## _wp0879

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [_wp0879](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp0879.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp0879.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp0879.pdf.json)

---

### Introduction and scope
- Uses firm-level data from the Prowess database (CMIE), covering detailed financial statement data for about 9,000 companies; sample includes from 3,300 to over 6,000 companies for fiscal years 1993/94 to 2005/06 after omitting errors and incomplete observations.
- External funds defined as long-term domestic and foreign debt, equity, and trade credit; total funds defined as external funds plus retained earnings and depreciation.
- Empirical strategy relies on the Rajan and Zingales (RZ) external finance-dependence measure (RZ_us) calculated from U.S. data (de Serres, et al (2006), ISIC 2-digit), used as an instrument for inherent external finance demand by industry.

### Are Indian firms increasingly relying on external funds?
- Share of external funds in total funds gradually declined through 2003/04 (Table 2, left panel).
- Median share of “core” external funds (formal/active sources: long-term debt and equity, excluding trade credit) fell sharply from 26 percent of total funds in 2000/01 percent to 9 percent in 2002/03 and 2003/04 (Table 2, right panel).
- The share of “core” external funds recovered to about 16 percent in 2005/06 (Table 2, right panel).
- Use of foreign borrowing increased and became more widespread across sectors (Table 4, left panel).
- Factors influencing patterns:
  - Domestic cycle: corporate investment declined by about 5 percent of GDP from the mid-1990s peak through 2001/02; pickup in external funds coincides with investment pickup starting 2002/03.
  - Corporate tax rate decline: from 60–75 percent in early 1990s to 45 percent in 2005/06 (including surcharges).
  - Global influences: de-leveraging in emerging markets since 2000; corporate sectors in G-7 turned into net savers around turn of century.
- Cross-section patterns:
  - Age: younger firms rely more on external finance (higher share of external funds and higher external funds relative to investment).
  - Size: smaller firms have limited access to formal external finance, rely more on trade credit and owner-equity; larger firms more likely to borrow from abroad.

### Signs of financing constraints / uneven financial development
- Macro indicators (2003/04–2006/07):
  - Annual growth rate of bank credit to the corporate sector averaged 30 percent y/y.
  - Bank credit share in GDP increased by 5 percentage points to over 16 percent of GDP.
  - Market capitalization of the Bombay Stock Exchange in percent of GDP more than tripled to over 100 percent of GDP (between 2002/03 and mid-2007).
  - Capital inflows: accelerated from 2 percent of GDP in 2002/03 to 5 percent of GDP in 2006/07; FDI inflows into Indian companies increased by 1 percentage point of GDP; external commercial borrowing disbursements to corporations rose by 2.5 percentage points of GDP.
- Underdevelopment of debt markets:
  - Corporate debt (bank credit to corporates plus corporate bonds) to GDP ratio remained below 20 percent in 2006/07, compared with average 60 percent in emerging markets (near 80 percent in emerging Asia, 30 percent in emerging Latin America, and over 20 percent in emerging Europe (IMF, 2005)).
  - Corporate bond market under 5 percent of GDP, versus over 20 percent of GDP in Thailand, Chile, and Mexico, and 50–100 percent of GDP in more advanced economies.
  - Identified impediments: fragmented tax structure, low transparency, restrictive issuance rules, lack of repo markets, quantitative limits on investor base.
- Regulatory constraints on banks noted: Statutory Liquidity Requirement (banks must invest a minimum of 25 percent of deposits in government securities) and priority sector lending requirement (mandates banks lend a minimum of 40 percent of net credit to the priority sector).

