## wpiea2020018-print-pdf

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [wpiea2020018-print-pdf](https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2020/english/wpiea2020018-print-pdf.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/files/publications/wp/2020/english/wpiea2020018-print-pdf.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/files/publications/wp/2020/english/wpiea2020018-print-pdf.pdf.json)

---

### Introduction
- Paper analyzes two concomitant phenomena: the secular slowdown in productivity growth and the role of trade integration and its potential reversal in advanced economies.
- Advanced economies experienced a material slowdown in labor productivity that began in the mid-1970s, was starker post-financial crisis, and has been more pronounced in recent post-crisis years.
- Globalization and connectedness facilitated specialization, trade, competition, and technological diffusion; expansion of global value chains (GVCs) was robust during the 1990s, eased during the 2000s, and is currently slowing and in some cases reversing.
- Retreat from multilateralism (including a “trade war”) can hurt growth directly (higher tariffs) and indirectly (higher uncertainty and market volatility, higher cost of capital, weaker investment, inhibited efficient allocation of resources, constrained productivity).
- Analysis focuses on four European countries selected based on firm-level data availability and level of trade integration: Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Germany as a regional hub.
- Key GVC statistics (verbatim):
  - “GVC participation rates with Germany range from 46 of gross exports for Denmark to 55 percent for the Netherlands”
  - “From Germany’s perspective, GVC participation rates to these countries range from 42 to 47 percent of its gross exports”
  - Table excerpt (as presented): AUT(25, 28)   (27, 24)   (20, 36); DEU(19,22)(18, 29)   (17, 27); DNK(26, 24)   (27, 19)(24, 33); NLD(27, 28)   (25, 29)   (28, 30)
  - The sum of the numbers in the parentheses equals the total GVC participation rate.

### Productivity Trends and Sectoral Contributions
- Labor productivity growth:
  - Slowed considerably after the global financial crisis and has not recovered to pre-crisis levels.
  - Finance and insurance and ICT generally registered higher average annual growth of output per worker.
- Country-specific productivity trajectories (verbatim):
  - Austria: average labor productivity growth declined from “2 ¼ percent” (1997–2006) to “about 1 percent” (2010–18), after having slowed to “½ percent” during 2007–09.
  - Denmark experienced somewhat higher labor productivity growth than others over the past eight years (relative to peers), albeit below pre-crisis rates; Denmark’s productivity growth over 2015-18 lagged that of Germany more recently.
- Sectoral and factor contributions:
  - Sectoral employment shifts (ICT, real estate) affected labor productivity but explain a relatively smaller share of recent productivity developments in advanced economies where much transformation occurred earlier.
  - In Germany, decline in within-sector labor productivity accounted for the largest post-crisis impact.
  - Austria: pre-crisis labor productivity predominantly driven by TFP growth with strong capital deepening; during the crisis non-ICT capital deepening contribution was “0.8 percent” while TFP contributed negatively; TFP recovered somewhat later while non-ICT capital contribution shrank.
  - Germany: TFP growth declined since mid-1990s but strengthened recently, contributing to a positive gap with comparators.
  - Average annual TFP contribution to labor productivity in Denmark and Netherlands since 2000 has been below that of Austria and Germany.
  - Total ICT capital deepening across advanced Europe fell from “about 10-15 percent” to “about 5 percent per year on average” beginning in the early 2000s.
- Figures and indices reported in source (verbatim):
  - “Labor Productivity Contributions (Average annual growth, 2000 - 2017)” components: TFPICT capital deepeningNon-ICT capital deepening.
  - “ICT Capital Deepening, 1996-2018 (Annual growth, percent)” series for Austria, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands.
  - “Total Factor Productivity (Index, 2010=100)” series for Austria, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands.

### Drivers of Productivity Growth — Firm-Level Evidence
- Overview of mechanisms:
  - Labor productivity reflects complementarity of labor and capital, access to finance, labor force attributes (skills, aging).
  - TFP reflects management practices, brand/status effects, organizational changes, network effects, spillovers, economies of scale, effects of imperfect competition, measurement errors — all affecting allocation of factor inputs and technology diffusion.
  - Policy-relevant areas: level of trade integration, access to finance, education and training, innovation, and aging.

