## Jordan — Financial Sector Assessment Program and Financial System Stability Assessment

_IMF News, April 20, 2023_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Jordan — Financial Sector Assessment Program and Financial System Stability Assessment](https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2023/04/20/pr23124-jordan-financial-sector-assessment-program-and-financial-system-stability-assessment)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/news/articles/2023/04/20/pr23124-jordan-financial-sector-assessment-program-and-financial-system-stability-assessment/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/news/articles/2023/04/20/pr23124-jordan-financial-sector-assessment-program-and-financial-system-stability-assessment/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/news/articles/2023/04/20/pr23124-jordan-financial-sector-assessment-program-and-financial-system-stability-assessment/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Published: April 20, 2023

---

### Executive summary and context
- Press Release No. PR23/124; IMF Press center; April 20, 2023.
- The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) with Jordan on March 17, 2023 without convening formal discussions.
- The Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) report was completed on February 23, 2023.
- The report is based on the work of joint IMF/World Bank FSAP missions to Jordan during June and October 2022.
- Jordan’s financial sector is dominated by banks and has withstood several large external shocks since the latest FSAP in 2008-09, including:
  - Global Financial Crisis
  - Arab Spring
  - war in Syria and influx of refugees
  - COVID-19
- Current external pressures highlighted: global growth headwinds, high energy and food prices, and higher interest rates, which put pressure on corporate and household sector balance sheets.

### Systemic risk analysis: key findings
- The FSAP’s systemic risk analysis found that Jordan’s banking sector appeared broadly resilient.
- Specific findings:
  - Banks would be able to withstand a large global stagflationary shock, if it were to occur, given high levels of systemwide regulatory capital and robust earnings.
  - Contagion risk among banks is limited.
  - Credit concentration risk is substantial.
  - Banks’ exposures to the sovereign are large.
  - Nonfinancial corporations’ debt at risk could increase significantly in an adverse scenario.
  - Banks have ample liquidity and can manage significant liquidity pressures.

### Regulatory and supervisory strengths and shortfalls
- Authorities have introduced key elements of:
  - Basel III
  - IFRS 9
  - domestic systemically important bank (D-SIB) frameworks
- Financial integrity framework has been upgraded.
- Recommended supervisory enhancements:
  - Make the banking supervision approach more risk-based and forward-looking.
  - Develop Pillar 2 supervisory assessments for more risk-sensitive capital requirements.
  - Improve Risk-based Anti-Money Laundering/Combatting the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) supervision.

### Macroprudential framework and data needs
- The macroprudential framework needs:
  - Stronger decision-making
  - A more refined strategy
- Data gaps to be filled to enable:
  - Implementation of stress tests on a globally consolidated basis
  - Systemic foreign currency liquidity analyses
  - More granular analyses of household and corporate sector vulnerabilities to guide calibration of borrower-based macroprudential tools

### Sovereign-bank nexus and resolution framework
- The sovereign-bank nexus needs further analysis.
- Consideration should be given to related prudential policies for enhancing system resilience.
- Resolution framework improvements recommended, including:
  - Creating a multi-agency crisis management committee

### Background on FSAP
- The Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), established in 1999, is a comprehensive and in-depth assessment of a country’s financial sector.
- FSAPs provide input for Article IV consultations and thus enhance Fund surveillance.
- FSAPs are mandatory for the 47 jurisdictions with systemically important financial sectors and otherwise conducted upon request from member countries.
- The key findings of an FSAP are summarized in a Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA).
- The Executive Board takes decisions under its lapse-of-time procedure when the Board agrees that a proposal can be considered without convening formal discussions.

*Source: Jordan — Financial Sector Assessment Program and Financial System Stability Assessment; Press Release No. PR23/124; April 20, 2023.*

---


## References

- [PRESS CENTER](http://presscenter.imf.org/)
- [https://www.imf.org/en/home](https://www.imf.org/en/home)

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2023/04/20/pr23124-jordan-financial-sector-assessment-program-and-financial-system-stability-assessment_