## The Evidence Is in on Negative Interest Rate Policies

_IMF Blog, March 3, 2021_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [The Evidence Is in on Negative Interest Rate Policies](https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/blogs/articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/blogs/articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/blogs/articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Gaston Gelos
- Published: March 3, 2021

---

### Summary and context
- Publication author: Gaston Gelos.
- Date: March 3, 2021.
- Context: After eight years of experience with negative interest rate policies, evidence suggests these policies have worked to ease financial conditions and likely supported growth and inflation.
- Since 2012, central banks in Denmark, euro area, Japan, Sweden, and Switzerland adopted negative interest rate policies in response to persistently below-target inflation rates and a very low “neutral real interest rate.”

### Effects on financial conditions, inflation, and growth
- Negative interest rate policies have:
  - Eased financial conditions.
  - Likely supported growth and inflation.
  - Stimulated inflation and output by roughly as much as comparable conventional interest rate cuts or other unconventional monetary policies.
  - Been estimated in some studies to be up to 90 percent as effective as conventional monetary policy.
  - Led to lower money-market rates, long-term yields, and bank rates.

### Behavior of banks, markets, and depositors
- Deposit-rate dynamics:
  - Deposit rates for corporate deposits have dropped more than those on retail deposits because it is costlier for companies than for individuals to switch into cash.
- Lending and bank behavior:
  - Bank lending volumes have generally increased.
  - Larger banks have increased lending, introduced fees on deposit accounts, and benefited from capital gains.
  - Banks that rely more on deposit funding—as well as smaller and more specialized banks—have suffered more adverse impact on profitability.
- Cash hoarding and rate limits:
  - Neither banks nor their customers have markedly shifted to cash, suggesting interest rates can probably become even more negative before large-scale cash substitution occurs.
- Money market funds and risk-taking:
  - Money market funds in adopting countries have not collapsed.
  - The increase in bank risk-taking does not appear to have been excessive.
  - If a “low-for-long” environment causes search for yield or excessive risk taking, negative interest rate policies per se do not appear to have compounded the problem.

### Financial stability and profit effects
- Any adverse effects on bank profits and financial stability have so far been limited.
- Caveats:
  - The absence of a significant impact on bank profitability may reflect shorter-term effects that could be reversed over time.
  - Side effects may still arise if policy rates go even more negative or if negative rate policies persist for a very long time.

### Institutional, structural, and political considerations
- Reasons for limited adoption:
  - Institutional and legal constraints may deter adoption.
  - Financial system structure or interconnection with global markets may make some countries more prone to adverse side effects.
  - Countries with many small banks relying on household deposits may be more reluctant to adopt negative interest rates.
- Adoption posture:
  - Even adopting central banks have moved tentatively, typically implementing small interest rate cuts because of the risk that negative side effects become more apparent with deeper or prolonged negative rates.
- Policy implication:
  - Central banks that adopted negative rates may be able to cut them further.
  - Non-adopting central banks should not rule out adding a similar policy to their toolkit—even if they may be unlikely to use it.
  - Ultimately, given the low level of the neutral real interest rate, many central banks may be forced to consider negative interest rate policies sooner or later.

### Research provenance
- This blog entry is based on work by Luis Brandao-Marques, Marco Casiraghi, Gaston Gelos, Gunes Kamber, and Roland Meeks.

*IMF Blog: The Evidence Is in on Negative Interest Rate Policies*

---


## References

- [عربي](https://www.imf.org/ar/News/Articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies)
- [日本語](https://www.imf.org/ja/News/Articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies)
- [Português](https://www.imf.org/pt/News/Articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies)
- [evidence so far](https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Departmental-Papers-Policy-Papers/Issues/2021/03/01/Negative-Interest-Rates-Taking-Stock-of-the-Experience-So-Far-50115)
- [does not appear to have been excessive](https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/IMF001/25824-9781498300858/25824-9781498300858/25824-9781498300858_A001.xml?redirect=true)

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2021/03/03/blog-the-evidence-is-in-on-negative-interest-rate-policies_