## Nurture, Then Prosper

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Nurture, Then Prosper](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/09/cafe-economics-nurture-then-prosper-ha-joon-chang-bruce-edwards)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/09/cafe-economics-nurture-then-prosper-ha-joon-chang-bruce-edwards/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/09/cafe-economics-nurture-then-prosper-ha-joon-chang-bruce-edwards/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/09/cafe-economics-nurture-then-prosper-ha-joon-chang-bruce-edwards/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: BRUCE EDWARDS
- Published: September 1, 2026

---

### Background and personal history
- Ha-Joon Chang born in 1963 in South Korea, which at the time had a life expectancy of 53.
- Grew up during Korea’s rapid industrialization under five-year plans, nationalization of the banking system, and military dictatorship—experiencing both double-digit growth rates and political repression.
- Education and career:
  - Earned a PhD at the University of Cambridge.
  - Taught for 30-plus years at Cambridge before moving to SOAS University of London in 2022.
  - Author of 17 books translated into 46 languages and sold over 3 million copies globally.
  - Latest title: Edible Economics: A Hungry Economist Explains the World.
- Motivations: pursued economics to reconcile simultaneous positive and negative societal changes witnessed during Korea’s transformation.

### Views on infant industry protection and tariffs
- Core position: developing countries need an initial period of protectionism to nurture infant industries.
- Historical grounding:
  - Cites Alexander Hamilton’s 1791 report to Congress on manufactures as origin of the idea—advocates for tariffs, subsidies, infrastructure investment, banking development, government bond markets, and patent systems.
  - Notes that the US was heavily protected for nearly a century; South Korea and other East Asian economies used heavy tariff protection successfully.
- Key caveats:
  - Tariffs and protection can be misused; success depends on disciplined recipients of state support.
  - Protection should be a time-limited nurturing phase to allow industries to invest and raise productivity.

### Industrial policy today
- Industrial policy was common historically; became taboo mainly between 1980 and 2020.
- Recent developments:
  - The 2019 IMF working paper “The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named” signaled renewed attention to industrial policy.
  - Renewed industrial policy in advanced economies—especially the US—responds to deindustrialization and competition from China.
- Assessment:
  - Industrial policy is back in fashion, but many new programs (especially in the US) are at risk of being poorly designed; described as a “geriatric version of infant industry protection.”
  - Points to continued covert government roles in technology development (example: technologies in the iPhone originating from US government–funded research; semiconductor funded by the US Navy; computer and internet developed by the Pentagon).

### Trade, capitalism, and economic development
- Stance on trade:
  - No economic development without trade, but criticizes the free-trade absolutist position; advocates “managed trade.”
  - Developing economies need protection for new industries and subsidies for export capabilities to earn foreign exchange for importing advanced machines and technologies.
- Views on capitalism:
  - Different varieties of capitalism exist; institutional choices reflect values and politics.
  - Example: top US income tax rate was 91 percent between the late 1940s and mid-1960s—illustrating alternatives in economic management.
  - Argues capitalism is flawed but preferable to alternatives; can be made more efficient, humane, and sustainable.

### Sustainability and policy implications
- Broad definition of sustainability: environmental, economic, political, and social dimensions.
- Policy priorities:
  - Avoid exploitative labor practices, precarious jobs, and rapidly rising inequality to ensure political sustainability of growth.
  - Foster mass economic literacy so citizens can meaningfully participate in democratic choice over economic policy.
  - Combine protective measures for nascent industries with disciplined state support, export promotion, and investments in institutions (banking, infrastructure, patents).

### Key statistics and factual highlights (preserved as in source)
- Birth year: 1963
- Life expectancy at birth (South Korea, early 1960s): 53
- Academic tenure: taught for 30-plus years at Cambridge
- Move to SOAS University of London: 2022
- Books authored: 17
- Languages translated into: 46
- Copies sold globally: over 3 million
- Hamilton’s report year: 1791
- Period when industrial policy became taboo: between 1980 and 2020
- IMF working paper year: 2019 (“The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named”)
- Top US income tax rate between the late 1940s and mid-1960s: 91 percent

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Nurture, Then Prosper**
  - [Nurture, Then Prosper (Markdown version)](/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2026/09/caf-economics.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Nurture, Then Prosper (PDF)](/-/media/files/publications/fandd/article/2026/09/caf-economics.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2026/09/cafe-economics-nurture-then-prosper-ha-joon-chang-bruce-edwards_