### Empirical findings on financing patterns (summary of regression results)
- Overall approach: regressions of firm capital-structure measures and firm growth on firm characteristics and industry RZ_us; samples: 1993/94–2005/06 (whole), 1993/94–1998/99 (first half), 1999/00–2005/06 (second half). Dependent variables are period averages (stocks or flows as specified).
- Determinants of External Funds Use (Table 5; dependent variable: percent share of external funds (flow) over total funds):
  - RZ_us coefficient: negative and significant for the whole sample and the 1990s sub-sample, implying India’s financial system did not allocate more external funds to industries with higher external finance dependence in those samples.
  - Firm characteristics: Size (log, sales) positive and significant (e.g., 2.467*** in one specification); Profitability (ROA) negative and significant (e.g., -1.601*** in one specification).
  - Ownership dummies: Foreign and government-owned firms use less external finance overall, especially debt; private group dummy negative in some specifications.
  - Number of observations: examples include 934, 425, 142, 073, 621, 278, 24 (as reported in Table 5).
  - R-square examples: 0.20, 0.30, 0.18, 0.29, 0.03, 0.12 (as reported).
- Determinants of Leverage (Table 6; dependent variable: debt-to-assets ratio):
  - RZ_us coefficient: not significantly different from zero for any of the three samples in the debt regressions.
  - Firm characteristics conform to expected signs: size positive, profitability negative, asset tangibility generally positive.
- Determinants of Foreign Borrowing Use (Table 7; dependent variable: foreign debt in percent of total assets; columns for “All” firms and “Access” subset):
  - RZ_us coefficient: either not significantly different from zero or significantly negative across cases, indicating lack of evidence that finance-intensive firms went abroad to avoid domestic constraints.
  - Foreign debt mostly accessed by large firms; size impact significant when estimation limited to firms with foreign debt access.
  - Asset tangibility associated with increased foreign borrowing in some specifications.
- Determinants of Equity-to-Assets (Table 8; dependent variable: ratio of equity to total assets):
  - RZ_us coefficient: generally positive and significant, indicating equity markets are tapped more by industries with higher external finance dependence.
  - Equity provides an important source of finance for young and small firms with high growth opportunities in recent years.
- Determinants of Firm Growth (Table 9; dependent variable: annual average growth rate of firm gross value added):
  - RZ_us coefficient: negative and significant in the reported specifications, indicating that firms in industries with higher external finance dependence grow more slowly than others.
  - Firm controls: age mostly negatively related to firm growth; high profitability positively correlated with growth; access to foreign finance seems to contribute positively to growth.
  - Number of observations examples and R-squares reported in Table 9 (e.g., Number of observations 867, 394, 129, 767, 819, 198, 01; R-square examples 0.32, 0.32, 0.15, 0.24, 0.05, 0.19).

### Key quantitative macro and market facts (exact values preserved)
- Bank credit to corporate sector annual growth (2003/04–2006/07): averaged 30 percent y/y.
- Bank credit share in GDP: increased by 5 percentage points to over 16 percent of GDP.
- Market capitalization of the Bombay Stock Exchange: more than tripled to over 100 percent of GDP (between 2002/03 and mid-2007).
- Capital inflows: increased from 2 percent of GDP in 2002/03 to 5 percent of GDP in 2006/07.
  - FDI inflows into Indian companies: increased by 1 percentage point of GDP.
  - External commercial borrowing disbursements to corporations: rose by 2.5 percentage points of GDP.
- Corporate debt to GDP (2006/07): remained below 20 percent.
- Corporate bond market: less than 5 percent of GDP.
- Corporate tax rate: reduced from 60–75 percent in early 1990s to 45 percent in 2005/06 (including surcharges).
- Median share of “core” external funds: 26 percent in 2000/01 percent; 9 percent in 2002/03 and 2003/04; about 16 percent in 2005/06.

### Policy implications and interpretation
- Main policy implication: having an efficient equity market does not fully compensate for underdeveloped debt financing opportunities; evidence points to inefficiencies particularly in debt financing mechanisms (banks and corporate bond market).
- Arguments for upgrading debt financing facilities in India:
  - Debt instruments can provide optimal contracts when verification is costly (Townsend (1979), Diamond (1984), Gale and Hellwig (1985)).
  - Debt market development helps foster other financial products (predictable cash flows facilitate structuring derivatives).
  - Banks and markets are complementary: intermediaries and markets can serve different client segments and tasks (information acquisition, monitoring, aggregation, product tailoring).
  - Empirical findings show equity markets channel funds to finance-intensive industries but debt markets do not align with industry external finance dependence, and higher industry external finance dependence is associated with lower firm growth.
- Policy focus recommended: upgrade debt markets and banking sector to improve capital allocation efficiency and support sustained productivity and investment-led growth.

### Conclusion
- Evidence from firm-level data in India indicates:
  - Increasing use of external funds in recent years (although levels are below 1990s peak).
  - Signs of inefficiency in allocation of debt finance; debt and foreign borrowing patterns do not correspond to industries’ external finance dependence.
  - Equity markets appear more responsive to finance-intensive industries.
  - Industries with higher external finance dependence exhibit slower firm growth, consistent with financing constraints.
- Policy recommendation: financial sector development in India should include focused measures to develop debt financing facilities (bank credit allocation efficiency and corporate bond market development) to complement the equity market and support sustained growth and better capital allocation.

