## _wp0737

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [_wp0737](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/_wp0737.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/_wp0737.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/_wp0737.pdf.json)

---

### I. Introduction — fiscal challenge and policy questions
- Japan’s net public debt: "over 85 percent of GDP."
- Cabinet Office projection without adjustment: social security expenditure would reach "22 percent of GDP by 2025," up from "about 18 percent of GDP in 2005."
- Without adjustment, government net debt could rise to "over 150 percent of GDP."
- Authorities’ commitment: achieve a primary balance of the general government (excluding social security) by "2011."
- Key analytical questions addressed:
  - Costs of expenditure cuts versus selected tax increases.
  - Effect of consolidation that stabilizes the debt-to-GDP ratio rather than achieves primary balance.
  - Trade-off between gradual and stop-and-go adjustment.
  - Gains from a revenue-neutral shift from corporate taxation to consumption taxation.
  - Spillover effects of fiscal consolidation in Japan to its trading partners.

### II. Analytical framework — IMF’s Global Fiscal Model (two-country, calibrated to Japan)
- Model departures from Ricardian equivalence and key features:
  - Consumers have finite horizons (overlapping-generations/perpetual youth structure).
  - Taxes are distortionary; labor supply and capital accumulation decisions endogenous.
  - Markets not fully competitive; firms and workers have monopolistic power.
  - A fraction of consumers are liquidity constrained.
- Tax instruments modeled:
  - Payroll tax, corporate income tax, personal income tax, VAT (equivalent to a sales tax).
  - Assumption: single marginal rate per tax coinciding with the average tax rate.
- Uses of revenue: lump-sum transfers, government consumption of nontraded goods (home bias), servicing government debt.
- Calibration highlights:
  - Ratios of consumption, investment, government spending, wage income, and capital income to GDP set to current values.
  - Tax rates calibrated to match observed revenue yields for VAT, social security contributions by employers, personal income tax, corporate income tax.
  - Social security contributions by workers adjust endogenously.
- Behavioral parameter baseline and alternatives:
  - Sensitivity of labor supply to the real wage: baseline "0.08".
  - Elasticity of intertemporal substitution: baseline "0.33"; alternative "0.2".
  - Wedge between rate of time preference and yield on government bonds: baseline "5 percent"; alternative "10 percent". Baseline implies effective planning horizon of "twenty years."
  - Fraction liquidity constrained: baseline "40 percent" of population (≈ "20 percent of total private consumption"); alternative assumes all consumers can use financial markets.
- Other model ingredients:
  - CES functions for consumption and production; traded and non-traded goods with home bias.
  - Two factors: capital and labor; no international factor mobility.
  - Investment via Tobin’s Q with adjustment costs; wages and prices fully flexible; central bank implements money targeting.
  - Two financial assets: government debt (traded internationally) and equity (held domestically). International trade in government debt implies equalization of nominal interest rates across countries over time.

