## Limits of Conditionality in Poverty Reduction Programs

_IMF Working Papers, July 1, 2002_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Limits of Conditionality in Poverty Reduction Programs](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/limits-of-conditionality-in-poverty-reduction-programs-15838)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/limits-of-conditionality-in-poverty-reduction-programs-15838/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/limits-of-conditionality-in-poverty-reduction-programs-15838/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/limits-of-conditionality-in-poverty-reduction-programs-15838/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Giovanni Dell'Ariccia, Tito Cordella
- Published: July 1, 2002
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451853872.001

---

### Key findings and analytical conclusions
- When donors and recipients have different preferences over budgetary allocations, conditionality helps the implementation of donor-financed poverty reduction programs.
- If donors cannot perfectly monitor all recipients' actions, conditionality entails an inefficient allocation of resources.
- Under conditions of imperfect monitoring, the optimal amount of conditionality varies (often not monotonically) with the recipients' degree of social commitment.
- If recipients' preferences are not observable, conditionality can be used to prevent recipients with a weak commitment to poverty reduction from obtaining aid funds; this screening role may lead to further distortions in terms of resource allocation and to phenomena of "aid rationing."

### Policy implications and considerations
- Conditionality can improve alignment of donor-financed programs with donor objectives when preferences diverge between donors and recipients.
- Limited monitoring capacity introduces inefficiencies that alter the welfare-maximizing design of conditionality; policymakers should account for monitoring constraints when designing conditionality regimes.
- The relationship between recipients' social commitment and the optimal intensity of conditionality is complex and may be non-monotonic; one-size-fits-all conditionality intensities may be suboptimal.
- Using conditionality as a screening device when recipients' preferences are unobservable can exclude poorly committed recipients but risks additional distortions and aid rationing; donors should weigh the trade-offs between screening benefits and allocation distortions.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Limits of Conditionality in Poverty Reduction Programs - WP/02/115**
  - [Limits of Conditionality in Poverty Reduction Programs - WP/02/115 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2002/_wp02115.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Limits of Conditionality in Poverty Reduction Programs - WP/02/115 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2002/_wp02115.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/limits-of-conditionality-in-poverty-reduction-programs-15838_