ii) can invest in securities issued by nonresident only within a certain threshold? (If there are not restrictions on outward portfolio investment, please go to the next question.) |
|
No restriction |
Not allowed |
Allowed up to a threshold |
Threshold |
Specify |
Comments |
Banks |
|
|
|
See comments |
|
Banks are not allowed to invest in securities issued by their subsidiaries |
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension funds |
|
|
 |
See comments |
|
The portfolio net value could be invested abroad subject to different limits, depending on the nature of the fund. For example, in the case of Obligatory Pension Funds, maximum 20% of their portfolio net value could be invested in foreign assets. |
Mutual funds, unit trusts, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monetary authorities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonfinancial corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Households |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. 1. 5. If you follow a mixed end-investor and custodian approach: how did you organize your survey in order to avoid double-counting between end-investors and custodians? (Otherwise go to the next question) |
Respondents to the end-investor survey were required to provide the name and address of the custodian. In the case of securities held with resident custodians, the data were compared with data reported by resident custodians (which identify individual resident clients). In most cases, the end-investor source was preferred. |
1. 2. Concepts and Definitions |
1. 2. 1. Residence of the securities holder |
1. 2. 1. 1. Was the CPISG2 principle adopted for determining the country of residence of the security holder? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 3.6 to 3.10 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
|
Partly |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
1. 2. 1. 2. For countries without offshore financial centers, were you able to implement the definition of residence of holders of securities in accordance with the principle underlining the CPIS? (in line with the answer to question 1. 2. 1. 1.) (Please pay attention to the treatment of resident Special Purpose Entities (SPEs), if relevant; those are defined in the IMF's Balance of Payments Textbook as entities "(1) generally organized or established in economies other than those in which the parent companies are resident and (2) engaged primarily in international transactions but in few or no local operations." For the CPIS, the country of residence of an SPE should be determined by its legal domicile, which, in most cases, will be the country where it is incorporated. |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
There are no SPEs that have established legal domicile in Colombia. |
|
Partly |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
Do not know |
|
|
1. 2. 1. 3. For countries with offshore financial centers: were entities without a physical presence treated as resident for the purposes of the CPIS? (Enterprises without a physical presence are those incorporated and unincorporated enterprises legally domiciled in the reporting economy, that (i) either perform little production activity in the reporting country or (ii) undertake productive activities that do not require any physical presence (commonly business services and financial services connected with management of financial assets and liabilities)). |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Partly |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
Do not know |
|
|
1. 2. 2. Distinction between long-term and short term debt securities: principle adopted and practical implementation |
1. 2. 2. 1. Were the CPISG2 principles on distinguishing short and long-term debt securities adopted? Ref.: CPISG2, Appendix 1 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
|
Partly |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
1. 2. 2. 2. In practice, were respondents generally able to implement the distinction between short and long-term debt securities in accordance with the principle underlining the CPIS? (in line with answer to question 1. 2. 2. 1.) Ref.: CPISG2, par. 3.87 to 3.94 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
|
Partly |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
Do not know |
|
|
1. 2. 3. Distinction between direct and portfolio investment: principle adopted and practical implementation |
1. 2. 3. 1. Were the CPISG2 principles for distinguishing between direct and portfolio investment adopted? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 3.51 to 3.58 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
|
Partly |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
1. 2. 3. 2. In practice, how did you implement the distinction between direct and portfolio investments in accordance with the principle underlining the CPIS? (in line with answer to question 1.2.3.1.) Ref.: CPISG2, par. 3.51 to 3.58 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
A separate direct investment survey was run for sectors believed to have direct investment relationship |
|
|
 |
Guidance note was supplied to respondents to clarify the definition of direct and portfolio investment |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1. 2. 4. Valuation of portfolio investment holdings |
