## _wp11275 - 2008. The cost of provisioning for bad loans could therefore partly explain the high lending interest rates and the high interest margins

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [_wp11275 - 2008. The cost of provisioning for bad loans could therefore partly explain the high lending interest rates and the high interest margins](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/_wp11275.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/_wp11275.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/_wp11275.pdf.json)

---

### Financial sector background and monetary framework
- Bank of Ghana Act (2002) mandates price stability as primary objective and created the monetary policy committee (MPC).
- Formal inflation targeting started in May 2007; preceding transition involved shifting from reserve money targeting to broader indicator analysis.
- Key financial liberalizations and developments:
  - Liberalization of exchange and interest rate controls.
  - Partial opening of external capital account allowing foreigners participation in longer-end domestic bond market.
  - Introduction and spread of payment instruments (credit/debit cards) and electronic banking.
- Sample and data windows cited:
  - Wholesale interest rate series: 2004M12–2011M5 and 2004M12–2011M7 in figures.
  - Econometric samples: 2004M12—2010M4 (wholesale rates) and 2005Q1—2010Q1 (bank-specific retail rates).
  - Some wholesale estimations comprise only 65 observations.

### Illustrative bank optimization and pass-through model
- Operational target: Bank of Ghana targets the interbank money market interest rate.
- Risk-neutral bank chooses loan portfolio (L), deposit portfolio (D), and end-of-day reserves (R_t).
- Intermediation cost function c(L) with c’>0 and c’’>0 (marginal cost increasing in loan portfolio).
- Central bank policy rate described as prime rate with an asymmetric band:
  - deposit rate = prime rate − h’
  - lending (central bank) rate = prime rate + h’’
- Key relationships:
  - Lending interest rate (i_L) depends on interbank rate (i_IB) and marginal intermediation cost ρ′(L).
  - Pass-through from interbank to lending rates is dampened when c’’>0 (steeply rising intermediation costs).
  - Interbank rate equation incorporates central bank liquidity stance, reserves (R_t), money market short u and settlement uncertainty v.

### Econometric representation for pass-through (generic)
- Error-correction style specification (equation 3) with:
  - short-run dynamics via ∆ terms,
  - long-run elasticity denoted by ϕ,
  - speed of convergence denoted by μ.
- Error term ε_t assumed normally distributed with zero mean and constant variance.

### Wholesale market empirical findings
- Benchmarks: interbank money market interest rate and 91-day treasury bill interest rate.
- Interbank rate findings:
  - Responds to changes in Bank of Ghana prime rate with a one-month lag (all Models).
  - Significant inertia: significant first lag of dependent variable.
  - Long-run parity: estimated constant α and slope δ not statistically different from zero and one, respectively (text statement).
  - Speed of adjustment estimate: μ = -0.07 (statistically significant) — described as slow.
  - Asymmetry: faster convergence when policy rate falling (Model 3) than when rising (Model 4).
  - Interbank and treasury bill rates were significantly higher than prime rate during 2008-2009 for prolonged periods.
- 91-day treasury bill findings:
  - Strong pass-through from prime rate to 91-day TB in recent period (all Models).
  - Policy rate influences 91-day TB within a one-month lag; same-period effect often not significant.
  - Inertia in TB rate stronger than interbank rate.
  - Significant contemporaneous effect from interbank rate to treasury bill rate (all Models).
- VAR between interbank and 91-day TB:
  - Changes in prime rate influence both wholesale rates with a one-month lag (about one-half of pass-through occurs in this period).
  - Convergence to long-run parity is complete but takes time; interbank equation has low adjusted R-squared indicating unexplained variation.

