## _wp12138

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [_wp12138](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/_wp12138.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/_wp12138.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/_wp12138.pdf.json)

---

### I. Introduction — Context and motivation
- Explosive growth of cross-border capital flows over past decades partly due to increased macroeconomic stability and policy reforms in developing and emerging economies, and partly due to removal of statutory restrictions on capital account transactions.
- For capital-scarce countries, capital inflows permit smoothing of consumption over time, development of financial markets, and funding of productive investments.
- The IMF has long cautioned against maintaining or imposing controls on capital flows that would curtail advantages and introduce market distortions, and has encouraged gradual opening of the capital account.
- After the 2008 global financial crisis, many emerging market economies experienced a surge in capital inflows that can threaten economic and financial stability; some countries imposed restrictive measures, including capital controls, to manage inflows.
- The debate about responding to large and destabilizing capital inflows regained prominence.

### IMF proposed framework for the use of capital flow management measures (CFMs)
- CFMs definition: prudential, administrative, and tax measures designed to counter large and usually rapid capital inflows.
- Framework conditions for CFMs (IMF, 2011a):
  - (i) the exchange rate is not undervalued,
  - (ii) reserves are in excess of adequate prudential levels, and
  - (iii) the cyclical position suggests overheating of the economy and precludes monetary easing, and there is no scope to tighten fiscal policy.
- Order of policy response in framework:
  - First line: macroeconomic policies (exchange rate, reserves, monetary/fiscal).
  - Second line: CFMs that do not discriminate on residency.
  - Third line: CFMs discriminating on residency, implemented only when other options exhausted or excluded.
- Preference for CFMs that do not discriminate on residency; emphasis on prudential and structural measures to increase absorption capacity and financial resilience.
- Two illustrative application approaches:
  - Judgment-based approach: desk judgment on exchange rate, overheating, and reserve adequacy.
  - Threshold-based approach: numerical thresholds for reserves, inflation, and credit growth:
    - Reserves adequate if ratio of reserves to the sum of short-term debt (residual maturity) and the current account deficit exceeded 100 percent.
    - Economy considered not overheating when (i) year-on-year CPI inflation averaged less than 3 percent over the last two years, or less than 10 percent in 2010 and declined from the average level of 2009; and (ii) bank credit did not rise by more than 5 percent of GDP in the last year.
    - Exchange rate assessed via average of CGER estimates; not undervalued if average misalignment estimate was above zero percent.

### Policy tools for managing capital inflows
- Structural changes:
  - Structural reforms to foster financial market development are central to absorbing capital inflows; they are long-run and complement macroeconomic policies.
- Macroeconomic policies (first line of defense):
  - Allow the currency to appreciate if undervalued from a multilateral viewpoint.
  - Accumulate reserves if inadequate from a precautionary perspective.
  - Sterilized intervention should be used if overheating and inflation concerns are present; sterilization incurs costs because return on central bank liabilities usually exceeds return on foreign reserve assets.
  - Monetary policy easing can be used if consistent with inflation objectives; not viable if economy overheating.
  - Fiscal tightening can reduce domestic demand growth and restrain current account deficit; announcement effects may influence exchange rates.
- CFMs and related design considerations:
  - Residency-based CFMs discriminate on basis of residency (e.g., taxes on flows from non-residents, unremunerated reserve requirements); evidence suggests limited impact on total inflow volumes but can alter maturity and composition.
  - Other CFMs do not discriminate by residency but influence inflows (e.g., currency-specific prudential measures, minimum holding periods, taxes on certain investments).
  - Non-CFMs: prudential measures not intended to influence capital inflows (e.g., maximum loan–to-value ratios, capital adequacy requirements).
  - Price-based (taxes, URRs) versus quantity-based (limits, bans): price-based preferable in general; quantity-based may suit prudential needs.
  - CFMs should be temporary and scaled back once inflows abate.
  - Monitoring and compliance are complicated and costly; international treaties (e.g., EU membership constraints) may limit capital controls.

### Overview of episodes and key statistics (Czech Republic, Poland, Romania)
- Episodes of capital inflows identified:
  - Czech Republic: starting Q2 2009 (cut-off for assessment: March 2011).
  - Poland: starting Q2 2009 (cut-off for assessment: June 2011).
  - Romania: starting Q3 2009 (cut-off for assessment: June 2011).
- Average quarterly net capital inflows during the two-year episode:
  - Poland: 9.2 percent of GDP.
  - Romania: 7.5 percent of GDP.
  - Czech Republic: 5.3 percent of GDP.
- Comparable emerging markets during similar episodes: Korea 1.9 percent of GDP; Indonesia 2.6 percent of GDP; South Africa 6.6 percent of GDP; Turkey 6.9 percent of GDP.
- Composition shifts:
  - Portfolio flows dominated in the Czech Republic and Poland; portfolio flows picked up in Romania though other investment flows still accounted for more than half of total inflows.
- Vulnerability risk: predominance of portfolio inflows and short-run nature increases exposure to rapid reversals.

