## Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks - Best Practices

_Policy Papers, May 4, 2016_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks - Best Practices](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/analyzing-and-managing-fiscal-risks-best-practices-pp5042)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/analyzing-and-managing-fiscal-risks-best-practices-pp5042/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/analyzing-and-managing-fiscal-risks-best-practices-pp5042/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/analyzing-and-managing-fiscal-risks-best-practices-pp5042/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Published: May 4, 2016
- Series: Policy Papers

---

### Key findings
- Over the past quarter century, governments experienced on average an adverse fiscal shock of 6 percent of GDP once every 12 years, with some of the largest stemming from financial crises.
- Existing fiscal risk disclosure and analysis practices tend to be incomplete, fragmented, and qualitative in nature.
- Comprehensive, reliable, and timely fiscal data covering all public entities, stocks, and flows are a necessary foundation for credible fiscal risk analysis.

### Fiscal stress testing and analysis
- A comprehensive and integrated assessment of potential shocks—implemented as a fiscal stress test—can help policymakers simulate:
  - effects of shocks to their central forecasts;
  - implications for government solvency;
  - implications for government liquidity; and
  - implications for government financing needs.
- Fiscal stress tests combined with probabilistic tools can provide information on the probabilities that a country will stay within debt ceilings embedded in fiscal rules.

### Data, institutions, and capacity
- Countries need a more complete understanding of potential threats to their fiscal position.
- The Fund supports technical assistance in:
  - constructing public sector balance sheets;
  - developing institutions and capacity to identify specific fiscal risks and to quantify their potential impact;
  - undertaking fiscal stress tests; and
  - integrating risks into the design of medium-term fiscal targets.

### Fiscal risk management tools and strategies
- Current fiscal risk management practices are often blunt, ad hoc, and too focused on imposing limits on the creation of exposures.
- Countries should expand their toolkits for fiscal risk management and adopt instruments to:
  - transfer risks;
  - share risks; and
  - provision for risks.
- Policymakers need to weigh the benefits of reducing exposure to shocks against the financial and other costs of the policies used to do so.

### Probabilistic forecasting and fiscal targets
- Greater use of probabilistic forecasting methods is recommended when setting long-run objectives and medium-term targets for fiscal policy.
- Simple probabilistic tools can be used to map the uncertainty around medium-term trajectories for public debt and, in combination with fiscal stress tests, inform the likelihood of remaining within debt ceilings.

*Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks - Best Practices (May 4, 2016).*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks Best Practices; IMF Policy Paper; May 4, 2016**
  - [Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks Best Practices; IMF Policy Paper; May 4, 2016 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/np/pp/eng/2016/_050416.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks Best Practices; IMF Policy Paper; May 4, 2016 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/np/pp/eng/2016/_050416.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/analyzing-and-managing-fiscal-risks-best-practices-pp5042_