{
  "title": "Global Talent and Economic Success",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr/index.md",
  "summary": "Access to top performers sets an upper bound on a country’s aspirations",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Talent and migration: key findings",
      "content": "- Some 5.4 percent of workers with a college education live outside their home countries, compared with 1.8 percent of high school graduates.\n- Inventors migrate at twice the college-educated-worker rate; Nobel Prize winners migrate at six times the college-educated-worker rate.\n- In many immigrant-receiving countries, an elevated and rising share of the skilled workforce is foreign-born, particularly in science and engineering fields.\n- Six US tech centers increased their share of patents from 11.3 percent during 1975–79 to 34.2 percent for 2015–19 (out of more than 300 metropolitan areas).\n- By 2010, the stock of female high-skilled migrants in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries had surpassed the male stock.\n- Recent public-opinion patterns:\n  - Gallup surveys show overall support in the US for immigration hit its high-water mark in the early 2020s; support has declined sharply since then but \"remains comparable to the level in 2010—and above that of earlier decades.\"\n  - A 2024 Echelon Insights poll revealed broad bipartisan support for high-skilled immigration in the US.\n- Global talent tends to cluster geographically; clusters expand productivity and attract successive arrivals, reinforcing their appeal for knowledge-oriented work serving global markets."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Points of vulnerability and political economy",
      "content": "- Local tensions can arise within talent clusters due to:\n  - Rising housing prices and public anger over affordability.\n  - Overcrowded schools or hospitals and pressure on local public goods.\n  - Perceptions that migrants are responsible for preexisting bottlenecks (for example, where strict regulations stifle new construction).\n- Tension between residents inside clusters (“the elite”) and those outside can amplify skepticism toward global talent (“the foreign elite”).\n- Business advocacy for employment-based migration reveals capacity to employ and expand production, but local complementary resources (housing, schools) may be slower to scale.\n- Political trade-offs:\n  - Dispersal strategies (e.g., interest in “heartland visas”) can broaden political support by distributing talent more evenly, though productivity gains may be lower outside top clusters.\n  - Policy uncertainty undermines long-term investment decisions by prospective migrants and firms."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Policy recommendations for attracting and integrating global talent",
      "content": "- Ensure the “education pathway” is coherent:\n  - Align school visas, work visas, and permanent residency pathways so that investments in schooling lead to viable work and residency outcomes.\n  - Recognize that the highest-quality students select schools based on future labor opportunities (work of Takao Kato and Chad Sparber).\n- Treat global talent attraction as complementary to local investment:\n  - Invest in good schools, quality infrastructure, and safe neighborhoods to make locations attractive for long-term human capital decisions.\n  - Leverage immigrant entrepreneurship to draw upon native workforces and strengthen economic links.\n- Build stable policy foundations:\n  - Reduce policy uncertainty that deters long-term investments by migrants and firms; stable systems help ensure investments will be recognized and rewarded.\n- Design flexibility into immigration systems:\n  - Emulate “immigrant engineering” approaches that permit experimentation and iterative policy recalibration (example: Canada).\n  - Consider automatic adjustments to visa caps based on easily indexed data, like population growth, to add responsiveness.\n- Allocate scarce immigration slots effectively:\n  - Reassess lotteries and first-come-first-served procedures that may not prioritize truly rare skills; prioritize selection mechanisms that maximize economic impact.\n- Incorporate gender realities into policy design:\n  - Acknowledge that women are increasingly represented in high-skilled migration flows and design destination features that appeal to women."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Strategic implications for countries and sending states",
      "content": "- Access to global talent sets an upper bound on a country’s aspirations for competing in advanced technologies and knowledge-based work.\n- Countries that manage complementary investments (housing, schools, infrastructure) and political tensions can extract larger gains from talent inflows.\n- Sending-country welfare effects vary:\n  - Some countries lose out from emigration of talent while others gain through networks and economic engagement with diaspora.\n  - A significant benefit for sending countries can be greater schooling of young people who aspire to migrate, many of whom ultimately do not migrate.\n- Farsighted national strategy should treat talent as a strategic asset:\n  - Integrate people strategies with economic strategy much as firms elevate “people functions” into strategic discussion.\n  - Court migrants actively rather than assuming they will simply arrive, particularly for frontier fields like AI.\n\nSource: \"Global Talent and Economic Success,\" William Kerr, F&D Magazine, March 2025.\n\n---\n\n Content in this bundle\n\n- Global Talent and Economic Success\n  - Global Talent and Economic Success (Markdown version){rel=\"alternate\" type=\"text/markdown\"}\n  - Global Talent and Economic Success (PDF){rel=\"external\" type=\"application/pdf\"}\n\n---\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Authors: WILLIAM KERR",
    "Published: March 3, 2025",
    "Some 5.4 percent of workers with a college education live outside their home countries, compared with 1.8 percent of high school graduates.",
    "Inventors migrate at twice the college-educated-worker rate; Nobel Prize winners migrate at six times the college-educated-worker rate.",
    "In many immigrant-receiving countries, an elevated and rising share of the skilled workforce is foreign-born, particularly in science and engineering fields.",
    "Six US tech centers increased their share of patents from 11.3 percent during 1975–79 to 34.2 percent for 2015–19 (out of more than 300 metropolitan areas).",
    "By 2010, the stock of female high-skilled migrants in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries had surpassed the male stock.",
    "Recent public-opinion patterns:",
    "Global talent tends to cluster geographically; clusters expand productivity and attract successive arrivals, reinforcing their appeal for knowledge-oriented work serving global markets.",
    "Local tensions can arise within talent clusters due to:",
    "Tension between residents inside clusters (“the elite”) and those outside can amplify skepticism toward global talent (“the foreign elite”).",
    "Business advocacy for employment-based migration reveals capacity to employ and expand production, but local complementary resources (housing, schools) may be slower to scale.",
    "Political trade-offs:",
    "Ensure the “education pathway” is coherent:",
    "Treat global talent attraction as complementary to local investment:",
    "Build stable policy foundations:",
    "Design flexibility into immigration systems:",
    "Allocate scarce immigration slots effectively:",
    "Incorporate gender realities into policy design:",
    "Access to global talent sets an upper bound on a country’s aspirations for competing in advanced technologies and knowledge-based work.",
    "Countries that manage complementary investments (housing, schools, infrastructure) and political tensions can extract larger gains from talent inflows.",
    "Sending-country welfare effects vary:",
    "Farsighted national strategy should treat talent as a strategic asset:",
    "**Global Talent and Economic Success**"
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "title": "Global Talent and Economic Success",
      "role": "document",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2025/03/kerr.pdf",
      "summary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2025/03/kerr.pdf.md",
        "mime": "text/markdown"
      },
      "binary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2025/03/kerr.pdf",
        "mime": "application/pdf"
      }
    }
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/03/global-talent-and-economic-success-william-kerr/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-15T19:44:03.854Z"
}