### III. Alternative fiscal adjustment strategies — composition, size, pace, timing
A. Composition of Fiscal Adjustment
- Required adjustment to attain primary balance by "2011": roughly "½ percent of GDP each year" (or combination of measures).
- Options considered:
  - (i) lower government transfers, (ii) lower government spending, (iii) higher workers’ social security contribution, (iv) higher employers’ social security contribution, (v) higher personal income taxes, (vi) higher corporate income taxes, (vii) higher consumption taxes, (viii) a package combining expenditure reductions and tax increases.
- Illustrative single-measure magnitudes to reach primary balance by "2011":
  - Doubling consumption tax rate to "10 percent" from "5.0" actual rate (effective rate from "4.5" to "8.3"; revenue from "2.0" to "4.5" percent of GDP).
  - A "5 percentage-point increase in the corporate income tax" (corporate actual rate from "7.5" to "12.5"; revenue from "2.6" to "5.1" percent of GDP).
  - About a "25 percentage-point cut" in discretionary central government spending (goods and services fall from "6.2" to "3.7" percent of GDP; transfers from "4.1" to "1.6" percent of GDP; cumulative percent changes "–25.0" and "–54.3" respectively over 2006–11).
- Short-run output cost comparisons:
  - Cutting social security transfers is less damaging to growth than cutting other spending or increasing taxes (acts like lump-sum tax; mainly reduces demand of liquidity-constrained households).
  - Consumption tax increase qualitatively similar to transfer cuts but amplified: reduces output and nominal interest rates; real interest rates decline supporting investment; lower imports improve the current account.
  - Reduction in government spending decreases demand (especially non-traded goods), lowers nominal interest rates and prices; real interest rate rises, crowding out private investment and reinforcing adverse output effects; real exchange rate depreciates less than under consumption tax or transfer cut.
  - A package combining lower government spending and higher taxes compares favorably to strategies solely increasing consumption tax or reducing government expenditure (result independent of sequencing).
- Relative effects of revenue measures:
  - Consumption tax increase has the least negative effect on output among revenue measures.
  - Corporate income tax increase entails larger short-term output costs because it discourages investment and reduces consumption for capital-owning consumers; fall in real interest rate following consolidation mitigates effects.
- Simulated primary-balance scenarios (excluding social security):
  - Net debt ratio rises to around "130 percent of GDP" from "90 percent of GDP" after "25 years."
  - Consolidation scenario with transfers yields lowest debt ratio (~"125 percent").
  - Lowering government spending on goods and services generates highest debt ratio (~"135 percent").
- Spillovers to rest of world from planned consolidation of "2½ percent over 5 years":
  - Limited spillovers; largely invariant to consolidation strategy.
  - Trade channel: initial reduction in Japan’s imports reduces foreign growth; small effect on world output given Japan’s share.
  - Finance channel: medium-term lower debt ratio associated with higher national savings, lower world interest rates, and higher investment domestically and abroad.

B. Size, Pace, and Timing of Adjustment
- Debt stabilization requires adjustment of at least "¾ percent of GDP on average per year" or "3¾ percent of GDP over 5 years."
- Larger consolidation: larger short-run output costs but higher longer-term growth via stimulated labor effort and consumption (lower anticipated tax burden and higher after-tax real wages).
- Rest of world benefits via lower world interest rates and financing room for additional capital spending despite reduced Japanese import demand.
- Timing scenarios simulated to stabilize debt ratio:
  - Gradual scenario: sustained adjustment of "½ percent of GDP a year over eight years."
  - Stop-and-go scenario: envisages a pause in adjustment for "three years."
- Findings on timing:
  - Less front-loaded (delayed) adjustment limits short-term negative effects but reduces long-term benefits due to higher debt and crowding out of private domestic and foreign investment through higher interest rates.
  - Trade-off increases with shortening of consumers’ planning horizon; model does not incorporate menu costs (which may argue against gradual increases, particularly in consumption tax).

### IV. Tax reform — shifting corporate taxation toward consumption taxation
- Context: Japan has the highest statutory corporate tax rates and the lowest consumption tax rate among G8 countries, indicating scope for reform.
- Reform simulated: reduce corporate income tax by "0.5 percentage point a year for five years," offset by VAT increases that leave reform revenue neutral.
  - Required effective VAT-rate increase: about "2 percentage points" (described as "slightly less than the envisaged decline in the corporate income tax rate").
- Short-run effects:
  - Small and temporary decline in real GDP as higher VAT dampens consumption, particularly of liquidity constrained consumers.
  - Reform is regressive in the short run.
- Long-run effects:
  - National saving increases substantially.
  - Interest rate declines.
  - Increased capital accumulation leads to higher output over time.
  - Improvement in the current account balance in a sustained manner.
- Distributional and intergenerational note:
  - Revenue-neutral shift from corporate taxation to consumption taxation could be justified on intergenerational equity grounds in the context of an aging population.
- External effects:
  - Spillovers to the rest of the world are positive, albeit modest.