### Country-specific analysis — Czech Republic (findings and staff advice)
- Macroeconomic context:
  - Recovery since mid-2009; fiscal consolidation credibility gains following mid-2010 government program.
  - Headline CPI inflation largely below 2 percent target since mid-2010.
  - CNB two-week repo rate at 0.75 percent after cumulative cuts of 325 basis points between August 2008 and May 2010.
  - Koruna appreciating since beginning of 2009; IMF staff viewed exchange rate as broadly in line with fundamentals.
- Fiscal measures in 2010 included: one percentage point increase in the VAT; increased excise and real estate taxes; expenditure cuts; expansion in base for social security contributions (rate reduction postponed); ad hoc expenditure cuts and freezes.
- Framework application — Judgment-based:
  - Exchange rate criterion: met (exchange rate broadly in line with fundamentals).
  - Reserve adequacy: met (composite RAM indicated adequate reserves).
  - Overheating: not fulfilled (sizable negative output gap; forecast to close around 2014).
  - Conclusion: judgment-based exercise indicates CFMs not warranted.
- Framework application — Threshold-based:
  - Reserves covered approximately 144 percent of the sum of short-term debt at residual maturity and the current account deficit (threshold = 100 percent) → reserves adequate.
  - CGER REER misalignment average estimate: -2 percent (range -10 percent to +11 percent) → small undervaluation.
  - Year-on-year CPI inflation averaged 1.2 percent over the past two years (threshold = less than 3 percent) → not overheating.
  - Bank credit rose by 4.5 percent of GDP in the last year (threshold = not more than 5 percent of GDP) → not overheating.
  - Conclusion: threshold-based exercise does not advocate CFMs.
- Policy advice consistency:
  - Framework and IMF staff advice converge on conventional macro responses: allow further appreciation of the koruna and maintain accommodative monetary policy until output gap narrows, unless inflation expectations or labor market slack change.

### Country-specific analysis — Poland (findings and staff advice)
- Fiscal and tax measures in 2011 included:
  - temporary expenditure rule limiting growth of discretionary expenditure;
  - freeze of the wage fund in nominal terms;
  - reduced expenditure on less effective labor market programs;
  - VAT rate increase by 1 percent for three years;
  - increased excise taxes;
  - tightened eligibility for early retirement;
  - decreased transfers by social insurance institution to open pension funds.
- IMF recommended further permanent measures amounting to slightly over 1 percent of GDP (e.g., limiting tax reliefs, tightening pension indexation, streamlining public administration employment).
- Monetary policy and inflation:
  - Policy rate raised from 3.5 percent in January 2011 to 4.5 percent in June 2011.
  - Core inflation expected to continue to rise; IMF staff suggested further policy rate increases.
- Reserve and exchange rate assessment:
  - IMF staff found reserves exceeded several metrics but recommended additional accumulation, noting reserves fell short of "debt at remaining maturity plus the current account deficit".
  - National Bank of Poland considered reserves more than adequate and opposed additional accumulation.
- Threshold-based metrics (Poland):
  - Ratio of reserves to short-term debt plus current account deficit: 71 percent in 2010 and projected at 84.1 percent for 2011 (threshold = 100 percent).
  - REER misalignment average estimate: -2 percent (range -7 percent to +5 percent).
  - Year-on-year CPI inflation averaged 3.1 percent over the last two years (threshold = less than 3 percent).
  - Increase in bank credit equaled 6.8 percent of GDP in the last year (threshold = not more than 5 percent of GDP).
  - Overheating indicators suggest signs of overheating.
- IMF staff recommendations:
  - Gradual tightening of monetary policy and accelerated fiscal consolidation.
  - Some exchange rate appreciation to ease inflationary pressure.
  - Additional reserve accumulation desirable.
  - Targeted macro-prudential measures (tightening bank lending standards) as complements — could be CFMs if intended to influence inflows.
- Authorities’ measures:
  - Agreed on exchange rate appreciation and fiscal acceleration but did not support additional reserve accumulation.
  - Planned foreign-exchange related prudential measures including a 50 percent limit on share of exposures open to FX risk in retail credit portfolios, recommending alignment of currency of exposure with currency of income, and obliging identification of reliable financing sources for long-term FX exposures.

