## 1.         Macroeconomic         Effects         of Population Aging

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [1.         Macroeconomic         Effects         of Population Aging](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp0695.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp0695.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp0695.pdf.json)

---

### Introduction: scope and main findings
- Study framework: dynamic overlapping generations model of a small open economy, extended to incorporate demographic and life-cycle dynamics; calibrated to the Czech Republic.
- Main projected impacts of population aging (relative to a stationary-population baseline):
  - By 2050, the elderly dependency ratio increases by about 12½ percent.
  - By 2050, the level of real GDP is projected to decline by about 30 percent (relative to the baseline without demographic change).
  - By 2050, real GDP per capita is projected to decline by 15 percent (relative to the baseline).
  - These imply average reductions of about ½ percentage point per year in trend growth for aggregate GDP and less than ⅓ percent per year on average for per capita GDP.
- Fiscal consequences:
  - Additional age-related expenditures are financed through borrowing until debt reaches 60 percent of GDP.
  - Resulting increases in direct taxes are about 6 percent of GDP in 2050.
- Timing of fiscal action matters:
  - Earlier consolidation requires a smaller fiscal adjustment; delayed consolidation increases required adjustments.
- Short-run vs long-run dynamics:
  - Growth effects display a two-stage process driven by rising longevity and declining fertility; initially (until 2015) rising longevity increases output, later declining fertility dominates and reduces labor supply and output.

### Theory and model structure
- Key model features:
  - Dynamic general equilibrium with forward-looking agents and model-consistent expectations.
  - Consumption-saving based on Blanchard (1985) finite planning horizons.
  - Production: Cobb-Douglas with capital and labor.
  - Investment behavior: Tobin’s q-theory.
  - External sector: import volumes depend on aggregate demand; exports reflect foreign import demand; exchange rates and interest rates linked by interest parity.
  - Small open economy assumption: perfect international capital markets; borrowing at the prevailing world interest rate.
  - Government absorption exogenous; aggregate tax rate endogenous to converge government debt-to-GDP to a target.
- Life-cycle and demographic channels:
  - Age-earnings profiles are hump-shaped: earnings rise, peak at middle age, decline in retirement.
  - Younger cohorts: net borrowers; mature cohorts: savers; elderly save to a lesser extent due to longevity risk.
  - Changes in age composition affect aggregate labor supply (through productivity-adjusted labor) and aggregate saving/consumption.

### Calibration and experiments
- Data and parameters:
  - Age-earnings profiles estimated from Czech Statistical Office wage-based salaries by age cohort for 1996–2003, adjusted by labor force participation rates and normalized to the youngest working cohort (20–24).
  - Exponential fit (equation (1)) estimated parameters: α1 = 0.09; α2 = 0.12; α3 = 0.10; all significant at the 5 percent level.
  - Model assumes stability of relative age-earnings profiles over time.
- Demographic assumptions:
  - Fertility decline: from 2.69 children per woman in 1950–55 to 1.17 in 2000–05.
  - World Bank projections used: fertility stabilizes around 2015 and then rises gradually to replacement, population stationary by 2100; elderly dependency ratio peaks in 2060 and stabilizes by 2090.
  - Demographic projections assume zero net migration.
- Baseline macroeconomic calibration:
  - Long-run real GDP growth converges to EU-15: about 2 percent per year.
  - Intertemporal elasticity of substitution = 0.4.
  - Rate of time preference = 2½ percent.
  - Capital-output ratio = 3.
  - Long-run real world interest rate = 4 percent.
  - Initial level of public debt ≈ 25 percent.
- Policy experiments simulated:
  - Demographic change shock: elderly dependency ratio rises in line with projections; by 2050 increases by about 12½ percent relative to stationary baseline.
  - Fiscal consolidation scenarios:
    - Delayed consolidation: consolidation delayed by about 10 years, from 2020 to 2030; government borrows to finance rising age-related expenditures during delay.
    - No consolidation: government finances increases exclusively through borrowing.
  - Labor market reforms and labor-augmenting technological change:
    - Effective labor supply augmented by an average rate of ⅓ percent per year during 2005–50 (returning gradually to baseline thereafter).
    - This ⅓ percent could come from: ⅓ percent growth in number of workers (higher participation), or ⅓ percent labor-augmenting productivity growth, or ⅓ percent growth in hours worked, or a mix.
    - Cumulative required increase in effective labor supply by 2050 = 17½ percent.