### Retail deposit and lending rate findings (bank-specific quarterly data)
- Deposits:
  - Demand deposit rates changed infrequently and were excluded.
  - Time deposit interest rates:
    - 91-day TB significant in explaining both time and savings deposit rates (all Models).
    - Interbank rate significant for time deposits (Models 2 and 3 in Table 6).
    - Cross-rate influences: demand and savings deposit rate changes affect time deposit rates.
    - Long-term convergence: strong convergence between time deposit and wholesale rates in Models 5–7 (Table 6).
    - Speed of adjustment for time deposit to interbank gap in Model 7: -0.28 (highly significant); long-run convergence complete.
    - Fixed (bank-specific) effects important.
  - Savings deposit interest rates:
    - Long-run convergence less strong than for time deposits; convergence to TB and time-deposit rates significant but incomplete.
    - Bank-specific effects important (Models 6–7 in Table 7).
- Retail lending interest rates:
  - Short-run effect from interbank rate is immediate (all Models).
  - Short-run pass-through from 91-day TB significant only when long-run effects excluded (Models 2–4).
  - Time deposit rate has significant short-run effect on lending rates (Models 3–7 in Table 8), indicating deposit cost channel to lending rates.
  - Long-run (level) effects (Models 5–7 in Table 8):
    - Retail lending rates converge to a weighted average of interbank and time deposit rates (Model 7).
    - Estimated speed of adjustment for lending rates: -0.30 (highly significant).
    - Pass-through to lending rates is incomplete in the long-run.
    - Bank-specific fixed effects significant — adjustment differs across banks.

### Simulation exercises and quantitative scenarios
- Wholesale market VAR simulation (Table 5):
  - Shock: 500 basis points reduction in prime rate (reflecting Bank of Ghana monetary easing during October 2009–July 2010).
  - Result: interbank and 91-day TB adjust comparably within two months, then “overshoot” the policy rate and converge back within 24 months.
  - Treasury bill rate found more volatile than interbank rate in simulations.
- Retail market simulation (using Model 7 in Table 6, Model 7 in Table 8, and wholesale simulation):
  - Assumption: demand and savings deposit rates unchanged for simplicity.
  - Retail time deposit rate: falls from 12 percent to 7 percent at trough — similar to 2009–2010 experience.
  - Retail lending rate: falls from 31 percent to 26 percent at trough — similar to actual experience during policy easing.
  - Timing: retail deposit and lending rates reach lowest points after 5–6 quarters following initial easing.
  - Spread between retail lending and time deposit rates remains relatively constant during adjustment.

### Conclusions, interpretation, and policy-relevant observations
- Overall pass-through:
  - About one-half of a change in the policy interest rate is reflected in wholesale market rates with a one-month lag.
  - Wholesale interbank market long-run responses are protracted; deviations from policy rate are substantial and prolonged, weakening Bank of Ghana’s ability to control short-term money market rates.
- Retail adjustment:
  - Banks’ retail rates adjust to changes in wholesale and policy rates but the process is slow and long-run adjustment is incomplete.
  - Simulations indicate retail time deposit and lending rates can and did respond materially to a 500 basis points policy easing, but only with multi-quarter lags.
- Factors contributing to incomplete and slow pass-through:
  - High levels of problem loans and provisioning costs could explain elevated lending interest rates and margins.
  - Past high inflation and large fiscal deficits may raise concerns about sustainability of low inflation and fiscal consolidation, contributing to uncertainty and banks’ reluctance to lower retail lending rates rapidly.
  - Lack of competition / monopolistic competition in the banking system raises intermediation costs and mark-ups.
  - High financing needs of government and reliance on government bonds reduce competitive pressures for private lending business.
  - Market structure and institutional factors: settlement uncertainty, shallow money markets, and central bank liquidity management can add to interbank volatility and pass-through frictions.
- Research and policy avenues highlighted:
  - Further research into short- and long-run pass-through nuances and how market development can speed and complete pass-through.
  - Address banking sector competition, provisioning and non-performing loan levels, payment/settlement efficiency, and central bank liquidity management to improve transmission.