### V. Sensitivity analysis and robustness
- Key behavioral determinants: planning horizon of consumers, fraction of liquidity constrained consumers, elasticity of labor supply, intertemporal elasticity of substitution, substitutability between capital and labor.
- Robustness summary: results are robust to changes in behavioral parameters; benefits and spillovers remain modest but positive across alternative assumptions.
- Specific sensitivity findings:
  - Labor supply sensitivity: expenditure reduction becomes more attractive if workers are more sensitive to real wages.
  - Timing of consolidation: impact depends on consumers' planning horizon and sensitivity to interest rates; longer planning horizons reduce the impact of fiscal consolidation on real interest rates and the current account.
  - Tax reform under alternative parameters:
    - Less elastic labor supply increases benefits of shifting from corporate income taxation to indirect taxation.
    - Lower intertemporal elasticity of substitution reduces sensitivity of savings to interest rates, implying a larger negative effect on interest rates from tax reform.
    - Lower markups (higher competition) increase distortionary effects of corporate income taxation; benefits of reform are somewhat smaller with lower markups because wages bear a larger share of adjustment.
    - Planning horizon and access to financial markets have a more limited impact on benefits; effects depend on whether households perceive tax-rate changes as permanent or transitory.
  - Overall: stimulating saving and encouraging investment yields positive but modest spillovers to the foreign economy in most cases.

### VI. Short-run versus long-run consolidation and growth
- Net Present Value of Growth (deviation from control, percentage point):
  - Cumulative impact of consolidation on growth is positive for strategies based on reducing transfers, increasing the consumption tax, or a combination of expenditure cuts and tax increases.
  - Cumulative impact is negative for strategies based on raising corporate taxes or personal income taxes.
- Timing and structure:
  - A front-loaded consolidation that accounts for future aging costs and stabilizes the debt ratio entails greater long-term benefits than an adjustment that targets primary balance (excluding social security), but carries somewhat larger short-term output costs.
  - A less front-loaded or stop-and-go approach limits short-term output costs but reduces longer-term benefits.
  - Shifting from corporate taxation to consumption taxation facilitates fiscal adjustment and locks in permanent gains.
- External effects:
  - Spillovers to the rest of the world from consolidation in Japan are positive in the medium term, but modest.

### VII. Key baseline macroeconomic and fiscal parameters (initial steady state)
- Country size: Japan 11.5; Rest of the World 88.5
- Percent share of world real income: Japan 11.4; Rest of the World 88.7
- National expenditure accounts at market prices (Japan / Rest of the World):
  - Consumption: 57.0 / 51.5
    - Rule-of-thumb: 12.4 / 7.2
    - Forward-looking: 44.6 / 44.3
    - Domestic: 47.4 / 50.1
    - Imported: 9.5 / 1.4
  - Investment: 18.1 / 18.7
    - For tradables: 3.1 / 4.2
    - For non-tradables: 15.0 / 14.6
    - Domestic: 15.1 / 18.2
    - Imported: 3.0 / 0.5
  - Government expenditures: 22.7 / 30.0
  - Exports: 14.4 / 1.6
    - Of consumption goods: 10.4 / 1.2
    - Of investment goods: 4.0 / 0.4
  - Imports: 12.2 / 1.8
    - Of consumption goods: 9.1 / 1.3
    - Of investment goods: 3.0 / 0.5
- Tradable/nontradable split:
  - Tradables: 15.7 / 20.2
    - Domestic: 1.1 / 8.6
    - Imported: 12.3 / 1.9
    - Net exports: 2.3 / -0.3
  - Nontradables: 84.3 / 79.8
- Factor incomes:
  - Capital: 37.7 / 36.1
  - Labor: 62.4 / 63.9
- Interest rate:
  - Real short-term interest rate: 2.0 / 2.0
- Government:
  - Debt: 87.5 / 40.0
- Tax rates and revenue shares:
  - Workers' social security contribution (effective): 20.1 / 32.4
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 4.8 / 11.7
  - Employers' social security contribution (effective): 11.0 / 11.0
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 4.5 / 5.0
  - Corporate income:
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 3.7 / 3.3
    - Of which on capital income: 7.5 / 7.5
      - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 1.0 / 1.0
    - Of which on dividend income (profits): 7.5 / 7.5
      - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 2.7 / 2.3
  - Personal income: 9.5 / 9.5
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 7.5 / 7.1
  - Consumption (effective VAT rate): 4.4 / 6.0
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 2.5 / 3.0