### Simulations: transmission and quantitative outcomes
- Two-stage transmission process:
  - Stage 1 (initial, until 2015): rising longevity dominates, increasing adult population and effective labor supply; output increases by about 3 percent relative to baseline by 2015 as investment and capital-labor ratios rise; savings rise and current account narrows by about 2 percent by 2015; social security expenditures relative to GDP are less than 1 percent higher in 2015 than in baseline.
  - Stage 2 (longer term): declining fertility reduces labor force entry, effective labor supply falls, output and per capita income decline relative to baseline.
- Long-run quantitative impacts (relative to stationary-population baseline):
  - Real GDP level by 2050: decline of about 30 percent.
  - Real GDP per capita by 2050: decline of 15 percent.
  - Average annual aggregate growth reduction: about ½ percentage point per year.
  - Average annual per capita growth reduction: less than ⅓ percent per year.
- Fiscal and external outcomes:
  - Governments assumed to borrow to cover age-related expenditures until debt reaches 60 percent of GDP.
  - Direct taxes increase by about 6 percent of GDP in 2050 under borrowing-then-adjust scenarios.
  - Current account deficit widens in the long run as savings fall by more than investment.

### 2005 — Macroeconomic findings and projections
- Public debt rises by about 5 percent relative to GDP in the moderate-growth phase until the late 2020s.
- From around 2015, the effective labor supply starts to decline as lower fertility rates dominate.
- Interest rates rise, as savings and investment decline with output.
- After 2020–25, total and per capita GDP decline.
- Growth of social security expenditures accelerates, requiring the government to start raising taxes around 2020 to close the financing gap and to maintain the debt ratio on a sustainable path.
- Public debt approaches 60 percent of GDP by 2050.
- The current account deficit continues to narrow until about 2030, as investment falls; after 2040, this trend reverses as savings of the aging population decline.

### Fiscal scenarios and timing
- A delay in fiscal consolidation by 10 years (to 2030) accelerates public debt accumulation and raises the cost of adjustment; public debt reaches the targeted level earlier, by 2030 instead of 2050.
- If consolidation does not take place at all, the debt ratio reaches 60 percent by 2030 and the fiscal position becomes unsustainable in the long run.
- Simulations assume the fiscal gap is closed through an increase in direct taxes (the paper notes this is the most conservative assumption because the distortionary effects on saving and labor supply are likely higher than for indirect taxation and cuts in social security benefits).

### Structural reforms, labor supply, and welfare
- Labor market reforms or boosts to labor-augmenting technological change can offset adverse impacts of population aging on growth and welfare.
- An increase in the effective labor supply by about 17½ percent by 2050 would largely neutralize the welfare implications (measured by GDP and consumption in per capita terms) of the increase in the elderly dependency ratio.
- Labor market reforms and/or labor-augmenting technological change would reduce the need for fiscal adjustment relative to GDP by about 2 percent.
- Nonetheless, the needed fiscal adjustment would remain significant—about 4 percent of GDP in 2050.

### Robustness, sensitivity, and limits of mitigation
- Qualitative conclusions are robust to demographic projections and alternative assumptions on consolidation policies.
- Results are quantitatively sensitive to alternative demographic projections, with growth and fiscal effects being proportional to the increase in the elderly dependency ratio; for a reasonable range (e.g., United Nation’s high and low variants), simulated effects remain broadly similar.
- Results are somewhat sensitive to the assumption on how the fiscal gap is closed; closing via direct taxes is conservative and yields larger negative growth effects than alternative closures (indirect taxation or benefit cuts), though impacts remain significant for reasonable values.
- Even with reforms increasing labor supply and productivity, eliminating the need for structural fiscal reforms is unlikely.
- Age-earnings profile assumptions matter: if healthier individuals postpone retirement and age-earnings profiles flatten, the negative labor-supply impact is mitigated; the model uses fitted profiles that are flatter for old-age cohorts than historical data, partially addressing potential overestimation.

