{
  "title": "Worlds Apart",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/index.md",
  "summary": "There are ways to narrow the gap between economics and politics",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Overview",
      "content": "- The chronic clash between sound economics and good politics often blocks better policy.\n- The chasm is wide and won’t be fully bridged, but it can be shrunk with effort and goodwill.\n- The piece draws on a past lecture to the American Academy of Political and Social Science."
    },
    {
      "heading": "The divide between economics and politics",
      "content": "- Economists and politicos hail from different civilizations: they speak different languages, define success differently, have dramatically different time horizons, and employ different logic.\n- Common perception that economists have enormous influence on public policy is disputed; in truth, they don’t.\n- The author previously argued, seven years ago, that economic policymaking often adheres to the Lamppost Theory: Politicians use economics the way a drunk uses a lamppost—for support, not illumination."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Political logic (illustrative arithmetic example)",
      "content": "- Example setup:\n  - A tax break yields $1 million in gains for each of 10 people.\n  - The tax break costs 20 million people $1 apiece.\n- Implications:\n  - Economic logic counts this as bad policy.\n  - Political logic values the concentrated, obvious gains for the 10 winners more than the diffuse, barely noticed losses for 20 million.\n  - Politicians gain support and campaign contributions from the beneficiaries; only highly principled politicians would resist.\n- Conclusion:\n  - Economic and political logic often point in opposite directions; improving politicians’ understanding of economics would not by itself resolve the divergence."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Narrowing the gap: a suggestion for politicos",
      "content": "- Political advisers often have extremely short time horizons—focused on the next opinion poll or the next tweet.\n- A US president’s four-year term is long enough for major effects of most economic policies to be felt.\n- Policy window:\n  - Sound economic policies enacted in the president’s first year or two are likely to show major benefits before the next presidential election.\n  - The policy phase of a new presidential term rarely lasts more than 12–18 months.\n  - By the 18th month of a new presidency, attention turns to midterm congressional elections, making major initiatives harder to push through Congress.\n- Recommendation:\n  - Persuade politicians that longer-term habits can be politically productive because good economics can also be good politics within the initial 12–18 month policy window of a presidency."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Narrowing the gap: two suggestions for economists",
      "content": "- High-level summary:\n  - Economists must change more than politicians; two specific changes are proposed.\n- First suggestion — pay attention to transition costs and shorter horizons:\n  - Economists typically focus on “equilibrium” or “steady-state” effects; these questions are often close to irrelevant in politics because people live through transitions.\n  - Economists often brush off “transition costs” as fleeting; they should not.\n  - Trade example:\n    - David Ricardo taught over 200 years ago that the free-trade equilibrium is better for society as a whole than the equilibrium with trade protection.\n    - Adjustment to the superior free-trade equilibrium may be lengthy and painful: job losses, reduced incomes for some, decimated communities.\n    - Politicians live in the real world of ever-present transition costs and may not be in office long enough to enjoy equilibrium benefits.\n  - Recommendation:\n    - Economists should spend a lot more time and effort thinking about transition costs and how to mitigate them, and think more about what happens before steady-state effects arrive.\n- Second suggestion — pay more attention to fairness as well as efficiency:\n  - In politics, perceived fairness almost always trumps efficiency; politicos understand that, which helps explain manifest inefficiencies in policy.\n  - Economists traditionally prioritize efficiency because greater efficiency enlarges the economic pie.\n  - Recommendation:\n    - Temper the worship of efficiency with more respect for political feasibility, which often hinges on perceived fairness.\n    - Example: Debates over the tax code are dominated by fairness considerations rather than economists’ theory of optimal taxation, contributing to current tax complexity.\n- Practical stance for economists interested in policy:\n  - Don’t abandon efficiency; but be prepared to “nibble at the edges” below the political headline level to reduce inefficiencies.\n  - Accept that in practice one may need to settle for the theory of the third or fourth best."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Key takeaways",
      "content": "- The gap between economic reasoning and political logic is structural and persistent, but not insurmountable.\n- Effective strategies include:\n  - For politicos: exploit the 12–18 month policy window in a presidency to align economic benefits with electoral timelines.\n  - For economists: focus on transition costs, mitigation strategies, and perceived fairness to improve political feasibility of sound policies.\n- Practical policymaking requires balancing efficiency with fairness and realistic time horizons.\n\nAlan Blinder, \"Worlds Apart\", F&D Magazine.\n\n---\n\n Content in this bundle\n\n- Worlds Apart\n  - Worlds Apart (Markdown version){rel=\"alternate\" type=\"text/markdown\"}\n  - Worlds Apart (PDF){rel=\"external\" type=\"application/pdf\"}\n\n---\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Authors: Alan Blinder",
    "Published: March 3, 2026",
    "The chronic clash between sound economics and good politics often blocks better policy.",
    "The chasm is wide and won’t be fully bridged, but it can be shrunk with effort and goodwill.",
    "The piece draws on a past lecture to the American Academy of Political and Social Science.",
    "Economists and politicos hail from different civilizations: they speak different languages, define success differently, have dramatically different time horizons, and employ different logic.",
    "Common perception that economists have enormous influence on public policy is disputed; in truth, they don’t.",
    "The author previously argued, seven years ago, that economic policymaking often adheres to the Lamppost Theory: Politicians use economics the way a drunk uses a lamppost—for support, not illumination.",
    "Example setup:",
    "Implications:",
    "Conclusion:",
    "Political advisers often have extremely short time horizons—focused on the next opinion poll or the next tweet.",
    "A US president’s four-year term is long enough for major effects of most economic policies to be felt.",
    "Policy window:",
    "Recommendation:",
    "High-level summary:",
    "First suggestion — pay attention to transition costs and shorter horizons:",
    "Second suggestion — pay more attention to fairness as well as efficiency:",
    "Practical stance for economists interested in policy:",
    "The gap between economic reasoning and political logic is structural and persistent, but not insurmountable.",
    "Effective strategies include:",
    "Practical policymaking requires balancing efficiency with fairness and realistic time horizons.",
    "**Worlds Apart**"
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "title": "Worlds Apart",
      "role": "document",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2026/03/blinder.pdf",
      "summary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2026/03/blinder.pdf.md",
        "mime": "text/markdown"
      },
      "binary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2026/03/blinder.pdf",
        "mime": "application/pdf"
      }
    }
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-15T20:22:50.350Z"
}