## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [EXECUTIVE SUMMARY](https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2019/october/english/execsum.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2019/october/english/execsum.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2019/october/english/execsum.pdf.json)

---

### Overview
- Financial markets have been buffeted by the ebb and flow of trade tensions and growing concerns about the global economic outlook.
- Weakening economic activity and increased downside risks have prompted a shift toward a more dovish stance of monetary policy across the globe, accompanied by sharp declines in market yields.
- The amount of bonds with negative yields has increased to about $15 trillion.
- Investors now expect interest rates to remain very low for longer than anticipated at the beginning of the year.
- Accommodative monetary policy is supporting the economy in the near term, but easy financial conditions are encouraging financial risk-taking and fueling a further buildup of vulnerabilities in some sectors and countries.

### Key vulnerabilities in the global financial system
- Rising corporate debt burdens.
- Increasing holdings of riskier and more illiquid assets by institutional investors.
- Greater reliance on external borrowing by emerging and frontier market economies.

### Corporate sector vulnerabilities
- Corporate sector vulnerabilities are already elevated in several systemically important economies as a result of rising debt burdens and weakening debt service capacity.
- In a material economic slowdown scenario, half as severe as the global financial crisis, corporate debt-at-risk (debt owed by firms that are unable to cover their interest expenses with their earnings) could rise to $19 trillion—or nearly 40 percent of total corporate debt in major economies—above crisis levels.
- Recommendation highlights:
  - Maintain stringent supervision of bank credit risk assessment and lending practices.
  - Increase disclosure and transparency in nonbank finance markets to enable a more comprehensive assessment of risks.
  - In economies where overall corporate sector debt is systemically high, consider developing prudential tools for highly leveraged firms in addition to sector-specific prudential tools for banks.
  - Reduce tax-system biases that favor debt over equity financing.

### Nonbank financial institutions and institutional investors
- Very low rates are prompting investors to search for yield and take on riskier and more illiquid assets.
- Vulnerabilities among nonbank financial institutions are now elevated in 80 percent of economies with systemically important financial sectors (by GDP).
- This share is similar to that at the height of the global financial crisis.
- Vulnerabilities remain high in the insurance sector.
- Institutional investors’ search for yield could lead to exposures that may amplify shocks during market stress:
  - Similarities in investment funds’ portfolios could magnify a market sell-off.
  - Pension funds’ illiquid investments could constrain their ability to play a stabilizing role in markets.
  - Cross-border investments by life insurers could facilitate spillovers across markets.
- Policy recommendations:
  - Strengthen oversight of nonbank financial entities.
  - Use appropriate incentives (for example, to reduce the offering of guaranteed return products).
  - Implement minimum solvency and liquidity standards and enhanced disclosure.

### Capital flows and emerging/frontier market vulnerabilities
- Capital flows to emerging markets have been spurred by low interest rates in advanced economies.
- Median external debt in emerging market economies has risen to 160 percent of exports from 100 percent in 2008.
- In some countries, this ratio has increased to more than 300 percent.
- Increased borrowing could raise rollover and debt sustainability risks in the event of a sharp tightening in global financial conditions.
- Some overindebted state-owned enterprises may find it harder to maintain market access and service their liabilities without sovereign support.
- Greater reliance on external borrowing in some frontier market economies could increase the risk of future debt distress.
- Policy recommendation:
  - Indebted emerging market and frontier economies should mitigate debt sustainability risks through prudent debt management practices and strong debt management frameworks.

### Banking sector and funding risks
- Post-crisis regulation has improved the overall resilience of the banking sector, but pockets of weaker institutions remain.
- Negative yields and flatter yield curves—along with a more subdued growth outlook—have reduced expectations of bank profitability, and the market capitalization of some banks has fallen to low levels.
- Banks are exposed to sectors with high vulnerabilities through lending activities, leaving them susceptible to potential losses.
- In China, the authorities had to intervene in three regional banks.
- Among non-US banks, US dollar funding fragilities remain a source of vulnerability in many economies; these fragilities could amplify the impact of a tightening in funding conditions and create spillovers to countries that borrow in US dollars from non-US banks.

### Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations
- ESG principles are becoming increasingly important for borrowers and investors.
- ESG factors could have a material impact on corporate performance and may give rise to financial stability risks, particularly through climate-related losses.
- Authorities have a key role in developing standards for ESG investing, closing data gaps, and encouraging more consistent reporting.

### Macroeconomic policy guidance
- Medium-term risks to global growth and financial stability remain firmly skewed to the downside.
- Macroeconomic and macroprudential policies should be tailored to each economy’s circumstances:
  - In countries where economic activity remains robust but vulnerabilities are high or rising amid still easy financial conditions, policymakers should urgently tighten macroprudential policies, including broad-based macroprudential tools (such as the countercyclical capital buffer).
  - In economies easing policy in response to a deterioration in the economic outlook, but where sectoral vulnerabilities remain a concern, use a more targeted approach to address specific pockets of vulnerability.
  - For economies facing a significant slowdown, the focus should be on more accommodative policies, considering available policy space.

### Urgent policy actions (summary)
- Rising corporate debt burdens:
  - Maintain stringent supervision of bank credit risk assessment and lending practices.
  - Increase disclosure and transparency in nonbank finance markets.
  - Consider prudential tools for highly leveraged firms where corporate debt is systemically high.
  - Reduce tax biases favoring debt over equity.
- Increasing holdings of riskier and more illiquid securities by institutional investors:
  - Strengthen oversight of nonbank financial entities.
  - Use incentives, minimum solvency and liquidity standards, and enhanced disclosure to address vulnerabilities.
- Increased reliance on external borrowing by emerging and frontier market economies:
  - Mitigate debt sustainability risks through prudent debt management practices and strong debt management frameworks.

### Global coordination priorities
- Resolve trade tensions.
- Complete and fully implement the global regulatory reform agenda, ensuring no rollback of regulatory standards.
- Ensure a smooth transition from LIBOR to new reference rates for a wide range of financial contracts around the world by the end of 2021.

*International Monetary Fund | October 2019*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/gfsr/2019/october/english/execsum.pdf_
