Washington, DC:
The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on January 24,
concluded the Article IV consultation
[1]
with El Salvador.
The pandemic interrupted ten years of growth, but El Salvador is rebounding
quickly. Robust external demand, resilient remittances, and a sound
management of the pandemic—with the help of a disbursement under the Rapid
Financing Instrument (SDR287.2 million or US$389 million) approved in April
2020—are supporting a strong recovery. The economy contracted by 7.9
percent in 2020 and is projected to grow by about 10 percent in 2021 and
3.2 percent in 2022.
Against this backdrop, public debt vulnerabilities emerged. Persistent
fiscal deficits and high debt service are leading to large and increasing
financing needs. The fiscal deficit is projected at 5¾ percent of GDP in
2021 and about 5 percent of GDP in 2022. Under current policies, public
debt is expected to rise to about 96 percent of GDP in 2026 on an
unsustainable path.
Since September 2021, the government has adopted Bitcoin as legal tender.
The adoption of a cryptocurrency as legal tender, however, entails large
risks for financial and market integrity, financial stability, and consumer
protection. It also can create contingent liabilities.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They
commended the authorities for their timely and effective management of the
pandemic, which has helped limit its economic and human toll. The economy
is rebounding strongly, and El Salvador has one of the lowest rates of
COVID-19 infection and mortality in the region.
Directors cautioned that fiscal vulnerabilities—stemming from the large
public debt stock-to-GDP ratio—have grown during the pandemic and need to
be promptly addressed. They underscored that high and rising financing
needs are constraining medium-term growth and stressed the need to
implement structural fiscal reforms. Directors also underscored the
importance of other structural reforms to boost inclusive growth and
supported the authorities’ efforts to reduce crime, cut red tape, reduce
energy costs, and increase infrastructure and social spending, including on
education and health.
Directors generally agreed on the need to implement a fiscal consolidation
starting this year based on high-quality revenue and spending measures to
restore fiscal sustainability and put public debt on a firm downward trajectory. Directors welcomed in this
context the steps being taken to modernize public financial management and
assess fiscal risks.
With the unwinding of the exceptional measures introduced to support
liquidity and provide debt relief to households and companies, Directors
stressed the need to monitor banks’ recovery strategies and welcomed plans
to introduce a banking crisis resolution framework. They also took positive
note of the decision to transition toward a forward-looking and risk-based
financial supervision.
Directors agreed on the importance of boosting financial inclusion and
noted that digital means of payment—such as the Chivo
e-wallet—could play this role. However, they emphasized the need for strict
regulation and oversight of the new ecosystem of Chivo and
Bitcoin. They stressed that there are large risks associated with the use
of Bitcoin on financial stability, financial integrity, and consumer
protection, as well as the associated fiscal contingent liabilities. They
urged the authorities to narrow the scope of the Bitcoin law by removing
Bitcoin’s legal tender status. Some Directors also expressed concern over
the risks associated with issuing Bitcoin-backed bonds.
Directors welcomed the publication of reports on the use of public funds
for COVID-19 and the audits of the Court of Accounts, as well as the
decision to further strengthen fiscal transparency and accountability.
Directors urged the authorities to strengthen the anti-corruption and
AML/CFT frameworks in line with international standards. Directors also
recommended upgrading the statistical framework.
|
Table 1. El Salvador:
Selected Economic
Indicators
|
|
|
|
I. Social Indicators
|
|
|
|
Per capita income (U.S. dollars,
2020)
|
3,799
|
|
|
Population (million, 2020)
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
Percent of pop. below poverty line
(2020)
|
26
|
|
|
Gini index (2019)
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
II. Economic Indicators
(percent of GDP, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proj.
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP growth (percent)
|
2.5
|
2.2
|
2.4
|
2.6
|
-7.9
|
10.0
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Consumer price inflation (average,
percent)
|
0.6
|
1.0
|
1.1
|
0.1
|
-0.4
|
3.5
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
Terms of trade, percent change
|
6.1
|
-4.3
|
-3.9
|
0.8
|
6.0
|
-5.4
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
External sovereign bond spread
(basis points)
|
599
|
520
|
424
|
453
|
760
|
837
|
…
|
|
|
|
Money and Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit to the private sector
|
51.2
|
52.2
|
53.5
|
55.3
|
62.1
|
57.6
|
56.3
|
|
|
|
Broad money
|
50.0
|
53.8
|
54.8
|
59.0
|
70.2
|
65.7
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
Interest rate (time deposits,
percent)
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
4.2
|
4.3
|
4.1
|
3.9
|
…
|
|
|
|
External Sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account balance
|
-2.3
|
-1.9
|
-3.3
|
-0.6
|
0.5
|
-3.9
|
-2.5
|
|
|
|
Trade balance
|
-19.2
|
-19.4
|
-21.7
|
-21.2
|
-21.1
|
-28.7
|
-28.4
|
|
|
|
Transfers (net)
|
18.8
|
20.2
|
20.6
|
21.0
|
24.2
|
26.1
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
Foreign direct investment
|
-1.4
|
-3.6
|
-3.2
|
-2.4
|
-0.8
|
-2.8
|
-1.9
|
|
|
|
Gross international reserves (mill.
U.S. dollars)
|
3,238
|
3,567
|
3,569
|
4,446
|
3,083
|
3,510
|
3,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonfinancial Public Sector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall balance
|
-3.1
|
-2.5
|
-2.7
|
-3.1
|
-8.2
|
-5.8
|
-4.9
|
|
|
|
Primary balance
|
-0.2
|
0.7
|
0.9
|
0.6
|
-3.8
|
-1.1
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
Of which:
tax revenue
|
17.2
|
17.6
|
18.0
|
17.7
|
18.5
|
20.4
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
Public sector debt 1/
|
68.8
|
70.5
|
70.4
|
71.3
|
89.2
|
84.4
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
National Savings and Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross domestic investment
|
16.0
|
16.7
|
18.4
|
16.9
|
17.9
|
18.5
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
Private sector 2/
|
13.5
|
14.1
|
15.7
|
14.2
|
15.7
|
15.8
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
National savings
|
13.7
|
14.8
|
15.1
|
16.3
|
18.4
|
14.5
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
Private sector
|
13.7
|
14.7
|
14.7
|
16.4
|
24.0
|
17.3
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
Net Foreign Assets of the
Financial System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Millions U.S. dollars
|
1,995
|
2,645
|
2,714
|
3,424
|
3,046
|
3,303
|
3,836
|
|
|
|
Memorandum Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (billions of U.S.
dollars)
|
24.2
|
25.0
|
26.0
|
26.9
|
24.6
|
27.9
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Central Reserve Bank of El
Salvador, Ministry of Finance, and
IMF staff estimates.
|
|
|
|
1/ Includes gross debt of the
nonfinancial public sector
(including pension liabilities) and
external debt of the central bank.
|
|
|
|
2/ Includes inventories.
|
|
|
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found
here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.