## Transcript of a Press Teleconference Call with International Monetary Fund Officials on China's 2009 Article IV Consultation

_IMF News, July 24, 2009_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Transcript of a Press Teleconference Call with International Monetary Fund Officials on China's 2009 Article IV Consultation](https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/54/tr072309)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/54/tr072309/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/54/tr072309/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/54/tr072309/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Published: July 24, 2009

---

### Background and scope of the 2009 Article IV Consultation
- Mission timing and locations visited:
  - Mission went to China in late May, early June.
  - Visits included Anhui Province (Hefei), Shanghai, and Beijing.
- Principal focus:
  - The main focus was on policies needed to catalyze private consumption and to reorient investments in China amid the global financial crisis.
  - Dialogue with authorities, financial institutions, and private sector participants was described as constructive and candid.
- Institutional framing:
  - The consultation assessed both domestic policy needs and international spillovers, consistent with the Fund’s bilateral and multilateral surveillance mandate.

### Exchange rate assessment and labeling
- Operational guidance and labels:
  - The original operational guidance from the 2007 surveillance decision included exchange rate labels (e.g., “fundamental misalignment”).
  - That guidance was revised in June because the use of labels was judged to impede effective implementation and candid surveillance assessments.
  - As a result, labels were not used in the China consultation.
- Staff and Board views on valuation:
  - The staff report assessed the exchange rate as “substantially undervalued.”
  - Board discussion showed differences of view: some directors described the exchange rate as substantially undervalued; others saw a lesser role for the exchange rate in rebalancing.
- Role of exchange rate in rebalancing:
  - A stronger RMB was judged to help by:
    - Reducing the price of tradable goods and increasing labor income (boosting consumption).
    - Providing incentives for greater investment in domestically-oriented sectors.
  - The exchange rate was one important policy among many; reliance on any single policy would be insufficient.

### Quantitative note on past exchange rate movement
- Since 2005, the mission noted “around a 20 percent increase in the real exchange rate” in effective terms.

### Monetary policy, interest rates, and cost of capital
- Structural cost of capital:
  - Staff saw a need for a structural increase in the cost of capital because capital was judged to be cheap, incentivizing highly capital-intensive investment, particularly in tradable sectors.
  - Recommended gradual phasing out of the ceiling on deposit rates to raise the cost of capital.
- Current monetary stance (as of the consultation):
  - The loosening of monetary policy since late last year and through this year was judged appropriate and well calibrated to circumstances.
  - Risks from monetary expansion were recognized, notably related to credit quality given a very large increase in credit growth.
- Policy sequencing:
  - Once the economic recovery is more firmly established, the staff favored withdrawing monetary stimulus prior to fiscal stimulus.
  - There was perceived scope for “perhaps even a little bit more fiscal policy stimulus this year, the remainder of this year and next,” while monetary stimulus is steadily withdrawn.
- Deposit-rate liberalization:
  - Authorities have moved toward market determination of rates in the interbank and corporate bond markets.
  - Remaining issue: liberalizing deposit and lending rate ceilings, with attention to timing and preconditions (strong supervisory framework, alternative monetary-policy tools) to mitigate financial-stability risks.

### Fiscal stimulus and rebalancing toward consumption
- Existing stimulus:
  - A substantial stimulus package announced in the fall of last year was framed across two and a half years through the end of 2010.
  - A large part of the stimulus has come through infrastructure spending; expanded health care spending and some pension expansion are also in the pipeline.
- Staff recommendations on fiscal stance:
  - There was “probably some scope for maintaining that stimulus next year in terms of maintaining a fiscal deficit of about the same order this year as next year.”
  - Preference to reorient some fiscal stimulus away from infrastructure and toward measures that directly boost private consumption (consumption subsidies, reductions in some consumption taxes).
  - Any additional stimulus envisioned was marginal relative to last year’s package, possibly coming from an additional deficit or reorientation within existing plans.

### Labor markets, reallocation, and regional dynamics
- Labor-market absorption:
  - Official data and anecdotal evidence suggested labor markets have been “absorbing workers laid off from export industries,” with reallocation occurring geographically and across sectors.
  - Observed dynamics:
    - Some migrant labor returned to export sectors with possible reductions in real wages.
    - Interior provinces and rural areas have been experiencing stronger growth relative to historical patterns, absorbing labor.
    - Fiscal stimulus (infrastructure spending) has absorbed labor in inland areas.
  - Caveats:
    - Data coverage issues (especially for migrant workers) complicate precise measurement; assessment uses a mix of official statistics and mission field observations.
    - Outstanding concerns remain for specific groups (e.g., college graduates).

### Spillovers and multilateral context
- Near-term spillovers:
  - Because current growth was driven largely by public spending with relatively low import content, near-term regional spillovers were assessed as more limited, except to commodity producers (e.g., Australia) where infrastructure is commodity-intensive.
- Long-run spillovers and global rebalancing:
  - The policies advocated (boosting private consumption, social sector improvements, increasing cost of capital, capital-market development, exchange-rate adjustment) were judged to reduce global current account imbalances and have positive global effects.
  - The Fund positioned these policies as consistent with China’s domestic interest and beneficial for the global economy.

### Data quality and the Fund’s information use
- Data scrutiny:
  - The Fund does not collect primary statistics but triangulates China’s official data with other available data (regional comparators, Hong Kong; Taiwan Province of China; Japan).
  - Fund staff judged China’s official statistics broadly consistent with other information, acknowledging some statistical issues but not ones that materially changed the overall view.
- Technical assistance:
  - The IMF provides considerable technical assistance to China on statistical issues.

### Article IV timing, publication, and related procedural issues
- Delays in consultations:
  - The Article IV consultation had been delayed in prior years; reasons included implementation issues related to the 2007 surveillance decision on exchange-rate labeling and disruptions from the global financial crisis (e.g., September problems with Lehman Brothers).
  - The Board meeting was not blocked or vetoed by Chinese authorities; the delays were related to internal discussions on guidance and other intervening factors.
  - Other members’ consultations were also delayed for similar reasons.
- Publication of staff report:
  - A staff report was presented to the Executive Board.
  - Publication of the staff report is subject to the decision of the Chinese authorities, who were considering whether to publish; there was no specified timeframe for that decision.

*Transcript of a Press Teleconference Call with International Monetary Fund Officials on China's 2009 Article IV Consultation, July 24, 2009.*

---


## References

- [People's Republic of China and the IMF](http://www.imf.org/external/country/CHN/index.htm)
- [IMF Policy Advice -- A Factsheet](https://www.imf.org/en/about/factsheets/imf-surveillance)
- [Transcripts](https://www.imf.org/en/news/searchnews)
- [PRESS CENTER](http://presscenter.imf.org/)
- [IMF Executive Board Concludes 2009 Article IV Consultation with the People's Republic of China](https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pn/2009/pn0987.htm)
- [https://www.imf.org/en/home](https://www.imf.org/en/home)

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2015/09/28/04/54/tr072309_