## IMF-Supported Programs: Recent Staff Research

_Seminar Volumes, April 3, 2006_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [IMF-Supported Programs: Recent Staff Research](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/seminar-volumes/issues/2016/12/30/imf-supported-programs-recent-staff-research-17437)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/seminar-volumes/issues/2016/12/30/imf-supported-programs-recent-staff-research-17437/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/seminar-volumes/issues/2016/12/30/imf-supported-programs-recent-staff-research-17437/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/seminar-volumes/issues/2016/12/30/imf-supported-programs-recent-staff-research-17437/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Alessandro Rebucci, Ashoka Mody
- Published: April 3, 2006
- Series: Seminar Volumes
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589063617.072

---

### Overview
- Research by IMF staff on the effectiveness of the country programs the organization supports has intensified in recent years.
- IMF analysts sought to “open up the black box” by more closely examining program design and implementation, as well as how these influence programs’ effectiveness.
- Efforts also focused on identifying the lending, signaling, and monitoring features of the IMF that may affect member countries’ economic performance.
- The book reports on a large portion of both the new and the continuing research.

### Key findings
- IMF programs work best where domestic politics and institutions permit the timely implementation of the necessary measures.
- IMF programs work best when a country is vulnerable to, but not yet in, a crisis.
- There is substantial diversity among IMF member countries that needs wider recognition.
- Programs should be tailored to country-specific circumstances while broadly maintaining the IMF’s general principle of uniformity of treatment.

### Analytical emphasis and research agenda
- Close examination of program design and implementation to understand causal links to program effectiveness.
- Analysis of lending, signaling, and monitoring features of the IMF as mechanisms influencing economic performance.
- Reporting covers both new and continuing lines of staff research into supported programs.

### Policy implications and recommendations
- Design programs that account for domestic political and institutional capacity to implement measures in a timely manner.
- Prioritize IMF engagement when countries are vulnerable but not yet in crisis for stronger program outcomes.
- Tailor program content to the substantial diversity across member countries while preserving overall uniformity of treatment in IMF practice.

*IMF-Supported Programs: Recent Staff Research — Alessandro Rebucci, Ashoka Mody; April 3, 2006.*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **IMF-Supported Programs: Recent Staff Research; Ashoka Mody and Alessandro Rebucci; April 3, 2006**
  - [IMF-Supported Programs: Recent Staff Research; Ashoka Mody and Alessandro Rebucci; April 3, 2006 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2006/isp/eng/_isp.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [IMF-Supported Programs: Recent Staff Research; Ashoka Mody and Alessandro Rebucci; April 3, 2006 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2006/isp/eng/_isp.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/seminar-volumes/issues/2016/12/30/imf-supported-programs-recent-staff-research-17437_