### VIII. Behavioral assumptions and GFM model structure (overview)
- Behavioral assumptions (Japan / Rest of the World):
  - Planning horizon of consumers: 20 years / 12.5 years
  - Labor disutility parameters: 0.92 / 0.92
  - Fraction of rule-of-thumb consumers: 0.40 / 0.25
  - Intertemporal elasticity of substitution: 0.33 / 0.33
- Other key parameters:
  - Elasticity of substitution between capital and labor: 0.93 / 0.93
  - Effective discount rate: 0.92 / 0.92
  - Depreciation rate on capital: 0.12 / 0.07
  - Capital adjustment cost parameters: 1.00 / 0.60
  - Elasticity of substitution between varieties (tradables): 4.85 / 7.67
    - Price markup over marginal cost: 1.26 / 1.15
  - Elasticity of substitution between varieties (nontradables): 3.44 / 4.23
    - Price markup over marginal cost: 1.41 / 1.31
  - Capital share in production tradables sector: 0.42 / 0.42
  - Capital share in production nontradables sector: 0.42 / 0.42
  - Utility from real money balances: 0.02 / 0.02
  - Price stickiness parameters: 0 / 0
  - Home bias in government consumption: yes / yes
  - Home bias in private consumption: no / no
  - Elasticity of substitution between traded and nontraded goods: 0.75 / 0.75
  - Bias toward domestically produced tradables over nontradables: 0.20 / 0.30
- GFM two-country overview:
  - Home country = Japan; foreign country = rest of the world.
  - Incomplete international markets: only nominal non-contingent bonds traded internationally (both denominated in home currency).
  - Complete home bias in equity holdings and government debt.
  - Households derive utility from consumption, leisure, and real money balances; rule-of-thumb consumers (share Ψ) matter for short-run demand responses.
  - Firms face corporate tax τп on return to capital and excess profits; set prices above marginal cost.
  - Fiscal closure via target debt-to-GDP ratio b* with aggregate tax rate τ adjusting to close debt gap; tax adjustment rule includes smoothing term v2>0.
  - External sector: current account equals interest receipts on NFA plus trade balance; real exchange rate determined via uncovered interest parity.

*Source: _wp0737*

### References..............................................................................................................

### _wp0737 - References

### I. Introduction
- Japan’s net public debt is reported as "over 85 percent of GDP."
- Cabinet Office estimate: in the absence of adjustment, social security expenditure will reach "22 percent of GDP by 2025," up from "about 18 percent of GDP in 2005."
- Without adjustment, government net debt could rise to "over 150 percent of GDP."
- Authorities’ commitment: achieve a primary balance of the general government (excluding social security) by "2011."
- Key questions addressed:
  - Costs of expenditure cuts versus selected tax increases.
  - Effect of consolidation that stabilizes the debt-to-GDP ratio rather than achieves primary balance.
  - Trade-off between gradual and stop-and-go adjustment.
  - Gains from a revenue-neutral shift from corporate taxation to consumption taxation.
  - Spillover effects of fiscal consolidation in Japan to its trading partners.

