To Starve or Not to Starve the Beast?

Author/Editor:

Daniel Leigh ; Douglas Laxton ; Michael Kumhof

Publication Date:

September 1, 2010

Electronic Access:

Free Full text (PDF file size is 976 KB).Use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this PDF file

Disclaimer: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate

Summary:

For thirty years prominent voices have advocated a policy of starving the beast cutting taxes to force government spending cuts. This paper analyzes the macroeconomic and welfare consequences of this policy using a two-country general equilibrium model. Under several strong assumptions the policy, if fully implemented, produces domestic output and welfare gains accompanied by losses elsewhere. But negative effects can easily arise in the presence of longer policy implementation lags, utility-enhancing government spending, and productive government capital. Overall, the analysis finds no support for the idea that starving the beast is a foolproof way towards higher output and welfare.

Series:

Working Paper No. 10/199

Subject:

English

Publication Date:

September 1, 2010

ISBN/ISSN:

9781455205295/1018-5941

Stock No:

WPIEA2010199

Price:

$18.00 (Academic Rate:$18.00)

Format:

Paper

Pages:

36

Please address any questions about this title to publications@imf.org