## Press Release: IMF Executive Board Approves US$2.46 Billion Stand-By Arrangement for Belarus

_IMF News, January 12, 2009_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Press Release: IMF Executive Board Approves US$2.46 Billion Stand-By Arrangement for Belarus](https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr0905)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/news/articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr0905/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/news/articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr0905/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/news/articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr0905/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Published: January 12, 2009

---

### Overview
- Date: January 12, 2009.
- The Executive Board approved a 15-month SDR 1.62 billion (about US$2.46 billion) Stand-By Arrangement for Belarus to support adjustment to external shocks.
- An amount equivalent to SDR 517.8 million (about US$787.9 million) is available immediately; the remainder will be phased thereafter, subject to quarterly reviews.
- The Stand-By Arrangement entails exceptional access to IMF resources, amounting to 418.8 percent of Belarus's quota.
- Belarus joined the IMF on July 10, 1992; its quota is SDR 386.4 million (about US$588.0 million).
- Belarus's latest prior arrangement with the IMF was a Stand-By Arrangement that expired on September 11, 1996.

### Program objectives and terms
- Main objectives:
  - Facilitate an orderly adjustment to external shocks.
  - Address pressing vulnerabilities through macroeconomic adjustment measures and structural reforms.
- Immediate financing available: SDR 517.8 million (about US$787.9 million).
- Exceptional access: 418.8 percent of quota.

### Key messages from Mr. Takatoshi Kato, Deputy Managing Director and Acting Chairman
- "Belarus is experiencing serious economic problems."
- External vulnerabilities have been exposed by adverse terms of trade movements, falling demand from trading partners, and difficulties in securing external finance, leading to a decline in international reserves.
- In the face of these shocks the economy is likely to slow in 2009.
- Authorities have adjusted the exchange rate and put in place tight fiscal and wage policies; measures already taken and announced are strong and, with resolute implementation, will be sufficient to restore stability.
- Planned structural reforms in key areas should help return the economy to a higher growth path by 2010-11.
- Exchange rate adjustment:
  - Adjustment of the exchange rate parity will help restore competitiveness and address external imbalances.
  - Adoption of a new currency basket and wider band will leave the economy better able to adapt to external shocks.
  - Increase in interest rates that preceded the shift in the exchange rate regime, and subsequent further upward adjustment, will help support the new exchange rate regime.
- Fiscal policy:
  - Fiscal tightening will help bring demand into line with external financing constraints.
  - Key measures include planned reduction in directed lending, observance of the target of a balanced central government budget balance, and maintenance of a prudent wage policy in the broader public sector.
  - Authorities plan to review the social safety net, in cooperation with the World Bank, to ensure protection for the most vulnerable against the downturn and utility tariff increases.
- Structural reform priorities:
  - Price and wage liberalization should follow the realignment of the currency.
  - Broader measures to support private sector development include reductions in the size of government, deregulation, and privatization, to be undertaken as fast as market conditions allow.
- Financial sector:
  - Structural reform in the financial sector is an important priority.
  - Authorities enacted a blanket deposit guarantee, but the framework for financial sector liquidity and solvency support still needs refinement.
  - Purging the banking system of directed lending is crucial to improve incentives, manage risks, and strengthen banks' capital positions.
- Conclusion: The authorities have developed a strong macroeconomic program; their actions merit substantial Fund support and give confidence in a speedy return to stability and prospects for resumption of rapid growth if reforms are followed through.

### Recent economic developments
- Growth record and drivers:
  - GDP averaged close to 9 percent since 2002, with spare capacity and high investment underpinning production growth.
  - Sharp export price gains, strong growth in trading partners, and large energy subsidies from Russia supported demand.
- Overheating and inflation:
  - Economy has been overheating.
  - Inflation rose from a 2006 low of 7 percent to currently 16 percent (as of the press release).
  - Rise in inflation partly due to global food and energy shocks; domestic indicators—high credit growth, output growth above trend—point to overheating.
- External vulnerabilities:
  - International reserves remained low during the boom.
  - Some Russian energy prices were unwound.
  - Exports to Western markets remained concentrated on oil products; higher value-added exports were mostly to the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).
  - Credit risks from foreign exchange borrowing and funding exposure to the global banking system increased.
  - Recent global developments exposed these vulnerabilities; the currency peg to the U.S. dollar came under pressure toward the end of 2008.