### II. Analytical framework (IMF’s Global Fiscal Model — two-country version calibrated to Japan)
- Model features and departures from Ricardian equivalence:
  - Consumers have finite horizons (overlapping-generations/perpetual youth structure).
  - Taxes are distortionary; labor supply and capital accumulation decisions are endogenous; markets not fully competitive; firms and workers have monopolistic power.
  - A fraction of consumers are liquidity constrained.
- Taxes incorporated: payroll tax, corporate income tax, personal income tax, VAT (equivalent to a sales tax). Assumption: single marginal rate per tax coinciding with the average tax rate.
- Revenue uses: lump-sum transfers, government consumption of nontraded goods (home bias), servicing government debt.
- Calibration:
  - Ratios of consumption, investment, government spending, wage income, and income from capital to GDP set to current values (Tables 1 and 2 referenced).
  - Tax rates calibrated so revenue yields equal observed figures in Japan (VAT, social security contributions by employers, personal income tax, corporate income tax). Social security contributions by workers adjust endogenously.
- Behavioral parameters (baseline and alternatives):
  - Sensitivity of labor supply to the real wage: baseline "0.08"; alternative assumes value close to lower limits (inelastic labor supply).
  - Elasticity of intertemporal substitution: baseline "0.33"; alternative "0.2".
  - Wedge between rate of time preference and yield on government bonds: baseline "5 percent"; alternative "10 percent". Baseline implies effective planning horizon of "twenty years."
  - Fraction liquidity constrained: baseline "40 percent" of population (translates into about "20 percent of total private consumption"); alternative assumes all consumers can use financial markets.
- Other model aspects:
  - Constant elasticity of substitution functions for consumption and production.
  - Traded and non-traded goods; home bias.
  - Two factors of production: capital and labor; domestic mobility across sectors; no international factor mobility.
  - Investment driven by Tobin’s Q with adjustment costs; wages and prices fully flexible; central bank implements money targeting.
  - Two financial assets: government debt (traded internationally) and equity (held domestically). International trade in government debt implies equalization of nominal interest rates across countries over time.

### III. Alternative fiscal adjustment strategies
A. Composition of Fiscal Adjustment
- To attain primary balance by "2011" requires roughly "½ percent of GDP each year" or a combination of measures.
- Options considered: (i) lower government transfers, (ii) lower government spending, (iii) higher workers’ social security contribution, (iv) higher employers’ social security contribution, (v) higher personal income taxes, (vi) higher corporate income taxes, (vii) higher consumption taxes, (viii) a package combining expenditure reductions and tax increases.
- Illustrative single-measure magnitudes to reach primary balance by "2011":
  - Doubling of the consumption tax rate to "10 percent" from "5.0" actual rate (effective rate from "4.5" to "8.3"; revenue from "2.0" to "4.5" percent of GDP).
  - A "5 percentage-point increase in the corporate income tax" (corporate actual rate from "7.5" to "12.5"; revenue from "2.6" to "5.1" percent of GDP).
  - About a "25 percentage-point cut" in discretionary central government spending (spending on goods and services falls from "6.2" to "3.7" percent of GDP; transfers from "4.1" to "1.6" percent of GDP; cumulative percent changes "–25.0" and "–54.3" respectively over 2006–11).
- Short-run output cost comparisons:
  - Reducing social security transfers is less damaging to growth than cutting other spending or increasing taxes because it acts like a lump-sum tax and does not distort labor supply decisions; it mainly reduces demand of liquidity-constrained households.
  - Consumption tax increase has qualitatively similar effects to transfer cuts but amplified: reduces output and nominal interest rates; real interest rates decline supporting investment; lower imports improve the current account.
  - Reduction in government spending decreases demand (especially non-traded goods), lowers nominal interest rates and prices; as prices fall less than interest rates, real interest rate rises, crowding out private investment and reinforcing adverse output effects; real exchange rate depreciates less than under consumption tax or transfer cut.
  - A package combining lower government spending and higher taxes compares favorably to strategies solely increasing consumption tax or reducing government expenditure. This result is independent of sequencing.
- Relative effects of revenue measures:
  - Consumption tax increase has the least negative effect on output among revenue measures because the tax base is the discounted stream of future income and accumulated savings, limiting distortion of consumption-leisure decision.
  - Corporate income tax increase entails larger short-term output costs because it discourages investment (raises after-tax cost of capital) and reduces consumption for capital-owning consumers. Effects mitigated by fall in real interest rate following consolidation. Calibration implies capital is more sensitive to taxes than labor.
- Simulated outcomes for primary-balance scenarios (excluding social security):
  - Net debt ratio rises to around "130 percent of GDP" from "90 percent of GDP" after "25 years."
  - Consolidation scenario with transfers yields lowest debt ratio (~"125 percent").
  - Lowering government spending on goods and services generates highest debt ratio (~"135 percent").
- Spillover effects to rest of world from planned consolidation of "2½ percent over 5 years":
  - Limited spillovers; largely invariant to consolidation strategy.
  - Trade channel: initial reduction in Japan’s imports reduces foreign growth; small effect on world output given Japan’s share in world output.
  - Finance channel: medium-term lower debt ratio associated with higher national savings, lower world interest rates, and higher investment domestically and abroad.