### Appendix Table. Industries' Dependence on External Finance (U.S.) — References (content overview)
- The references cover theoretical and empirical literature on financial intermediation, corporate finance, financial systems, and links between finance and economic growth.
- Major topics and recurring themes:
  - Financial intermediation, delegated monitoring, and incentive-compatible contracts (e.g., Diamond, 1984; Townsend, 1979; Gale and Hellwig, 1985).
  - Bank- versus market-based financial systems and firm financing choices (e.g., Demirgüç-Kunt and Maksimovic, 1996 and 2002; Beck and Levine, 2002).
  - Finance and economic growth; causality between financial development and growth (e.g., King and Levine, 1993; Levine, Loayza, and Beck, 2000; Levine and Zervos, 1998).
  - Corporate finance, capital structure, and firm growth (e.g., Harris and Raviv, 1991; Rajan and Zingales, 1995).
  - Firm-level evidence on financing patterns, misallocation, and productivity (e.g., Hsieh and Klenow, 2007).
  - Country- and region-specific studies relevant to external finance and corporate sector development (e.g., Allen et al., 2006; Topalova, 2004; World Bank, 2006; IMF, 2004 and 2005).
  - Methodological and theoretical contributions to corporate finance and financial systems (e.g., Diamond, 1991; Lucas, 1988; Rajan and Zingales, 1998).

### Notable authors and frequent citations
- Repeatedly cited authors include: Allen, F.; Demirgüç-Kunt, A.; Maksimovic, V.; Levine, R.; Rajan, R.; Zingales, L.; Diamond, D.; Townsend, R.; and World Bank and IMF institutional publications.
- Publication types include: Journal of Political Economy; Journal of Finance; Review of Economic Studies; Journal of Financial Economics; World Bank Economic Review; IMF Working Papers; NBER Working Papers; books by MIT Press and other academic publishers.

### Implications for the associated appendix table
- The references emphasize empirical and theoretical foundations for studying industries' dependence on external finance, including:
  - Distinctions between bank-based and market-based financing and their effects on firm growth.
  - Measures of financial dependence, capital structure, and firm-level financing patterns.
  - Cross-country and sectoral analyses that inform interpretation of U.S. industry data on external finance reliance.

*Source: _wp0879 - Appendix Table (Prowess firm-level analysis and appendix tables as presented).*

### References..............................................................................................................

### _wp0879 - References................................................................................................................................27

### Figures
- 1.    India: The Corporate Sector and Growth..........................................................................16
- 2.    India: Sources of External Funds, Aggregate, Flow.........................................................16

### Tables
- 1.    Distributions of Firms in the Study: Number of Firms.....................................................17
- 2.    Distributions of Firms in the Study: External Funds in Percent of Total Funds ..............18
- 3.    Distributions of Firms in the Study: Equity-to-Asset and Debt-to-Asset Ratios..............19
- 4.    Distributions of Firms in the Study: Foreign Borrowing to Asset Ratio and  
            External Funds Relative to Capital Expenditure..........................................................20
- 5.    Determinants of External Funds Use in India...................................................................21
- 6.    Determinants of Leverage in India, Debt-to-Assets Ratio................................................22
- 7.    Determinants of Foreign Borrowing Use in India ............................................................23
- 8.    Determinants of External Funds Use in India...................................................................24
- 9.    Determinants of Firm Growth ..........................................................................................25

*Source: _wp0879 - References..............................................................................................................*

### Appendix Table

### _wp0879 - Appendix Table

### Introduction and scope
- Uses firm-level data from the Prowess database (CMIE), covering detailed financial statement data for about 9,000 companies; sample includes from 3,300 to over 6,000 companies for fiscal years 1993/94 to 2005/06 after omitting errors and incomplete observations.
- External funds defined as long-term domestic and foreign debt, equity, and trade credit; total funds defined as external funds plus retained earnings and depreciation.
- Empirical strategy relies on the Rajan and Zingales (RZ) external finance-dependence measure (RZ_us) calculated from U.S. data (de Serres, et al (2006), ISIC 2-digit), used as an instrument for inherent external finance demand by industry.