- GVC participation (stylized facts and firm-level effects):
  - GVC participation can boost productivity via specialization and access to cheaper or higher-quality imported intermediate inputs.
  - Upstream industries gain access to technology and foreign knowledge via higher-quality intermediate goods; downstream industries benefit from cheaper intermediate inputs allowing additional investment in innovation.
  - Greater share of intangibles in firms with higher GVC participation can boost TFP; GVC embeddedness is also a vulnerability (propagation of risks, higher mitigation costs).
  - GVC participation rates in selected countries increased significantly since 2000 and peaked around 2010.
  - Among the four countries, the Netherlands has the highest overall GVC participation rate while Germany has the lowest (partly due to economy size).
  - Selected countries are more integrated through backward participation (manufacturing sources inputs from abroad more than it supplies intermediates exported to third countries).
  - Sectoral integration: manufacturing, industry, and construction are among the most integrated sectors; Denmark’s trade sector is also highly integrated.
  - Functional specialization shows concentration toward initial- and end-stage service activities (“smile curve”), yielding higher value-added gains (Ströllinger, 2019).
  - GVC participation figures (verbatim):
    - “GVC Participation Rates (Percent)” series (2000–2014) for AUT DNK NLD DEU.
    - “Backward and Forward GVC Participation Rates (Percent)” series for DEU DNK AUT NLD with Backward and Forward components.

- Access to finance:
  - Financial constraints were important in the Euro Area during and after the global financial crisis; SMEs faced greater difficulty accessing finance.
  - Financing constraints hinder innovation, human capital investment, and firm growth, keeping firms sub-optimally small and reducing productivity.
  - Country notes:
    - Netherlands: financing constraints for SMEs highlighted (Hassine, 2014).
    - Austria: financing constraints highlighted (European Commission, 2017).
    - Germany: financing constraints noted but less so than in the past (European Central Bank, 2018).
    - Denmark: excessively high corporate leverage across all firms reduced willingness and ability to borrow and invest, hindering capital stock growth, productivity and potential output (Poghosyan, 2018).

- Skills mismatches:
  - Skills mismatches can undermine employability, raise hiring and training costs, create resource misallocation, and put downward pressure on productivity while inflating average labor costs.
  - Evidence: wage penalty for overeducated individuals and wage premium for matched individuals in same occupation with lower education (McGuinnes et al., 2017).
  - Non-cognitive skills (managing, communication), ICT skills, and readiness to learn/think creatively are positively correlated with industry-level labor productivity.
  - Skills are positively associated with embeddedness into GVCs (Jamet and Squicciarini, 2016).
  - Firms increasingly report labor skill mix as the main drag on growth; example: Ernst&Young (2019) survey reports lack of skilled labor as the main bottleneck for “69 percent” of respondents in Austria (up “10 percentage points” since 2018).
  - While skills mismatches in Austria, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands appear lower than elsewhere, improvement has been marginal relative to other European countries.
  - Country education notes:
    - Austria’s number of graduates at doctoral level is low.
    - Germany could promote life-long learning more actively and address skepticism about digital technology adoption related to privacy concerns (Beblavý and others, 2019).

- Workforce aging:
  - Growing share of elderly in labor force is associated with hindered productivity growth in several studies.
  - Dependency ratio in Europe projected to increase from “about 50 percent today” to “about 75 percent by 2050” (UN World Population Prospects, 2019).
  - Some studies document declining labor productivity with aging (Ariu and Vandenberghe, 2014; Maestas et al., 2016; Shabunina, 2018; Ozimek et al., 2017).
  - Acemoglu and Restrepo (2017) document a lack of strong negative association between age-structure changes and changes in GDP per capita post-1990 in rapidly aging countries, attributing this to adoption of labor-replacing technologies (robotics, AI).
  - Figures reported (verbatim):
    - “Share of 55+ Workers in Employment by Sector (Percent)” for AUT DNK DEU NLD (2008 vs 2018).
    - “Education Spending and Outcome: Total Spending on Secondary Education, 2015 (Percent of per-capita GDP) vs PISA Math Score, 2015” scatter including AUT, DEU, DNK, NLD.

- Innovation and intangibles:
  - Investment in R&D and digitalization fosters innovation and automation, creating synergies across firm productive processes and increasing productivity.
  - Corrado et al. (2018) found intangible capital deepening accounted for as much as “30 percent” of labor productivity growth on average for Europe and the U.S. between 2000 and the period analyzed.