### Key quantitative estimates and statistics
- Wholesale interbank speed-of-adjustment estimate: μ = -0.07 (statistically significant).
- Time deposit speed-of-adjustment (Model 7): -0.28 (highly significant).
- Retail lending speed-of-adjustment (Model 7): -0.30 (highly significant).
- Simulation shock used: 500 basis points reduction in prime rate.
- Retail time deposit simulated fall: from 12 percent to 7 percent.
- Retail lending simulated fall: from 31 percent to 26 percent.
- Data windows and sample sizes:
  - Monthly samples noted: 2004M12–2011M5 and 2004M12–2011M7.
  - Quarterly sample for bank-specific retail rates: 2005Q1—2010Q1.
  - Observations in key statistics tables: 65 (some wholesale estimations), 65 (monthly Key Statistics observations), 384 (quarterly Key Statistics observations).

*Italicized source: IMF working paper excerpt (content unit: _wp11275 - 2008. The cost of provisioning for bad loans could therefore partly explain the high lending interest rates and the high interest margins).*

### 2008. The cost of provisioning for bad loans could therefore partly explain the high lending

### _wp11275 - 2008. The cost of provisioning for bad loans could therefore partly explain the high lending interest rates and the high interest margins

### Financial sector background and monetary framework
- Bank of Ghana Act (2002) mandates price stability as primary objective and created the monetary policy committee (MPC).
- Formal inflation targeting started in May 2007; prior transition involved shifting from reserve money targeting to broader indicator analysis.
- Key financial liberalizations and developments:
  - Liberalization of exchange and interest rate controls.
  - Partial opening of external capital account allowing foreigners participation in longer-end domestic bond market.
  - Introduction and spread of payment instruments (credit/debit cards) and electronic banking.
- Sample and data windows cited in the analysis:
  - Wholesale interest rate series: 2004M12–2011M5 and 2004M12–2011M7 in figures.
  - Econometric samples often cover 2004M12—2010M4 (wholesale rates) and 2005Q1—2010Q1 (bank-specific retail rates).
  - Data sample for some wholesale estimations comprises only 65 observations.

### Illustrative bank optimization and pass-through model
- Operational target: Bank of Ghana targets the interbank money market interest rate.
- Risk-neutral bank chooses loan portfolio (L), deposit portfolio (D), and end-of-day reserves (R_t).
- Intermediation cost function c(L) assumed with c’>0 and c’’>0 (marginal cost increasing in loan portfolio).
- Central bank policy rate described as prime rate with an asymmetric band:
  - deposit rate = prime rate − h’
  - lending (central bank) rate = prime rate + h’’
- Key model variables and relationships:
  - Lending interest rate (i_L) depends on interbank rate (i_IB) and marginal intermediation cost ρ′(L).
  - Pass-through from interbank to lending rates is dampened when c’’>0 (steeply rising intermediation costs).
  - Interbank rate equation incorporates central bank liquidity stance, reserves (R_t), and money market short u and settlement uncertainty v.

### Econometric representation for pass-through (generic)
- Error-correction style specification used (equation 3) with short-run changes and lagged level term to estimate:
  - short-run dynamics via ∆ terms,
  - long-run elasticity denoted by ϕ (presented in text as ϕ or similar),
  - speed of convergence denoted by μ.
- Error term ε_t assumed normally distributed with zero mean and constant variance.

### Wholesale market empirical findings
- Wholesale benchmarks analyzed: interbank money market interest rate and 91-day treasury bill interest rate.
- Interbank rate:
  - Responds to changes in Bank of Ghana prime rate with a one-month lag (all Models).
  - Significant inertia: significant first lag of dependent variable.
  - Long-run parity: estimated constant α and slope δ not statistically different from zero and one, respectively (text statement).
  - Speed of adjustment estimate: μ = -0.07 (statistically significant) — described as slow.
  - Evidence of asymmetry: faster convergence when policy rate falling (Model 3) than when rising (Model 4).
  - Volatility and deviations: interbank and treasury bill rates were significantly higher than prime rate during 2008-2009 for prolonged periods.
- 91-day treasury bill:
  - Strong pass-through from prime rate to 91-day TB in recent period (all Models).
  - Policy rate influences 91-day TB within a one-month lag; same-period effect often not significant.
  - Inertia in TB rate stronger than interbank rate.
  - Significant contemporaneous effect from interbank rate to treasury bill rate (all Models).
- Vector autoregressive (VAR) between interbank and 91-day TB:
  - Changes in prime rate influence both wholesale rates with a one-month lag (about one-half of pass-through occurs in this period).
  - Convergence to long-run parity is complete but takes time; interbank equation has low adjusted R-squared indicating unexplained variation.