### Country-specific analysis — Romania (findings and staff advice)
- Macroeconomic backdrop:
  - Growth resumed in 2011 after severe downturn in 2009–2010.
  - Year-on-year CPI inflation in May 2011: 8.4 percent (NBR target 3 percent ± 1ppt).
  - Central bank policy rate held at 6.25 percent since May 2010.
  - Currency appreciated and capital inflows picked up; official financing main source while FDI remained weak.
- Fiscal developments:
  - Higher-than-anticipated tax revenues and lower expenditures improved the fiscal deficit; government on track to reach 2011 target but further adjustments needed for 2012.
- Judgment-based assessment for CFMs:
  - Exchange rate: broadly in line with fundamentals.
  - Reserves coverage: well above standard rules of thumb; IMF staff saw room to accumulate additional reserves.
  - Output gap: large negative gap in 2010, projected to widen in 2011 and close only by 2016 — not overheating.
  - Judgment-based prescription: further reserve accumulation and exchange rate appreciation suitable to counter excessive inflows and help contain inflationary pressure.
- Threshold-based assessment for CFMs:
  - Average REER misalignment: +2.1 percent (misalignment range -0.1 percent to +5.2 percent).
  - Reserves covered 99 percent of short-term debt and current account deficit (threshold = 100 percent) — close to threshold.
  - Overheating criteria:
    - Year-on-year CPI inflation averaged almost 6 percent in 2009–2010 (threshold = less than 3 percent); projected 6.8 percent for 2011.
    - Credit growth previous year: 2.8 percent of GDP (threshold = not more than 5 percent of GDP).
  - Threshold-based conclusions:
    - Further appreciation of the leu may not be warranted given slight overvaluation.
    - Economy not overheating overall, but high inflationary pressures preclude monetary easing in response to inflows.
    - Marginal shortfall against reserve adequacy threshold leaves open whether further reserve buildup is warranted.
- Authorities’ measures and IMF response:
  - Authorities sought to discourage short-term portfolio inflows by maintaining large spreads around policy rates for interbank rates and allowing greater exchange rate fluctuations to introduce uncertainty.
  - IMF proposed absorbing inflows via additional reserve accumulation.
- Projections noted:
  - FDI projected to increase from Euros 4.1 in 2011 to Euros 5.1 by 2013.
  - Net portfolio inflows expected to decline moderately but remain positive.
  - Balance on other investments projected to turn positive in 2012 and increase to Euros 6.0 billion in 2013.

### Comparative application of the IMF capital inflows framework — synthesis and policy guidance
- General findings:
  - Both judgment-based and threshold-based approaches generally call for conventional macroeconomic policy responses as first-line measures to large inflows; neither approach broadly supported CFMs in the three case-study countries.
  - Eligibility for CFMs requires: exchange rate not undervalued; reserves in excess of adequate prudential levels or sterilization costs too high; economy overheating (precluding monetary easing); no scope to tighten fiscal policy.
- Summary of framework application (judgment-based and threshold-based outcomes):
  - Judgment-based summary:
    - Exchange Rate: Aligned for Czech Republic, Poland, Romania.
    - Reserves: Adequate (Czech Republic), Not Adequate (Poland), Not Adequate (Romania).
    - Overheating: No (Czech Republic), Yes (Poland), No (Romania).
    - CFMs warranted? No for all three.
  - Threshold-based summary:
    - Exchange Rate: Slightly undervalued (Czech Republic, Poland), Slightly overvalued (Romania).
    - Reserves and Overheating: mixed across countries; Poland shows signs of overheating under thresholds.
    - CFMs warranted? No for all three.
- IMF staff advice emphasized traditional macroeconomic policies:
  - Allow for further exchange rate appreciation and adjust policy rates (e.g., lower policy rates in Czech Republic where inflationary pressure was not a concern).
  - For Poland: some appreciation acceptable; monetary policy to be more gradually tightened; accelerate fiscal adjustment; additional reserve accumulation desirable.
  - For Romania: some appreciation acceptable; scope to accumulate additional reserves.
  - Targeted macro-prudential measures recommended for Poland as complements; CFMs not explicitly endorsed by IMF for any of the countries.
- Framework refinements discussed:
  - Tailoring thresholds more flexibly and relying on a broader set of variables (particularly for overheating and reserve adequacy) could improve guidance but complicates analysis and raises evenhandedness concerns.
  - Judgment-based approach benefits from country-specific in-depth knowledge but could be enhanced by referencing a range of thresholds to guide staff judgment.
  - Operational frameworks must balance strengths of both approaches to allow IMF staff judgment while ensuring consistent cross-country advice.

