{
  "title": "‘DeFi’ and ‘TradFi’ Must Work Together",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey/index.md",
  "summary": "Decentralized and traditional finance can thrive in tandem to fund renewable energy and other pressing needs, but only with clear standards and rules",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Crypto winter and the need for integration",
      "content": "- The cryptocurrency industry is in the throes of a crypto winter: tokens like bitcoin and Ethereum’s ether have lost three-quarters of their value while major crypto lending and investing firms have collapsed into bankruptcy.\n- Traditional finance (TradFi) is also stressed: highest inflation in 40 years, a war that’s fractured the international monetary system, an energy and commodity crisis sowing famine and political unrest, and record temperatures exposing a massive shortfall in investment to fight climate change.\n- Thesis: Both DeFi and TradFi need each other. DeFi must integrate some regulatory and self-regulatory practices from TradFi to attain mainstream adoption, while stewards of the global economy should explore DeFi and crypto solutions to pressing problems."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Centralization problems in energy and rationale for decentralization",
      "content": "- Examples of centralization vulnerabilities:\n  - Negotiations hinging on a sole decision by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to boost oil production.\n  - Germany’s dependence on Russian natural gas constraining policy choices.\n  - The Colonial pipeline shutdown affecting 60 million people.\n  - 2017’s Hurricane Maria leaving 90 percent of Puerto Ricans deprived of power for months after a few transmission lines failed.\n- Argument: Vulnerability to outside events (lack of “redundancy”) is a primary reason to decentralize energy systems.\n- Solution focus: Renewables (solar, geothermal, wind, recycling of waste heat and energy) because they are locally sourced and can function at wide ranges of scale."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Funding shortfall for climate action and obstacles to investment",
      "content": "- Climate investment gap:\n  - The Climate Policy Initiative estimates the world invested $632 billion in addressing climate change in 2019–20.\n  - The same source says $4.5–$5 trillion is needed annually to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050.\n- Two primary barriers preventing investment:\n  - Lack of reliable, rapidly actionable information to measure and project outcomes.\n  - Lack of a source of persistent, flexible user demand to make renewable energy production economically viable."
    },
    {
      "heading": "How DeFi and crypto technologies could mobilize green funding",
      "content": "- Tokenization and real-time data:\n  - Crypto technology can convert sensor-verified generation data into unique one-off tokens via provably secure sensors and blockchain-based tracking.\n  - Those tokens can become collateral in a DeFi environment to give lenders remote security.\n- Potential liquidity and cost impacts:\n  - With governments and ESG-compliant companies demanding proven carbon-reducing assets, a large pool of liquidity could form around such tokens, forging deeper capital markets and driving down financing costs.\n- Illustrative scenario:\n  - A remote Rwandan community building a DeFi-funded solar microgrid to power a new irrigation system shows potential for local development financing."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Demand smoothing via Bitcoin mining and energy economics",
      "content": "- The demand problem example:\n  - Economies of scale: a microgrid may require at least 2 megawatts of capacity but local needs may be only 500 kilowatts.\n- Bitcoin mining as a flexible energy sink:\n  - Bitcoin mining is geography-agnostic and will operate anywhere if energy is priced low enough.\n  - By definition, the cheapest form of energy is renewables.\n  - Already, 53 percent of the Bitcoin network runs on renewable energy, according to the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance.\n  - Cambridge Center’s midrange estimate: the total Bitcoin network currently consumes around 84 terawatt hours of electricity annually, about 0.38 percent of total world consumption.\n- Market and technology drivers:\n  - Bitcoin prices have plunged; Intel’s new Blockscale application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) are poised to create a glut of cheap chips for miners.\n  - Presence of low-cost energy will become the main factor in miner expansion plans.\n- Policy direction:\n  - Regulators should avoid preventing miners from forming relationships with renewable developers.\n  - Sensible energy policies should remove subsidies for dirty power plants and entice Bitcoin miners to provide long-term funding commitments to renewable providers with minimum capacity thresholds for communities.\n- Equity and decentralization caveat:\n  - Critique of centralization models: e.g., El Salvador’s government mining Bitcoin at a government-owned geothermal plant and keeping the proceeds for itself.\n  - Recommendation: developing economies should encourage partnerships between miners and community-based solar microgrids to spread wealth and generation capacity."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Risks, failures, and how regulation should differ for CeFi vs DeFi",