1. 2. 4. 1. Were the CPISG2 principles on valuing stock of assets at current market prices at the appropriate reference date adopted? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 3.33 to 3.42 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
|
Partly |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
1. 2. 4. 2. In practice, were respondents able to implement the market valuation of securities in accordance with the principle underlining the CPIS? (in line with answer to question 1.2.4.1.) Ref.: CPISG2, par. 3.33 to 3.42 |
|
Equity securities |
Debt securities |
Specify |
Comments |
Listed on organized market/readily tradable |
Not quoted on stock exchanges/not regularly traded |
Yes |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Partly |
|
 |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
Do not know |
|
|
|
|
|
1. 3. Statistical techniques |
1. 3. 1. Was there any exemption threshold? (if yes, please specify the sector where the threshold applies, the value and the currency and currency unit used) |
|
Threshold |
Simplification |
Exemption |
Specify |
Comments |
For all respondents |
|
|
|
|
|
For some class of respondents only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
 |
|
|
|
No exemptions are applied |
1. 3. 2. If you answer "Yes" to question 1. 3. 1., do you have an indication of the proportion of holdings in hands of the survey population below the threshold? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Yes |
|
|
 |
No |
|
Not applicable. |
1. 3. 3. What steps were undertaken to deal with nonresponse? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Grossing-up techniques |
|
|
|
Other estimation techniques |
|
|
|
Contact with respondents |
|
|
 |
No action |
|
Law requiring response are strictly enforced. Therefore, there is no non-response. |
|
Other |
|
|
1. 4. Assessment and validation of data |
1. 4. 1. Are independent checks made on CPIS data supplied by respondents? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 5.28 to 5.52 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
CPIS data compared with totals obtained from regulatory sources |
|
|
 |
CPIS data reconciled with IIP data supplied by respondent |
|
A reconciliation is done between the CPIS and the IIP |
 |
CPIS data reconciled with BOP flow data for the respondent |
|
A reconciliation is done between the CPIS and the BOP |
 |
CPIS data compared with data supplied from other statistical collections |
|
A reconciliation is done between the CPIS and the financial accounts. |
 |
Other |
|
A reconciliation is done between the CPIS and the TIC system data. |
|
No |
|
|
1. 4. 2. What kind of action was taken when the checks showed some errors? |
No errors found in the CPIS compilation process. |
1. 5. 1. Were data collected (but not provided) for any of the following CPIS encouraged items? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 2.11 to 2.14 |
|
Equity securities |
Long-term debt securities |
Short-term debt securities |
Comments |
Portfolio investment liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Currency breakdown of portfolio investment assets |
 |
 |
 |
|
Sector breakdown of portfolio investment assets according to institutional sector of the holder |
 |
 |
 |
|
1. 5. 2. If sector data for assets were produced, which sector classification was used? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 3.43 to 3.50 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Not applicable, no sector data. |
|
|
|
1993 System of National Accounts (SNA) classification |
|
|
 |
Balance of Payments Manual (5th edition) (BPM5) classification |
|
|
|
BPM5 classification extended in line with the SNA framework |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1. 6. 1. Which institution is in charge of compiling the international investment position (IIP) statement in your country/jurisdiction? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
The same institution(s) that is/are in charge of compiling the CPIS |
|
|
|
Institution(s) other than the institution(s) in charge of compiling the CPIS |
|
|
|
International investment position data are not compiled |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1. 6. 2. If the IIP is compiled, will your CPIS results be used to compile the portfolio investment item of the IIP? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Not applicable - international investment position data are not compiled |
|
|
|
Yes, CPIS and IIP data will be identical |
|
|
|
Yes, but they will differ due to differences in coverage/adjustments etc. |
|
|
 |
No |
|
CPIS data were not available when the IIP was completed. |
1. 6. 3. If the IIP data are compiled and differ from the corresponding CPIS results, will the differences be documented and explained for data users? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Not applicable - international investment position data are not compiled or are identical to CPIS data. |
|
|
 |
Yes, differences between CPIS and IIP will be documented and explained |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
1. 7. 1. If the CPIS results are subject to revision, is there a policy regarding the treatment of revised data? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
Revision is subject to the availability of new information provided by the respodents. |
|
No |
|
|
