Global Financial Shocks and Foreign Asset Repatriation: Do Local Investors Play a Stabilizing Role?
IMF Working Papers, April 16, 2014
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Global Financial Shocks and Foreign Asset Repatriation: Do Local Investors Play a Stabilizing Role?
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Gustavo Adler, Marie-Louise Djigbenou, Sebastian Sosa
- Published: April 16, 2014
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484353349.001
Overview
- Study objective: Examine the dynamic response of gross capital flows in emerging market economies to different global financial shocks, focusing on whether domestic investors offset the response of foreign investors.
- Empirical approach: Panel vector-autoregressive (PVAR) setting.
- Authors: Gustavo Adler, Marie-Louise Djigbenou, Sebastian Sosa.
- Date: April 16, 2014.
Methodology
- Framework: Panel vector-autoregressive (PVAR) to identify responses of gross capital flows to global financial shocks.
- Focus variables: Gross capital flows, resident (local) investor behavior, non-resident (foreign) investor behavior.
- Types of global shocks analyzed:
- Global uncertainty shocks.
- Shocks to long-term U.S. interest rates.
- Short-term U.S. interest rate shocks.
Key Findings
- Evidence of a stabilizing role for local investors exists, but its presence and magnitude depend on the nature of the shock.
- Global uncertainty shocks:
- Local investors play a meaningful stabilizing role.
- Sizeable asset repatriation by residents largely offsets the retrenchment of non-residents.
- Shocks to long-term U.S. interest rates:
- Local investors also play a stabilizing role, but the extent of offsetting is much more limited compared with global uncertainty shocks.
- Short-term U.S. interest rate shocks:
- Residents and non-residents behave alike, both pulling capital away from emerging markets.
- Magnitudes of responses to short-term rate shocks are not economically significant.
- Broader implication:
- Results shed light on the potential impact of the Fed’s QE tapering on emerging market economies.
Implications for Policy and Interpretation
- The stabilizing capacity of domestic investors is shock-specific:
- Policymakers should consider the type of global shock when assessing vulnerability and designing responses.
- For global uncertainty episodes:
- Domestic asset repatriation can provide substantial offset to foreign investor retrenchment, suggesting resilience stemming from resident behavior.
- For long-term interest rate shifts:
- Limited resident offset implies emerging markets may remain vulnerable to prolonged shifts in global long-term yields.
- For short-term interest rate changes:
- Similar resident and non-resident behavior implies broad-based capital withdrawal tendencies, but small economic magnitudes reduce immediate concerns.