## Overview

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Overview](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/2006/moldova/eng/_mrm.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/2006/moldova/eng/_mrm.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/2006/moldova/eng/_mrm.pdf.json)

---

### Key findings from the Moldova case
- Large-scale labor emigration and workers’ remittance flows have played a dominant role in shaping Moldova’s economic evolution in recent years.
- Workers’ remittances officially estimated gross inflows reached almost 27 percent of GDP in 2004.
- Migrant workers (temporary and permanent) show strong attachment to Moldova and remit large portions of their earnings home.
- Migrants accounted for about 40 percent of the economically active population at end-2004.
- Remittances are primarily used to meet basic consumption needs and to finance housing and education; smaller amounts are invested in business activities.
- Remittances are likely to remain a stable and countercyclical source of foreign exchange in the short run, though longer-term portfolio shifts may occur as more migrants settle permanently abroad.
- The uptick in migration and remittances intensified after the 1998 regional crisis, which compounded domestic transition-related output contraction and job losses.

### Macroeconomic consequences identified
- Remittances drive growth through household consumption.
- Labor migration reduces labor supply and puts pressure on wages.
- Remittances finance a large and widening trade deficit.
- Remittance inflows put the exchange rate under appreciation pressure.
- Remittances fuel inflationary pressures.
- Remittances contribute to higher tax revenues.
- Emigration and remittances threaten the sustainability of the pension system, especially given a PAYG design where current worker contributions finance current retiree benefits.

### Policy implications and priorities
- Three broad policy areas are critical: structural, monetary, and fiscal.
- Structural policy:
  - Address the “push” factors driving emigration by improving the business environment to attract foreign capital and stimulate domestic private investment.
  - Channel remittance savings into productive investment by improving investment climate and removing impediments to private sector development.
- Monetary policy:
  - Maintain a flexible exchange rate regime.
  - Set low inflation as the overriding goal of monetary policy to preserve macroeconomic stability in the presence of large remittance inflows.
  - Monetary policy effectiveness depends on complementary fiscal and structural policies.
- Fiscal policy:
  - Short-term: safeguard macroeconomic stability and resist procyclical spending temptations amid surging tax revenues.
  - Long-term: address fiscal sustainability challenges arising from demographic shifts and a shrinking base of contributors to the PAYG pension system.
  - Be aware of changes in tax revenue composition—indirect taxes (e.g., VAT on imports) may increase their share at the expense of business and personal income taxes as remittances reshape domestic demand.

### Analytical perspective and broader relevance
- The Moldova analysis reinforces common stylized facts from migration literature: strong migrant attachment, high remittance propensity, and predominant use of remittances for consumption and housing.
- Extending analysis beyond “real” effects to monetary and fiscal consequences is important for policymaking in remittance-dependent economies.
- Policies that tackle structural weaknesses (improving investment climate and creating domestic employment opportunities) are essential to convert remittance inflows into sustained development gains and to reduce reliance on emigration driven by lack of domestic opportunity.

*Source: Chapter “Overview,” Migration and Remittances in Moldova (IMF).*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/2006/moldova/eng/_mrm.pdf_