How Property Taxes Can Help Low-Income Countries to Develop
IMF Blog, November 11, 2024
Source details
- Canonical URL
- How Property Taxes Can Help Low-Income Countries to Develop
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Martin Grote, Mario Mansour, Jean-Francois Wen
- Published: November 11, 2024
Overview and key findings
- Authors: Martin Grote, Mario Mansour, Jean-François Wen
- Publication date: November 11, 2024
- Major finding: Taxing property more efficiently can play a meaningful role in raising revenue at the local level and allow countries to invest more in their people.
- Global revenue need: Governments must raise an additional $3 trillion to achieve sustainable and inclusive economic growth goals this decade.
- Fiscal burden by country group: The cost equals 4 percent of gross domestic product for emerging markets, and 16 percent for low-income countries.
- Potential tax revenue gain (prior IMF research): up to 5 percentage points of GDP over two decades.
- Current property-tax performance:
- more than 1 percent of GDP on average in OECD countries,
- nearly 3 percent in some advanced economies,
- around 0.1 percent of GDP in emerging Asia and Africa.
- Ambition with reforms and technology: recurrent property tax revenues in developing countries should be at least 10 times higher than current levels.
Local revenue, accountability, and equity
- Benefits of well-designed property taxes:
- reliable and progressive municipal financing,
- enhance accountability of local governments since proceeds fund local public services,
- tax increases in wealth from construction-intensive urbanization and public-infrastructure development.
- Political advantages:
- locally collected and spent taxes may be politically less challenging than broad-base national taxes,
- the tight link between local revenue and spending shields property taxes from national politics and raises accountability standards for local councils.
- Legislative and design guidance:
- national legislation should regulate how much property taxes can differ across a country to limit divergences in local public-service levels,
- municipalities should limit exemptions to a narrow range of public organizations,
- forgone revenues from exemptions should be regularly reported.
- Protection for “asset-rich but cash-poor” households:
- soften impact by deferring taxes until the property is sold, at which point full payment is due.
Technology, implementation, and sequencing
- Recommended sequencing:
- take a gradual approach to property-tax reform,
- initially broaden coverage using area-based taxes (fixed rate per square meter),
- transition to full value-based property taxes as valuation capacity and market price information improve.
- Role of modern mapping technology:
- satellite imagery and aerial photography by drones can fast-track expansion and coverage to all parcels that ought to be included in the fiscal register,
- increased precision enables accurate measuring of surface areas and development of fiscal-register maps that depict buildings and their alterations,
- area-based taxes can be rolled out quickly while market-value valuation capacity matures.
- Capacity demand and implementation support:
- demand for capacity development from the IMF indicates many countries are seeing benefits from combining policy reforms with technology enablers,
- effective communication of objectives to the public makes property-tax reform politically appealing.
Country examples and empirical evidence
- India:
- officials in Delhi and the greater Bangalore metropolitan area have started using satellite imagery to map properties in a geographic information system.
- Africa:
- several municipalities have made impressive strides.
- Lagos increased tax collection fivefold to more than $1 billion in 2011 by broadening the base of its property tax, coupled with better enforcement.
Policy recommendations (summary)
- Improve property-tax coverage and valuation capacity to reverse revenue underperformance.
- Use modern mapping technologies (satellites, drones) to create fiscal-register maps and measure surface areas accurately.
- Implement area-based taxes initially, migrate to market value-based property taxes over time.
- Regulate national limits on local tax divergence and require reporting of forgone revenues from exemptions.
- Provide mechanisms to defer payment for vulnerable property owners (tax deferral until sale).
- Communicate reform objectives clearly to the public to build political acceptability.
Source: How Property Taxes Can Help Low-Income Countries to Develop (IMF, November 11, 2024).