Macroeconomic Implications of Money LaunderingWP/96/66-EA Macroeconomic Implications of Money Laundering by Peter J. Quirk Money laundering and measures to counter it have become the focus of an intense international effort. Evaluation of the resource costs and benefits of the countermeasures depends in part on an understanding of the macroeconomic effects of money laundering. The wide range of activities and financial instruments involved in money laundering is not directly observable, and comprehensive, microeconomic-based estimates are difficult to compile. Indirect, macroeconomic-based techniques that involve estimating the extent of money laundering are, therefore, the focus of most empirical work. This paper introduces an international cross-section econometric examination of the role of money laundering, tax evasion, and employment opportunities in determining monetary behavior, and concludes that money laundering has a significant role. A shift is detected from the use of currency in the 1980s to noncash money laundering in the 1990s. The economic literature suggests that money laundering can distort economic data and thus distort macroeconomic analysis and policymaking. In addition, there may be direct effects on saving resulting from induced changes in income distribution and from the erosion of confidence in financial markets. The paper reports a first attempt at econometric estimation to link differences in economic growth rates among industrial countries to crime as a proxy for money laundering; some evidence is found of a depressant effect on growth. Finally, the paper examines the implications for economic policymakers. Freedom to launder money could promote private economic welfare for some while undermining social welfare. Public policy considerations, therefore, suggest an antilaundering role for financial institutions involved in prudential banking supervision, tax evasion monitoring, statistical reporting, and legislation. However, in order to minimize the negative consequences for macroeconomic efficiency, care must be taken in designing the form of the interventions. |