### Retail deposit and lending rate findings (bank-specific quarterly data)
- Retail deposits analyzed: time and savings deposit interest rates (demand deposit rates changed infrequently and were excluded).
- Time deposit interest rates:
  - 91-day TB is significant in explaining both time and savings deposit rates (all Models).
  - Interbank rate significant for time deposits (Models 2 and 3 in Table 6).
  - Deposit-rate-setting exhibits cross-rate influences: demand and savings deposit rate changes affect time deposit rates.
  - Long-term convergence: strong convergence between time deposit and wholesale rates in Models 5–7 (Table 6).
  - In Model 7, speed of adjustment for time deposit to interbank gap: -0.28 (highly significant); long-run convergence complete.
  - Fixed (bank-specific) effects important.
- Savings deposit interest rates:
  - Long-run convergence less strong than for time deposits; convergence to TB and time-deposit rates significant but incomplete.
  - Bank-specific effects important (Models 6–7 in Table 7).
- Retail lending interest rates:
  - Short-run effect from interbank rate is immediate (all Models).
  - Short-run pass-through from 91-day TB significant only when long-run effects excluded (Models 2–4).
  - Time deposit rate has significant short-run effect on lending rates (Models 3–7 in Table 8), indicating deposit cost channel to lending rates.
  - Long-run (level) effects (Models 5–7 in Table 8):
    - Retail lending rates converge to a weighted average of interbank and time deposit rates (Model 7).
    - Estimated speed of adjustment for lending rates: -0.30 (highly significant).
    - Pass-through to lending rates is incomplete in the long-run.
    - Bank-specific fixed effects significant — adjustment differs across banks.

### Simulation exercises and quantitative scenarios
- Wholesale market simulation using VAR estimates (Table 5):
  - Shock: 500 basis points reduction in prime rate (reflecting Bank of Ghana monetary easing during October 2009–July 2010).
  - Result: interbank and 91-day TB adjust comparably within two months, then “overshoot” the policy rate and converge back within 24 months.
  - Treasury bill rate found more volatile than interbank rate in simulations.
- Retail market simulation using retail estimates (Model 7 in Table 6 and Model 7 in Table 8) and wholesale simulation:
  - Assumed demand and savings deposit rates unchanged for simplicity.
  - Retail time deposit rate: falls from 12 percent (pre-change) to 7 percent at trough — similar to what happened during 2009–2010.
  - Retail lending rate: falls from 31 percent (pre-change) to 26 percent at trough — similar to actual experience during policy easing.
  - Timing: retail deposit and lending rates reach lowest points after 5–6 quarters following initial easing.
  - Spread between retail lending and time deposit rates remains relatively constant during adjustment.