### Data, Methods, and Regression Findings
- Data sources and sample:
  - Firm-level data: Orbis database compiled by the Research Department of the IMF.
  - Sample: approximately 65,000 to 230,000 companies per year over 2004-15 (about 1.5 million observations in total); German firms represent 2/3 of the sample.
  - Regression sample used for main estimates: about 630,000 observations for the period spanning 2008-15 (sample includes firms from Austria, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands for the years 2008-16).
  - Complementary variables: share of elderly in labor force by sector from Eurostat; participation in GVCs from the World Input-Output database; skills mismatches from the OECD.
- Dependent variables: total factor productivity (TFP) level, TFP growth, labor productivity growth, and value-added growth.
- Main regression specification (abbreviated):
  - PRODist = 훽 * e55st + 훾 * DAist + 훿 * ITAist + φ SWist + ψ GVCst + μ * Xist + 훼i + 훼t + 휀ist.
  - e55st = share of population older than 55 working in sector s at time t.
  - DA = debt-to-asset ratio.
  - ITA = share of intangible assets in total fixed assets.
  - SW = skills mismatch variable multiplied by average wage at firm level.
  - GVC = sum of backward and forward participation rates by sector.
  - Estimation: OLS with firm fixed effects, time dummies, robust standard errors clustered at the firm level.

- Main regression findings (coefficients and signs reported verbatim):
  - GVC participation:
    - Participation in GVCs at sector level has contributed positively to labor productivity growth in firms in the four countries, though the coefficient is rather small.
    - Appendix table reports GVC coefficient entries: GVC 0.02*** and 0.00 in different specifications.
  - Debt-to-assets (firm leverage / access to finance):
    - Elevated debt-to-asset ratio is negatively and significantly correlated with labor productivity and TFP growth for small firms.
    - Appendix table entries: Debt-to-assets 0.14*** 0.15*** -0.58*** -0.58*** -0.09*** -0.09***; Debt-to-assets*sme -0.12*** -0.13*** 0.40*** 0.40*** -0.07*** -0.07***.
  - Intangible assets:
    - A higher share of intangible assets in firms is positively correlated with labor productivity growth and explains a large portion of overall variation.
    - Interaction: Intangibles*GVC(back) coefficient 0.01*** indicates GVC participation is positive for TFP when firms invest in intangibles.
    - Appendix table entries: Share of intangibles 0.13*** 0.15*** 0.38*** 0.39*** 0.15***.
  - Skills mismatch:
    - Skills mismatches are negative for TFP but the coefficient is very small; measurement imprecision is noted because mismatch is estimated at country level and multiplied by firm-level average wage.
    - Appendix table entry: Misallocation*avg wage -0.00**.
  - Workforce aging:
    - The share of elderly in total workforce is highly significant and negatively correlated with labor productivity, though the coefficient scaled by its standard error is small.
    - Appendix table entries: Share of elderly workforce -0.11*** -0.11*** -0.01*** -0.01***.
  - Firm size and age:
    - Smaller firms with less than 10 employees have generally been more productive than large ones; TFP growth tended to be negatively related with firm size.
    - Productivity growth is negatively correlated with firm age; younger firms and startups exhibit higher TFP growth.
    - Appendix table: firm age coefficients (e.g., Over 20 years 0.000 0.01 0.36*** 0.36*** -0.06*** -0.05***).

- Key regression table statistics (verbatim):
  - Public R&D spending: from 2.42 percent to 3.16 percent of GDP in 2017.
  - Sample and observations:
    - Approximately 65,000 to 230,000 companies per year (2004-15), about 1.5 million observations total.
    - Regression sample: about 630,000 observations for 2008-15; Appendix reports Number of obs. 629,588; 581,114; 246,928; 235,296; 201,006; 198,531 across columns.
  - Appendix Table 1 (selected entries):
    - Lagged dependent variable: -0.13*** -0.15*** -0.77*** -0.77*** -0.25*** -0.25***.
    - Share of elderly workforce: -0.11*** -0.11*** -0.01*** -0.01***.
    - Debt-to-assets: 0.14*** 0.15*** -0.58*** -0.58*** -0.09*** -0.09***.
    - Share of intangibles: 0.13*** 0.15*** 0.38*** 0.39*** 0.15***.
    - GVC: 0.02*** 0.00.
    - Intangibles*GVC(back): 0.01***.
    - R-sq between: 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.01.
  - Notes: TFP is measured as first difference of logarithm of firm TFP weighted by mean sales; default estimation follows Ackerberg, Caves, and Frazer, 2015, and De Loecker and Warzynski, 2012. GVC participation is measured as sum of backward and forward participation rates.

### Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
- Determinants of stagnating labor productivity across Austria, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands include resource misallocation affecting chiefly TFP: access to finance, skills mismatches, workforce aging, and low investment in intangibles.
- Policy recommendations (verbatim focus areas):
  - Facilitate access to finance (address financing constraints, especially for small firms and later-stage funding for startups).
  - Foster digitalization and innovation; strengthen science-business links and support knowledge-intensive sectors.
  - Address skill shortages and mismatches; provide workers with necessary skills for changing job contents and promote life-long learning.
  - Improve diffusion of digital technologies among SMEs and expand high-speed connectivity in rural areas.
  - Counteract potential effects of GVC disintegration by filling gaps in other policy areas (finance, skills, innovation).

- Additional overview points:
  - Austria increased public spending on R&D in 2017 from 2.42 percent of the gross domestic product to 3.16 percent (this was the second-highest public spending on R&D in the EU).
  - Larger companies are better positioned to exploit digital economy opportunities; SMEs and micro-enterprises lag behind.
  - Total real investment growth and firm-level innovation have lagged advanced economy averages since 2005.
  - Intangible investment and digitalization are linked to labor productivity gains and can help offset workforce aging.

*Source: wpiea2020018-print-pdf - Introduction (IMF publication content provided).*

### Introduction ___________________________________________________________________________________ 4

### wpiea2020018-print-pdf - Introduction

### Introduction
- Paper analyzes two concomitant phenomena: the secular slowdown in productivity growth and the role of trade integration and its potential reversal in advanced economies.
- Advanced economies have experienced a material slowdown in labor productivity that began in the mid-1970s, was starker post-financial crisis, and has been more pronounced in recent post-crisis years.
- Globalization and connectedness facilitated specialization, trade, competition, and technological diffusion; expansion of global value chains (GVCs) was robust during the 1990s, eased during the 2000s, and is currently slowing and in some cases reversing.
- Retreat from multilateralism (including a “trade war”) can hurt growth directly (higher tariffs) and indirectly (higher uncertainty and market volatility, higher cost of capital, weaker investment, inhibited efficient allocation of resources, constrained productivity).
- Analysis focuses on four European countries selected based on firm-level data availability and level of trade integration: Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Germany as a regional hub.

Key statistics and facts (verbatim from source)
- “GVC participation rates with Germany range from 46 of gross exports for Denmark to 55 percent for the Netherlands”
- “From Germany’s perspective, GVC participation rates to these countries range from 42 to 47 percent of its gross exports”
- Table excerpt (as presented): AUT(25, 28)   (27, 24)   (20, 36); DEU(19,22)(18, 29)   (17, 27); DNK(26, 24)   (27, 19)(24, 33); NLD(27, 28)   (25, 29)   (28, 30)
- The sum of the numbers in the parentheses equals the total GVC participation rate.

### Productivity Trends
- Labor productivity growth slowed considerably after the global financial crisis and has not recovered to pre-crisis levels.
- Finance and insurance and ICT generally registered higher average annual growth of output per worker.
- Austria: average labor productivity growth declined from “2 ¼ percent” (1997–2006) to “about 1 percent” (2010–18), after having slowed to “½ percent” during 2007–09.
- Denmark experienced somewhat higher labor productivity growth than others over the past eight years (relative to peers), albeit below pre-crisis rates; Denmark’s productivity growth over 2015-18 lagged that of Germany more recently.
- Literature-cited explanations for post-crisis productivity decline include:
  - Sectoral shifts toward tertiary/services with structurally lower productivity (Dabla-Norris et al., 2015).
  - Stringent labor and product market regulations reducing efficient resource allocation (Andrews and Cingano, 2014).
  - Weak investment (infrastructure, IT, R&D) and inadequate access to finance (Aghion et al., 2009).
  - Workforce aging and underinvestment in human capital (Feyrer (2007), Aiyar et al. (2016)).
  - Young and innovative firms contributing more to productivity gains than small firms in some countries (Budina et al., 2015).

