## _wp14215 — Section III: Impact of an Increase in U.S. Long-Term Yields on Emerging Markets’ Public Debt Dynamics

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [_wp14215 — Section III: Impact of an Increase in U.S. Long-Term Yields on Emerging Markets’ Public Debt Dynamics](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/_wp14215.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/_wp14215.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/_wp14215.pdf.json)

---

### Scope, data coverage, and analytical focus
- Sample and period:
  - Yearly (unbalanced) panel of "29 EMs" over the period "1990–2013" (Section III uses April 2014 Fiscal Monitor fiscal data for effective interest rates).
- Primary channels analyzed:
  - Impact of U.S. long-term bond yields on Emerging Markets (EMs) Interest Rate Growth Differential (IRGD).
  - Consequent effects on EMs public debt dynamics through the dynamic equation of public debt.
  - Interaction with global risk aversion (VIX) and heterogeneity across regions.
  - Historical link between U.S. monetary tightening cycles and the frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs using a Poisson count model.
- Main variable construction:
  - IRGD constructed using three interest-rate measures: (i) effective interest rate from fiscal accounts; (ii) EMBI (foreign-currency bond yields); (iii) domestic government bond yields (5-year and 10-year where available).

### Methodology and estimation approach
- Econometric framework:
  - Regressions of IRGD variations on real 10-year U.S. government bond yields, VIX (CBOE volatility index), U.S. real GDP growth, and EM macro, fiscal, financial, institutional, and external controls; fixed effects panel with robust clustered standard errors.
  - Use estimated IRGD responses to map into changes in public debt-to-GDP via the dynamic debt equation (holding other controls unchanged; ceteris paribus).
- Crisis-frequency analysis:
  - Identification of U.S. monetary tightening cycles following Adrian and Estrella (2008) extended to the sample.
  - Poisson count model (and negative binomial robustness) for number of sovereign debt crises (Reinhart and Rogoff crisis dates 1955–2010) with variables including Fed funds rate (FFR), tightening dummy (Tight), and term spread (Spread = 10-year minus FFR).

### Key econometric findings on IRGDs and interest rates
- Baseline sensitivities:
  - A "100 basis points" increase in U.S. bond yields leads to an "80 basis point" increase in the effective IRGD at average VIX (Table 1, Specification (1)).
  - At average VIX, a "100 basis points" increase in U.S. long-term bond yields leads to a "50 basis points" increase in the effective interest rate (Table 2).
  - The paper summarizes the conversion as: a unit permanent increase in U.S. long-term bond yields would increase the IRGD based on effective interest rates by "0.8 percentage points".
- Amplification by global risk aversion:
  - At high global risk aversion (VIX at the "95th percentile" = "31.1"): the same "100 basis points" U.S. yield increase would raise the effective IRGD by "380 basis points".
- Drivers and robustness:
  - Most IRGD widening comes from rising interest rates; growth slowdown complements the widening.
  - Sensitivity strongest for EMBI and EMBI-based IRGD; weakest for domestic bond yields.
  - The level of public debt significantly increases IRGDs; capital market and institutional variables are less consistently relevant.
  - Results robust to inclusion of fiscal, financial, institutional, and external controls (Tables 3 and 4).

### Regional heterogeneity and transmission channels
- Regional groups: Asia, Latin America, Europe (Emerging Europe), Middle East & Central Asia.
- Regional impacts (simulations and interpretation):
  - Latin America:
    - At average VIX ("normal times"—VIX average = "19.9"): a permanent "one percent" increase in U.S. yields would raise public debt by about "3 percent of GDP".
    - At VIX = "31.1" (95th percentile): about "4½ percentage points" higher public debt-to-GDP over a five-year horizon.
  - Emerging Europe:
    - At high global risk aversion (VIX = "31.1"): about "3½ percent of GDP" higher public debt-to-GDP.
  - Other regions: less affected at average VIX; all regions would be affected at high VIX.
- Factors explaining stronger transmission in Latin America and Emerging Europe:
  - Foreign-currency debt share: EMs with high foreign currency debt (one standard deviation above average) face "2 percentage points" higher impact on IRGD than EMs with average foreign currency debt (evaluated at average VIX).
  - Fiscal balance: European EMs with weaker fiscal positions suffer "1.5 percentage points" higher increase in IRGDs following a U.S. interest rate shock (at average VIX); fiscal balances in Europe are on average "one percentage point" worse than in Latin America (and "1.2 percentage points" worse than in Asia).
  - Exchange rate regime and VIX interaction: more floating exchange rates dampen the role of the VIX; Europe’s more managed regimes on average show a stronger VIX effect.