### Conclusions, interpretation, and policy-relevant observations
- Overall pass-through:
  - About one-half of a change in the policy interest rate is reflected in wholesale market rates with a one-month lag.
  - Wholesale interbank market long-run responses are protracted; deviations from policy rate are substantial and prolonged, weakening the Bank of Ghana’s ability to control short-term money market rates.
- Retail adjustment:
  - Banks’ retail rates adjust to changes in wholesale and policy rates but the process is slow and long-run adjustment is incomplete.
  - Simulations indicate retail time deposit and lending rates can and did respond materially to a 500 basis points policy easing, but only with multi-quarter lags.
- Factors contributing to incomplete and slow pass-through:
  - High levels of problem loans and provisioning costs could explain elevated lending interest rates and margins.
  - Past high inflation and large fiscal deficits may raise concerns about sustainability of low inflation and fiscal consolidation, contributing to uncertainty and banks’ reluctance to lower retail lending rates rapidly.
  - Lack of competition / monopolistic competition in the banking system raises intermediation costs and mark-ups.
  - High financing needs of government and reliance on government bonds reduce competitive pressures for private lending business.
  - Market structure and institutional factors: settlement uncertainty, shallow money markets, and central bank liquidity management can add to interbank volatility and pass-through frictions.
- Quantified speeds of adjustment and estimates cited in the analysis:
  - Wholesale interbank speed-of-adjustment estimate: μ = -0.07 (statistically significant).
  - Time deposit speed-of-adjustment (Model 7): -0.28 (highly significant).
  - Retail lending speed-of-adjustment (Model 7): -0.30 (highly significant).
  - Simulation shock used: 500 basis points reduction in prime rate.
  - Retail time deposit simulated fall: from 12 percent to 7 percent.
  - Retail lending simulated fall: from 31 percent to 26 percent.
- Research and policy avenues highlighted:
  - Further research into short- and long-run pass-through nuances and how market development can speed and complete pass-through.
  - Addressing banking sector competition, provisioning and non-performing loan levels, payment/settlement efficiency, and central bank liquidity management to improve transmission.

*Italicized source: IMF working paper excerpt (content unit: _wp11275 - 2008. The cost of provisioning for bad loans could therefore partly explain the high lending interest rates and the high interest margins).*

### REFERENCES

### _wp11275 - REFERENCES

### References
- Addison, Ernest, 2008, “Lessons from Inflation Targeting in Developing Countries: The Case of  Ghana,”  International  Symposium  on  Monetary  Policy  and  Price  Stability  in  the  West  African  Economic  and  Monetary  Union  Zone:  Constraints  and  Challenges,  Dakar, Senegal.
- Bondt, Gabe de, 2002, “Retail Bank Interest Rate Pass-Through: New Evidence at the Euro Area Level,” ECB Working Paper Series 02/136 (Frankfurt: European Central Bank).
- Borio, Claudio E.V. and Wilhelm Fritz, 1995, “Response of Short-Term Bank Lending Rates to  Policy  Rates:  A  Cross-Country  Perspective,”  Bank  for  International  Settlements,  Monetary and Economic Department, Working Papers (International), No. 27, May.
- Buchs,  Thierry  and  Johan  Mathisen,  2005,  “Competition  and  Efficiency  in  Banking:  Behavioral   Evidence   from   Ghana,”   IMF   Working   Paper   05/17   (Washington:   International Monetary Fund).
- Chen,  Chuling,  2009,  “Bank  Efficiency  in  Sub-Saharan  African  Middle-Income  Countries,”  IMF Working Paper 09/14 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
- Cottarelli, Carlo and Angeliki Kourelis, 1994, ‘Financial Structure, Bank Lending Rates, and the  Transmission  Mechanism  of  Monetary  Policy,”  IMF  Staff  Papers,  41,  pp.  587-623.
- Ennis,    Huberto    M.    and    Todd    Keister,    2008,    “Understanding    Monetary    Policy    Implementation,” Economic  Quarterly,  Federal  Reserve  Bank  of  Richmond,  94,  3,  pp. 235-63.
- Ghartey,  Edward  E.,  2005,  “Monetary  Policy  on  Ghana’s  Term  Structure  of  Interest  Rates:  Effects and Implications,” No. 8, The Institute of Economic Affairs, Accra, Ghana.
- Goodfriend,  M.,  1991,  “Interest  Rates  and  the  Conduct  of  Monetary  Policy,”  Carnegie Rochester Series on Public Policy, 34, pp. 7-30.
- Henckel, Timo, Alain Ize, and Arto Kovanen, 1999, “Central Banking Without Central Bank Money,” IMF Working Paper 99/92 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
- Hofmann,   Boris   and   Paul   Mizen,   2004,   “Interest   Rate   Pass-Through   and   Monetary   Transmission:   Evidence   from   Individual   Financial   Institutions’   Retail   Rates,’   Economica, 71, pp. 99-123.
- International Monetary Fund, 2011, “Ghana: Financial System Stability Assessment Update,” IMF Country Report 11/131 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
- Karagiannis,  Stelios,  Yannis  Panagopoulos,  and  Prodromos  Vlamis,  2010,  “Interest  Rate  Pass-Through  in  Europe  and  the  US:  Monetary  Policy  After  the  Financial  Crisis,”  Journal of Policy Modeling, 32, pp. 323-338.
- Kwapil,  Claudia  and  Johann  Scharler,  2010,  “Interest  Rate  Pass-Through,  Monetary  Policy  Rules  and  Macroeconomic  Stability,”  Journal  of  International  Money  and  Finance, 29, pp. 236-51.
- Liu,  Ming-Hua,  Dimitri  Margaritis,  and  Alireza  Tourani-Rad,  2008,  “Monetary  Policy  Transparency  and  Pass-Through  of  Retail  Interest  Rates,”  Journal  of  Banking  and  Finance, 32, pp. 501-11.
- Mishkin,  Frederic  S.,  1999,  “International  Experiences  With  Different  Monetary  Policy  Regimes,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, pp. 579-605.
- Mishra, Prachi, Peter J. Montiel, and Antonio Spilimbergo, 2010, “Monetary Transmission in Low  Income  Countries,”  Centre  for  Economic  Policy  Research,  Discussion  Paper  Series, 7951, August.
- Sander,  Harald  and  Stefanie  Kleimeier,  2006,  “Interest  Rate  Pass-Through  in  the  Common  Monetary Area of the SACU Countries,” South African Journal of Economics, 74, 2, pp. 215-29.
- Tieman, Alexander, 2004, “Interest Rate Pass-Through in Romania and Other Central  European Countries,“ IMF Working Paper 04/211 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