*Content derived from the provided IMF PDF chapter/section text.*

### References .............................................................................................................

### References

### I. INTRODUCTION — Context and motivation
- Explosive growth of cross-border capital flows over past decades partly due to increased macroeconomic stability and policy reforms in developing and emerging economies, and partly due to removal of statutory restrictions on capital account transactions.
- For capital-scarce countries, capital inflows permit smoothing of consumption over time, development of financial markets, and funding of productive investments.
- The IMF has long cautioned against maintaining or imposing controls on capital flows that would curtail advantages and introduce market distortions, and has encouraged gradual opening of the capital account.
- After the 2008 global financial crisis, many emerging market economies experienced a surge in capital inflows that can threaten economic and financial stability; some countries imposed restrictive measures, including capital controls, to manage inflows.
- The debate about responding to large and destabilizing capital inflows regained prominence (examples cited: Eyzaguirre et al., 2011; IMF, 2011a; Ostry et al., 2010, 2011; Pradhan et al., 2011).

### IMF proposed framework for the use of capital flow management measures (CFMs)
- In 2011, the IMF (2011a) proposed a framework setting out objective criteria for determining under what circumstances use of CFMs would seem appropriate.
- Definition: CFMs encompass a number of prudential, administrative, and tax measures designed to counter large and usually rapid capital inflows.
- According to the framework, CFMs seem warranted when:
  - (i) the exchange rate is not undervalued,
  - (ii) reserves are in excess of adequate prudential levels, and
  - (iii) the cyclical position suggests overheating of the economy and precludes monetary easing, and there is no scope to tighten fiscal policy.
- Preference in using CFMs should be given to measures that do not discriminate on the basis of residency.
- The framework emphasizes prudential and structural measures to increase the capacity of the economy to absorb capital inflows and strengthen resilience of the domestic financial system.
- The framework aims to provide a basis for coherent policy advice by the IMF to national authorities.

### Application to Czech Republic, Poland, and Romania
- This paper applies the proposed framework to the Czech Republic, Poland, and Romania — three central and eastern European countries that experienced elevated capital inflows after the onset of the 2008 global financial crisis.
- The paper assesses whether conditions have been met for use of CFMs according to both the judgment-based and the threshold-based illustrative approaches put forward by the IMF.
- The assessment is compared with the actual advice IMF staff gave to country authorities in the context of bilateral surveillance under Article IV or program missions.

### Findings and policy implications
- Overall evaluation under both approaches demonstrates that the conditions for employing CFMs have not been met in the three countries.
- The analysis broadly supports use of conventional macroeconomic instruments as the first line of defense against large-scale capital inflows.
- The IMF’s policy advice in the context of surveillance missions likewise advocates:
  - allowing the currency to strengthen,
  - building additional reserves, and
  - rebalancing the policy mix.
- Findings underscore desirability of further refining the framework to provide more effective guidance for IMF staff in prescribing appropriate policies in an efficient, consistent, and evenhanded manner.

### Structure of the remainder of the paper
- Section II reviews tools available to policymakers for managing large-scale capital inflows, with particular emphasis on CFMs.
- Section III briefly presents the IMF’s proposed framework for managing capital inflows.

*Source: _wp12138 - References ............................................................................................................................... 20*

### Section IV contains the three country-specific analyses for the Czech Republic, Poland, and

### _wp12138 - Section IV contains the three country-specific analyses for the Czech Republic, Poland, and

### Policy tools for managing capital inflows — Structural changes
- Structural reforms to foster financial market development play a central role in enabling a country to reap benefits from capital inflows and prepare against risks from unwanted surges of capital inflows.
- Structural reforms are generally long-run strategies and thus complement macroeconomic policies that have more immediate effects on capital inflows and their consequences.
- A country’s capacity to absorb foreign capital depends on many factors and in particular on the depth and efficiency of the financial system.

### Policy tools for managing capital inflows — Macroeconomic policies
- Macroeconomic policies are the first line of defense against large and destabilizing capital inflows: appropriate exchange rate, monetary and fiscal policies should be prioritized.
- Policymakers should let the domestic currency appreciate if it is undervalued from a multilateral viewpoint; an appreciation may enhance expectations of future currency depreciation, reducing domestic assets’ attractiveness to external investors (see Eyzaguirre et al., 2011).
- If foreign exchange reserves are inadequate from a precautionary perspective, reserve accumulation might be a meaningful option.
- Intervention should be sterilized if overheating and inflation concerns are present; sterilization incurs costs because the return paid on central bank liabilities usually exceeds return earned on foreign reserve assets and sterilization upholds incentives for continuing capital inflows.
- Monetary policy easing can be used if consistent with inflation objectives; however, if the economy is at risk of overheating, reducing policy rates may not be viable.
- Fiscal policy can be tightened (particularly if pro-cyclical) to reduce domestic demand growth, restrain the current account deficit, and ease exchange rate pressures; announcement effects may influence exchange rates even when implementation lags limit immediate fiscal impact.