### Time variation and trends
- Interaction effects:
  - Sensitivity of IRGD to U.S. interest rates has changed over time.
  - Interactions with a time trend and the VIX are highly significant:
    - Sensitivity declined at average VIX (possible contributors: lengthening debt maturities, more domestic financing).
    - Sensitivity increased at high VIX (possibly due to more interconnected financial markets).
  - Latin America and Asia drive the decline at average VIX; Europe’s IRGD has been more strongly affected by U.S. bond yields in recent years including the global financial crisis.

### Public debt dynamics — simulations for a permanent "one percent" U.S. yield increase
- Simulation design:
  - Use dynamic debt equation (Equations (2) and (3)) to map IRGD responses into public debt-to-GDP changes, holding all other control variables unchanged and not accounting for policy responses or revenue feedbacks.
  - Trajectories reflect only higher debt service/issuance (ceteris paribus).
- Simulated results:
  - At average VIX (VIX average = "19.9"):
    - Latin America: about "3 percent of GDP" higher public debt.
    - Other regions: less affected at average VIX.
  - At high global risk aversion (VIX at "95th percentile" = "31.1"):
    - Latin America: around "4½ percentage points" higher public debt-to-GDP over five years.
    - Emerging Europe: about "3½ percent of GDP" higher public debt-to-GDP.
- Additional note:
  - IRGDs would nonetheless remain negative in all regions and debt would continue to decline over the medium term under the ceteris paribus simulation.

### U.S. monetary tightening and the frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs
- Historical patterns:
  - Crisis data cover "1955–2010" (Reinhart and Rogoff).
  - Peaks in Fed funds often coincide with higher frequency of sovereign debt crises, especially when accompanied by a high term spread.
- Tightening-cycle identification:
  - Based on Adrian and Estrella (2008) procedure extended through the sample; tightening episodes shown in Figure 6.
- Count-model findings:
  - The estimated Poisson model implies higher frequency of sovereign debt crises at the beginning of tightening cycles, especially when accompanied by rising term spreads.
  - Quantitative interpretation:
    - Frequency of sovereign debt crises is estimated to be higher by about "15 percent" at the beginning of U.S. monetary tightening cycles.
    - An additional "20 percent" increase in crisis frequency if the term spread rises above its historical median value.
  - Figure 7 illustrates predicted counts across tightening/no-tightening and above-/below-median term spread scenarios.

### Robustness checks for crisis-frequency results
- Volcker disinflation (1980–1983) dummy:
  - Adding a dummy yields little change—no evidence that sovereign debt crises were more frequent during that episode in the sample.
- Regional sensitivity:
  - Excluding Latin America leaves tightening effects significant though slightly smaller.
  - Estimating the model for Latin America alone yields a higher impact of U.S. tightening on sovereign debt distress, especially when the term spread is high and at the beginning of tightening cycles.

### Policy-relevant implications and recommendations
- For emerging economies:
  - Stand ready to withstand potential disruptions from shifts in source-economy monetary policy.
  - Strengthen macroeconomic fundamentals early, as much of the impact occurs at the early stage of tightening cycles.
  - Monitor exposure to foreign-currency debt and the maturity structure of public debt given magnified transmission via IRGD.
- For source countries (e.g., U.S.):
  - Manage expectations through well-articulated forward guidance and enhanced monetary policy communication to limit spillovers and prevent a bumpy exit from unconventional policy.
- Monitoring emphasis:
  - Pay special attention to the term spread as an indicator: episodes of U.S. tightening that feature increases in the term spread are associated with higher frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs.
  - Track global risk aversion (VIX) because investor discrimination across EMs is amplified during periods of high global risk aversion.

### Conclusion and caveats
- Main quantified impacts:
  - A unit permanent increase in U.S. long-term bond yields would increase the IRGD based on effective interest rates by "0.8 percentage points".
  - Holding everything else equal, this converts into an increase of public debt by about "4½ percentage points of GDP" for countries in Latin America (and by "3½ percent of GDP" in Emerging Europe) over a 5-year horizon at times of high global risk aversion.
- Sovereign-crisis timing:
  - Frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs tends to increase at the early stages of U.S. monetary policy tightening when tightening is associated with a steepening yield curve.
- Caveats and limits:
  - The identification of the beginning of a tightening episode is only clear ex-post.
  - None of the historical episodes in the estimation had a binding Zero Lower Bound (ZLB) on nominal rates.
  - Exit from unconventional policy may occur in an unprecedented leveraging environment, limiting the information content of historical data.
  - Countries with different fundamentals will face varying fiscal stress risk; investor discrimination intensifies when global liquidity tightens and risk aversion is high.

