## Public Information Notice: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2009 Article IV Consultation with Georgia

_IMF News, March 27, 2009_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Public Information Notice: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2009 Article IV Consultation with Georgia](https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/53/pn0937)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/53/pn0937/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/53/pn0937/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/53/pn0937/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Published: March 27, 2009

---

### Background
- Executive Board concluded the Article IV consultation with Georgia on March 23, 2009.1
- Combined shocks: August 2008 armed conflict and the global crisis led to:
  - Real GDP growth decline from 12½ percent in 2007 to an estimated 2 percent in 2008, after a sharp contraction in the second half of the year.
  - Inflation slowed to 5½ percent at end-2008 as global food and energy prices receded and demand weakened.
  - External current account deficit estimated at 22½ percent of GDP in 2008 but narrowed substantially in the second half of the year.
  - Private capital inflows dropped from $1.7 billion during the first half of the year to an estimated $450 million during the second half.
- Gross official reserves fell immediately after the conflict but recovered later, aided by:
  - donor support,
  - borrowing from the Fund under the Stand-By Arrangement approved last September,
  - transfers from the sovereign wealth funds to government accounts in the central bank.
- Fiscal and monetary developments:
  - Fiscal deficit widened markedly in 2008; composition of spending shifted from high defense and election outlays in the first half to infrastructure and social spending in the second half.
  - Monetary policy had focused on resisting inflationary pressures until the conflict, then faced declining demand for local currency and bank liquidity issues.
  - Central bank intervened heavily in the foreign exchange market to support the lari.
  - Banks stopped new lending despite central bank liquidity injections, reduced reserve requirements and policy rate cuts.
- Banking sector vulnerabilities:
  - Tightening of credit conditions and economic weakening exposed liquidity and solvency deterioration.
  - Nonperforming loans increased sharply; need for loan-loss provisioning, higher funding costs and lost interest income affected profitability.
- Structural reforms in early 2008:
  - Gradual reduction of income and dividend taxes.
  - Introduction of rules to guide fiscal and monetary policies in the medium term while ensuring public sector discipline and price stability.

### Executive Board Assessment — Findings and Risks
- Directors observed that the Georgian economy was seriously affected by the August 2008 armed conflict and the global downturn.
- Directors judged combined shocks to the current and capital accounts likely to be larger and more prolonged than originally expected, increasing external adjustment challenges and diminishing near-term growth prospects.
- Directors endorsed the authorities’ economic strategy:
  - Fiscal policy to support domestic demand.
  - Exchange rate flexibility to achieve external stability.
  - Structural reforms to secure sustained economic growth over the medium term.
- Directors saw considerable downside risks to the economic outlook and recommended readiness to adapt policies as warranted.
- Support for authorities’ plans:
  - Contain slowdown through a donor-financed fiscal stimulus and reorientation of expenditures.
  - Authorities reduced targeted 2009 fiscal deficit in line with a downward revision in expected official external financing.
  - Expenditure switched from imported defense goods toward essential productivity-enhancing infrastructure investment and better targeted social spending.
  - Directors welcomed planned expenditure management reforms.
- Exchange rate and reserves:
  - Move to foreign exchange auctions welcomed as important for greater exchange rate flexibility and protecting international reserves, which are relatively low.
  - Agreed exchange rate flexibility needed to be managed to preserve confidence in the financial sector.
  - Directors took note of the staff assessment that the real effective exchange rate is overvalued.
  - Over the medium term, commitment to exchange rate flexibility and structural reforms should help correct the overvaluation and reduce vulnerabilities from the large underlying current account deficit.
- Monetary policy and liquidity management:
  - Recommended all instruments of monetary policy, including the interest rate and reserve requirements, be employed to support more cautious liquidity management and ease pressures on the foreign exchange market.
  - Welcomed planned improvement of the central bank’s liquidity framework to strengthen effectiveness of interest rate policy.
  - Stressed importance of closely coordinating fiscal and monetary policies to contain pressures in the foreign exchange market.
- Financial sector stability:
  - Close supervision emphasized given deterioration in banks’ loan portfolios and profitability.
  - Welcomed Financial Supervisory Agency’s actions to increase provisioning based on bank-by-bank assessments.
  - Noted upcoming technical assistance from the Fund to strengthen stress-testing capability.
  - Endorsed authorities’ measures to bolster depositor confidence through increased transparency and adequate safety nets.
  - Welcomed authorities’ commitment to developing a financial stability plan to respond to potential situations of stress.

