June 18, 2021
PRESS OFFICER: Raphael Anspach
Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org
Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation [1] with Republic of Serbia and approved a new 30-month Policy Coordination Instrument (PCI).[2]
Serbia has coped well with the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic recovery is expected to continue in 2021. The economic contraction in 2020 is estimated at around 1 percent, one of the smallest in Europe. Job losses have mostly been contained to the informal sector, which could not benefit from direct policy measures. Inflation remains low, with a stable exchange rate and well-anchored inflation expectations. The banking system remains stable, liquid, and well capitalized. A supplementary budget for 2021 was adopted in April, boosting capital expenditure and extending policy support to households and corporates. The latest wave of infections is tapering and Serbia’s vaccination rollout remains one of the fastest in Europe. In this context, and given the strong 1Q2021 data, real GDP growth is projected to reach 6 percent in 2021.
Over the medium-term, growth is projected to gradually converge to its potential of 4 percent, supported by strong FDI, continued high public investment, and an assumed recovery in trading partner countries. Inflation is projected to remain in the lower half of the inflation target band. The current account deficit is projected at about 5 percent of GDP and to remain fully covered by FDI.
However, high uncertainty surrounds prospects for an ongoing swift recovery. The future course of the pandemic in Serbia and its key EU trading partners remains highly uncertain. New waves of infections and new variants of the virus present a clear downside risk to the growth outlook and could lead to higher fiscal and external financing needs. On the other hand, building on the 1Q2021 momentum, a stronger-than-expected impact of the fast vaccine rollout in the country and globally could provide an upside risk.
The new PCI will build on the 2018 PCI successfully completed in January 2021 and aims at supporting the recovery from the pandemic, maintaining macroeconomic stability, and anchoring the medium-term fiscal policy framework, while pushing ahead with structural reforms to deliver more inclusive and sustainable growth. Program reviews will take place on a semiannual fixed schedule. While the PCI involves no use of IMF financial resources, successful completion of program reviews will help signal Serbia’s commitment to continued strong macroeconomic policies and structural reforms.
Following the Executive Board’s discussion on Serbia, Mr. Tao Zhang, Deputy Managing Director and Acting Chair, issued the following statement:
“Serbia has coped relatively well with the COVID-19 pandemic. The hard-won macroeconomic stability that was achieved prior to the crisis, and the large policy support package that was deployed as the crisis hit, helped mitigate the adverse impact of the pandemic on economic activity. Nonetheless, with the uncertain future course of the pandemic, sustaining a solid economic recovery should be a policy priority.
“Fiscal policy is appropriately focused on providing support to the economy. The supplementary budget provides additional relief to households and businesses affected by the recent waves of the pandemic, while a scaling up of public investment—including in green infrastructure—should support near-term growth. Once the recovery gains momentum, it will be important to rebuild policy buffers and anchor them by a new fiscal rule.
“Monetary policy is accommodative, with inflation under control. In addition, extraordinary monetary and financial sector policy measures have supported economic activity through the pandemic. The banking system remains liquid but continued close monitoring of risks in the banking sector remains critical as crisis support measures expire.
“Further structural and institutional reforms are needed to underpin high, inclusive, and greener growth, as well as accelerate income convergence with the EU. Strengthening the governance and management of SOEs remains critical, while efforts to improve the business environment should continue to help attract investments. Developing domestic capital markets would enhance financial deepening and support medium-term growth. Finally, promoting green growth and enhancing the social safety net would support the recovery out of the crisis and ensure a more sustainable development.”
Executive Board Assessment [3]
Executive Directors commended the authorities’ strong policy response, which cushioned the impact of the pandemic and set the stage for an economic recovery. Continued policy support will be necessary in view of still high uncertainty, while safeguarding macroeconomic and financial stability. It will also be important to maintain reform momentum to foster stronger, more resilient, and more inclusive medium‑term growth.
Directors highlighted the importance of preserving flexibility in the policy response and avoiding a premature withdrawal of support and having a contingency plan. Any additional assistance should be targeted, take into account the narrowing fiscal room, and maintain transparency and accountability. Once the recovery is fully under way, public finances should be anchored by the adoption of a new fiscal rule to help restore fiscal buffers, while prioritizing productive capital investments, moderating the growth of public wages and pensions, and further enhancing fiscal management.
