## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [EXECUTIVE SUMMARY](https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/fiscal-monitor/2025/english/execsum.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/files/publications/fiscal-monitor/2025/english/execsum.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/files/publications/fiscal-monitor/2025/english/execsum.pdf.json)

---

### Fiscal outlook and sources of uncertainty
- Escalating uncertainty and substantial policy shifts are reshaping economic and fiscal outlooks.
- Major tariff announcements by the United States and countermeasures by other countries are contributing to financial market volatility, deteriorating prospects, and heightening downside risks.
- Disinflation has stalled in many countries; growth projections have been significantly downgraded (see April 2025 World Economic Outlook).
- Financial turbulence poses considerable downside risks to growth (see April 2025 Global Financial Stability Report).
- Public finances were already strained, and debt levels were elevated in many countries.
- Heightened uncertainty regarding tariffs and economic policy, rising yields in major economies, and widening spreads in emerging markets—alongside increased defense spending, particularly in Europe, and a challenging foreign aid landscape—are further complicating the fiscal outlook.
- Fiscal policy now faces a sharper trade-off between reducing debt, building buffers against uncertainties and accommodating spending pressures, all amidst weaker growth prospects, higher financing costs, and heightened risks.

### Baseline projections and country coverage
- Based on the April 2025 World Economic Outlook “reference point” forecast:
  - Global public debt is projected to rise by an additional 2.8 percentage points of GDP by 2025.
  - Global public debt is projected to approach 100 percent of GDP by the end of the decade, surpassing the pandemic peak.
- More than one-third of countries are expected to see debt increase in 2025 compared to 2024.
- Collectively, these economies represent about 75 percent of global GDP and include: China and the United States, as well as Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.
- The estimates and projections are based on statistical information available through April 14, 2025.

### Risk metrics and adverse scenarios
- Risks to the fiscal outlook have intensified since the October 2024 Fiscal Monitor.
- Global debt-at-risk three-years ahead—a metric encompassing all risk determinants to the end of 2024—has increased by 2 percentage points of GDP.
- In a severe adverse scenario:
  - Global public debt could soar to around 117 percent of GDP by 2027.
  - This would mark levels not seen since World War II and be about 20 percentage points above projections for that year.
- Debt levels may continue to rise as revenues and output decline due to higher tariffs and increasing uncertainty (April 2025 World Economic Outlook).
- Elevated geoeconomic uncertainties may further increase public debt by pushing up spending, particularly in defense, especially in Europe.
- Tighter and more volatile financial conditions in the United States may spill over into emerging market and developing economies, increasing financing costs and lowering commodity prices.
- Limited improvements in fiscal positions could further exacerbate the risks associated with rising interest rates, at a time when many nations are already grappling with substantial gross financing needs.
- Higher-than-expected interest rates could crowd out essential spending, including social benefits and public investment, while shortfalls in foreign aid further aggravate financing risks in low-income developing countries.
- Higher and persistent fiscal deficits in the United States, weaker-than-expected domestic demand in China, prolonged uncertainty, and stagnant productivity growth would further exacerbate fiscal risks.

### Policy guidance and country-specific priorities
- Countries should first and foremost put their own fiscal house in order.
- A gradual fiscal adjustment, within a credible medium-term framework, is needed in most countries to reduce debt while building buffers against heightened uncertainty.
- Adjustments should balance the pace of debt reduction with economic growth, tailored to each country’s specific circumstances, fiscal space, and overall economic conditions.
- Countries with limited fiscal space should prioritize public spending and allow automatic stabilizers to operate fully.
- Those with room for fiscal maneuver facing significant spending pressures and public investment needs (for example, Germany) can utilize this space within well-defined medium-term fiscal frameworks.
- In the United States, substantial fiscal adjustments are necessary to put public debt on a decisively downward path, which will require building social consensus to address ongoing fiscal imbalances.
- More broadly, advanced economies with aging populations should:
  - Reprioritize expenditures.
  - Advance pension and health care reforms.
  - Eliminate inefficient tax incentives.
  - Broaden the tax base.
- For China, on-budget fiscal expansion should help support the economy and lower the current account surplus; given higher tariffs and unusually high uncertainty, some additional fiscal support is warranted.
- Low-income developing countries should stay the course on planned fiscal adjustment in light of financing challenges.
- For many emerging market and developing economies, rationalizing spending and increasing revenues through tax reform, broadening tax bases, and enhancing revenue administration remain critical priorities.

### Strengthening frameworks, transparency, and crisis preparedness
- Medium-term frameworks and modern public financial management systems should anchor adjustment paths effectively and reduce fiscal policy uncertainty.
- Countries facing new spending needs, particularly in defense, must demonstrate commitment to maintaining the integrity of their own fiscal rules while ensuring transparency.
- Any permanent increase in fiscal outlays for investment and defense must be accompanied by:
  - Enhanced spending efficiency.
  - Strengthened procurement systems.
  - Improved multiyear fiscal planning and macroeconomic forecasting to ensure realistic assessments of their impacts on economic growth and fiscal positions.
  - Credible and detailed financing plans that clarify how increased outlays will be funded.
- For countries in debt distress, timely restructuring and coordinated efforts to provide concessional financing are essential, particularly for low-income developing countries.
- International cooperation and coordinated initiatives to provide concessional financing are vital to prevent undue fiscal tightening, alleviate human suffering, and sustain development efforts in these nations.
- During times of financial instability, fiscal policy can support central banks through direct lending, guarantees, and equity injections to mitigate deleveraging and restore confidence.
- Governments should provide timely, temporary, and targeted support to businesses and communities affected by significant trade dislocations, ensuring transparency and careful cost management.
- If trade disruptions become permanent, implementing active labor market policies and skills retraining is essential, with fiscal policy facilitating this transition.
- Maintaining fiscal discipline is vital; failure risks turning fiscal policy from a source of stability into one of turmoil.

### Fiscal and structural reforms to boost medium-term growth
- Advancing fiscal and structural reforms is essential for reigniting medium-term economic growth (Georgieva 2024) and mitigating growth-debt sustainability trade-offs.
- Well-designed tax and spending reforms can boost employment and investment.
- Improving the efficiency of spending—especially on health, education, and infrastructure—can increase an economy’s productive capacity.
- Chapter 2 examines factors influencing the social acceptability of major expenditure reforms (energy subsidies and pensions). Key findings include:
  - Sentiment regarding reforms from major stakeholders—including households, unions, civil society organizations, private sector entities, and opposition groups—plays a crucial role in advancing reforms.
  - Design of reforms is essential for acceptability and success.
  - Building support among households, civil society organizations, unions, and opposition groups is key for advancing significant reform measures.
  - Design, timing, and accompanying measures—particularly those alleviating impacts on affected groups—are critical for bolstering public support.
  - In challenging macroeconomic environments, larger, front-loaded measures may be necessary to stabilize the economy and gain public backing.
  - Enhanced governance, trust, accompanying social transfers, and effective communication strategies are particularly important for fostering acceptability.
  - Ownership and political commitment are essential for building consensus and enhancing the credibility of reforms.

*International Monetary Fund | April 2025*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/fiscal-monitor/2025/english/execsum.pdf_