- Sectoral and factor contributions:
  - Sectoral employment shifts (ICT, real estate) affected labor productivity but explain a relatively smaller share of recent productivity developments in advanced economies where much transformation occurred earlier.
  - In Germany, decline in within-sector labor productivity accounted for the largest post-crisis impact.
  - Austria: pre-crisis labor productivity predominantly driven by TFP growth with strong capital deepening; during the crisis non-ICT capital deepening contribution was “0.8 percent” while TFP contributed negatively; TFP recovered somewhat later while non-ICT capital contribution shrank.
  - Germany: TFP growth declined since mid-1990s but strengthened recently, contributing to a positive gap with comparators.
  - Average annual TFP contribution to labor productivity in Denmark and Netherlands since 2000 has been below that of Austria and Germany.
  - Total ICT capital deepening across advanced Europe fell from “about 10-15 percent” to “about 5 percent per year on average” beginning in the early 2000s.

Key statistics and indexes (verbatim)
- “Labor Productivity Contributions (Average annual growth, 2000 - 2017)” components: TFPICT capital deepeningNon-ICT capital deepening (as shown in figures).
- “ICT Capital Deepening, 1996-2018 (Annual growth, percent)” series shown for Austria, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands.
- “Total Factor Productivity (Index, 2010=100)” series shown for Austria, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands.

### Drivers of Productivity Growth – Firm-Level Analysis
- Changes in labor productivity reflect complementarity of labor and capital, access to finance, labor force attributes (skills, aging).
- TFP reflects management practices, brand/status effects, organizational changes, network effects, spillovers, economies of scale, effects of imperfect competition, measurement errors — all affecting allocation of factor inputs and technology diffusion.
- Key potential policy-relevant areas affecting firm productivity: level of trade integration, access to finance, education and training, innovation, and aging.

(i) Stylized facts: GVC participation
- GVC participation can boost productivity via specialization and access to cheaper or higher-quality imported intermediate inputs.
- Upstream industries gain access to technology and foreign knowledge via higher-quality intermediate goods; downstream industries benefit from cheaper intermediate inputs allowing additional investment in innovation.
- Greater share of intangibles in firms with higher GVC participation can boost TFP; GVC embeddedness is also a vulnerability (propagation of risks, higher mitigation costs).
- GVC participation rates in selected countries increased significantly since 2000 and peaked around 2010.
- Among the four countries, the Netherlands has the highest overall GVC participation rate while Germany has the lowest (partly due to economy size).
- Selected countries are more integrated through backward participation (manufacturing sources inputs from abroad more than it supplies intermediates exported to third countries).
- Sectoral integration: manufacturing, industry, and construction are among the most integrated sectors; Denmark’s trade sector is also highly integrated.
- Functional specialization differs from sectoral specialization and shows concentration toward initial- and end-stage service activities (“smile curve”), yielding higher value-added gains (Ströllinger, 2019).

GVC participation figures (verbatim from figures)
- “GVC Participation Rates (Percent)” series (2000–2014) for AUT DNK NLD DEU.
- “Backward and Forward GVC Participation Rates (Percent)” series for DEU DNK AUT NLD with Backward and Forward components.

(ii) Access to finance
- Financial constraints were important in the Euro Area during and after the global financial crisis; SMEs faced greater difficulty accessing finance.
- Financing constraints hinder innovation, human capital investment, and firm growth, keeping firms sub-optimally small and reducing productivity.
- Country-specific notes from the source:
  - Netherlands: financing constraints for SMEs highlighted (Hassine, 2014).
  - Austria: financing constraints highlighted (European Commission, 2017).
  - Germany: financing constraints noted but less so than in the past (European Central Bank, 2018).
  - Denmark: excessively high corporate leverage across all firms reduced willingness and ability to borrow and invest, hindering capital stock growth, productivity and potential output (Poghosyan, 2018).