### Policy tools for managing capital inflows — Capital Flow Management Measures (CFMs)
- CFMs encompass administrative, tax, and prudential measures designed to influence capital flows; they can be grouped into residency-based CFMs and other CFMs.
- Residency-based CFMs (often referred to as capital controls) discriminate on the basis of residency (residents versus non-residents) rather than citizenship; examples include taxes on flows from non-residents or unremunerated reserve requirements on such flows.
- Evidence cited: capital controls have been found to have little impact on total volume of inflows (see Habermeier et al., 2011) but can alter maturity structure and composition of inflows, reducing exposure to risk.
- Key concerns with residency-based CFMs: market distortions, regulatory arbitrage, circumvention, potential to impede addressing global imbalances by avoiding appreciation of undervalued currencies, and contagious diversion of flows to other countries (IMF, 2011f).
- Other CFMs do not discriminate by residency but influence inflows (e.g., prudential measures differentiating transactions by currency such as limits on foreign currency borrowing and currency specific reserve requirements; minimum holding periods; taxes on certain investments).
- Non-CFMs are prudential measures not intended to influence capital inflows and typically do not discriminate by residency; examples include maximum loan–to-value (LTV) ratios, capital quality/quantity requirements, constraints on domestic credit growth, and capital adequacy requirements (Ostry et al., 2011).
- Design considerations for CFMs:
  - Price-based (taxes or unremunerated reserve requirements) versus quantity-based (limits or bans). Rule of thumb: price-based preferable in general; quantity-based may be more appropriate for prudential purposes, especially in financial sector where information asymmetries complicate price-based calibration.
  - Broad-based versus targeted: macroeconomic concerns argue for broad-based CFMs (aggregate inflow matters for exchange rate); prudential concerns may favor targeted CFMs while accounting for circumvention risks.
  - CFMs should be temporary and scaled back once capital inflows abate.
- Monitoring and compliance with CFMs is complicated and costly.
- International constraints: some treaties limit capital controls (for example, EU members may not impose capital controls, though some safeguards for temporary restrictions are permitted for countries not part of the euro area).

### Policy framework for managing capital inflows (IMF framework)
- The IMF’s early 2011 policy framework intends to identify when CFMs may be necessary and effective, streamlining IMF approach to capital flows and ensuring consistent treatment.
- The framework stresses macroeconomic policies as primary response: allow exchange rate appreciation when undervalued, accumulate foreign reserves to a reasonable extent, lower policy rates and/or tighten fiscal policy as the first line of defense against excessive capital inflows (see IMF, 2011a).
- The framework’s conditions for CFMs: CFMs should be used only when (a) the exchange rate is not undervalued on a multilateral basis in relation to medium-term fundamentals, (b) reserves are in excess of adequate precautionary levels or sterilization costs are excessive, and (c) the economy is overheating (inflation outlook not benign or developing credit or asset price boom) precluding monetary easing (see IMF, 2011a).
- Order of policy response in framework:
  - First line: macroeconomic policies (exchange rate, reserves, monetary/fiscal).
  - Second line: CFMs that do not discriminate on residency.
  - Third line: CFMs discriminating on residency, implemented only when other options exhausted or excluded.
- Two illustrative approaches for applying framework:
  - Judgment-based approach: desk judgment on exchange rate (assessed as overvalued or broadly in line with fundamentals), overheating (output gap closed or closing rapidly), and reserve adequacy (desk judgment based on relevant metrics).
  - Threshold-based approach: consistent numerical thresholds for the three criteria:
    - Reserves judged adequate if ratio of reserves to the sum of short-term debt (residual maturity) and the current account deficit exceeded 100 percent.
    - Economy considered not overheating when (i) year-on-year CPI inflation averaged less than 3 percent over the last two years, or less than 10 percent in 2010 and declined from the average level of 2009; and (ii) bank credit did not rise by more than 5 percent of GDP in the last year.
    - Exchange rate assessment based on an average of CGER estimates where available; exchange rate assessed as not undervalued if the average estimate for misalignment was above zero percent.
- Caveat: different metrics may be more suitable for specific countries (e.g., reserve adequacy metrics, output gap estimates, and exchange rate assessment methodologies).

