{
  "title": "International Monetary Fund Administrative Tribunal Reports, Volume II, 2000-2002",
  "publication": "Miscellaneous Publications, January 26, 2009",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471/index.md",
  "summary": "This paper discusses that during 2000–2002, the Tribunal considered a number of issues of substantive law upon which it had not previously been called upon to rule.",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Overview",
      "content": "- Coverage period: 2000–2002.\n- Main focus: decisions and legal reasoning of the IMF Administrative Tribunal (IMFAT) on substantive law issues and procedural relationships within the IMF’s internal dispute resolution system.\n- Publication date on the landing page: January 26, 2009."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Substantive legal issues addressed",
      "content": "- Interpretation of a provision of the IMF’s Staff Retirement Plan permitting the IMF, pursuant to specified procedures, to give effect to orders for family support and division of marital property issued by domestic courts.\n- The Tribunal considered extensive pleadings from all three parties and rendered a decision resolving the merits of that dispute."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Differential benefits and rationale",
      "content": "- The Tribunal examined evidence offered by the IMF in support of a differential in benefits between two categories of staff.\n- Conclusion: the distinction was found to be rationally related to the purposes of the employment benefits at issue."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Relationship to IMF dispute resolution system and admissibility questions",
      "content": "- The Tribunal grappled with complexities of its relationship to other elements of the IMF’s dispute resolution system during 2000–2002.\n- The IMFAT addressed the question of the admissibility before the Tribunal of an Application following dismissal of the complaint as untimely by the IMF’s Grievance Committee.\n\n---\n\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Published: January 26, 2009",
    "Series: Miscellaneous Publications",
    "DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589067998.073",
    "Coverage period: 2000–2002.",
    "Main focus: decisions and legal reasoning of the IMF Administrative Tribunal (IMFAT) on substantive law issues and procedural relationships within the IMF’s internal dispute resolution system.",
    "Publication date on the landing page: January 26, 2009.",
    "Interpretation of a provision of the IMF’s Staff Retirement Plan permitting the IMF, pursuant to specified procedures, to give effect to orders for family support and division of marital property issued by domestic courts.",
    "The Tribunal considered extensive pleadings from all three parties and rendered a decision resolving the merits of that dispute.",
    "The Tribunal examined evidence offered by the IMF in support of a differential in benefits between two categories of staff.",
    "Conclusion: the distinction was found to be rationally related to the purposes of the employment benefits at issue.",
    "The Tribunal grappled with complexities of its relationship to other elements of the IMF’s dispute resolution system during 2000–2002.",
    "The IMFAT addressed the question of the admissibility before the Tribunal of an Application following dismissal of the complaint as untimely by the IMF’s Grievance Committee."
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/miscellaneous-publication-other/issues/2016/12/31/international-monetary-fund-administrative-tribunal-reports-volume-ii-2000-2002-volume-ii-22471/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-21T17:43:03.089Z"
}