## Asia's Economic Resilience Is Being Tested by the Energy Shock

_IMF Blog, April 16, 2026_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Asia's Economic Resilience Is Being Tested by the Energy Shock](https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2026/04/16/asias-economic-resilience-is-being-tested-by-the-energy-shock)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/blogs/articles/2026/04/16/asias-economic-resilience-is-being-tested-by-the-energy-shock/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/blogs/articles/2026/04/16/asias-economic-resilience-is-being-tested-by-the-energy-shock/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/blogs/articles/2026/04/16/asias-economic-resilience-is-being-tested-by-the-energy-shock/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Andrea Pescatori, Krishna Srinivasan
- Published: April 16, 2026

---

### Baseline outlook and growth projections
- Asia entered 2026 on a strong footing after resilient growth in 2025 despite US tariffs and trade policy uncertainty.
- Reference forecast (assuming the energy shock proves transient):
  - Regional growth: "5 percent" in 2025; projected to moderate to "4.4 percent" in 2026 and "4.2 percent" in 2027.
  - China and India expected to contribute "70 percent" of the region’s growth.
- Downside risk: Should the shock persist or intensify, growth through 2027 could be reduced cumulatively by "1 to 2 percent".

### Energy dependence and the nature of the shock
- Asia’s exposure to oil and gas:
  - Net oil and gas imports equal about "2.5 percent" of economic output for the region.
  - Asia consumes about "38 percent" of the world’s oil and "24 percent" of its natural gas.
  - Asia accounts for about "35 percent" of global refining capacity.
  - The region’s oil and gas use amounts to about "4 percent" of gross domestic product, nearly double Europe’s share.
  - Oil and gas use exceeds "10 percent" of GDP in economies such as Malaysia and Thailand.
  - Asia is the main buyer of oil and gas shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, accounting for about "80 percent" of LNG exported through the waterway.
- Immediate risks:
  - Direct shock to refiners, utilities, and factories.
  - Risk of local shortages of petroleum products and gas in countries with limited stockpiles.
  - Potential disruption of fertilizers, petrochemicals, helium, sulfur — raising the risk of broader supply-chain disruptions.

### Transmission channels to the broader economy
- Terms-of-trade channel: High energy prices worsen terms of trade for net importers, transferring income to fossil fuel exporters.
- Real income channel: Higher fuel and electricity prices reduce households’ real incomes.
- Cost-push channel: Energy as an input raises production costs across transport, industry, petrochemicals, and fertilizers, reducing business profits and feeding into second-round inflation pressures.
- Financial channel: Higher bond yields, a stronger US dollar, currency depreciation, and higher risk premia—especially for fossil fuel importers—magnify the shock’s impact.
- Country-specific factors (fossil fuel intensity, pricing regimes) affect the magnitude of impacts.

### Shifting outlook across subregions and inflation dynamics
- Growth:
  - Most of the region: projected to moderate from January baseline.
  - Korea: exception, benefiting from strong links to the technology cycle.
  - Emerging Asia: remains main global growth engine but is projected to slow by about "0.5 percentage points" to "4.9 percent" in 2026, then stabilize in 2027.
  - Advanced Asia: similar deceleration expected.
  - Southeast Asia and Pacific island countries: deceleration expected, with considerable variation.
- Inflation:
  - Regional rise to "2.6 percent" in 2026 — "0.4 percentage point" more than the January forecast and up from "1.4 percent" in 2025.
  - Emerging Asia inflation projected to increase from "1.1 percent" in 2025 to "2.6 percent" in 2026, driven in part by upward revisions in China and India.
  - Advanced Asia: mixed — inflation pressures have eased in Japan but remain persistent in Australia, where the 2026 inflation forecast has been revised up significantly.