### Are Indian firms increasingly relying on external funds?
- Share of external funds in total funds gradually declined through 2003/04 (Table 2, left panel).
- Median share of “core” external funds (formal/active sources: long-term debt and equity, excluding trade credit) fell sharply from 26 percent of total funds in 2000/01 percent to 9 percent in 2002/03 and 2003/04 (Table 2, right panel).
- The share of “core” external funds recovered to about 16 percent in 2005/06 (Table 2, right panel).
- Use of foreign borrowing increased and became more widespread across sectors (Table 4, left panel).
- Factors influencing patterns:
  - Domestic cycle: corporate investment declined by about 5 percent of GDP from the mid-1990s peak through 2001/02; pickup in external funds coincides with investment pickup starting 2002/03.
  - Corporate tax rate decline: from 60–75 percent in early 1990s to 45 percent in 2005/06 (including surcharges).
  - Global influences: de-leveraging in emerging markets since 2000; corporate sectors in G-7 turned into net savers around turn of century.
- Cross-section patterns:
  - Age: younger firms rely more on external finance (higher share of external funds and higher external funds relative to investment).
  - Size: smaller firms have limited access to formal external finance, rely more on trade credit and owner-equity; larger firms more likely to borrow from abroad.

### Signs of financing constraints / uneven financial development
- Macro indicators (2003/04–2006/07):
  - Annual growth rate of bank credit to the corporate sector averaged 30 percent y/y.
  - Bank credit share in GDP increased by 5 percentage points to over 16 percent of GDP.
  - Market capitalization of the Bombay Stock Exchange in percent of GDP more than tripled to over 100 percent of GDP (between 2002/03 and mid-2007).
  - Capital inflows: accelerated from 2 percent of GDP in 2002/03 to 5 percent of GDP in 2006/07; FDI inflows into Indian companies increased by 1 percentage point of GDP; external commercial borrowing disbursements to corporations rose by 2.5 percentage points of GDP.
- Underdevelopment of debt markets:
  - Corporate debt (bank credit to corporates plus corporate bonds) to GDP ratio remained below 20 percent in 2006/07, compared with average 60 percent in emerging markets (near 80 percent in emerging Asia, 30 percent in emerging Latin America, and over 20 percent in emerging Europe (IMF, 2005)).
  - Corporate bond market under 5 percent of GDP, versus over 20 percent of GDP in Thailand, Chile, and Mexico, and 50–100 percent of GDP in more advanced economies.
  - Identified impediments: fragmented tax structure, low transparency, restrictive issuance rules, lack of repo markets, quantitative limits on investor base.
- Regulatory constraints on banks noted: Statutory Liquidity Requirement (banks must invest a minimum of 25 percent of deposits in government securities) and priority sector lending requirement (mandates banks lend a minimum of 40 percent of net credit to the priority sector).

### Empirical findings on financing patterns (summary of regression results)
- Overall approach: regressions of firm capital-structure measures and firm growth on firm characteristics and industry RZ_us; samples: 1993/94–2005/06 (whole), 1993/94–1998/99 (first half), 1999/00–2005/06 (second half). Dependent variables are period averages (stocks or flows as specified).
- Determinants of External Funds Use (Table 5; dependent variable: percent share of external funds (flow) over total funds):
  - RZ_us coefficient: negative and significant for the whole sample and the 1990s sub-sample, implying India’s financial system did not allocate more external funds to industries with higher external finance dependence in those samples.
  - Firm characteristics: Size (log, sales) positive and significant (e.g., 2.467*** in one specification); Profitability (ROA) negative and significant (e.g., -1.601*** in one specification).
  - Ownership dummies: Foreign and government-owned firms use less external finance overall, especially debt; private group dummy negative in some specifications.
  - Number of observations: examples include 934, 425, 142, 073, 621, 278, 24 (as reported in Table 5).
  - R-square examples: 0.20, 0.30, 0.18, 0.29, 0.03, 0.12 (as reported).
- Determinants of Leverage (Table 6; dependent variable: debt-to-assets ratio):
  - RZ_us coefficient: not significantly different from zero for any of the three samples in the debt regressions.
  - Firm characteristics conform to expected signs: size positive, profitability negative, asset tangibility generally positive.
- Determinants of Foreign Borrowing Use (Table 7; dependent variable: foreign debt in percent of total assets; columns for “All” firms and “Access” subset):
  - RZ_us coefficient: either not significantly different from zero or significantly negative across cases, indicating lack of evidence that finance-intensive firms went abroad to avoid domestic constraints.
  - Foreign debt mostly accessed by large firms; size impact significant when estimation limited to firms with foreign debt access.
  - Asset tangibility associated with increased foreign borrowing in some specifications.
- Determinants of Equity-to-Assets (Table 8; dependent variable: ratio of equity to total assets):
  - RZ_us coefficient: generally positive and significant, indicating equity markets are tapped more by industries with higher external finance dependence.
  - Equity provides an important source of finance for young and small firms with high growth opportunities in recent years.
- Determinants of Firm Growth (Table 9; dependent variable: annual average growth rate of firm gross value added):
  - RZ_us coefficient: negative and significant in the reported specifications, indicating that firms in industries with higher external finance dependence grow more slowly than others.
  - Firm controls: age mostly negatively related to firm growth; high profitability positively correlated with growth; access to foreign finance seems to contribute positively to growth.
  - Number of observations examples and R-squares reported in Table 9 (e.g., Number of observations 867, 394, 129, 767, 819, 198, 01; R-square examples 0.32, 0.32, 0.15, 0.24, 0.05, 0.19).

