{
  "title": "A Review of the Fund's External Communications Strategy",
  "publication": "Policy Papers, February 13, 2003",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256/index.md",
  "summary": "This paper reviews implementation of the Fund’s external communications strategy and suggests issues that the Board may wish to discuss at its third meeting since 1998 on the subject.",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Purpose and scope",
      "content": "- Reviews implementation of the Fund’s external communications strategy.\n- Represents more of a stocktaking than a fundamental reconsideration of the Fund’s approach to external communications.\n- Suggests issues that the Board may wish to discuss at its third meeting since 1998 on the subject.\n- Strategy shaped by previous Board discussions and more recent decisions and discussions on transparency, conditionality, PRSP/PRGF, the Independent Evaluation Office, and other issues.\n- Examines progress made in recent years and steps that might be taken with current resources to increase the effectiveness of the strategy."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Key findings and observations",
      "content": "- The paper emphasizes implementation and progress rather than proposing wholesale changes to the Fund’s communications approach.\n- Recent decisions and discussions on transparency, conditionality, PRSP/PRGF, and the Independent Evaluation Office have materially shaped the strategy.\n- The Board has previously discussed the strategy; this paper is intended to inform the Board’s third meeting since 1998 on the subject."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Suggested steps and practical measures",
      "content": "- Identifies steps that might be taken with current resources to increase the effectiveness of the strategy.\n- Focus is on feasible, resource-constrained improvements rather than new resource-intensive initiatives."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Intended audience and use",
      "content": "- Intended to inform Board discussion and decision-making on external communications.\n- Aimed at providing a concise stocktaking to support the Board’s third meeting since 1998 on the topic.\n\nA Review of the Fund's External Communications Strategy, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 0) accessed 9/18/2026\n\n---\n\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Published: February 13, 2003",
    "Series: Policy Papers",
    "Reviews implementation of the Fund’s external communications strategy.",
    "Represents more of a stocktaking than a fundamental reconsideration of the Fund’s approach to external communications.",
    "Suggests issues that the Board may wish to discuss at its third meeting since 1998 on the subject.",
    "Strategy shaped by previous Board discussions and more recent decisions and discussions on transparency, conditionality, PRSP/PRGF, the Independent Evaluation Office, and other issues.",
    "Examines progress made in recent years and steps that might be taken with current resources to increase the effectiveness of the strategy.",
    "The paper emphasizes implementation and progress rather than proposing wholesale changes to the Fund’s communications approach.",
    "Recent decisions and discussions on transparency, conditionality, PRSP/PRGF, and the Independent Evaluation Office have materially shaped the strategy.",
    "The Board has previously discussed the strategy; this paper is intended to inform the Board’s third meeting since 1998 on the subject.",
    "Identifies steps that might be taken with current resources to increase the effectiveness of the strategy.",
    "Focus is on feasible, resource-constrained improvements rather than new resource-intensive initiatives.",
    "Intended to inform Board discussion and decision-making on external communications.",
    "Aimed at providing a concise stocktaking to support the Board’s third meeting since 1998 on the topic."
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/a-review-of-the-fund-s-external-communications-strategy-pp256/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-18T20:39:55.911Z"
}