### Adverse and severe scenarios, and differential impacts
- Reference forecast assumes a conflict of limited scope with disruptions fading gradually.
- WEO adverse scenario:
  - Larger and more gradual energy shock relative to reference.
  - GDP growth in the major economies of the region would decline by almost "1 percentage point" in 2026 relative to the reference scenario.
  - Larger losses in more import-dependent and fossil fuel-intensive economies.
- WEO severe scenario:
  - Even larger shock lasting well into 2027 before fading.
  - Cumulative output loss of about "2 percentage point" by 2027 for major economies relative to the reference scenario.
  - Headline inflation would be "2.3 percentage points" higher in 2027.
  - Economies relying on imported energy, with limited fiscal space, or highly exposed to the Middle East conflict (through remittances, tourism, or commodities) would be disproportionately hurt.
- Country examples of vulnerability:
  - Sri Lanka: dependence on imported oil, remittances, and tourism transiting from the Gulf.
  - Lao P.D.R., Nepal, Myanmar: agriculture-dependent economies where higher fertilizer costs could lower incomes and raise food prices.
  - Malaysia and Thailand: oil and gas use exceeds "10 percent" of GDP.

### Policy responses and priorities
- General principles:
  - Protect vulnerable people.
  - Let prices adjust to preserve demand signals.
  - Anchor inflation expectations.
  - Accelerate structural reforms to reduce energy import dependence and strengthen resilience.
- Fiscal policy:
  - Support should be temporary and targeted at vulnerable people and viable businesses.
  - Cash transfers can supplement personal income.
  - Support should be financed by reprioritizing budgets where possible; otherwise, clearly communicate consolidation plans.
  - Broad fuel subsidies, tax cuts, and general price caps are costly, often regressive, and hard to unwind; they may raise fiscal costs quickly.
  - Country-specific room for support:
    - Sri Lanka and Cambodia can provide support but it should be targeted and consistent with rebuilding or preserving fiscal space.
    - Bangladesh faces sharper tradeoffs due to limited budgetary room for broad support.
- Monetary and exchange-rate policy:
  - Inflation expectations broadly anchored so far in most economies, giving some room to look through first-round headline inflation.
  - Monetary policy should remain agile; a prolonged shock could weaken currencies and generate more persistent inflation.
  - Advanced-economy interest rates generally expected to remain on hold or tighten to maintain disinflation.
  - Japan: central bank can look through first-round energy shock and continue withdrawing accommodation as inflation expectations rise to near target.
  - Australia: where inflation is above target and domestic demand pressures remain firm, scope to look through the shock is limited.
  - Thailand and the Philippines: where inflation remains below target, further rate cuts can be paused to preserve room for easing later.
  - Exchange-rate flexibility should remain the first defense; intervention should be limited to addressing disorderly markets, consistent with the IMF’s Integrated Policy Framework.
- Structural reforms:
  - Strengthen social safety nets to protect people without resorting to general subsidies.
  - Policies to balance job-rich growth and stronger domestic demand to reduce dependence on external demand.
  - Address youth unemployment and skill mismatches to boost productivity and inclusion.
  - Manage Artificial Intelligence adoption through policies on skills, inclusion, and governance to avoid widening gaps.
  - Deepen regional trade, services, and investment integration to strengthen resilience.
  - Invest in energy efficiency, power grids, and alternative energy to protect against future fuel-import shocks.

*Source: Asia's Economic Resilience Is Being Tested by the Energy Shock (April 16, 2026), Andrea Pescatori and Krishna Srinivasan, IMF blog*

---


## References

- [we project Asia](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/reo/apac/issues/2026/04/16/regional-economic-outlook-for-asia-and-pacific-april-2026?cid=bl-com-sm26-REOAPDEA2026001)
- [World Economic Outlook](https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2026/04/14/war-darkens-global-economic-outlook-and-reshapes-policy-priorities)
- [Integrated Policy Framework](https://www.imf.org/en/topics/ipf-integrated-policy-framework)

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2026/04/16/asias-economic-resilience-is-being-tested-by-the-energy-shock_