Directors agreed that the accommodative monetary and financial sector policies remain appropriate. Continued oversight of risks in the banking sector will be important as the crisis measures are gradually unwound. Directors welcomed the authorities’ plans to encourage dinarization and improve capital markets and access to development finance. Some Directors considered that greater exchange rate flexibility could raise awareness to the risks of unhedged FX loans, and underscored the importance of developing hedging markets. A few other Directors, however, noted the potentially limited role of a more flexible exchange rate as a shock absorber.
Directors emphasized the importance of implementing structural reforms. They welcomed the reforms to state‑owned enterprises, including the new ownership and governance strategy, as well as reforms to strengthen the rule of law, improve the efficiency of the judicial system, and curb corruption. Investment in a green and digital economy can raise productivity, support job creation, and enhance economic and environmental resilience. Reforms to labor taxation and social protection will also be important.
|
Table 1. Serbia: Selected Economic and Social Indicators, 2018-2023 |
||||||||||
|
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
|||||
|
CR 21/8 |
Est. |
CR 21/8 |
Proj. |
CR 21/8 |
Proj. |
Proj. |
||||
|
(Percent change, unless otherwise indicated) |
||||||||||
|
Real sector |
||||||||||
|
Real GDP |
4.5 |
4.2 |
-1.5 |
-1.0 |
5.0 |
6.0 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|
|
Real domestic demand (absorption) |
6.5 |
6.2 |
-1.7 |
0.0 |
6.7 |
5.8 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|
|
Consumer prices (average) |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
|
|
GDP deflator |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
3.0 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
|
|
Unemployment rate (in percent) 1/ |
2.0 |
2.4 |
3.5 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
|
|
Nominal GDP (in billions of dinars) |
13.3 |
10.9 |
… |
9.5 |
… |
… |
… |
… |
… |
|
|
5,073 |
5,418 |
5,524 |
5,464 |
5,940 |
5,942 |
6,375 |
6,389 |
6,868 |
||
|
(Percent of GDP) |
||||||||||
|
General government finances |
||||||||||
|
Revenue 2/ |
41.5 |
42.1 |
40.3 |
41.3 |
40.8 |
41.7 |
41.3 |
41.4 |
41.6 |
|
|
Expenditure 2/ |
40.9 |
42.3 |
49.2 |
49.4 |
43.8 |
48.7 |
42.8 |
44.4 |
43.1 |
|
|
Current 2/ |
36.4 |
36.9 |
43.1 |
43.1 |
37.6 |
40.9 |
36.7 |
37.2 |
36.5 |
|
|
Capital and net lending |
4.1 |
5.1 |
5.9 |
6.2 |
6.0 |
7.6 |
5.8 |
6.8 |
6.5 |
|
|
Amortization of called guarantees |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
|
|
Fiscal balance 3/ |
0.6 |
-0.2 |
-8.9 |
-8.1 |
-3.0 |
-6.9 |
-1.5 |
-3.0 |
-1.5 |
|
|
Primary fiscal balance (cash basis) |
2.8 |
1.8 |
-6.9 |
-6.1 |
-1.1 |
-5.0 |
0.3 |
-1.1 |
0.4 |
|
|
Structural primary fiscal balance 4/ |
2.8 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
-0.3 |
0.4 |
-1.6 |
0.3 |
|
|
Gross debt /5 |
54.4 |
52.8 |
59.1 |
58.4 |
57.7 |
60.3 |
55.5 |
58.9 |
56.0 |
|
|
(End of period 12-month change, percent) |
||||||||||
|
Monetary sector |
||||||||||
|
Money (M1) |
20.1 |
16.3 |
24.2 |
36.3 |
7.5 |
11.8 |
8.7 |
8.4 |
8.0 |
|
|
Broad money (M2) |
15.0 |
8.8 |
12.7 |
18.4 |
7.1 |
9.1 |
7.3 |
7.8 |
7.5 |
|
|
Domestic credit to non-government 6/ |
10.1 |
9.5 |
10.6 |
12.0 |
6.5 |
5.6 |
7.8 |
4.6 |
6.6 |
|
|
(Period average, percent) |
||||||||||
|
Interest rates (dinar) |
||||||||||
|
NBS key policy rate |
3.1 |
2.3 |
… |
1.0 |
… |
… |
… |
… |
… |
|
|