B. Size, Pace, and Timing of Adjustment
- Debt stabilization requires adjustment of at least "¾ percent of GDP on average per year" or "3¾ percent of GDP over 5 years."
- Larger consolidation entails larger short-run output costs but raises longer-term growth by stimulating labor effort and consumption via lower anticipated tax burden and higher after-tax real wages.
- Rest of world benefits from Japan debt stabilization through lower world interest rates and financing room for additional capital spending despite reduced Japanese import demand.
- Timing scenarios simulated to stabilize debt ratio:
  - Gradual scenario: sustained adjustment of "½ percent of GDP a year over eight years" (yields primary surplus necessary to stabilize debt ratio).
  - Stop-and-go scenario: envisages a pause in adjustment for "three years" (text table).
- Findings on timing:
  - Less front-loaded adjustment (delayed) limits short-term negative effects on growth but reduces long-term benefits due to higher debt and crowding out of private domestic and foreign investment through higher interest rates.
  - Trade-off increases with shortening of consumers’ planning horizon; GFM does not incorporate menu costs (which may argue against gradual increases, particularly in consumption tax).

### IV. Tax reform
- Japan has the highest statutory corporate tax rates and the lowest consumption tax rate among G8 countries, suggesting scope for tax reform to enhance efficiency.
- Substituting direct taxation (corporate or labor income) with indirect taxation (consumption) is considered more "growth" friendly.
- The paper analyzes a reduction in the effective corporate income tax rate by (text truncated in source at this point).

*Source: _wp0737 - References*

### 0.5 percentage point a year for five years,

### _wp0737 - 0.5 percentage point a year for five years,

### Tax reform: reducing corporate income tax offset by VAT increases
- Reform design described: reduce corporate income tax by 0.5 percentage point a year for five years, offset by increases in the VAT rate that leaves the reform revenue neutral.
- Required effective VAT-rate increase: about 2 percentage points, described as "slightly less than the envisaged decline in the corporate income tax rate."
- Short-run effects:
  - Small and temporary decline in real GDP as higher VAT dampens consumption, particularly of liquidity constrained consumers.
  - Reform is characterized as regressive in the short run.
- Long-run effects:
  - National saving increases substantially.
  - Interest rate declines.
  - Increased capital accumulation leads to higher output over time.
  - Improvement in the current account balance in a sustained manner.
- Distributional / intergenerational note:
  - A revenue-neutral shift from corporate taxation to consumption taxation could be justified on intergenerational equity grounds in the context of an aging population.
- External effects:
  - Spillovers to the rest of the world are positive, albeit modest.

