## Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different?

_IMF Working Papers, June 1, 1998_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different?](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/leading-indicators-of-banking-crises-was-asia-different-2654)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/leading-indicators-of-banking-crises-was-asia-different-2654/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/leading-indicators-of-banking-crises-was-asia-different-2654/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/leading-indicators-of-banking-crises-was-asia-different-2654/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Published: June 1, 1998
- Series: IMF Working Papers

---

### Summary
- Paper examines episodes of banking system distress and crisis in a large sample of countries.
- Empirical results identify several macroeconomic and financial variables as useful leading indicators.
- Main macroeconomic indicators were of limited value in predicting the Asian crises; the best warning signs were proxies for the vulnerability of the banking and corporate sector.
- Full-blown banking crises are shown to be more associated with external developments, while domestic variables are the main leading indicators of severe but contained banking distress.

### Key empirical findings
- Several macroeconomic and financial variables function as useful leading indicators of banking system distress and crises.
- Main macroeconomic indicators had limited predictive value for the Asian crises.
- Proxies for vulnerability of the banking sector and the corporate sector provided the best warning signs for the Asian episodes.
- Full-blown banking crises correlate more strongly with external developments.
- Severe but contained banking distress is primarily indicated by domestic variables.

### Leading indicators and variables (themes identified)
- Macroeconomic indicators (general predictive power limited for Asia).
- Financial variables (identified as useful leading indicators).
- Proxies for banking-sector vulnerability (highlighted as strong warning signs for Asia).
- Proxies for corporate-sector vulnerability (highlighted as strong warning signs for Asia).
- External developments (associated with full-blown banking crises).
- Domestic variables (main leading indicators of severe but contained banking distress).

### Regional distinction: Asia vs. broader sample
- Asian crises: main macroeconomic indicators were of limited value; best warning signs came from banking- and corporate-sector vulnerability proxies.
- Broader international sample: mix of macroeconomic, financial, external, and domestic indicators with external developments linked to full-blown crises and domestic variables linked to contained distress.

### Policy implications and recommendations (implied by findings)
- Monitoring should include financial-sector-specific and corporate-sector vulnerability indicators in addition to standard macroeconomic indicators.
- Early warning systems for Asia should emphasize banking- and corporate-sector vulnerability proxies.
- Policies addressing external exposure and managing external developments are crucial to prevent escalation to full-blown banking crises.
- Domestic policy tools should be prioritized to detect and contain severe but localized banking distress.

### Publication and document identifiers
- Publication title: Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different?
- Date: June 1, 1998
- Series: Working Paper No. 1998/091
- Volume: 1998
- Issue: 091
- Pages: 32
- Stock No: WPIEA0911998
- ISBN: 9781451951745
- ISSN: 1018-5941

*International Monetary Fund. "Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different?", IMF Working Papers 1998, 091 (1998).*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different? - WP/98/91**
  - [Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different? - WP/98/91 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/_wp9891.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different? - WP/98/91 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/_wp9891.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/leading-indicators-of-banking-crises-was-asia-different-2654_