## A New Look at Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade Flows

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [A New Look at Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade Flows](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/235/_op235.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/235/_op235.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/235/_op235.pdf.json)

---

### Overview and Purpose
- Study updates the IMF's 1984 analysis on the impact of exchange rate volatility on trade in response to a request from the Director General of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
- Motivations:
  - Major developments since 1984 may have either increased or reduced the effect of exchange rate volatility on trade.
  - Need to reexamine whether exchange rate volatility itself has changed and whether firms’ sensitivity to exchange rate risk has evolved.
- Scope and improvements over 1984 study:
  - Broader country coverage: covers the exchange rates of all IMF members for which data are available (vs. focus on the G-7 in IMF (1984)).
  - Explores a range of exchange rate volatility measures.
  - Disaggregates products into differentiated and homogeneous goods to test for differential volatility effects.
  - Employs recent theoretical advances in gravity-equation specification.
  - Examines whether volatility effects differ between advanced and developing countries.
  - Considers the effect of common currency arrangements following Rose (2000).

### Historical Context and Developments
- Noted developments possibly increasing exchange rate fluctuations:
  - Liberalization of capital flows over the last 30 years and a large increase in cross-border financial transactions.
  - Increased frequency of currency crises in emerging markets during the last two decades.
  - Transition to market-based systems in Central and Eastern Europe involving major currency adjustments.
- Developments possibly reducing the impact of volatility:
  - Proliferation of financial hedging instruments over the last 20 years.
  - Multinational firms’ operations may offset volatility effects across currencies.
- Key historical references and periods cited:
  - Breakdown of the Bretton Woods system in 1971–73.
  - IMF (1984) original study.
  - Recent episodes: decline in world exports growth in 2001–03 from double-digit pace in 2000; fairly sharp U.S. dollar fluctuations in 2002–03.
  - Related analyses: Prasad and others (2003); World Trade Organization (2003); IMF (2003a); Rogoff and others (2004); Rose (2000).

### Theoretical and Empirical Findings
- Theoretical review:
  - No unambiguous theoretical relationship between exchange rate volatility and trade flows.
  - The presumed negative effect of volatility on trade depends on specific assumptions and may not hold in general equilibrium models.
  - Exchange rate volatility reflects volatility in underlying economic shocks and the policy regime’s transmission of shocks to exchange rates and other variables.
- Empirical findings (aggregate and bilateral):
  - Aggregate level: No obvious association between periods of low exchange rate volatility and periods of fast growth in world trade—no evidence of a negative effect on world trade at the aggregate level.
  - Bilateral level: Some negative relationship between volatility and trade is observed in parts of the empirical evidence.
  - Robustness: The negative bilateral relationship is not robust to a more general gravity-equation specification incorporating recent theoretical advances.
  - Quantitative assessment: If a negative impact exists, it is not likely to be quantitatively large and the effect is not robust.

### Exchange Rate Regimes and Volatility
- Observations:
  - An exchange rate regime classified as pegged does not necessarily imply lower overall exchange rate volatility than regimes allowing some flexibility.
  - Pegging to an anchor currency exposes a country to fluctuations of the anchor against other currencies.
  - A misaligned peg can generate exchange market pressures and large, discrete changes in currency values, increasing volatility.
- Historical pattern:
  - Exchange rate fluctuations increased during currency and balance of payments crises in the 1980s and 1990s.
  - No apparent average increase in exchange rate volatility between the 1970s and the 1990s.

### Policy Implications and Recommendations
- From the perspective of promoting world trade:
  - Exchange rate volatility is probably not a major policy concern for enhancing trade.
- Caveats:
  - Large exchange rate volatility can affect economies through other channels (for example, currency crises require painful output and consumption adjustments).
  - Policy emphasis should be on addressing the underlying causes of large and unpredictable exchange rate movements rather than attempting to moderate exchange rate fluctuations per se.
- Issues outside the study’s scope:
  - Determining the optimal level of exchange rates or choosing the optimal exchange rate arrangement (e.g., fixed versus floating) is not addressed by this study.

### Structure of the Study (sections summarized)
- Section II: Reviews theoretical and empirical literature over the last two decades since IMF (1984).
- Section III: Describes recent history of exchange rate volatility across regions and groups of countries.
- Section IV: Presents new empirical evidence on the effect of exchange rate volatility on trade, including disaggregated product analysis.
- Section V: Offers concluding remarks.
- Appendix: Investigates whether countries with stable exchange rates and a common currency trade more; includes a Statistical Appendix.

*Source: OCCASIONAL PAPER 235, A New Look at Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade Flows, Peter B. Clark, Natalia Tamirisa, and Shang-Jin Wei, with Azim Sadikov and Li Zeng, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, 2004.*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/235/_op235.pdf_