### Sensitivity analysis (behavioral parameters and robustness)
- Key behavioral determinants highlighted: planning horizon of consumers, fraction of liquidity constrained (rule-of-thumb) consumers, elasticity of labor supply, intertemporal elasticity of substitution, substitutability between capital and labor.
- Robustness summary: results are robust to changes in behavioral parameters; benefits and spillovers remain modest but positive across alternative assumptions.
- Specific sensitivity findings:
  - Labor supply sensitivity:
    - The relative impact of consolidation measures depends on workers' sensitivity to changes in real wages.
    - Expenditure reduction becomes more attractive if workers are more sensitive to real wages because payroll tax or consumption tax increases have larger impacts on consumption-leisure decisions.
  - Timing of consolidation:
    - Impact depends on consumers' planning horizon and sensitivity to interest rates.
    - The longer the planning horizon, the smaller the impact of fiscal consolidation on real interest rates and the current account.
    - With a lower degree of impatience (higher intertemporal elasticity of substitution), consumption is more sensitive to interest-rate changes, implying smaller interest-rate changes are necessary to re-equilibrate world savings and investment.
  - Tax reform benefits under alternative parameters:
    - Less elastic labor supply increases benefits of shifting from corporate income taxation to indirect taxation.
    - A lower intertemporal elasticity of substitution reduces sensitivity of savings to interest rates, implying a larger negative effect on interest rates from tax reform.
    - Lower markups (higher competition) increase distortionary effects of corporate income taxation because a larger share of the tax burden falls on capital rather than on rents; but benefits of reform are somewhat smaller with lower markups because wages bear a larger share of adjustment.
    - Planning horizon and access to financial markets have a more limited impact on benefits; effects depend on whether households perceive tax-rate changes as permanent or transitory.
    - Overall, stimulating saving and encouraging investment yields positive but modest spill-over effects to the foreign economy in most cases.

### Short-run vs. long-run fiscal consolidation strategies and growth
- Net present value calculations (Net Present Value of Growth, in deviation from control, percentage point) indicate:
  - Cumulative impact of consolidation on growth is positive for strategies based on reducing transfers, increasing the consumption tax, or a combination of expenditure cuts and tax increases.
  - Cumulative impact is negative for strategies based on raising corporate taxes or personal income taxes.
- Timing and structure of consolidation:
  - A front-loaded consolidation that accounts for future aging costs and stabilizes the debt ratio entails greater long-term benefits than an adjustment that targets primary balance (excluding social security), but carries somewhat larger short-term output costs.
  - A less front-loaded or stop-and-go approach limits short-term output costs but reduces longer-term benefits.
  - Shifting from corporate taxation to consumption taxation facilitates fiscal adjustment and locks in permanent gains.
- External effects:
  - Spillovers to the rest of the world from consolidation in Japan are positive in the medium term, but modest.

### Key baseline macroeconomic and fiscal parameters (initial steady state, Japan and Rest of the World)
- Country size: Japan 11.5; Rest of the World 88.5
- Percent share of world real income: Japan 11.4; Rest of the World 88.7
- National expenditure accounts at market prices (Japan / Rest of the World):
  - Consumption: 57.0 / 51.5
    - Rule-of-thumb: 12.4 / 7.2
    - Forward-looking: 44.6 / 44.3
    - Domestic: 47.4 / 50.1
    - Imported: 9.5 / 1.4
  - Investment: 18.1 / 18.7
    - For tradables: 3.1 / 4.2
    - For non-tradables: 15.0 / 14.6
    - Domestic: 15.1 / 18.2
    - Imported: 3.0 / 0.5
  - Government expenditures: 22.7 / 30.0
  - Exports: 14.4 / 1.6
    - Of consumption goods: 10.4 / 1.2
    - Of investment goods: 4.0 / 0.4
  - Imports: 12.2 / 1.8
    - Of consumption goods: 9.1 / 1.3
    - Of investment goods: 3.0 / 0.5
- Tradable/nontradable split:
  - Tradables: 15.7 / 20.2
    - Domestic: 1.1 / 8.6
    - Imported: 12.3 / 1.9
    - Net exports: 2.3 / -0.3
  - Nontradables: 84.3 / 79.8
- Factor incomes:
  - Capital: 37.7 / 36.1
  - Labor: 62.4 / 63.9
- Interest rate:
  - Real short-term interest rate: 2.0 / 2.0
- Government:
  - Debt: 87.5 / 40.0
- Tax rates and revenue shares:
  - On workers' social security contribution (effective): 20.1 / 32.4
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 4.8 / 11.7
  - On employers' social security contribution (effective): 11.0 / 11.0
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 4.5 / 5.0
  - On corporate income:
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 3.7 / 3.3
    - Of which on capital income: 7.5 / 7.5
      - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 1.0 / 1.0
    - Of which on dividend income (profits): 7.5 / 7.5
      - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 2.7 / 2.3
  - On personal income: 9.5 / 9.5
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 7.5 / 7.1
  - On consumption (effective VAT rate): 4.4 / 6.0
    - Revenue as a percent of GDP: 2.5 / 3.0

