## IMF Executive Board Discusses Building Resilience in Developing Countries Vulnerable to Large Natural Disasters

_IMF News, June 26, 2019_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [IMF Executive Board Discusses Building Resilience in Developing Countries Vulnerable to Large Natural Disasters](https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2019/06/25/pr19241-exec-board-discusses-building-resilience-developing-countries-vulnerable-natural-disasters)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/news/articles/2019/06/25/pr19241-exec-board-discusses-building-resilience-developing-countries-vulnerable-natural-disasters/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/news/articles/2019/06/25/pr19241-exec-board-discusses-building-resilience-developing-countries-vulnerable-natural-disasters/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/news/articles/2019/06/25/pr19241-exec-board-discusses-building-resilience-developing-countries-vulnerable-natural-disasters/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Published: June 26, 2019

---

### Background and context
- Press Release No. 19/241; published June 26, 2019.  
- Media relations contact: PRESS OFFICER: Maria Candia; Phone: +1 202 623-7100; Email: MEDIA@IMF.org.
- On May 1, 2019, the Executive Board discussed an IMF staff paper on building resilience to large natural disasters and options for managing associated risks in vulnerable developing countries.
- Recent large disasters cited:
  - Cyclone Idai (March 2019) — caused significant loss of life and widespread economic disruption in Mozambique and neighboring countries.
  - Hurricane Maria (September 2017) — caused damage to property and infrastructure estimated at some 200 percent of GDP in Dominica.
- Observations:
  - Frequency and intensity of natural disasters are projected to increase over time with climate change, increasing economic and social impacts.
  - Many disaster-vulnerable countries, particularly small states, underinvest in resilience due to capacity constraints, large upfront costs, and limited fiscal space.
  - International financial institutions and development partners provide support, but domestic institutional capacity often limits countries’ ability to leverage available resources.

### Staff recommendations and proposed framework
- IMF staff paper recommends development of comprehensive disaster resilience strategies (DRS) in consultation with development partners and other stakeholders.
- Core elements of a DRS:
  - Grounded in a clear diagnostic of disaster vulnerabilities.
  - Rest on three pillars: building structural resilience, financial resilience, and post-disaster/social resilience.
  - Support ex-ante planning, coordinate partner actions before and after disasters, and help catalyze donor support.
- Role of institutions:
  - IMF: leverage expertise in designing macroeconomic policies and frameworks; support resilience building in operational work and capacity development.
  - World Bank and other development banks: assist in identifying and assessing disaster vulnerabilities and prioritizing investment needs.

### Executive Board assessment — key findings
- Directors agreed natural disasters can have significant and long‑lasting effects on economic well‑being, particularly in small, fragile, and low‑income states.
- Directors noted weather‑related shocks’ frequency and intensity are expected to increase with climate change.
- Benefits of resilience policies:
  - Targeted infrastructure investments and effective use of financial instruments can mitigate social and economic impacts.
- Incorporating disaster risk into macroeconomic management:
  - Directors agreed this is important where risks of large‑scale natural disasters are significant.
  - Fund can help assess trade‑offs between development needs, rising debt vulnerabilities, and benefits of ex ante resilience building.
  - Most Directors favored extending the Fund’s approach to include slower‑onset disasters.
- Three‑pillar approach:
  - Welcomed as a useful framework informed by the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and World Bank work on disaster risk management and insurance strategies.
- Capacity constraints:
  - Many small, fragile, and low‑income countries face significant capacity constraints that impair effective use of external support.
  - Fund and World Bank are well placed to assist in overcoming capacity gaps.
  - Government ownership is crucial.
- National disaster resilience strategy (DRS):
  - Directors saw merit in countries developing a national DRS with international support.
  - IMF could lead on macroeconomic policy frameworks reflecting disaster costs and returns from resilient investment and identifying fiscal actions.
  - World Bank and development banks could lead on vulnerability assessment and investment prioritization.
  - Need for close IMF–World Bank collaboration; recognition of Bank’s core expertise in key areas.
  - A DRS would provide a roadmap for policy design and sequencing, facilitate donor coordination, and could catalyze higher levels of financial support from bilateral donors, climate funds, and other sources.
  - Development of DRS would benefit from peer learning and experience‑sharing.
- Financial resilience instruments:
  - Directors emphasized greater use of risk‑transfer instruments in government measures while noting challenges in developing insurance markets with reasonable premium levels relative to expected annual payouts.
  - Welcomed donor support for insurance market development and risk pooling.
  - Broad support for further Fund–World Bank work on state‑contingent debt instruments’ role in resilience building.
- Fund roles and tools:
  - Fund has a valuable role in surveillance and capacity building to support resilience.
  - A coherent resilience strategy should fit within a medium‑term macroeconomic policy framework consistent with maintaining debt sustainability, including under adverse shocks.
  - Staff could analyze economic impacts of disasters and trade‑offs between public investment and debt accumulation.
  - Directors saw the Fund’s lending toolkit as sufficiently flexible to provide support for disaster‑vulnerable countries facing a BoP need, but most saw scope to increase access limits and to use the toolkit in non‑traditional ways to support resilience‑building.
  - Encouraged giving special attention to disaster‑prone countries in the upcoming FSAP Review and Comprehensive Surveillance Review.
- Diagnostics and assessments:
  - DRS should be based on a robust diagnostic of risks and vulnerabilities, with a pragmatic approach in coordination with the World Bank.
  - Directors asked for a full assessment of the Climate Change Policy Assessments being piloted in a handful of small countries, in collaboration with the World Bank.
- Division of labor and coordination:
  - Building resilience extends to areas where the Fund lacks in‑house expertise; effective support requires close collaboration with other institutions.
  - Directors called for a clear division of labor based on respective mandates among the Fund, multilateral development banks, and other agencies.

### Implications and next steps highlighted by Directors
- Promote country ownership of DRS and facilitate coordination of donor support.
- Strengthen IMF–World Bank collaboration on diagnostics, capacity building, and policy sequencing.
- Analyze and expand appropriate financial instruments, including risk‑transfer mechanisms and state‑contingent debt instruments.
- Assess and pilot Climate Change Policy Assessments as potential diagnostics for national authorities.
- Consider adjustments to Fund lending access limits and non‑traditional uses of the lending toolkit to support resilience-building.

*IMF Executive Board Discusses Building Resilience in Developing Countries Vulnerable to Large Natural Disasters (Press Release No. 19/241), June 26, 2019.*

---


## References

- [https://www.imf.org/-/media/images/imf/bios/imfboard.jpg](https://www.imf.org/-/media/images/imf/bios/imfboard.jpg)
- [The Executive Board](https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/eds.aspx)
- [Dominica and the IMF](http://www.imf.org/external/country/DMA/index.htm)
- [Republic of Mozambique and the IMF](http://www.imf.org/external/country/MOZ/index.htm)
- [Press Releases](https://www.imf.org/en/news/searchnews)
- [PRESS CENTER](http://presscenter.imf.org/)
- [http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm](http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm)
- [https://www.imf.org/en/home](https://www.imf.org/en/home)

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2019/06/25/pr19241-exec-board-discusses-building-resilience-developing-countries-vulnerable-natural-disasters_