### Appendix Table 1: Variable Definitions
- Variable name — Description
- IB_RATE — Interbank interest rate, annual percent
- BOG_RATE — Prime rate (Bank of Ghana's policy rate), annual percent
- TB_91_D_RATE — Treasury bill interest rate (91 days maturity), annual percent
- DD_RATE — Retail demand deposit interest rate, annual percent
- SD_INT — Retail savings deposit interest rate, annual percent
- TD_INT — Retail time deposit interest rate, annual percent
- LEND_INT — Retail lending interest rate, annual percent
- SPREAD # 1 — IB_RATE - BOG_RATE
- SPREAD # 2 — TB_91_D_RATE - IB_RATE
- SPREAD # 3 — TB_91_D_RATE - BOG_RATE

### Appendix Table 2. Key Statistics (Monthly Data), 2004M12–2010M4
- Variables: BOG_RATE  IB_RATE  TB_91_D
- Me an15.6714.8415.15
- Me di an15.5013.9513.26
- Std. De v.2.144.025.68
- Skewness-0.060.520.54
- Kurtosi s1.692.301.71
- Jarque-Bera4.664.327.72
- Probability0.100.120.02
- Sum1,019965985
- Sum Sq. De v.2931,0332,067
- Obse rvati ons656565
- Sources: Bank of Ghana and author's estimates.

### Appendix Table 3. Key Statistics (Quarterly Data), 2005Q1–2010Q1
- Variables: BOG_RATE  IB_RATE  TB_91_D  DD_INT  SD_INT  TD_INT  LEND_INT
- Me an15.5114.8315.190.612.529.5829.05
- Me di an15.4213.0112.680.252.009.3028.66
- Std. De v.2.094.085.880.822.405.333.83
- Ske wne ss0.010.560.512.201.390.570.40
- Kurtosi s1.642.081.549.865.753.332.57
- Jarque - Be ra29.7933.5350.631,063.09245.0822.2913.26
- Probability0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
- Sum5,9575,6975,8342339683,67811,154
- Sum Sq. De v.1,6726,38313,2642582,20910,8665,619
- Obse rvati ons384384384384384384384
- Sources: Bank of Ghana and author's estimates.

*Source: _wp11275 - REFERENCES*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/_wp11275.pdf_