### Country-specific analysis — Overview for Czech Republic, Poland, Romania
- The IMF (2011a) identified episodes of capital inflows starting: second quarter of 2009 in the Czech Republic and Poland, and third quarter of 2009 in Romania.
- Cut-off dates for staff assessments: March 2011 for the Czech Republic; June 2011 for Poland and Romania.
- During the two year episode:
  - Average quarterly net capital inflows amounted to 9.2 percent of GDP in Poland.
  - Average quarterly net capital inflows amounted to 7.5 percent of GDP in Romania.
  - Average quarterly net capital inflows amounted to 5.3 percent of GDP in the Czech Republic.
- Comparison: net capital inflows as percent of GDP in other emerging markets during similar episodes ranged from 1.9 percent in Korea and 2.6 percent in Indonesia to 6.6 percent in South Africa and 6.9 percent in Turkey.
- Composition shift: portfolio flows assumed a much larger role in the Czech Republic and Poland, dominating direct investment and other investment flows; portfolio flows also picked up in Romania though other investment flows continued to account for more than half of total inflows.
- Risk: increased prevalence of portfolio inflows and their short-run nature raise vulnerability to rapid changes in capital inflows; reversals would be particularly harmful if coupled with weaker macroeconomic outlook, changes in global risk aversion, or deterioration of public finances.

### Country-specific analysis — Czech Republic (findings and IMF staff advice)
- Economic background:
  - Recovery underway since mid-2009; Czech economy weathered global crisis relatively well (IMF staff report for the 2011 Article IV Consultation).
  - Government formed mid-2010 outlined medium-term policy agenda anchored in fiscal consolidation, yielding credibility gains.
  - Monetary policy remained supportive; inflation pressures subdued until recent commodity price surge; banking sector stable.
  - Capital inflows resumed with composition change: debt flows now exceeding equity flows including FDI.
  - IMF (2011c) observed low Czech yields and capital inflows seemingly driven by strong fundamentals.
- Fiscal consolidation measures in 2010 included: one percentage point increase in the VAT, increased excise and real estate taxes, expenditure cuts, expansion in the base for social security contributions (rate reduction postponed), ad hoc expenditure cuts and freezes to compensate underperformance of corporate income taxes and social security contributions.
- IMF advised the Czech authorities to define additional fiscal consolidation measures beyond 2011 to support medium-term fiscal targets and preserve market credibility.
- Monetary policy and exchange rate:
  - Headline CPI inflation largely remained below the 2 percent target since mid-2010.
  - Czech National Bank (CNB) maintained the two-week repo interest rate at the record low level of 0.75 percent after cumulative cuts of 325 basis points between August 2008 and May 2010.
  - The koruna has been appreciating since the beginning of 2009 but IMF staff viewed it as broadly in line with fundamentals.
  - IMF recommended maintaining an accommodative monetary policy stance until the sizable negative output gap narrows considerably, unless a spike in inflation expectations or faster reduction in labor market slack necessitate earlier action.
- Application of IMF framework — Judgment-based exercise:
  - IMF staff viewed the exchange rate to be broadly in line with fundamentals → exchange rate criterion met.
  - Composite new IMF Reserve Adequacy Metric (RAM) (accounts for exports, broad money, and external liabilities) indicated adequate reserves → reserve adequacy met.
  - Overheating criterion not fulfilled: IMF report observed sizable negative output gap expected to narrow only marginally in 2011 and forecast to close around 2014 → economy not overheating.
  - Conclusion: judgment-based exercise indicates Czech Republic does not qualify for CFMs.
- Application of IMF framework — Threshold-based exercise:
  - Czech reserves covered approximately 144 percent of the sum of short-term debt at residual maturity and the current account deficit (threshold = 100 percent) → reserves adequate.
  - CGER REER misalignment estimates (2011 Article IV Consultation): range from -10 percent under the external sustainability approach to +11 percent using the equilibrium real exchange rate approach; the average estimate of REER misalignment was -2 percent → small undervaluation.
  - Overheating criteria:
    - Year-on-year CPI inflation rate averaged 1.2 percent over the past two years (threshold = less than 3 percent) → not overheating.
    - Bank credit rose by 4.5 percent of GDP in the last year (threshold = not more than 5 percent of GDP) → not overheating.
  - Conclusion: threshold-based exercise does not advocate CFMs as the Czech Republic meets only reserve adequacy criterion.
- Policy recommendation consistency:
  - Despite large capital inflows, the framework does not justify CFMs for the Czech Republic because the economy is not overheating.
  - Framework recommends primacy of macroeconomic policies: allow koruna to appreciate further and—if needed—lower policy interest rates.
  - IMF staff advice: allow appreciation of the koruna in case of significant capital inflows and lower policy rates if needed; staff advice is consistent with framework outcome.