### Model structure and mechanics (summary)
- The model builds on Faruqee (2002) and Blanchard (1985), introducing demographic dynamics into an overlapping generations framework using cohort-specific birth rates and time-varying population growth.
- Population dynamics: population growth rate n equals birth rate b minus death rate p; population size evolves according to accumulated past changes in growth (equations (1) and (2)).
- Dependency ratio: elderly dependency ratio φ defined as proportion of population above a threshold age j(t); its evolution depends on new dependents, elderly death rates, and population growth (equations (4) and (5)).
- Age-earnings and effective labor supply: individual effective labor supply is hump-shaped over the life cycle (equation (6)); aggregate labor input L aggregates age-specific effective labor and follows a law of motion influenced by new entrants, deaths, and productivity (equation (9)).
- Consumption and saving: agents maximize expected lifetime utility subject to a dynamic budget constraint; optimal consumption depends on financial assets and human wealth (equations (10)–(12)); agents build up precautionary financial wealth and do not necessarily dissave in retirement.
- Human wealth dynamics: aggregate human wealth H evolves with labor taxes, disposable income, pension system financing gaps, and the human wealth of new generations (equation (13) and modified form (17) in presence of social security financing gaps).
- Pension system: transfers tr(s,t) distinguish contributors (younger) and beneficiaries (older); a full-financing condition for transfers requires benefit-to-contribution ratio to equal the support ratio (equation (16)); shortfalls must be closed via general tax revenues or government borrowing.

*Source: _wp0695 - 1. Macroeconomic Effects of Population Aging (IMF staff chapter, calibrated to the Czech Republic).*

### 1.         Macroeconomic         Effects         of Population Aging....................................................

### 1.         Macroeconomic         Effects         of Population Aging

### Introduction: scope and main findings
- Study framework: dynamic overlapping generations model of a small open economy, extended to incorporate demographic and life-cycle dynamics; calibrated to the Czech Republic.
- Main projected impacts of population aging (relative to a stationary-population baseline):
  - By 2050, the elderly dependency ratio increases by about 12½ percent.
  - By 2050, the level of real GDP is projected to decline by about 30 percent (relative to the baseline without demographic change).
  - By 2050, real GDP per capita is projected to decline by 15 percent (relative to the baseline).
  - These imply average reductions of about ½ percentage point per year in trend growth for aggregate GDP and less than ⅓ percent per year on average for per capita GDP.
- Fiscal consequences:
  - Additional age-related expenditures are financed through borrowing until debt reaches 60 percent of GDP.
  - Resulting increases in direct taxes are about 6 percent of GDP in 2050.
- Timing of fiscal action matters:
  - Earlier consolidation requires a smaller fiscal adjustment; delayed consolidation increases required adjustments.
- Short-run vs long-run dynamics:
  - Growth effects display a two-stage process driven by rising longevity and declining fertility; initially (until 2015) rising longevity increases output, later declining fertility dominates and reduces labor supply and output.

### Theory and model structure
- Key model features:
  - Dynamic general equilibrium with forward-looking agents and model-consistent expectations.
  - Consumption-saving based on Blanchard (1985) finite planning horizons.
  - Production: Cobb-Douglas with capital and labor.
  - Investment behavior: Tobin’s q-theory.
  - External sector: import volumes depend on aggregate demand; exports reflect foreign import demand; exchange rates and interest rates linked by interest parity.
  - Small open economy assumption: perfect international capital markets; borrowing at the prevailing world interest rate.
  - Government absorption exogenous; aggregate tax rate endogenous to converge government debt-to-GDP to a target.
- Life-cycle and demographic channels:
  - Age-earnings profiles are hump-shaped: earnings rise, peak at middle age, decline in retirement.
  - Younger cohorts: net borrowers; mature cohorts: savers; elderly save to a lesser extent due to longevity risk.
  - Changes in age composition affect aggregate labor supply (through productivity-adjusted labor) and aggregate saving/consumption.