(iii) Skills mismatches
- Skills mismatches can undermine employability, raise hiring and training costs, create resource misallocation, and put downward pressure on productivity while inflating average labor costs.
- Empirical evidence points to a wage penalty for overeducated individuals and a wage premium for matched individuals in the same occupation with lower education (McGuinnes et al., 2017).
- Non-cognitive skills (managing, communication), ICT skills, and readiness to learn/think creatively are positively correlated with industry-level labor productivity.
- Skills are positively associated with embeddedness into GVCs (Jamet and Squicciarini, 2016).
- Firms increasingly report labor skill mix as the main drag on growth; example: Ernst&Young (2019) survey reports lack of skilled labor as the main bottleneck for “69 percent” of respondents in Austria (up “10 percentage points” since 2018).
- While skills mismatches in Austria, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands appear lower than elsewhere, improvement has been marginal relative to other European countries.
- Country-specific education observations from the source:
  - Austria’s number of graduates at doctoral level is low.
  - Germany could promote life-long learning more actively and address skepticism about digital technology adoption related to privacy concerns (Beblavý and others, 2019).

(iv) Workforce aging
- Growing share of elderly in labor force is associated with hindered productivity growth in several studies.
- Dependency ratio in Europe projected to increase from “about 50 percent today” to “about 75 percent by 2050” (UN World Population Prospects, 2019).
- Some studies document declining labor productivity with aging (Ariu and Vandenberghe, 2014; Maestas et al., 2016; Shabunina, 2018; Ozimek et al., 2017).
- Acemoglu and Restrepo (2017) document a lack of strong negative association between age-structure changes and changes in GDP per capita post-1990 in rapidly aging countries, attributing this to adoption of labor-replacing technologies (robotics, AI).

Figures and sectoral details (verbatim)
- “Share of 55+ Workers in Employment by Sector (Percent)” for AUT DNK DEU NLD (2008 vs 2018).
- “Education Spending and Outcome: Total Spending on Secondary Education, 2015 (Percent of per-capita GDP) vs PISA Math Score, 2015” scatter shown for countries including AUT, DEU, DNK, NLD.

(v) Innovation
- Investment in R&D and digitalization fosters innovation and automation, creating synergies across firm productive processes and increasing productivity.
- Corrado et al. (2018) found intangible capital deepening accounted for as much as “30 percent” of labor productivity growth on average for Europe and the U.S. between 2000 and the period analyzed.

### Conclusions (as signposted in document)
- Subsequent sections of the paper analyze labor and TFP developments using Eurostat sectoral data (section B), present stylized facts and regression estimates on determinants of productivity growth and GVC using an Orbis-based firm-level panel (section C), and conclude (section D).

*Source: wpiea2020018-print-pdf - Introduction (IMF publication content provided).*

### 2013. Austria has increased its public spending on R&D in 2017 considerably (from 2.42 percent of

### wpiea2020018-print-pdf - 2013. Austria has increased its public spending on R&D in 2017 considerably (from 2.42 percent of

### Overview
- Austria increased public spending on R&D in 2017 from 2.42 percent of the gross domestic product to 3.16 percent (this was the second-highest public spending on R&D in the EU).
- Larger companies are better positioned to exploit digital economy opportunities; SMEs and micro-enterprises lag behind.
- Total real investment growth and firm-level innovation have lagged advanced economy averages since 2005.
- Intangible investment and digitalization are linked to labor productivity gains and can help offset workforce aging.

### Data and Methods
- Firm-level data source: Orbis database compiled by the Research Department of the IMF.
- Sample: approximately 65,000 to 230,000 companies per year over 2004-15 (about 1.5 million observations in total); German firms represent 2/3 of the sample.
- Regression sample used for main estimates: about 630,000 observations for the period spanning 2008-15 (notes state sample includes firms from Austria, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands for the years 2008-16).
- Complementary sector and country-level variables: share of elderly in labor force by sector from Eurostat; participation in GVCs from the World Input-Output database; skills mismatches from the OECD.
- Dependent variables: total factor productivity (TFP) level, TFP growth, labor productivity growth, and value-added growth.
- Main regression specification (abbreviated): PRODist = 훽 * e55st + 훾 * DAist + 훿 * ITAist + φ SWist + ψ GVCst + μ * Xist + 훼i + 훼t + 휀ist.
  - e55st = share of population older than 55 working in sector s at time t.
  - DA = debt-to-asset ratio.
  - ITA = share of intangible assets in total fixed assets.
  - SW = skills mismatch variable multiplied by average wage at firm level.
  - GVC = sum of backward and forward participation rates by sector.
- Estimation: OLS with firm fixed effects, time dummies, robust standard errors clustered at the firm level.

