## Automatic Fiscal Stabilizers

_IMF Staff Position Notes, September 28, 2009_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Automatic Fiscal Stabilizers](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/imf-staff-position-notes/issues/2016/12/31/automatic-fiscal-stabilizers-23303)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/imf-staff-position-notes/issues/2016/12/31/automatic-fiscal-stabilizers-23303/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/imf-staff-position-notes/issues/2016/12/31/automatic-fiscal-stabilizers-23303/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/imf-staff-position-notes/issues/2016/12/31/automatic-fiscal-stabilizers-23303/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Steven A. Symansky, Thomas Baunsgaard
- Published: September 28, 2009
- Series: IMF Staff Position Notes
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455290567.004

---

### Executive summary
- Discusses how to enhance automatic stabilizers without increasing the size of government.
- Distinguishes between:
  - Permanent changes in the parameters of the tax and expenditure system (for example, changes in tax progressivity) that enhance the traditional automatic stabilizer.
  - Temporary changes triggered by certain economic developments (for example, tax measures targeted at credit and liquidity constrained households, triggered during a severe downturn).
- Argues that, with some exceptions, temporary, triggered measures are preferable because they can be implemented with lower disruptions to other fiscal policy goals (for example, economic efficiency).
- Warns that countries should avoid introducing procyclicality as a result of fiscal rules, since such procyclicality would offset the effect of existing automatic stabilizers.

### Key findings and analysis
- Permanent parameter changes (e.g., greater tax progressivity) can strengthen the traditional automatic stabilizer but may have trade-offs with other fiscal objectives, including economic efficiency.
- Temporary, event-triggered measures (e.g., targeted tax measures for credit- and liquidity-constrained households during severe downturns) can enhance stabilization while limiting long-term distortions.
- Fiscal rules that induce procyclicality undermine the effectiveness of automatic stabilizers by offsetting their stabilizing impact.

### Policy recommendations
- Prioritize temporary, triggered fiscal measures to enhance stabilization without expanding the permanent size of government.
- Use targeted tax measures for households that are credit- and liquidity-constrained during severe downturns to maximize macroeconomic stabilization while preserving efficiency.
- Design fiscal rules to avoid procyclical incentives that would counteract automatic stabilizers.
- Consider exceptions where permanent parameter changes are justified, but weigh these carefully against potential efficiency costs.

*Source: IMF Staff Position Note "Automatic Fiscal Stabilizers" by Steven A. Symansky and Thomas Baunsgaard.*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_spn0923 - Executive Summary**
  - [_spn0923 - Executive Summary (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/spn/2009/_spn0923.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_spn0923 - Executive Summary (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/spn/2009/_spn0923.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/imf-staff-position-notes/issues/2016/12/31/automatic-fiscal-stabilizers-23303_