### Calibration and experiments
- Data and parameters:
  - Age-earnings profiles estimated from Czech Statistical Office wage-based salaries by age cohort for 1996–2003, adjusted by labor force participation rates and normalized to the youngest working cohort (20–24).
  - Exponential fit (equation (1)) estimated parameters: α1 = 0.09; α2 = 0.12; α3 = 0.10; all significant at the 5 percent level.
  - Model assumes stability of relative age-earnings profiles over time.
- Demographic assumptions:
  - Fertility decline: from 2.69 children per woman in 1950–55 to 1.17 in 2000–05.
  - World Bank projections used: fertility stabilizes around 2015 and then rises gradually to replacement, population stationary by 2100; elderly dependency ratio peaks in 2060 and stabilizes by 2090.
  - Demographic projections assume zero net migration.
- Baseline macroeconomic calibration:
  - Long-run real GDP growth converges to EU-15: about 2 percent per year.
  - Intertemporal elasticity of substitution = 0.4.
  - Rate of time preference = 2½ percent.
  - Capital-output ratio = 3.
  - Long-run real world interest rate = 4 percent.
  - Initial level of public debt ≈ 25 percent.
- Policy experiments simulated:
  - Demographic change shock: elderly dependency ratio rises in line with projections; by 2050 increases by about 12½ percent relative to stationary baseline.
  - Fiscal consolidation scenarios:
    - Delayed consolidation: consolidation delayed by about 10 years, from 2020 to 2030; government borrows to finance rising age-related expenditures during delay.
    - No consolidation: government finances increases exclusively through borrowing.
  - Labor market reforms and labor-augmenting technological change:
    - Effective labor supply augmented by an average rate of ⅓ percent per year during 2005–50 (returning gradually to baseline thereafter).
    - This ⅓ percent could come from: ⅓ percent growth in number of workers (higher participation), or ⅓ percent labor-augmenting productivity growth, or ⅓ percent growth in hours worked, or a mix.
    - Cumulative required increase in effective labor supply by 2050 = 17½ percent.

### Simulations: transmission and quantitative outcomes
- Two-stage transmission process:
  - Stage 1 (initial, until 2015): rising longevity dominates, increasing adult population and effective labor supply; output increases by about 3 percent relative to baseline by 2015 as investment and capital-labor ratios rise; savings rise and current account narrows by about 2 percent by 2015; social security expenditures relative to GDP are less than 1 percent higher in 2015 than in baseline.
  - Stage 2 (longer term): declining fertility reduces labor force entry, effective labor supply falls, output and per capita income decline relative to baseline.
- Long-run quantitative impacts (relative to stationary-population baseline):
  - Real GDP level by 2050: decline of about 30 percent.
  - Real GDP per capita by 2050: decline of 15 percent.
  - Average annual aggregate growth reduction: about ½ percentage point per year.
  - Average annual per capita growth reduction: less than ⅓ percent per year.
- Fiscal and external outcomes:
  - Governments assumed to borrow to cover age-related expenditures until debt reaches 60 percent of GDP.
  - Direct taxes increase by about 6 percent of GDP in 2050 under borrowing-then-adjust scenarios.
  - Current account deficit widens in the long run as savings fall by more than investment.

### Policy implications and mitigation options (as modeled)
- Fiscal policy:
  - Structural fiscal reforms (consolidation) are required to preserve debt sustainability; earlier consolidation reduces the magnitude of required adjustment.
  - Delaying consolidation (e.g., from 2020 to 2030) increases reliance on borrowing and raises eventual fiscal adjustment needs.
  - A no-consolidation scenario leads to continued borrowing and higher debt accumulation (debt path simulated until hitting a 60 percent of GDP threshold).
- Structural reforms:
  - Labor market reforms and labor-augmenting technological change that raise effective labor supply by an average of ⅓ percent per year during 2005–50 can substantially mitigate adverse growth effects.
  - The required cumulative increase in effective labor supply (17½ percent by 2050) is sizable and would require comprehensive and consistently effective reforms (e.g., higher participation, productivity increases, longer working lives, or targeted immigration of working-age individuals).
- Limits of mitigation:
  - Even with reforms increasing labor supply and productivity, eliminating the need for structural fiscal reforms is unlikely.
  - Age-earnings profile assumptions matter: if healthier individuals postpone retirement and age-earnings profiles flatten, the negative labor-supply impact is mitigated; the model uses fitted profiles that are flatter for old-age cohorts than historical data, partially addressing potential overestimation.

*Source: _wp0695 - 1. Macroeconomic Effects of Population Aging (IMF staff chapter, calibrated to the Czech Republic).*

### 2005. This increase is fully financed through borrowing. The rate of growth in public

### _wp0695 - 2005

### Macroeconomic findings and projections
- Public debt rises by about 5 percent relative to GDP in the moderate-growth phase until the late 2020s.
- From around 2015, the effective labor supply starts to decline as lower fertility rates dominate.
- Interest rates rise, as savings and investment decline with output.
- After 2020–25, total and per capita GDP decline.
- Growth of social security expenditures accelerates, requiring the government to start raising taxes around 2020 to close the financing gap and to maintain the debt ratio on a sustainable path.
- Public debt approaches 60 percent of GDP by 2050.
- The current account deficit continues to narrow until about 2030, as investment falls; after 2040, this trend reverses as savings of the aging population decline.