*Source: _wp14215 — Section III assesses the impact of an increase in U.S. long-term yields on emerging markets’ public debt dynamics*

### References .............................................................................................................

### _wp14215 - References

### Figures and Tables (as listed)
- Figures:
  - 1. U.S. 10-Year Bond Yields, EM Interest Rates and IRGDs (1995–2013)
  - 2. The Impact on IRGDs by Region at Different Levels of Global Risk Aversion
  - 3. Impact of Fiscal Fundamentals on IRGDs by Region
  - 4. Impact of a Permanent Increase in U.S. 10-Year Bond Yields on Public Debt
  - 5. U.S. Monetary Policy and the Frequency of Sovereign Debt Crises in EMS
  - 6. U.S. Monetary Tightening Cycles
  - 7. U.S. Monetary Policy Tightening and Frequency of Sovereign Debt Crises in EMS

- Tables:
  - 1. Impact of U.S. 10-Year Bond Yields on EM IRGDs by Region
  - 2. Impact of U.S. 10-Year Bond Yields on EM Interest Rates
  - 3. Impact of U.S. 10-Year Bond Yields on EM IRGDs—Fiscal Control
  - 4. Impact of U.S. 10-Year Bond Yields on EM IRGDs—Financial, Institutional, and External Control Variables
  - Appendix Tables

### Scope, data coverage, and analytical focus
- Sample and period:
  - Yearly panel of 29 EMs over the period of 1993–2013.
- Primary channels analyzed:
  - Impact of U.S. long-term bond yields on Emerging Markets (EMs) Interest Rate Growth Differential (IRGD).
  - Consequent effects on EMs public debt dynamics using the dynamic equation of public debt.
  - How global risk aversion affects investor discrimination across countries’ macroeconomic fundamentals.
  - Historical relationship between tighter U.S. monetary conditions and the frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs, using tightening cycles identified since the mid-1950s and a Poisson count model.

### Methodology (as described)
- Estimation approach:
  - Estimate impact of U.S. long-term bond yields on EM IRGD controlling for relevant macroeconomic fundamentals.
  - Use these estimates to quantify the effect of a permanent increase in U.S. long-term bond yields on EM public debt dynamics via the dynamic equation of public debt.
  - Assess heterogeneity by levels of global risk aversion.
  - Identify U.S. monetary tightening cycles since the mid-1950s and estimate a Poisson count model for frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs.
- Additional modeling detail noted:
  - Analysis accounts for the dynamics of the term spread, emphasizing its relevance given the long-term nature of debt sustainability.

### Key findings (explicit numeric and qualitative results preserved)
- Public debt dynamics:
  - "A unit permanent increase in U.S. bond yields would increase public debt by about 4½ percentage points of GDP over a five-year horizon in Latin America, at times of high global risk aversion."
  - "The equivalent increase is around 3½ percent of GDP in Emerging Europe."
- Sovereign debt crisis frequency:
  - "The term spread helps discriminate among tightening episodes in U.S. monetary policy: the frequency of sovereign debt crises is higher at the beginning of tightening episodes that feature an increase in the term spread; there is little change in the frequency of sovereign debt crises when the term spread is relatively low (below its median historical value)."

### Policy-relevant implications (as discussed)
- Tightening in advanced-economy monetary policy, and in particular increases in U.S. long-term interest rates, can materially worsen EM public debt dynamics, with heterogeneous effects across regions (notably Latin America and Emerging Europe).
- Episodes of U.S. monetary tightening that feature increases in the term spread are associated with a higher frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs; monitoring the term spread is therefore important for assessing risk of fiscal stress during tightening cycles.
- Investor discrimination across EMs is amplified during periods of high global risk aversion, implying that external monetary normalization can interact with global risk sentiment to produce larger cross-country divergences in financing conditions.

