## Figure 2.4.2. Consumption Response to House Prices

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Figure 2.4.2. Consumption Response to House Prices](https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2017/october/chapter-2/csv-data/boxfigure2-4.csv)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2017/october/chapter-2/csv-data/boxfigure2-4.csv.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2017/october/chapter-2/csv-data/boxfigure2-4.csv.json)

---

### Dataset description
- Worksheet name: csv
- Units: (Percent)
- Sections present in the worksheet:
  - 1. Household Consumption in Korea
  - 2. Household Consumption in Australia

### Key statistics
- Household Consumption in Korea:
  - Homeowner: 0.3736
  - Non-homeowner: -0.0613
- Household Consumption in Australia:
  - Debt-to-income ratio = 2: 0.0904
  - Debt-to-income ratio = 4: 0.2172

### Observations implied by the data layout
- The dataset reports consumption responses to house prices in percent for distinct household types and leverage levels.
- For Korea, homeowners show a positive consumption response (0.3736) while non-homeowners show a negative response (-0.0613).
- For Australia, higher debt-to-income ratio is associated with a larger reported consumption response (0.0904 at ratio = 2; 0.2172 at ratio = 4).

*Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2017/october/chapter-2/csv-data/boxfigure2-4.csv*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2017/october/chapter-2/csv-data/boxfigure2-4.csv_