### Key Statistics — Georgia: Selected Economic Indicators, 2004–2008
- Real Sector
  - Real GDP growth (percentage change): 2004: 5.9; 2005: 9.6; 2006: 9.4; 2007: 12.4; 2008: 2.0
  - GDP (in millions of U.S. dollars): 2004: 5,126; 2005: 6,411; 2006: 7,768; 2007: 10,227; 2008: 12,870
  - GDP per capita (in U.S. dollars): 2004: 1,188; 2005: 1,486; 2006: 1,800; 2007: 2,324; 2008: 2,925
  - Inflation (in percent) — Period average: 2004: 5.7; 2005: 8.3; 2006: 9.2; 2007: 10.0; 2008: (no period-average value listed)
  - Inflation (in percent) — End-of-period: 2004: 7.5; 2005: 6.2; 2006: 8.8; 2007: 11.0; 2008: 5.5
- Central government operations (in percent of GDP)
  - Revenue and grants: 2004: 23.1; 2005: 24.4; 2006: 26.7; 2007: 29.3; 2008: 30.7
  - Expenditure and net lending: 2004: 20.7; 2005: 26.0; 2006: 29.7; 2007: 34.0; 2008: 37.1
  - Overall balance (cash basis): 2004: 2.4; 2005: -1.6; 2006: -3.0; 2007: -4.7; 2008: -6.4
- Monetary indicators
  - Reserve money (end-of-period growth rate, in percent): 2004: 44.3; 2005: 19.7; 2006: 19.2; 2007: 25.6; 2008: -4.5
  - Broad money (end-of-period growth rate, in percent): 2004: 42.6; 2005: 26.4; 2006: 39.3; 2007: 49.6; 2008: 7.0
  - Broad money velocity: 2004: 7.64; 2005: 6.79; 2006: 5.18; 2007: 4.27; 2008: 4.48
- External Sector
  - Current account balance (including transfers) — In millions of U.S. dollars: 2004: -344; 2005: -701; 2006: -1,174; 2007: -2,006; 2008: -2,911
  - Current account balance (including transfers) — In percent of GDP: 2004: -6.7; 2005: -10.9; 2006: -15.1; 2007: -19.6; 2008: -22.6
  - External debt (in millions of U.S. dollars): 2004: 2,138; 2005: 2,095; 2006: 2,328; 2007: 3,136; 2008: 4,581
  - External debt (in percent of exports of goods and services): 2004: 41.7; 2005: 32.7; 2006: 30.0; 2007: 35.6; 2008: (no value listed)
  - Gross official international reserves (in millions of U.S. dollars): 2004: 352; 2005: 474; 2006: 881; 2007: 1,361; 2008: 1,480
  - Gross official international reserves (in months of imports of goods and services): 2004: 1.3; 2005: 1.8; 2006: 2.2; 2007: 3.0; 2008: (no value listed)
  - Exchange rate, lari/dollar, period average: 2004: 1.92; 2005: 1.81; 2006: 1.78; 2007: 1.66; 2008: 1.48

*Source: Public Information Notice (PIN) No. 09/37, March 27, 2009.*

---


## References

- [Georgia and the IMF](http://www.imf.org/external/country/GEO/index.htm)
- [Public Information Notices](https://www.imf.org/en/news/searchnews)
- [https://www.imf.org/en/home](https://www.imf.org/en/home)

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/53/pn0937_