*Source: _wp14215 - References*

### Section III assesses the impact of an increase in U.S. long-term yields on emerging markets’

### Section III assesses the impact of an increase in U.S. long-term yields on emerging markets’ public debt dynamics

### Literature review: role of U.S. long-term yields and global risk aversion
- U.S. long-term interest rates are a primary driver of EM bond market developments: Felices, Grisse and Yang (2009) find that U.S. long-term interest rates explain "60 to 70 percent" of the variation in the Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (EMBIG).  
- Uribe and Yue (2006) estimate that "a quarter" of fluctuations in EM spreads are caused by changes in U.S. interest rates.  
- U.S. long-term interest rates and EM bond yields: positive correlation over the medium term (“search for yield”) and negative correlation in the short term (“flight to quality”).  
- Global risk aversion amplifies effects: Jaramillo and Weber (2013) and Baldacci and Kumar (2010) document stronger fiscal variables’ effects on EM yields during periods of high global risk aversion (proxied by the VIX). IMF 2014d finds a sizable response of EM bond yields to a volatility shock. Lizarazo (2013) provides a theoretical model linking EM default risk, capital flows and bond prices to investor risk aversion and financial wealth.  
- Sovereign debt crises literature: Reinhart and Rogoff (2011) find borrowing surges ahead of external sovereign default and banking crises often precede sovereign debt crises. Park and Song (2011) find that domestic debt crisis thresholds depend on macro fundamentals. This paper examines both external and domestic debt crises and isolates U.S. monetary tightening as a factor.

### U.S. long-term bond yields and public debt dynamics — data and methods
- Sample and data: (unbalanced) yearly data for "29 EMs" over the period "1990–2013" using April 2014 Fiscal Monitor fiscal data for effective interest rates.  
- Main variable: Interest Rate Growth Differential (IRGD) constructed using three interest-rate measures: (i) effective interest rate from fiscal accounts; (ii) EMBI (foreign-currency bond yields); (iii) domestic government bond yields (5-year and 10-year where available).  
- Econometric approach: regressions of IRGD variations on real 10-year U.S. government bond yields, VIX (CBOE volatility index), U.S. real GDP growth, and a broad set of EM macro, fiscal, financial, institutional, and external controls; fixed effects panel with robust clustered standard errors. (See Equation (1) in source.)

### Key econometric findings on IRGDs and interest rates
- Baseline sensitivity (average VIX): a "100 basis points" increase in U.S. bond yields leads to an "80 basis point" increase in the effective IRGD (Table 1, Specification (1)).  
- High global risk aversion (VIX at the "95th percentile" = "31.1"): the same 100 basis points U.S. yield increase would raise the effective IRGD by "380 basis points".  
- Most of the IRGD widening comes from rising interest rates; growth slowdown complements the widening. In interest-rate regressions, a "100 basis points" increase in U.S. long-term bond yields leads to a "50 basis points" increase in the effective interest rate at average risk aversion (Table 2).  
- Sensitivity ranking: impact is strongest on EMBI and EMBI-based IRGD; weakest for domestic bond yields and related IRGD (domestic yields only weakly significant in interest-rate-only regressions).  
- Controls: the level of public debt significantly increases IRGDs. Capital market and institutional variables appear less consistently relevant across specifications. Results robust to inclusion of fiscal, financial, institutional, and external controls (Tables 3 and 4).

### Heterogeneity by region and drivers of stronger transmission
- Regional sample groups: Asia, Latin America, Europe (Emerging Europe), Middle East & Central Asia (see Table A1 for country lists).  
- Regional impacts (baseline / interpretation from Figure 2 and text):  
  - Latin America: strongest impact at average VIX (example: at average VIX Latin America would see a sizable increase in debt burden of about "3 percent of GDP" after a permanent 1 percent increase in U.S. yields).  
  - Emerging Europe: particularly strong impact at very high VIX; at times of high global risk aversion Emerging Europe faces about "3½ percent of GDP" higher public debt-to-GDP ratio (simulation results).  
- Three factors explaining stronger impact in Latin America and Emerging Europe:  
  - Debt fundamentals: a higher share of foreign-currency denominated debt magnifies transmission in Latin America. EMs with high foreign currency debt (one standard deviation above average) face "2 percentage points" higher impact on IRGD than EMs with average foreign currency debt (evaluated at average VIX). External and non-resident debt also matter in Latin America.  
  - Fiscal balance: matters more in Emerging Europe—European EMs with weaker fiscal positions suffer "1.5 percentage points" higher increase in IRGDs following a U.S. interest rate shock (at average VIX). Fiscal balances in Europe are on average "one percentage point" worse than in Latin America (and "1.2 percentage points" worse than in Asia).  
  - Exchange rate regime and VIX interaction: more floating exchange rates dampen the role of the VIX; Europe, with more managed regimes on average, shows a stronger VIX effect.

### Time variation and trends
- Time interactions: sensitivity of IRGD to U.S. interest rates has changed over time. Interactions with a time trend and the VIX are highly significant: sensitivity declined at average VIX (possible contributors: lengthening debt maturities, more domestic financing) and increased at high VIX (possibly due to more interconnected financial markets). Latin America and Asia drive the decline at average VIX; Europe’s IRGD has been more strongly affected by U.S. bond yields in recent years including the global financial crisis.