### Behavioral assumptions and key parameters (initial steady state)
- Behavioral assumptions subject to sensitivity analysis (Japan / Rest of the World):
  - Planning horizon of consumers: 20 years / 12.5 years
  - Labor disutility parameters: 0.92 / 0.92
  - Fraction of rule-of-thumb consumers: 0.40 / 0.25
  - Intertemporal elasticity of substitution: 0.33 / 0.33
- Other key parameters:
  - Elasticity of substitution between capital and labor: 0.93 / 0.93
  - Effective discount rate: 0.92 / 0.92
  - Depreciation rate on capital: 0.12 / 0.07
  - Capital adjustment cost parameters: 1.00 / 0.60
  - Elasticity of substitution between varieties (tradables): 4.85 / 7.67
    - Price markup over marginal cost: 1.26 / 1.15
  - Elasticity of substitution between varieties (nontradables): 3.44 / 4.23
    - Price markup over marginal cost: 1.41 / 1.31
  - Capital share in production tradables sector: 0.42 / 0.42
  - Capital share in production nontradables sector: 0.42 / 0.42
  - Utility from real money balances: 0.02 / 0.02
  - Price stickiness parameters: 0 / 0
  - Home bias in government consumption: yes / yes
  - Home bias in private consumption: no / no
  - Elasticity of substitution between traded and nontraded goods: 0.75 / 0.75
  - Bias toward domestically produced tradables over nontradables: 0.20 / 0.30

### Model structure (GFM two-country overview)
- Two-country GFM: home country = Japan; foreign country = rest of the world.
- Population and firm structure:
  - In each period, n individuals born in home economy and 1-n in foreign economy; relative size equals n/(1-n).
  - Unit measure of monopolistic firms producing differentiated varieties; n located home and 1-n abroad.
- Asset markets:
  - Incomplete markets; only nominal non-contingent bonds traded internationally.
  - Both bonds denominated in home currency.
  - Complete home bias in equity holdings and government debt.
- Households:
  - Utility from consumption C, leisure (1-L), and real money balances M/P with parameters β, ρ, η, χ, and survival probability q.
  - Insurance companies charge premium (1-q)/q and confiscate wealth of deceased to redistribute.
  - Optimality conditions yield Euler equation and labor supply schedule; labor-income tax is distortionary.
  - Consumption decision expressed as sum of human wealth and financial holdings; Ψ denotes share of rule-of-thumb consumers; D is marginal propensity to consume out of total wealth.
- Goods aggregation:
  - Final consumption good composed of traded C_T and nontraded C_N via CES functions; traded goods combine home C_H and foreign C_F.
  - Individual varieties aggregated with CES integrals.
- Firms:
  - Firms maximize discounted dividends subject to CES production and capital law of motion.
  - Corporate tax τп applies to return on capital and excess profits from monopolistic competition.
  - Firms set prices above marginal cost exploiting monopoly power.
- Government and fiscal policy:
  - Government spending G falls on nontraded goods; financed by taxes, debt issuance, and seignorage.
  - Fiscal closure via target debt-to-GDP ratio b*; aggregate tax rate τ adjusts to close debt gap, with potential rule parameter φ to fix tax temporarily.
  - Tax adjustment rule includes v2>0 term to prevent excessive tax-rate cycling.
- External sector:
  - Current account balance equals interest receipts on NFA plus trade balance: TBAL + AiCBAL.
  - Change in NFA equals current account balance.
  - Real exchange rate determined via uncovered interest parity: (1 + r*)/(1 + r) = RER_{t+1}/RER_t.

*Source: GFM simulations and model description in the provided document.*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/_wp0737.pdf_