Interest rate on new FX and FX-indexed loans |
2.8 |
3.1 |
… |
3.0 |
… |
… |
… |
… |
… |
|
|
(Percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated) |
||||||||||
|
Balance of payments |
||||||||||
|
Current account balance |
-4.8 |
-6.9 |
-5.7 |
-4.3 |
-5.8 |
-5.1 |
-5.6 |
-5.0 |
-4.9 |
|
|
Exports of goods |
35.2 |
35.7 |
32.6 |
34.5 |
33.8 |
39.3 |
36.8 |
40.3 |
40.8 |
|
|
Imports of goods |
-47.1 |
-47.9 |
-43.5 |
-45.7 |
-46.5 |
-50.4 |
-49.4 |
-51.0 |
-51.3 |
|
|
Trade of goods balance |
-11.9 |
-12.2 |
-10.9 |
-11.2 |
-12.7 |
-11.2 |
-12.6 |
-10.7 |
-10.5 |
|
|
Capital and financial account balance |
6.7 |
10.6 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
6.6 |
8.4 |
6.6 |
6.8 |
6.3 |
|
|
External debt (percent of GDP) 7/ |
66.1 |
65.5 |
67.4 |
70.9 |
64.3 |
70.6 |
61.4 |
68.0 |
64.8 |
|
|
of which: Private external debt |
30.9 |
30.8 |
29.9 |
34.1 |
28.8 |
31.8 |
27.3 |
30.2 |
28.5 |
|
|
Gross official reserves (in billions of euro) |
11.3 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
13.5 |
13.7 |
15.2 |
14.3 |
16.1 |
16.9 |
|
|
(in months of prospective imports) |
4.8 |
6.1 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
5.4 |
4.7 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
|
|
(percent of short-term debt) |
195.3 |
408.9 |
204.0 |
412.3 |
209.8 |
463.6 |
217.9 |
493.1 |
516.3 |
|
|
(percent of broad money, M2) |
52.2 |
57.8 |
56.8 |
57.7 |
54.6 |
60.3 |
53.2 |
60.1 |
58.7 |
|
|
(percent of risk-weighted metric) 8/ |
111.2 |
126.2 |
122.0 |
126.0 |
120.7 |
129.0 |
119.2 |
130.3 |
129.6 |
|
|
Exchange rate (dinar/euro, period average) |
118.3 |
117.9 |
… |
117.6 |
… |
… |
… |
… |
… |
|
|
REER (annual average change, in percent; |
||||||||||
|
+ indicates appreciation) |
2.8 |
1.0 |
… |
1.5 |
… |
… |
… |
… |
… |
|
|
Social indicators |
||||||||||
|
Per capita GDP (in US$) |
7,252 |
7,392 |
7,723 |
7,646 |
8,442 |
8,878 |
9,653 |
9,629 |
10,368 |
|
|
Real GDP per capita (percent change) |
5.1 |
4.5 |
-1.1 |
-0.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
|
|
Population (in million) |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
|
|
Sources: Serbian authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections. |
||||||||||
|
1/ Unemployment rate for working age population (15-64). |
||||||||||
|
2/ Includes employer contributions. |
||||||||||
|
3/ Includes amortization of called guarantees. |
||||||||||
|
4/ Primary fiscal balance adjusted for the automatic effects of the output gap both on revenue and spending as well as one-offs. |
||||||||||
|
5/ Excludes state guarantees on bank loans under the credit guarantee scheme introduced in response to the COVID-19 crisis, estimated |
||||||||||
|
at 0.85 percent of GDP as of end-April 2021. |
||||||||||
|
6/ At constant exchange rates. |
||||||||||
|
7/ After CR19/369, domestic securities held by non-residents are included in external debt. Historical data were updated since 2015. |
||||||||||
|
8/ The risk-weighted metric is IMF's ARA metric for the fixed exchange rate. Serbia was reclassified as stabilized exchange rate regime in 2019. |
||||||||||
[1] Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.
[2] The PCI is available to all IMF members that do not need Fund financial resources at the time of approval. It is designed for countries seeking to demonstrate commitment to a reform agenda or to unlock and coordinate financing from other official creditors or private investors.
[3] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.
IMF COVID-19 Hub
Policy Tracker
Financial Assistance
Questions & Answers