The Fear Economy: A Theory of Output, Interest, and Safe Assets
IMF Working Papers, September 9, 2022
Source details
- Canonical URL
- The Fear Economy: A Theory of Output, Interest, and Safe Assets
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Ruchir Agarwal
- Published: September 9, 2022
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400216084.001
Summary
- Presents a fear theory of the economy based on the interplay between fear of rare disasters and the interest rate on safe assets.
- Framework: studies macroeconomic consequences of government-administered interest rates in the neoclassical real business cycle model.
- Mechanism:
- When the government can fix the safe real interest rate, the gap between the "sticky real safe rate" and the "neutral rate" generates aggregate distortions.
- An exogenous rise in fear increases demand for safe assets and lowers the neutral rate.
- If the central bank does not lower the safe rate by the same amount, savings rise, leading to a decline in consumption and aggregate demand.
- The mechanism works in reverse when fear falls.
Quantitative findings and model performance
- A single fear factor can simultaneously:
- generate cross-correlations in output, labor, consumption, and investment consistent with the postwar US economy;
- generate variation in equity prices, bond prices, and a large risk premium consistent with asset pricing data.
- Pages: 82
- Volume: 2022
- Issue: 175
- Series: Working Paper No. 2022/175
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400216084.001
- Stock No: WPIEA2022175
- ISBN: 9798400216084
- ISSN: 1018-5941
Six novel insights (model implications)
- (1) Actively regulating the safe interest rate (in both directions) can mitigate the fluctuations generated by fear cycles.
- (2) Recessions will be deeper and longer when central banks accept the zero lower bound and are unwilling to use negative rates.
- (3) A commitment to use negative rates in recessions—even if never implemented—raises both the short- and long-run real neutral rates, and moderates the business cycle.
- (4) Counter-cyclical fiscal policy can act as disaster insurance and be expansionary by reducing fear.
- (5) Quantitative easing can be narrowly effective only when fear is high at the lower bound.
- (6) When fear is high, especially at the lower bound, policies that boost productivity also help fight recessions.
Policy implications and prescriptions
- Monetary policy:
- Consider active regulation of the safe real interest rate to offset fear-driven distortions.
- Avoid rigid acceptance of the zero lower bound; maintaining the option of negative rates can raise neutral rates and moderate cycles.
- Quantitative easing has limited effectiveness except when fear is high and the economy is at the lower bound.
- Fiscal policy:
- Counter-cyclical fiscal measures can serve as disaster insurance by reducing fear and thus be expansionary.
- Structural policy:
- Policies that boost productivity can mitigate recessions when fear is elevated, particularly at the lower bound.
Subjects and keywords
- Subject: Consumption, Financial services, Interest rate floor, Monetary policy, National accounts, Output gap, Production, Yield curve, Zero lower bound
- Keywords: business cycle model, business cycles, Consumption, fear, fear economy, fear factor, fear theory, Global, government-administered interest rates, interest, Interest rate floor, Output gap, safe assets, Yield curve, Zero lower bound
IMF Working Paper — Ruchir Agarwal, September 9, 2022. Publication details as listed above.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper