## Cross-Border Listings, Capital Controls, and U.S. Equity Flows to Emerging Markets

_IMF Working Papers, December 1, 2003_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Cross-Border Listings, Capital Controls, and U.S. Equity Flows to Emerging Markets](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/cross-border-listings-capital-controls-and-u-s-16990)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/cross-border-listings-capital-controls-and-u-s-16990/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/cross-border-listings-capital-controls-and-u-s-16990/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/cross-border-listings-capital-controls-and-u-s-16990/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Hali J Edison, Francis E. Warnock
- Published: December 1, 2003
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451875706.001

---

### Summary of analysis and framework
- The paper analyzes capital flows to emerging markets using a framework that incorporates:
  - Two quantitative measures of financial integration: the intensity of capital controls and the extent of cross border listings.
  - Controls for traditional global (push) and country specific (pull) factors.
- Main empirical approach evaluates capital flow responses to cross listings and to changes in capital controls while accounting for push and pull variables.

### Key findings
- Cross-listing effects:
  - The cross listing of an emerging market firm on a U.S. exchange is an important but short lived capital flows event.
  - Interpretation: the cross listed stock functions effectively as a new security that U.S. investors quickly incorporate into their portfolios.
- Financial liberalization / capital controls:
  - A reduction in capital controls results in increased inflows only when the controls are binding.
  - Implication: the effect of financial liberalization on capital flows is more nuanced than suggested by event studies.
- Push and pull factors:
  - Global factors are important: slack U.S. economic activity is associated with increased flows to emerging markets.
  - U.S. investors appear to chase expected, but not past, returns.

### Policy-relevant implications
- Cross-listing:
  - Cross listings generate rapid, concentrated inflows that dissipate relatively quickly; monitoring is important for market stability assessments.
- Capital controls:
  - Policymakers should recognize that easing capital controls will increase inflows primarily when existing controls are binding; blanket expectations of inflow surges after liberalization may be misplaced.
- Investor behavior and global linkages:
  - U.S. macroeconomic slack can drive capital to emerging markets, highlighting the role of global push factors in shaping flows.
  - Measures of expected returns (rather than past returns) are relevant for anticipating U.S. portfolio equity flows.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Wp03236**
  - [Wp03236 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/_wp03236.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Wp03236 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/_wp03236.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/cross-border-listings-capital-controls-and-u-s-16990_
