United Republic of Tanzania: Request for a Three-Year Policy Support Instrument
IMF Staff Country Reports, July 24, 2014
Source details
- Canonical URL
- United Republic of Tanzania: Request for a Three-Year Policy Support Instrument
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: July 24, 2014
- Series: IMF Staff Country Reports
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498385879.002
Economic background and outlook
- Tanzania has enjoyed strong and stable growth, projected to remain at 7 percent next year and in the medium term.
- Inflation is at 6 percent, gradually converging to the authorities’ 5 percent medium-term objective.
- The external current account deficit is 14 percent of GDP this year.
- Fiscal developments:
- The fiscal deficit rose to 6.8 percent of GDP in 2012/13 due to fiscal revenue shortfalls and overruns in domestically-financed spending.
- Revenue shortfalls in 2013/14 compared to the budget approved by parliament prompted the authorities to undertake expenditure cuts during the fiscal year to meet their 5 percent of GDP target.
- Debt sustainability:
- Based on the debt sustainability analysis, Tanzania remains at low risk of debt distress.
Recent program engagement
- Tanzania concluded its final review under a Standby Credit Facility (SCF) arrangement, together with its Article IV consultations, on April 25, 2014.
- The SCF expired on April 30, 2014.
Key challenges over the next three years
- Step up needed investment in infrastructure while protecting critical social spending.
- These objectives will need to be pursued following careful prioritization to preserve government debt sustainability.
- Prepare for natural gas.
- If recent discoveries of sizeable offshore natural gas deposits are confirmed as commercially viable, sizable fiscal revenues would need to be managed to bring benefits to all Tanzanians.
Request for a Policy Support Instrument (PSI) and staff view
- The authorities are requesting a three-year PSI to be in place by the start of FY2014/15.
- Authorities’ objectives for the PSI:
- Underpin the close policy dialogue with staff.
- Provide a positive signal to donors and markets.
- Safeguard policy discipline.
- IMF staff supports the authorities’ request for a PSI.