1. 8. 1. Will the CPIS results be published (other than in IMF publications)? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Paper publication |
|
|
 |
Web site |
|
|
|
Press releases |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
1. 9. 1. Will CPIS metadata (i.e., information on definitions, methods, etc.) be disseminated (other than in IMF publications)? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Paper publication |
|
|
 |
Web site |
|
Starting in 2004, definitions, methodology and formats are posted in the website of the central bank. |
|
Press releases |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
1. 11. 1 Are there any other comments that you wish to make that would assist users in the interpretation of the CPIS results? |
|
End-Investor
|
2. 1. 1. For what were data collected from end-investors? |
|
Response |
 |
All holdings |
|
Own custody or nonresident custodian holdings |
2. 1. 2. Please give the reason for adopting a collection system based on reporting by end-investors? Ref.: CPISG2, Chapter 4 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
Investment in foreign securities is mostly carried out by a relatively small number of large domestic institutional investors. |
|
|
|
There is a tradition and/or sound legal framework for collecting cross-border financial statistics from end-investors |
|
|
|
Resident investors keep securities mostly with nonresident custodians |
|
|
 |
Reporting preference by respondents |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2. 1. 3. If your end-investor CPIS collection system covers the household sector, could you describe the main difficulties encountered in approaching this sector? (Otherwise, please go to the next question) |
The household sector was covered indirectly through the survey of resident custodians. |
2. 1. 4. In the framework of your end-investor approach, what steps were taken to ensure that (end-investor) respondents provide the correct identification of the residence of issuers of securities? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Respondents were provided with comprehensive explanatory notes for completing the CPIS forms |
|
Web page guide |
 |
Respondents were required to check against ISIN or other security identification codes |
|
|
|
Respondents were told that the market of issue should not be a proxy for residence of the issuer |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2. 1. 5. What are the sources used to build up registers of resident entities included in the CPIS and to maintain them over time? Ref.: CPISG2, par. 5.9 to 5.24 |
|
|
Main |
Secondary |
Occasional |
Specify |
Comments |
Government administrative sources |
International Transaction Reporting System |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation records, files, or lists. |
|
|
|
|
|
Information held by foreign investment approval or monitoring boards. |
|
|
|
|
|
Central bank records |
 |
|
|
|
|
Information held by other regulatory authorities |
 |
|
|
|
|
Statutory company reports and company registration details. |
|
|
|
|
|
Records held in foreign exchange controls or international transaction reporting systems |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly available databases |
The stock exchange register. |
 |
|
|
|
Bloomberg. |
Commercial equity registers’ information services. |
|
|
|
|
|
Market research reports or services |
|
|
|
|
|
Media reports |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade associations and their associated reports and releases. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
2. 1. 6. Could you please indicate (1) the number of CPIS end-investors approached (outside the household sector), (2) the entities actually reporting CPIS data, and (3) the coverage of the reported CPIS holdings as a percentage over the national total? (Careful estimates are acceptable.) (Careful estimates are acceptable.) |
|
Entities approached |
Entities reporting |
CPIS coverage as a percentage of the national total value of holdings in foreign securities. |
Specify |
Comments |
Total |
364 |
364 |
|
|
|
Banks |
35 |
35 |
|
|
|
Insurance |
103 |
103 |
|
|
|
Pension funds |
40 |
40 |
|
|
|
Mutual funds, unit trusts, etc |
165 |
165 |
|
|
|
IBCs / SPEs |
|
|
|
|
|
General government |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
Nonfinancial corporations |
20 |
20 |
|
|
Data were collected from the most important nonfinancial public sector entities and all public sector entities. No data were collected from nonfinancial private sector entities. |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custodian
|
3. 1. 1. Could you please explain the reason for adopting a collection system centered around resident custodians and other indirect sources? |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
|
There is a tradition and/or sound legal framework for collecting cross-border financial statistics from custodians. |
|
|
|
Domestic investors by large keep their securities with resident custodians. |
|
|
 |
Ability to reduce reporting burden on respondents |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3. 1. 2. Are custodian services provided by resident entities other than banks? (e.g. investment managers, brokers, dealers, etc) |
|
Response |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
Partly |
|
|
No |
|