### Program summary and key features
- Program goal: Facilitate adjustment to external shocks, reduce vulnerabilities, and implement structural reforms critical to mitigating vulnerabilities.
- Growth and inflation outlook:
  - A sharp economic slowdown is forecast for 2009, with GDP projected to grow at 1-2 percent, after reaching 10.5 percent in 2008.
  - Inflation is projected to slow to 11.5 percent in 2009.
- Key features:
  - Implementation of a new exchange rate regime:
    - Devaluation to a new dollar parity and simultaneous switch to a currency basket that better reflects Belarus's trade and financial flows.
    - Both measures implemented on January 1, 2009.
  - Tight fiscal stance to contain domestic demand growth:
    - Fiscal tightening aimed at slowing investment and consumption.
    - Wage growth will slow in the budget and state enterprise sectors in 2009.
    - Public investment will be restrained.
    - Selected subsidies will be curtailed, while the social safety net will be strengthened to protect the most vulnerable.
  - Structural policies emphasizing economic liberalization:
    - Priority on price liberalization.
    - Efforts to enhance private sector role by reducing tax distortions and regulatory burdens, and continuing privatization efforts.

### Selected economic indicators, 2005-10 (annual percentage change, unless otherwise specified)
- Real GDP:
  - 2005: 9.4
  - 2006: 10.0
  - 2007: 8.2
  - 2008: 10.5
  - 2009: 1.4
  - 2010: 2.3
- Total domestic demand:
  - 2005: 11.0
  - 2006: 13.9
  - 2007: 12.8
  - 2008: 14.3
  - 2009: -2.2
  - 2010: 1.3
- Consumption:
  - 2005: 10.1
  - 2006: 9.0
  - 2007: 9.7
  - 2008: 10.7
  - 2009: -0.7
  - 2010: (not listed)
- Private consumption:
  - 2005: 15.0
  - 2006: 13.0
  - 2007: 13.3
  - 2008: 14.0
  - 2009: -1.0
  - 2010: 1.5
- Public consumption:
  - 2005: 0.4
  - 2006: -0.2
  - 2007: 0.5
  - 2008: 1.2
  - 2009: 0.0
  - 2010: 1.0
- Investment:
  - 2005: 26.2
  - 2006: 19.5
  - 2007: 21.4
  - 2008: -4.9
  - 2009: (not listed)
  - 2010: (not listed)
- Of which: fixed:
  - 2005: 26.5
  - 2006: 19.7
  - 2007: 20.8
  - 2008: -5.0
- Net exports (contribution to growth):
  - 2005: 0.1
  - 2006: -7.9
  - 2007: -0.8
  - 2008: -6.9
  - 2009: 3.9
  - 2010: 0.9
- Consumer prices, end of period:
  - 2005: 7.9
  - 2006: 6.6
  - 2007: 12.1
  - 2008: 13.7
  - 2009: 11.5
  - 2010: 8.0
- Consumer prices, average:
  - 2005: 10.3
  - 2006: 7.0
  - 2007: 8.4
  - 2008: 14.9
  - 2009: 15.7
  - 2010: 6.1