### Fiscal scenarios and timing
- A delay in fiscal consolidation by 10 years (to 2030) accelerates public debt accumulation and raises the cost of adjustment; public debt reaches the targeted level earlier, by 2030 instead of 2050.
- If consolidation does not take place at all, the debt ratio reaches 60 percent by 2030 and the fiscal position becomes unsustainable in the long run.
- Simulations assume the fiscal gap is closed through an increase in direct taxes (the paper notes this is the most conservative assumption because the distortionary effects on saving and labor supply are likely higher than for indirect taxation and cuts in social security benefits).

### Structural reforms, labor supply, and welfare
- Labor market reforms or boosts to labor-augmenting technological change can offset adverse impacts of population aging on growth and welfare.
- An increase in the effective labor supply by about 17½ percent by 2050 would largely neutralize the welfare implications (measured by GDP and consumption in per capita terms) of the increase in the elderly dependency ratio.
- Labor market reforms and/or labor-augmenting technological change would reduce the need for fiscal adjustment relative to GDP by about 2 percent.
- Nonetheless, the needed fiscal adjustment would remain significant—about 4 percent of GDP in 2050.

### Robustness and sensitivity
- Qualitative conclusions are robust to demographic projections and alternative assumptions on consolidation policies.
- Results are quantitatively sensitive to alternative demographic projections, with growth and fiscal effects being proportional to the increase in the elderly dependency ratio; for a reasonable range (e.g., United Nation’s high and low variants), simulated effects remain broadly similar.
- Results are somewhat sensitive to the assumption on how the fiscal gap is closed; closing via direct taxes is conservative and yields larger negative growth effects than alternative closures (indirect taxation or benefit cuts), though impacts remain significant for reasonable values.

### Policy conclusions and recommendations
- Population aging is likely to lower potential growth by ½ percentage point per year and put pressure on public finances in a small open economy like the Czech Republic over coming decades.
- Adverse growth impacts can be largely mitigated through achievable increases in labor force participation rates and labor-augmenting technological change.
- Even with extensive structural reforms, significant fiscal consolidation will be needed to ensure long-term debt sustainability.
- Earlier consolidation and deeper accompanying structural reforms reduce the required fiscal adjustment.
- Private savings also need to adjust endogenously in preparation for aging; this response is assumed in the simulation model but in practice requires good foresight by individuals and properly functioning long-term savings markets.

### Model structure and mechanics (summary)
- The model builds on Faruqee (2002) and Blanchard (1985), introducing demographic dynamics into an overlapping generations framework using cohort-specific birth rates and time-varying population growth.
- Population dynamics: population growth rate n equals birth rate b minus death rate p; population size evolves according to accumulated past changes in growth (equations (1) and (2)).
- Dependency ratio: elderly dependency ratio φ defined as proportion of population above a threshold age j(t); its evolution depends on new dependents, elderly death rates, and population growth (equations (4) and (5)).
- Age-earnings and effective labor supply: individual effective labor supply is hump-shaped over the life cycle (equation (6)); aggregate labor input L aggregates age-specific effective labor and follows a law of motion influenced by new entrants, deaths, and productivity (equation (9)).
- Consumption and saving: agents maximize expected lifetime utility subject to a dynamic budget constraint; optimal consumption depends on financial assets and human wealth (equations (10)–(12)); agents build up precautionary financial wealth and do not necessarily dissave in retirement.
- Human wealth dynamics: aggregate human wealth H evolves with labor taxes, disposable income, pension system financing gaps, and the human wealth of new generations (equation (13) and modified form (17) in presence of social security financing gaps).
- Pension system: transfers tr(s,t) distinguish contributors (younger) and beneficiaries (older); a full-financing condition for transfers requires benefit-to-contribution ratio to equal the support ratio (equation (16)); shortfalls must be closed via general tax revenues or government borrowing.

*Source: IMF Working Paper _wp0695 (2005) — excerpts and model appendix.*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp0695.pdf_