## How to Cut Methane Emissions

_Staff Climate Notes, October 31, 2022_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [How to Cut Methane Emissions](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/staff-climate-notes/issues/2022/10/28/how-to-cut-methane-emissions-525188)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/staff-climate-notes/issues/2022/10/28/how-to-cut-methane-emissions-525188/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/staff-climate-notes/issues/2022/10/28/how-to-cut-methane-emissions-525188/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/staff-climate-notes/issues/2022/10/28/how-to-cut-methane-emissions-525188/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Ian W.H. Parry, Simon Black, Danielle N Minnett, Victor Mylonas
- Published: October 31, 2022
- Series: Staff Climate Notes
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400224256.066

---

### Background on methane and the climate goal
- Methane has an outsized impact on temperatures relative to its atmospheric concentration.
- To date, 125 countries have pledged to cut global methane emissions by 30 percent by 2030.
- Limiting global warming to 1.5 to 2°C above preindustrial levels requires rapid cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, including methane.

### Sources and opportunities for mitigation
- Most emissions reductions would be in extractives (e.g., oil, gas, and coal sectors).
- In some cases, agriculture is administratively amenable to pricing-based approaches for reducing methane.

### Fiscal policy options analyzed
- Putting a price on methane, ideally through a fee, would reduce emissions efficiently.
- Revenue-neutral “feebates” are a complementary policy option: fees on dirtier polluters subsidize cleaner producers.
- A fee-based approach can be administratively straightforward for extractives industries and, in some cases, agriculture.

### Quantitative scenario and cost assessment
- A $70 methane fee among large economies would align 2030 emissions with 2oC.
- Most cuts under this scenario would occur in extractives.
- Abatement costs under the modeled scenario would be equivalent to just 0.1 percent of GDP.
- Costs are larger in certain developing countries, implying differential burden across countries and the potential role for international support.

### Policy implications and recommendations
- Implement a methane price (fee) as a primary tool for efficient emissions reduction.
- Consider revenue-neutral feebates to protect competitiveness and support cleaner producers.
- Recognize the need for climate finance or international cooperation to address higher costs facing certain developing countries and to enable a global agreement on a minimum methane price.

*Staff Climate Note: "How to Cut Methane Emissions" by Ian W.H. Parry, Simon Black, Danielle N Minnett, and Victor Mylonas (October 31, 2022).*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **How to Cut Methane Emissions; IMF Staff Climate Note 2022/008. October 2022**
  - [How to Cut Methane Emissions; IMF Staff Climate Note 2022/008. October 2022 (Markdown version)](/-/media/files/publications/staff-climate-notes/2022/english/clnea2022008.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [How to Cut Methane Emissions; IMF Staff Climate Note 2022/008. October 2022 (PDF)](/-/media/files/publications/staff-climate-notes/2022/english/clnea2022008.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/staff-climate-notes/issues/2022/10/28/how-to-cut-methane-emissions-525188_