### Key quantitative macro and market facts (exact values preserved)
- Bank credit to corporate sector annual growth (2003/04–2006/07): averaged 30 percent y/y.
- Bank credit share in GDP: increased by 5 percentage points to over 16 percent of GDP.
- Market capitalization of the Bombay Stock Exchange: more than tripled to over 100 percent of GDP (between 2002/03 and mid-2007).
- Capital inflows: increased from 2 percent of GDP in 2002/03 to 5 percent of GDP in 2006/07.
  - FDI inflows into Indian companies: increased by 1 percentage point of GDP.
  - External commercial borrowing disbursements to corporations: rose by 2.5 percentage points of GDP.
- Corporate debt to GDP (2006/07): remained below 20 percent.
- Corporate bond market: less than 5 percent of GDP.
- Corporate tax rate: reduced from 60–75 percent in early 1990s to 45 percent in 2005/06 (including surcharges).
- Median share of “core” external funds: 26 percent in 2000/01 percent; 9 percent in 2002/03 and 2003/04; about 16 percent in 2005/06.

### Policy implications and interpretation
- Main policy implication: having an efficient equity market does not fully compensate for underdeveloped debt financing opportunities; evidence points to inefficiencies particularly in debt financing mechanisms (banks and corporate bond market).
- The paper argues for upgrading debt financing facilities in India because:
  - Debt instruments can provide optimal contracts when verification is costly (Townsend (1979), Diamond (1984), Gale and Hellwig (1985)).
  - Debt market development helps foster other financial products (predictable cash flows facilitate structuring derivatives).
  - Banks and markets are complementary: intermediaries and markets can serve different client segments and tasks (information acquisition, monitoring, aggregation, product tailoring).
  - Empirical findings show equity markets channel funds to finance-intensive industries but debt markets do not align with industry external finance dependence, and higher industry external finance dependence is associated with lower firm growth.
- Upgrading debt markets and banking sector could improve capital allocation efficiency and support sustained productivity and investment-led growth.

### Conclusion
- Evidence from firm-level data in India indicates:
  - Increasing use of external funds in recent years (although levels are below 1990s peak).
  - Signs of inefficiency in allocation of debt finance; debt and foreign borrowing patterns do not correspond to industries’ external finance dependence.
  - Equity markets appear more responsive to finance-intensive industries.
  - Industries with higher external finance dependence exhibit slower firm growth, consistent with financing constraints.
- Policy recommendation: financial sector development in India should include focused measures to develop debt financing facilities (bank credit allocation efficiency and corporate bond market development) to complement the equity market and support sustained growth and better capital allocation.

*Source: _wp0879 - Appendix Table (Prowess firm-level analysis and appendix tables as presented).*

### Appendix Table.  Industries' Dependence on External Finance (U.S.)

### Appendix Table.  Industries' Dependence on External Finance (U.S.)

### Content overview
- The content unit consists of the References section accompanying the appendix table titled "Industries' Dependence on External Finance (U.S.)."
- References span theoretical and empirical literature on financial intermediation, corporate finance, financial systems, and links between finance and economic growth.
- Many works cited are journal articles, working papers, IMF and World Bank reports, and books.

