IMF Survey: Facing Global Crisis, Latin America Now More Resilient
May 6, 2009
- Region has more scope to implement countercyclical policies
- Latin America may recover faster than advanced economies
- IMF ready to help with financing, advice on policy response
Economic activity in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), sharply affected by the global economic crisis, is expected to contract by 1½ percent in 2009, from about 4½ percent growth in 2008, before rebounding next year, according to the latest forecast for the region by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
REGIONAL ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
Despite the contraction, the forecast suggests a relatively good performance for the region compared to the past, according to the latest Regional Economic Outlook: Western Hemisphere, published on May 6.
“There is no doubt that the region is being hurt by the global turmoil,” says Nicolas Eyzaguirre, Director of the IMF’s Western Hemisphere Department. “But the region today has a much higher level of preparedness.
“As a result, it is not facing a fiscal crisis, as some other developing regions, or a banking crisis, as the United States and much of Europe. Looking at previous global downturn episodes, the LAC region’s growth would normally trail the world by one or two percentage points. Now, however, we expect the region to keep up with world growth, which, in relative terms, is a positive development,” Eyzaguirre said.
The United States, where the crisis began, is expected to see a contraction in its economy in 2009 of 2.8 percent (see table below).
Improved policy underpinning
Eyzaguirre noted that in contrast to past downturns, when policymakers in the region had to react defensively to external shocks with spending cuts and interest rate hikes to avoid a deeper downward spiral, this time around they have been able to respond in a very different way: with active policies to boost output and employment. They have been able to implement more countercyclical policies than at any other time.
To different degrees, according to each country’s condition, governments have been able either to maintain public expenditure or increase it. “Many central banks were able to provide liquidity and interest rates were lowered,” Eyzaguirre said.
The external shocks hitting the region have been severe, the latest outlook notes. All countries have sustained a loss of external demand, and many also have suffered deterioration in their terms of trade as commodity export prices plunged. Countries with relatively large manufacturing sectors have been especially hard hit.
Income from remittances and tourism is also sinking. And external financing has become more costly for all, with some borrowers cut off from financing, the report explains. Overall, output losses from the current crisis would amount to several percentage points of the region’s GDP over 2009–10, the report estimates.
Sources of strength
But the outcome for the LAC region could have been much worse. Instead, the region has accumulated many sources of strength and resilience during the past decade, in varying degrees. Many countries have made important strides in strengthening fiscal positions and public debt structures, solidifying financial systems and their regulation, anchoring inflation expectations, and building more credible policy frameworks.
And a significant number of countries count on flexibility of their exchange rates as part of their adjustment process. “The lesson emerging from Latin America is that stronger fundamentals pay important dividends when external conditions deteriorate,” Eyzaguirre said in a press statement.
The IMF projects growth in the region will recover to around 1½ percent by 2010, in line with global growth—but earlier, and at a faster pace, than in advanced economies. This earlier rebound is supported by the absence of systemic banking problems in the region, which would allow Latin American economies to resume growth more quickly than in regions where severe problems persist in the financial sector. In addition, the greater scope for countercyclical policies, including to sustain public spending in infrastructure and social safety nets, would support growth going forward.
Inflation is likely to decline in most LAC countries this year. This represents another break from the past, when external shocks sometimes led to destabilization and a surge in the inflation tax, hitting the poor the hardest. For the region as a whole, the average inflation rate is projected to fall by about 2 percentage points, to about 6 percent in 2009.
The challenge for policymakers in Latin America and the Caribbean will be to manage an orderly process of adjustment, limiting feedback loops between the real and financial sectors that can reinforce the downturn, and minimizing associated output and employment losses. This means applying countercyclical policies where conditions are right, and maintaining policy credibility. The strengthening of financial systems and financial supervision has proved key for resilience, and the slowdown will be less pronounced if confidence in policy frameworks is maintained.
Role of the IMF
In this context, the report identifies a crucial role to be played by international financial institutions. In particular, the IMF can monitor and help coordinate the macroeconomic policy responses to the global crisis, encouraging each country to play its part and to avoid actions that could cause adverse spillovers. Financing by the IMF can support confidence and aid in cushioning the costs of the global shocks, including by providing more scope for countercyclical policies.
The IMF has an array of instruments that can be tailored to countries’ needs and circumstances. For instance, several countries in Central America (Costa Rica, El Salvador, and Guatemala) have large precautionary arrangements with the IMF to reduce uncertainty and bolster confidence. In the Caribbean, several countries have requested IMF financing or augmented existing arrangements.
The IMF has also invited strong-performing countries to use the newly created Flexible Credit Line, to underscore international confidence in their policy framework. Mexico and Colombia have responded to this invitation and the IMF Executive Board has approved such a line for Mexico, and will soon consider one for Colombia.
The experience of the global financial crisis so far, the report states, points to some key policy lessons.
• The importance of strengthening policy preparedness during “good times,” to build up resilience (not immunity) to future adverse shocks. When shocks do materialize, preparations implemented over past years will largely determine the room a country has for immediate policy responses to mitigate those shocks.
• The less favorable medium-term macroeconomic environment heightens the importance of accelerating structural reforms to boost investment and growth and to reduce poverty. With regard to the private sector, key priorities include increasing intermediation and access to bank and capital market funding for smaller firms, strengthening the financial infrastructure, and improving the business environment.
• Increasing the level of public investment and improving the quality of public services are also long-standing challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean, both with respect to physical as well as social infrastructure. Reducing budgetary rigidities and phasing out subsidies not targeted to the poor will be essential, to provide the fiscal space for public and social investment in the region.
• Better cross-border supervision. The current global discussion on financial reform will also influence the region’s medium-term agenda. The global debate is focusing on the longer-term reforms needed to close the gaps in financial supervision that helped sow the seeds of the current crisis in advanced economies. Such reforms would also help strengthen financial systems in the region, especially as the depth and sophistication of the region’s financial markets develop over time. Issues particularly relevant for Latin America are the need to further strengthen consolidated and cross-border supervision, as well as to reduce procyclicality in prudential regulation.
Comments on this article should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org