### Public debt dynamics: simulation of a permanent 1 percent U.S. yield increase
- Method: use the dynamic debt equation (Equations (2) and (3) in source) to map estimated IRGD responses into changes in public debt-to-GDP, holding all other control variables unchanged and not accounting for policy responses or revenue feedbacks. The increased debt trajectories therefore reflect only higher debt service/issuance ("ceteris paribus").  
- Simulated regional results for a permanent "one percent" increase in U.S. 10-year bond yields (Figure 4 and text):  
  - At average VIX ("normal times"—VIX average = "19.9"): Latin America would see about "3 percent of GDP" higher public debt. Other regions less affected at average VIX.  
  - At high global risk aversion (VIX at "95th percentile" = "31.1"): all regions would be affected. Latin America would be hit hardest with around "4½ percentage points" higher public debt-to-GDP; Emerging Europe about "3½ percent of GDP".  
- Note: IRGDs would nonetheless remain negative in all regions and debt would continue to decline over the medium term under the ceteris paribus simulation.

### U.S. monetary tightening and the frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs
- Historical look: data on sovereign debt crises from Reinhart and Rogoff (2011), covering "1955–2010". Fed funds rate and term spread (10-year minus Fed funds) plotted alongside the number of sovereign debt crises (Figure 5). Peaks in Fed funds often coincide with higher frequency of sovereign debt crises, especially when accompanied by a high term spread.  
- Tightening-cycle identification: based on Adrian and Estrella (2008) procedure for identifying cycle beginnings and ends, extended to cover post-crisis period (sample ends in 2010 for crises data). Shaded tightening episodes are shown in Figure 6.  
- Count model: Poisson count model (and negative binomial robustness) for number of sovereign debt crises across EMs (Equations (4)–(6) in source). Model variables include Fed funds rate (FFR), a tightening dummy (Tight) for the beginning of tightening cycles, and the term spread (Spread = 10-year minus FFR).  
- Estimation summary (Equation (7) coefficients reported): the estimated model implies higher frequency of sovereign debt crises at the beginning of tightening cycles, especially when accompanied by rising term spreads.  
- Quantitative interpretation: the frequency of sovereign debt crises is estimated to be higher by about "15 percent" at the beginning of U.S. monetary tightening cycles, and by an additional "20 percent" if the term spread rises above its historical median value. Figure 7 illustrates model-predicted counts across tightening/no-tightening and above-/below-median term spread scenarios.

### Robustness analyses for crisis frequency results
- Volcker disinflation concern: adding a dummy for 1980–1983 (Volcker disinflation) yields little change—no evidence that sovereign debt crises were more frequent during that episode in the sample.  
- Regional sensitivity: excluding Latin America from the sample leaves tightening effects significant though slightly smaller in magnitude. Estimating the model for Latin America alone yields a higher impact of U.S. tightening on sovereign debt distress, especially when the term spread is high and at the beginning of tightening cycles (consistent with public-debt dynamics results).

### Conclusion and policy implications
- Main quantified impacts: a unit permanent increase in U.S. long-term bond yields would increase the IRGD based on effective interest rates by "0.8 percentage points". Holding everything else equal, this converts into an increase of public debt by about "4½ percentage points of GDP" for countries in Latin America (and by "3½ percent of GDP" in Emerging Europe) over a 5-year horizon at times of high global risk aversion.  
- Sovereign-crises frequency: frequency of sovereign debt crises in EMs tends to increase at the early stages of U.S. monetary policy tightening when tightening is associated with a steepening yield curve; timing may relate to abrupt expectation shifts about future policy.  
- Policy recommendations:  
  - For emerging economies: stand ready to withstand potential disruptions from shifts in source-economy monetary policy, with emphasis on strengthening macroeconomic fundamentals early, since much of the impact occurs at the early stage of tightening cycles.  
  - For source countries (e.g., U.S.): manage expectations through well-articulated forward guidance and enhanced monetary policy communication to prevent a bumpy exit from unconventional policy and to limit spillovers.  
- Caveats and limits: the beginning of a tightening episode is identified well only ex-post; none of the historical episodes in the estimation had a binding Zero Lower Bound (ZLB) on nominal rates; exit from unconventional policy may occur in an unprecedented leveraging environment limiting the information content of historical data; countries with different fundamentals will face varying fiscal stress risk and investors will discriminate more across countries when global liquidity tightens and risk aversion is high.

*Italic: Source: _wp14215 - Section III assesses the impact of an increase in U.S. long-term yields on emerging markets’ (IMF working paper content provided in the prompt).*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/_wp14215.pdf_