3. 1. 3. If "yes" or "partly" to question 3. 1. 3., are investment managers likely to use the services of resident custodians? (If "no" to question 3. 1. 3., go to the question 3. 1. 5.) |
|
Response |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
Partly |
|
|
No |
|
3. 1. 4. If "yes" or "partly" to question 3. 1. 3., are resident brokers/dealers likely to use the services of resident custodians? (If "no" to question 3. 1. 3., go to the question 3. 1. 5.) |
|
Response |
Comments |
 |
Yes |
|
|
Partly |
|
|
No |
|
3. 1. 5. What are the main difficulties that resident custodians encounter in identifying the residence of beneficial holder? |
3. 1. 6. How did you organize your survey in order to avoid double-counting between custodians (resulting from chains of custodians responsible for the same security)? |
The survey apply a cross check between the data furnished by end-investor and the custodian residents in order to avoid double counting. |
3. 1. 7. How did you organize your survey in order to avoid inclusion of securities held on behalf of direct investors? |
The survey includes all the information necessary in order to avoid the double counting between custodians and direct investors, including investment managers and dealers. |
3. 1. 8. If your survey includes custodians, investment managers and brokers/dealers, how did you organize your survey to avoid the double counting between custodians, investment managers and brokers/dealers? (otherwise, go to next question) |
The end-investor survey asked the reporting entity to provide the name and country of residence of the custodian. |
3. 1. 9. How did you organize your survey to cover holdings of residents with nonresident custodians? |
The end-investor survey asked the reporting entity to provide the name and address of the custodian. |
3. 1. 10. Could you please indicate (1) the number of custodians/investment managers/brokers/dealers approached (as relevant), (2) the entities actually reporting CPIS data, and (3) the coverage of the reported CPIS holdings as a percentage over the national total? (Careful estimates are acceptable.) |
|
Entities approached |
Entities reporting |
CPIS coverage as a percentage of the notional total value of holdings in foreign securities. |
Total |
72 |
72 |
|
Custodians |
15 |
15 |
|
Investment managers/ brokers/ dealers |
57 |
57 |
|
|
Security-By-Security
|
4. 1. 1. For what reasons do you prefer security-by-security reporting to aggregate reporting? Ref.: CPISG2, Chapter 4 |
|
Response |
Specify |
Comments |
 |
Ability to cross-check data on the country of residence of the issuer. |
|
|
 |
Ability to cross-check data on the market value of the security. |
|
|
 |
Ability to cross-check data to avoid double counting. |
|
|
 |
Ability to cross-check other information for verification/quality control |
|
|
|
Ability to draw on the securities database for information on the issue and issuer |
|
|
|
Ability to reduce reporting burden on respondents |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4. 1. 2. What are the sources of data on individual securities and issues used in your CPIS? Rate on scale of importance: 1 -main; 2 - secondary; 3 - occasional; 4 - not at all. |
|
|
Eq. sec. |
Gov. L-T debt sec. |
L-T debt sec. banks |
L-T debt sec. nonbanks |
Gov. MMI |
Banks MMI |
Nonbanks MMI |
Specify |
Comments |
Securities issued in foreign financial markets by non-residents |
Commercial security database |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National numbering agency/ies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security-by-security data reported by end-investors |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Security-by-security data reported by custodians |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Banking records |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities registers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business registers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UIC database |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIS database for international debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities issued in domestic financial markets by non-residents |
Commercial security database |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National numbering agency/ies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security-by-security data reported by end-investors |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Security-by-security data reported by custodians |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Banking records |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities registers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business registers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UIC database |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIS database for international debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. 1. 3. If you collected security-by-security data primarily or exclusively from custodians, did you also ask end-investors to identify their custodians and the amount entrusted to them? If “yes” how useful did you find these data to be? |
End-investors were asked to report the amount entrusted to a custodian, its name and country (resident or non-resident). This information permitted checks to avoid double-counting. |
|
|