## Presumptive Taxation: Revenue and Automatic Stabilizer Aspects

_IMF Working Papers, August 1, 1993_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Presumptive Taxation: Revenue and Automatic Stabilizer Aspects](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/presumptive-taxation-revenue-and-automatic-stabilizer-aspects-1207)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/presumptive-taxation-revenue-and-automatic-stabilizer-aspects-1207/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/presumptive-taxation-revenue-and-automatic-stabilizer-aspects-1207/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/presumptive-taxation-revenue-and-automatic-stabilizer-aspects-1207/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: S. Nuri Erbas
- Published: August 1, 1993
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451960693.001

---

### Overview
- Presumptive taxation is used in many countries to tax hard-to-tax activities and reduce evasion.
- The paper assesses whether presumptive taxation can raise revenue and whether it undermines macroeconomic stability by lacking the automatic stabilizer properties of progressive income taxation.
- Two simple models are developed; one model’s relevance to presumptive excise taxation in Pakistan is examined.

### Research questions
- Could revenue be increased by adopting presumptive tax methods?
- Would presumptive income taxation contribute to macroeconomic instability because it lacks the automatic stabilizer property of standard progressive income taxation?

### Models and key findings
- Two simple theoretical models suggest:
  - There is scope for increasing revenue under presumptive taxation.
  - Revenue increases under presumptive taxation do not necessarily undermine economic stability.
- The analysis considers the behavior of a risk-averse taxpayer, tax liability, aggregate tax liability, distortionary taxation, and the role of utility functions in determining taxpayer responses.

### Relevance to Pakistan
- The first model is examined for its applicability to presumptive excise taxation in Pakistan.
- The paper discusses policy-relevant implications for countries using presumptive excise approaches to tax hard-to-tax activities.

### Policy implications and considerations
- Presumptive taxation can be a tool to improve net revenue collection from activities subject to evasion or difficult to administer under standard income taxation.
- Adoption of presumptive taxation methods should weigh potential efficiency gains against distributional and stabilization considerations associated with deviating from progressive income taxation.
- Implementing presumptive taxation for global income is presented as a case worth considering in light of possible efficiency gains.

### Subjects and keywords
- Subject: Income and capital gains taxes, Income tax systems, National accounts, Personal income, Presumptive tax, Revenue administration, Taxes
- Keywords: aggregate tax liability, distortionary taxation, Global, Income and capital gains taxes, income level, Income tax systems, net revenue collection, Personal income, Presumptive tax, presumptive taxation, revenue gain, risk-averse taxpayer, tax liability, utility function, WP

*Presumptive Taxation: Revenue and Automatic Stabilizer Aspects — S. Nuri Erbas, August 1, 1993; Pages: 20; Volume: 1993; Issue: 069; Series: Working Paper No. 1993/069; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451960693.001*

---


_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/30/presumptive-taxation-revenue-and-automatic-stabilizer-aspects-1207_