      "content": "- Recent failures and contagion sources:\n  - Three biggest sources of recent financial contagion were centralized “CeFi” services—Celsius, Voyager Digital, and Three Arrows Capital.\n  - Terra Luna was a de facto Ponzi scheme and was DeFi in name only.\n  - Real DeFi projects such as Aave and Compound have, so far, survived stress tests relatively well.\n- Security risks in DeFi:\n  - Crypto security firm Immunefi estimates that $670 million was lost in the second quarter of 2022 from smart contract breaches and hacks.\n- Regulatory prescriptions:\n  - Impose stricter fiduciary requirements on managers of CeFi services—treat them like brokerages or other regulated financial institutions.\n  - For DeFi operations, work with the industry to develop self-regulatory solutions that leverage technological strengths and decentralized structures.\n  - Suggested DeFi-focused measures include:\n    - Expanding “bug bounties” that reward developers who identify and fix incidents.\n    - Mandating periodic software audits.\n    - Conducting frequent stress tests of leverage and collateral models.\n- Foundational needs:\n  - Achieve consensus on what constitutes a decentralized system and whether projects intending to evolve in that direction are appropriately doing so.\n  - All interested parties from both DeFi and TradFi must agree on frameworks and a common lexicon, then establish standards and rules.\n\nMichael Casey, F&D Magazine, September 2022\n\n---\n\n Content in this bundle\n\n- ‘DeFi’ and ‘TradFi’ Must Work Together\n  - ‘DeFi’ and ‘TradFi’ Must Work Together (Markdown version){rel=\"alternate\" type=\"text/markdown\"}\n  - ‘DeFi’ and ‘TradFi’ Must Work Together (PDF){rel=\"external\" type=\"application/pdf\"}\n\n---\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Authors: MICHAEL CASEY",
    "Published: September 1, 2022",
    "The cryptocurrency industry is in the throes of a crypto winter: tokens like bitcoin and Ethereum’s ether have lost three-quarters of their value while major crypto lending and investing firms have collapsed into bankruptcy.",
    "Traditional finance (TradFi) is also stressed: highest inflation in 40 years, a war that’s fractured the international monetary system, an energy and commodity crisis sowing famine and political unrest, and record temperatures exposing a massive shortfall in investment to fight climate change.",
    "Thesis: Both DeFi and TradFi need each other. DeFi must integrate some regulatory and self-regulatory practices from TradFi to attain mainstream adoption, while stewards of the global economy should explore DeFi and crypto solutions to pressing problems.",
    "Examples of centralization vulnerabilities:",
    "Argument: Vulnerability to outside events (lack of “redundancy”) is a primary reason to decentralize energy systems.",
    "Solution focus: Renewables (solar, geothermal, wind, recycling of waste heat and energy) because they are locally sourced and can function at wide ranges of scale.",
    "Climate investment gap:",
    "Two primary barriers preventing investment:",
    "Tokenization and real-time data:",
    "Potential liquidity and cost impacts:",
    "Illustrative scenario:",
    "The demand problem example:",
    "Bitcoin mining as a flexible energy sink:",
    "Market and technology drivers:",
    "Policy direction:",
    "Equity and decentralization caveat:",
    "Recent failures and contagion sources:",
    "Security risks in DeFi:",
    "Regulatory prescriptions:",
    "Foundational needs:",
    "**‘DeFi’ and ‘TradFi’ Must Work Together**"
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "title": "‘DeFi’ and ‘TradFi’ Must Work Together",
      "role": "document",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2022/september/casey.pdf",
      "summary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2022/september/casey.pdf.md",
        "mime": "text/markdown"
      },
      "binary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2022/september/casey.pdf",
        "mime": "application/pdf"
      }
    }
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2022/09/point-of-view-defi-tradfi-must-work-together-michael-casey/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-15T18:09:47.365Z"
}