### Regression Findings (model conclusions and coefficient evidence)
- GVC participation:
  - Participation in GVCs at sector level has contributed positively to labor productivity growth in firms in the four countries, though the coefficient is rather small.
  - Appendix table reports GVC coefficient entries: GVC 0.02*** and 0.00 in different specifications.
- Debt-to-assets (firm leverage / access to finance):
  - Elevated debt-to-asset ratio is negatively and significantly correlated with labor productivity and TFP growth for small firms.
  - Appendix table entries: Debt-to-assets 0.14*** 0.15*** -0.58*** -0.58*** -0.09*** -0.09***; Debt-to-assets*sme -0.12*** -0.13*** 0.40*** 0.40*** -0.07*** -0.07***.
- Intangible assets:
  - A higher share of intangible assets in firms is positively correlated with labor productivity growth and explains a large portion of overall variation.
  - Interaction: Intangibles*GVC(back) coefficient 0.01*** indicates GVC participation is positive for TFP when firms invest in intangibles.
  - Appendix table entries: Share of intangibles 0.13*** 0.15*** 0.38*** 0.39*** 0.15***.
- Skills mismatch:
  - Skills mismatches are negative for TFP but the coefficient is very small; measurement imprecision is noted because mismatch is estimated at country level and multiplied by firm-level average wage.
  - Appendix table entry: Misallocation*avg wage -0.00**.
- Workforce aging:
  - The share of elderly in total workforce is highly significant and negatively correlated with labor productivity, though the coefficient scaled by its standard error is small.
  - Appendix table entries: Share of elderly workforce -0.11*** -0.11*** -0.01*** -0.01***.
- Firm size and age:
  - Smaller firms with less than 10 employees have generally been more productive than large ones; TFP growth tended to be negatively related with firm size.
  - Productivity growth is negatively correlated with firm age; younger firms and startups exhibit higher TFP growth.
  - Appendix table shows positive coefficients for firm size categories on Value Added Growth and Labor Productivity Growth, and negative relation of size with TFP growth in some specifications. Firm age coefficients (2-5 years to Over 20 years) show increasing positive values for Value Added Growth and Labor Productivity Growth and negative coefficients for TFP growth (e.g., Over 20 years 0.000 0.01 0.36*** 0.36*** -0.06*** -0.05***).

### Key Statistics and Table Highlights
- Public R&D spending: from 2.42 percent to 3.16 percent of GDP in 2017.
- Sample and observations:
  - Approximately 65,000 to 230,000 companies per year (2004-15), about 1.5 million observations total.
  - Regression sample: about 630,000 observations for 2008-15; Appendix reports Number of obs. 629,588; 581,114; 246,928; 235,296; 201,006; 198,531 across columns.
- Appendix Table 1 (selected entries):
  - Lagged dependent variable: -0.13*** -0.15*** -0.77*** -0.77*** -0.25*** -0.25***.
  - Share of elderly workforce: -0.11*** -0.11*** -0.01*** -0.01***.
  - Debt-to-assets: 0.14*** 0.15*** -0.58*** -0.58*** -0.09*** -0.09***.
  - Share of intangibles: 0.13*** 0.15*** 0.38*** 0.39*** 0.15***.
  - GVC: 0.02*** 0.00.
  - Intangibles*GVC(back): 0.01***.
  - R-sq between: 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.25 0.01 0.01.
- Notes: TFP is measured as first difference of logarithm of firm TFP weighted by mean sales; default estimation follows Ackerberg, Caves, and Frazer, 2015, and De Loecker and Warzynski, 2012. GVC participation is measured as sum of backward and forward participation rates.

### Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
- Determinants of stagnating labor productivity across Austria, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands include resource misallocation affecting chiefly TFP: access to finance, skills mismatches, workforce aging, and low investment in intangibles.
- Policies recommended:
  - Facilitate access to finance (address financing constraints, especially for small firms and later-stage funding for startups).
  - Foster digitalization and innovation; strengthen science-business links and support knowledge-intensive sectors.
  - Address skill shortages and mismatches; provide workers with necessary skills for changing job contents and promote life-long learning.
  - Improve diffusion of digital technologies among SMEs and expand high-speed connectivity in rural areas.
  - Counteract potential effects of GVC disintegration by filling gaps in other policy areas (finance, skills, innovation).

*Source: IMF — material compiled from the provided chapter content and Appendix I Table 1.*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2020/english/wpiea2020018-print-pdf.pdf_