*Italic: Content derived from the provided IMF PDF chapter/section text.*

### 2011. These resulted in a temporary expenditure rule, limiting the rate of growth of

### _wp12138 - 2011. These resulted in a temporary expenditure rule, limiting the rate of growth of

### Poland — policies, macro conditions, and staff assessment
- Fiscal and tax measures implemented in 2011 included:
  - a temporary expenditure rule limiting the rate of growth of discretionary expenditure;
  - a freeze of the wage fund in nominal terms;
  - reduced expenditure on less effective labor market programs;
  - a VAT rate increase by 1 percent for three years;
  - increased excise taxes;
  - tightened eligibility for early retirement; and
  - decreased transfers by the social insurance institution to open pension funds.
- IMF (2011d) forecast these policies and tax buoyancy would lower the deficit, but recommended further permanent measures amounting to slightly over 1 percent of GDP, including:
  - limiting tax reliefs and exemptions;
  - tightening pension indexation; and
  - streamlining public administration employment.
- Monetary policy and inflation:
  - core inflation was expected to continue to rise due to improving labor market conditions and tightening capacity constraints;
  - policy interest rate was constant through 2010, then raised from 3.5 percent starting in January 2011 to 4.5 percent in June 2011 as headline inflation rose above the National Bank of Poland target band;
  - IMF staff suggested policy rates be increased further, accounting for capacity constraints, inflationary expectations, labor market developments and exchange rate movements.
- Reserve and exchange rate assessment:
  - IMF staff found reserves exceeded several reserve-adequacy metrics but recommended additional reserve accumulation, arguing reserves fell short of "debt at remaining maturity plus the current account deficit";
  - National Bank of Poland considered reserves more than adequate and opposed additional accumulation.
- Threshold-based metrics (Poland):
  - ratio of reserves to short-term debt plus current account deficit: 71 percent in 2010 and projected at 84.1 percent for 2011 (threshold envisaged: 100 percent);
  - REER misalignment estimates in 2011 Article IV: ranged from -7 percent (equilibrium real exchange rate approach) to +5 percent (macrobalance approach); average estimate: -2 percent;
  - year-on-year CPI inflation averaged 3.1 percent over the last two years;
  - increase in bank credit equaled 6.8 percent of GDP in the last year;
  - framework limits were 3 and 5 percent, respectively, implying signs of overheating.
- IMF staff recommendations for Poland:
  - more gradual tightening of monetary policy and accelerated fiscal consolidation to counter substantial capital inflows;
  - some appreciation of the exchange rate to ease inflationary pressure;
  - additional reserve accumulation, especially given Poland's decision to convert part of its EU funds on the foreign exchange market;
  - targeted macro-prudential measures (tightening bank lending standards) as complements — which could be considered CFMs if intended to directly influence inflows.
- Authorities’ stance:
  - agreed on exchange rate appreciation and fiscal acceleration, but did not support additional reserve accumulation;
  - planned foreign-exchange related prudential measures (see NBP, 2010) including:
    - introducing a 50 percent limit for the share of exposures open to FX risk in the entire bank's portfolio of retail credit exposures financing real estate;
    - recommending alignment of currency of exposure with currency of income used for repayment;
    - obliging identification of reliable sources of financing for long-term credit exposures financing real estate, adequate to the currency of the exposure.