### External debt and balance of payments (in percent of GDP unless otherwise specified)
- Current account:
  - 2005: -3.9
  - 2006: -6.8
  - 2007: -7.6
  - 2008: -5.4
  - 2009: -3.6
  - 2010: (not listed)
- Trade balance:
  - 2005: -1.7
  - 2006: -6.1
  - 2007: -9.1
  - 2008: -9.6
  - 2009: -8.6
  - 2010: -7.4
- Exports of goods:
  - 2005: 53.3
  - 2006: 53.7
  - 2007: 54.3
  - 2008: 57.2
  - 2009: 52.5
  - 2010: 54.1
- Imports of goods:
  - 2005: -55.0
  - 2006: -59.8
  - 2007: -63.4
  - 2008: -66.8
  - 2009: -61.2
  - 2010: -61.5
- Gross external debt:
  - 2005: 17.0
  - 2006: 18.5
  - 2007: 28.0
  - 2008: 25.3
  - 2009: 32.4
  - 2010: 33.9
- Public (gross consolidated debt of the public sector):
  - 2005: 2.6
  - 2006: 5.9
  - 2007: 11.8
  - 2008: 13.1
- Private (banks and state-owned enterprises):
  - 2005: 14.4
  - 2006: 16.3
  - 2007: 21.5
  - 2008: 19.4
  - 2009: 20.6
  - 2010: (not listed)

### Savings and investment
- Gross domestic investment:
  - 2005: 28.5
  - 2006: 32.2
  - 2007: 33.2
  - 2008: 36.2
  - 2009: 32.9
  - 2010: 32.8
- (Other lines with values presented in the table:)
  - 9.6
  - 8.6
  - 11.2
  - 9.5
  - 19.1
  - 22.6
  - 24.6
  - 25.1
  - 24.9
  - 23.3
- National saving:
  - 2005: 29.9
  - 2006: 28.3
  - 2007: 26.4
  - 2008: 28.7
  - 2009: 27.4
  - 2010: 29.2
- (Other lines with values presented in the table:)
  - -0.5
  - 0.3
  - 30.6
  - 26.8
  - 25.9
  - 29.1
  - 27.2

### Public sector finance
- Central government balance:
  - 2005: -0.6
- General government balance:
  - (value not listed)
- Revenue:
  - 2005: 47.4
  - 2006: 49.1
  - 2007: 50.0
  - 2008: 52.2
  - 2009: 48.9
  - 2010: 48.5
- Expenditure:
  - 2005: 48.0
  - 2006: 47.6
  - 2007: 49.6
  - 2008: 52.7
  - 2009: 48.6
  - 2010: 49.2
- Of which, wages and subsidies and transfers (partial series shown):
  - Wages: 8.1, 6.9, 6.4 (years not explicitly aligned in the table)
  - Subsidies and transfers: 10.6, 8.8

### Terms of trade and exchange rate indicators
- Terms of Trade:
  - 2005: 12.3
  - 2006: -2.5
  - 2007: 8.7
  - 2008: -3.5
  - 2009: 1.6
- Real Effective Exchange Rate:
  - 2005: -0.1
  - 2006: -2.0
  - 2007: -4.4
  - 2008: -1.1
  - 2009: -4.8

### Official reserves and coverage indicators
- Official reserves (millions of U.S. dollars):
  - 2005: 1,297
  - 2006: 1,383
  - 2007: 4,182
  - 2008: 2,865
  - 2009: 5,204
  - 2010: 8,085
- Official reserves (months of imports of goods and services):
  - 2005: 0.7
  - 2006: 0.8
  - 2007: 1.7
- Official reserves (percent of short-term debt):
  - 2005: 39.3
  - 2006: 31.6
  - 2007: 56.8
  - 2008: 33.5
  - 2009: 62.2
  - 2010: 91.5

*Source: Press Release No. 09/05, IMF. The table and narrative reflect Belarusian authorities' data and IMF staff estimates as presented in the press release.*

---

## Content in this bundle

- [Pr0905rpdf (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported/external/russian/np/sec/pr/2009/pr0905rpdf.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

## References

- [Republic of Belarus and the IMF](http://www.imf.org/external/country/BLR/index.htm)
- [Press Releases](https://www.imf.org/en/news/searchnews)
- [PRESS CENTER](http://presscenter.imf.org/)
- [https://www.imf.org/en/home](https://www.imf.org/en/home)

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr0905_