### Major topics and recurring themes in the references
- Financial intermediation, delegated monitoring, and incentive-compatible contracts:
  - Diamond, D., 1984, “Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 51(3), pp. 393–414.
  - Townsend, R., 1979, “Optimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 21, pp. 417–75.
  - Gale, D. and M. Hellwig, 1985, “Incentive-Compatible Debt Contracts: The One-Period Problem,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 52(4), pp. 647–663.
- Bank- versus market-based financial systems and firm financing choices:
  - Demirgüç-Kunt and V. Maksimovic, 1996, “Stock Market Development and Firm Financing Choices,” World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 10(2), pp. 341–369.
  - Demirgüç-Kunt and V. Maksimovic, 2002, “Funding Growth in Bank-Based and Market-Based Financial Systems: Evidence from Firm Level Data,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 65(3), pp. 337–363.
  - Beck, T. and R. Levine, 2002, “Industry Growth and Capital Allocation: Does Having a Market-or Bank-Based System Matter?” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 64(2), pp. 147–180.
- Finance and economic growth; causality between financial development and growth:
  - King, R. and R. Levine, 1993, “Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108(3), pp. 717–738.
  - Levine, R., N. Loayza, and T. Beck, 2000, “Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 46(1), pp. 31–77.
  - Levine, R. and S. Zervos, 1998, “Stock Markets, Banks and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review, Vol. 88(3), pp. 537–558.
- Corporate finance, capital structure, and firm growth:
  - Harris, M. and A. Raviv, 1991, “The Theory of Capital Structure,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 46 (1), pp. 297–355.
  - Rajan, R. and L. Zingales, 1995, “What Do We Know About Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 50(5), pp. 1421–1460.
  - Booth, L., V. Aivazian, A. Demirguc-Kunt, and V. Maksimovic, 2001, “Capital Structures in Developing Countries,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 56(1), pp. 87–130.
- Firm-level evidence on financing patterns, misallocation, and productivity:
  - Hsieh, C. and P. Klenow, 2007, “Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India,” NBER Working Paper No. 13290.
  - Evans, D., 1987, “Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 95(4), pp. 657–74.
  - Hall, B., 1987, “The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), pp. 583–606.
- Country- and region-specific studies relevant to external finance and corporate sector development:
  - Allen, F., R. Chakrabarti, S. De, J. “QJ” Qian, and M. Qian, 2006, “Financing Firms in India,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3975.
  - Allen, F., R. Chakrabarti, and S. De, 2007, “India’s Financial System,” Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper No. 07–36.
  - Topalova, P., 2004, “Overview of the Indian Corporate Sector: 1989–2002,” IMF Working Paper 04/64.
  - World Bank, 2006, Developing India’s Corporate Bond Market. (Washington).
  - International Monetary Fund, 2004, Global Financial Stability Report, September, “Emerging Markets as Net Capital Importers” (Washington).
  - International Monetary Fund, 2005, Global Financial Stability Report, April, “Corporate Finance in Emerging Markets” (Washington).
- Methodological and theoretical contributions to corporate finance and financial systems:
  - Diamond, D., 1991, “Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99(4), pp. 689–721.
  - Lucas, R., 1988, “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22(1), pp. 3-42.
  - Rajan, R. and L. Zingales, 1998, “Financial Dependence and Growth” American Economic Review, Vol. 88(3), pp. 559–586.

### Notable authors and frequent citations
- Repeatedly cited authors include: Allen, F.; Demirgüç-Kunt, A.; Maksimovic, V.; Levine, R.; Rajan, R.; Zingales, L.; Diamond, D.; Townsend, R.; and World Bank and IMF institutional publications.
- Publication types include: Journal of Political Economy; Journal of Finance; Review of Economic Studies; Journal of Financial Economics; World Bank Economic Review; IMF Working Papers; NBER Working Papers; books by MIT Press and other academic publishers.

### Implications for the associated appendix table (inferred from references included)
- The references emphasize empirical and theoretical foundations for studying industries' dependence on external finance, including:
  - Distinctions between bank-based and market-based financing and their effects on firm growth.
  - Measures of financial dependence, capital structure, and firm-level financing patterns.
  - Cross-country and sectoral analyses that inform interpretation of U.S. industry data on external finance reliance.

*Source: Appendix Table. Industries' Dependence on External Finance (U.S.) — References section*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp0879.pdf_