## Worlds Apart

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Worlds Apart](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Alan Blinder
- Published: March 3, 2026

---

### Overview
- The chronic clash between sound economics and good politics often blocks better policy.
- The chasm is wide and won’t be fully bridged, but it can be shrunk with effort and goodwill.
- The piece draws on a past lecture to the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

### The divide between economics and politics
- Economists and politicos hail from different civilizations: they speak different languages, define success differently, have dramatically different time horizons, and employ different logic.
- Common perception that economists have enormous influence on public policy is disputed; in truth, they don’t.
- The author previously argued, seven years ago, that economic policymaking often adheres to the Lamppost Theory: Politicians use economics the way a drunk uses a lamppost—for support, not illumination.

### Political logic (illustrative arithmetic example)
- Example setup:
  - A tax break yields $1 million in gains for each of 10 people.
  - The tax break costs 20 million people $1 apiece.
- Implications:
  - Economic logic counts this as bad policy.
  - Political logic values the concentrated, obvious gains for the 10 winners more than the diffuse, barely noticed losses for 20 million.
  - Politicians gain support and campaign contributions from the beneficiaries; only highly principled politicians would resist.
- Conclusion:
  - Economic and political logic often point in opposite directions; improving politicians’ understanding of economics would not by itself resolve the divergence.

### Narrowing the gap: a suggestion for politicos
- Political advisers often have extremely short time horizons—focused on the next opinion poll or the next tweet.
- A US president’s four-year term is long enough for major effects of most economic policies to be felt.
- Policy window:
  - Sound economic policies enacted in the president’s first year or two are likely to show major benefits before the next presidential election.
  - The policy phase of a new presidential term rarely lasts more than 12–18 months.
  - By the 18th month of a new presidency, attention turns to midterm congressional elections, making major initiatives harder to push through Congress.
- Recommendation:
  - Persuade politicians that longer-term habits can be politically productive because good economics can also be good politics within the initial 12–18 month policy window of a presidency.

### Narrowing the gap: two suggestions for economists
- High-level summary:
  - Economists must change more than politicians; two specific changes are proposed.
- First suggestion — pay attention to transition costs and shorter horizons:
  - Economists typically focus on “equilibrium” or “steady-state” effects; these questions are often close to irrelevant in politics because people live through transitions.
  - Economists often brush off “transition costs” as fleeting; they should not.
  - Trade example:
    - David Ricardo taught over 200 years ago that the free-trade equilibrium is better for society as a whole than the equilibrium with trade protection.
    - Adjustment to the superior free-trade equilibrium may be lengthy and painful: job losses, reduced incomes for some, decimated communities.
    - Politicians live in the real world of ever-present transition costs and may not be in office long enough to enjoy equilibrium benefits.
  - Recommendation:
    - Economists should spend a lot more time and effort thinking about transition costs and how to mitigate them, and think more about what happens before steady-state effects arrive.
- Second suggestion — pay more attention to fairness as well as efficiency:
  - In politics, perceived fairness almost always trumps efficiency; politicos understand that, which helps explain manifest inefficiencies in policy.
  - Economists traditionally prioritize efficiency because greater efficiency enlarges the economic pie.
  - Recommendation:
    - Temper the worship of efficiency with more respect for political feasibility, which often hinges on perceived fairness.
    - Example: Debates over the tax code are dominated by fairness considerations rather than economists’ theory of optimal taxation, contributing to current tax complexity.
- Practical stance for economists interested in policy:
  - Don’t abandon efficiency; but be prepared to “nibble at the edges” below the political headline level to reduce inefficiencies.
  - Accept that in practice one may need to settle for the theory of the third or fourth best.

### Key takeaways
- The gap between economic reasoning and political logic is structural and persistent, but not insurmountable.
- Effective strategies include:
  - For politicos: exploit the 12–18 month policy window in a presidency to align economic benefits with electoral timelines.
  - For economists: focus on transition costs, mitigation strategies, and perceived fairness to improve political feasibility of sound policies.
- Practical policymaking requires balancing efficiency with fairness and realistic time horizons.

*Alan Blinder, "Worlds Apart", F&D Magazine.*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Worlds Apart**
  - [Worlds Apart (Markdown version)](/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2026/03/blinder.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Worlds Apart (PDF)](/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2026/03/blinder.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/03/point-of-view-worlds-apart-alan-blinder_