### Romania — macro conditions, framework assessments, and policy responses
- Macroeconomic backdrop (IMF, 2011e):
  - economy resumed growth in 2011 after severe downturn in 2009–2010;
  - headline inflation increased with rising food and energy prices; core inflation also edged higher;
  - currency appreciated and capital inflows picked up with official financing the main source while FDI remained weak.
- Inflation and monetary policy:
  - year-on-year CPI inflation in May 2011: 8.4 percent (above NBR target 3 percent ± 1ppt);
  - core inflation excluding VAT effects rose, partly due to processed food price increases;
  - central bank policy rate held at 6.25 percent since May 2010;
  - IMF staff suggested NBR be prepared to tighten monetary policy to achieve the 2012 inflation target.
- Fiscal developments:
  - higher-than-anticipated tax revenues and lower current and capital expenditures improved the fiscal deficit;
  - government on track to reach 2011 fiscal deficit target, but IMF saw further adjustments necessary for the 2012 target and urged resistance to tax cuts and expenditure hikes.
- Judgment-based assessment for CFMs in Romania:
  - exchange rate broadly in line with fundamentals (no significant misalignment at end-2010);
  - reserves coverage well above standard rules of thumb (3-months-of-imports and 100 percent short-term debt); IMF staff saw some room to accumulate additional reserves;
  - output gap: large negative gap in 2010, projected to widen in 2011 and close only by 2016 — economy not overheating.
  - judgment-based prescription: further reserve accumulation and exchange rate appreciation could be suitable responses to counter excessive inflows and help contain inflationary pressure.
- Threshold-based assessment for CFMs in Romania:
  - average REER misalignment: +2.1 percent (slightly overvalued);
  - misalignment range: -0.1 percent (external sustainability approach) to +5.2 percent (macroeconomic balance approach);
  - reserves covered 99 percent of short-term debt and current account deficit (very close to 100 percent threshold), allowing two interpretations: adequate or warranting further accumulation under strict threshold application;
  - overheating criteria: year-on-year CPI inflation averaged almost 6 percent in 2009–2010 (projected 6.8 percent for 2011) — exceeding the 3 percent framework threshold; credit growth previous year: 2.8 percent of GDP (below 5 percent threshold);
  - threshold-based conclusions:
    - further appreciation of the leu may not be warranted given slight overvaluation;
    - economy not overheating overall, but high inflationary pressures prevent monetary easing in response to large inflows;
    - marginal shortfall against reserve adequacy threshold leaves open whether further reserve buildup is warranted.
- Authorities’ measures and IMF response:
  - authorities concerned about portfolio inflows in Q1 2011 and sought to discourage short-term inflows by maintaining large spreads around policy rates for interbank rates and allowing greater exchange rate fluctuations to introduce uncertainty in returns;
  - IMF proposed absorbing inflows via additional reserve accumulation.
- Projections noted in IMF staff report:
  - FDI (in billions of Euros) projected to increase from 4.1 in 2011 to 5.1 by 2013;
  - net portfolio inflows expected to decline moderately but remain positive;
  - balance on other investments projected to turn positive in 2012 and increase to Euros 6.0 billion in 2013.

### Comparative application of the IMF capital inflows framework (Czech Republic, Poland, Romania) — findings and policy guidance
- General findings:
  - Both judgment-based and threshold-based approaches generally call for conventional macroeconomic policy responses as first-line measures to large inflows; neither approach broadly supported CFMs in the three case-study countries.
  - Eligibility for CFMs under the framework requires:
    - exchange rate not undervalued;
    - reserves in excess of adequate prudential levels or sterilization costs too high;
    - economy overheating (precluding monetary easing);
    - no scope to tighten fiscal policy.
- Synthesis (as summarized in Table 1):
  - Judgment-based approach: Exchange Rate — Aligned for Czech Republic, Poland, Romania; Reserves — Adequate (Czech Republic), Not Adequate (Poland), Not Adequate (Romania); Overheating — No (Czech Republic), Yes (Poland), No (Romania); CFMs warranted? No for all three.
  - Threshold-based approach: Exchange Rate — Slightly undervalued (Czech Republic, Poland), Slightly overvalued (Romania); Reserves — Adequate/Not Adequate mixed across countries; Overheating — No (Czech Republic), Yes (Poland), No (Romania); CFMs warranted? No for all three.
  - IMF staff advice emphasized traditional macroeconomic policies:
    - allow for further exchange rate appreciation and adjust policy rates (e.g., lower policy rates in Czech Republic where inflationary pressure was not a concern);
    - for Poland: some appreciation acceptable; monetary policy to be more gradually tightened; accelerate fiscal adjustment; additional reserve accumulation desirable;
    - for Romania: some appreciation acceptable; scope to accumulate additional reserves.
  - Targeted macro-prudential measures were recommended for Poland (and noted in general as potential complements), while CFMs were not explicitly endorsed by the IMF for any of the countries.
- Framework refinements discussed:
  - Tailoring thresholds more flexibly and relying on a broader set of variables (particularly for overheating and reserve adequacy) could improve guidance but complicates analysis and raises evenhandedness concerns.
  - Judgment-based approach benefits from country-specific in-depth knowledge but could be enhanced by referencing a range of thresholds to guide staff judgment.
  - Any operational framework—judgment-based, threshold-based, or composite—must balance the strengths of both approaches to allow IMF staff judgment while ensuring consistent cross-country advice.

*Source: _wp12138 - 2011. These resulted in a temporary expenditure rule, limiting the rate of growth of*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/_wp12138.pdf_