## _op253

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [_op253](https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/253/_op253.pdf)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/253/_op253.pdf.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/253/_op253.pdf.json)

---

### Introduction: role and challenges of aid
- Aid transfers resources from donor to recipient countries to increase consumption and investment, presenting an opportunity to reduce poverty, increase standards of living, and generate sustained growth.
- Effective use of increased aid requires finding and managing good projects and agreeing upon and implementing conditions for budgetary support.
- Administrative capacity constraints and weakened country ownership of economic and social policies are important microeconomic and institutional challenges.
- Macroeconomic challenges include:
  - Upward pressure on the real exchange rate that can harm exporting industries.
  - Fiscal management and debt sustainability problems when aid is volatile or comes as debt.
- Aid to low-income countries has increased somewhat over the past 10 years; in a few relatively well-performing low-income countries aid inflows have increased substantially from already significant levels.
- Scaling up aid is seen as critical to achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

### Key research objectives and questions
- Develop a framework to aid economists in studying policy questions arising from scaling up aid.
- Apply the framework to five countries that experienced large aid inflows.
- Core questions addressed:
  - Do recipients of aid surges encounter macroeconomic absorptive capacity constraints?
  - Is Dutch disease a real concern? Do aid surges lead to real exchange rate appreciations harmful to the export sector and economic growth?
  - How should fiscal policy be adapted to aid surges?
  - Are aid inflows inflationary, and what is the appropriate monetary and exchange rate policy response? Is there a role for sterilization?
  - Have programs supported by the IMF’s Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) adequately managed the macroeconomic impact of surges in aid inflows?

### Case-study approach: rationale and limitations
- Rationale for case studies:
  - Critical variables are hard to measure in broad samples; case studies allow deeper examination.
  - Regression frameworks struggle with complex interactions (e.g., terms-of-trade shocks, quality of policies, macroeconomic effects of aid).
  - Case studies permit analysis of countries not in a “steady state” facing dynamic macroeconomic environments.
  - Only a few cases exist where aid rose by several percentage points of GDP in the context of reasonably strong policies and governance.
- Limitations:
  - Small sample size reduces generalizability to all aid recipients.
  - Harder to quantitatively control for exogenous changes (e.g., large terms-of-trade movements, natural disasters).
  - Study horizon limited to a short- to medium-term policy horizon of three to four years following the initial surge in aid; long-run effects may be hard to trace.

### Surprising results from the case studies
- Contrary to initial expectations about real exchange rate appreciation and Dutch disease, the case studies revealed:
  - No significant real appreciation accompanying aid surges in any sample country; in the majority there was substantial real depreciation over the period.
  - Terms-of-trade shocks partly explain outcomes in some countries, but generally the increase in aid dominated terms-of-trade movements.
- Explanations examined:
  - Increased imports absorbing aid (no pressure on real exchange rate) — one possibility.
  - Supply responses keeping nontraded goods prices from rising — another possibility.
  - A key alternative: macroeconomic policy response—central banks were reluctant to sell foreign exchange associated with aid inflows to accommodate a rise in net imports, instead building international reserves.
- Observed policy behavior and implications:
  - Central banks accumulated substantial portions of aid in reserves rather than accommodating higher net imports.
  - Fiscal authorities often increased expenditures on domestic goods and services by selling the aid foreign exchange to the central bank and using the local currency received.
  - This led effectively to using the same aid dollar twice: once to build reserves and once to finance government expenditure—similar in outcome to a domestically-financed fiscal expansion but with larger reserves.
  - Outcomes of such uncoordinated behavior include a surge in the money supply and the need to choose between inflation and crowding out the private sector via sale of treasury bills.

### Policy implications: coordination and framework
- Fiscal and monetary authorities must coordinate their responses to an aid surge.
- Uncoordinated responses—typically fiscal authorities spending aid while monetary authorities avoid exchange rate appreciation—can produce unintended negative macroeconomic consequences.
- The study develops an analytical framework emphasizing interactions between fiscal and monetary policy choices to interpret observed country patterns.

### Work program and related research
- The IMF and others have undertaken related theoretical and empirical work:
  - Rajan and Subramanian (2005a, 2005b): extensive empirical investigation suggesting real exchange rate appreciation from aid is likely a key impediment to sustained growth.
  - Gupta, Powell, and Yang (2005): survey literature on macroeconomic challenge of scaling up aid, providing practical guidance including discussion of monetary and fiscal policy drawing on the framework here.
  - Heller (2005): discusses impacts of higher aid on competitiveness, delivery of public services, fiscal and monetary management, behavioral incentives, and growth.
- The absorb-and-spend framework from IMF (2005a) and this paper has been used in subsequent analyses (Adam and others (2006); Chowdhury and McKinley (2006); Foster and Killick (2006); Mohanty and Turner (2006); United Nations (2006)).
- The model formalized in Chapter VIII abstracts from features key to scaled-up aid policy implications, such as private capital mobility and sterilization through treasury bills; ongoing research aims to extend the model to capture key trade-offs faced by fiscal and monetary authorities.
- Preliminary work indicates private capital flows may respond to aid flows in important ways; developing the role of private capital flows to low-income countries is a priority for further analysis.
- A next step is to simplify a more complete model into a practical tool for forecasting and policy analysis in aid-dependent, low-income countries.

*Source: _op253*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-publications/external/pubs/nft/op/253/_op253.pdf_